The list of participants of the Pokémon WikiProject is quite sizable, however, there is no way to determine which of whom are active contributors to that project. All participants in the list have been moved to Inactive. If you consider yourself to be an active member of the Pokémon WikiProject, please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants and move your username to the Active section. Thank you. Useight (talk) 23:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this message is being sent to inform you that a proposal to un-merge all Pokemon articles has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pokemon#Pokemon and their rightful place. As a member of WikiProject Pokemon, your input would be much appreciated. GlassCobra 22:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Following a discussion on the Project's talk page, we will be updating WikiProject Pokémon's list of participants. To do this, all users previously listed as "Active" have been moved to the "Inactive" list; after this change anyone may add/re-add their name to the "Active" participants list. As your name was one of those on the Active members list, I am notifying you in case your active interest remains. Thank you for your cooperation in our efforts to keep our list of active participants as accurate and up-to-date as possible. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 04:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Varia suite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 11:28, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stormphrax has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for elements of fiction.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 16:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Phraxdust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for elements of fiction.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 02:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Edgewater River has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Edgewater River – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, user. About the map I saw you make in that Impact of the Arab Spring section, if you really want to do such a map like this, you shouldn't follow the same pattern as in the Arab Spring section because not all protests are about overthrowing a government. What you need to do is make a same colour by highlight those countries which faces the "impact" from the Arab Spring, and that's how you do it.

Thanks.

Myronbeg (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep that in mind. The real difficulty is in deciding which protests were "influenced" and which were not, if we really want to be accurate we will need to make a huge discussion somewhere for people to discuss this. If you were to count the occupy movement then that would be almost the whole world... I will open a discussion on the talk page for Impact of the Arab Spring. Thanks for the advice. --ERAGON (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Masaharu Iwata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deltora Quest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electra (Dio song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Trlovejoy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, International recognition of Kosovo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TRL (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Impru20, who produces the graphs currently on the UK polling page (and the Next UK General Election page) has said he is willing to include a line for the Green Party, and on the logic of what he says, SNP and any other party that has a discernable non-zero line that is listed on the page, PROVIDED he has data for the entire time since 2010. So, if you want the graphs, you need to put effort into backdating the data for Greens on the main table and/or Greens/SNP/PC/BNP on the detailed polling results table. I found it wasn't terribly difficult to get around 6-10 polls done on the 'detailed polling results table' in an editing session of considerably less than an hour when I got the hang of it, so was able to take that table from two month's worth to seven, before current debates de-motivated me. I certainly am interested in backdating data for the Greens in the main table, and if I can see someone else contributing I may be more inclined to bother with the additional detail needed to further backdate the 'detailed polling results' too. Are you up for it? DrArsenal 46.208.137.165 (talk) 19:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry dude, the amount of time that would take (without some sort of scripting wizardry) would be incredible; thats like a full day of work back-dating that much information into a table.--ERAGON (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...a bit of teamwork and determination and it's done! ...Thanks for contributing.

Oct 2011 YouGovs are by far the biggest/worst gap left, but try as I might, I can't find them. Techniques that have found all sorts of others don't work with them.

So, I would tend to agree with you: time to ask impru20 to change the 'Graphical Summary', I think. DrArsenal (talk) 08:14, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Time to share a beer, I think!
	I thought those of us who worked to backdate Green shares at Opinion polling for the 2015 United Kingdom general election and clear up the mess of the UKIP 2011 shares there should share a beer to celebrate 'mission accomplished'. DrArsenal (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Green Party of England and Wales page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States of Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Sirte. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buckethead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wakarusa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Astronaut training, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soyuz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of treaties may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Very long}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Tuition fees in the United Kingdom without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of country and capital changes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiran. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ERAGON. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ERAGON. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stemage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Random Encounter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clint McElroy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages WRVC and WEMM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Galerider is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Galerider until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 09:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Riverrise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unremarkable location, fancraft

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sanctaphrax requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unremarkable location, fancraft

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 10:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ERAGON. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ERAGON,

Thank you for creating Aivi & Surasshu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Twitter posts and reddit comments are not appropriate sources for a Wikipedia article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Rosguill)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clint McElroy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal Soldier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clint McElroy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard of Oz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Navy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Act of Union and King John.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that you need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 13:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know; I've been on here since 2008 and hadn't heard of that policy. Yes, I've been doing some work migrating what was once a huge history section on the Royal Navy article out onto dedicated pages. Still got the last 300 years to do, so I'll make sure to include that line in the remaining edit summaries. --ERAGON (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Royal Navy (before 1707), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry VII.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Royal Navy (after 1707), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beira.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ERAGON! Just wanted to let you know that I'm probably done working on this for today; I've noticed that a few times we've ended up editing near the same time and I don't want to accidentally delete something you've been working on. Thanks again for writing a bunch of episode summaries. Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for telling me. I've been writing them at odd moments through the day, UK time. --ERAGON (talk) 20:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In hindsight it would make sense for me to just write summaries in notepad and paste them in to reduce the chance of edit conflict. I'm focusing on the Mighty Nein campaign currently, and more or less intend to go through chronologically. --ERAGON (talk) 20:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doom Eternal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laura Bailey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

ERAGON,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Sariel Xilo (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

thanks and the same to you! ERAGON (talk) 10:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ERAGON. I went ahead and reviewed your article Alphabet (video game). This means that I've assessed your article as suitable for the mainspace and that it can now be indexed by search engines. Before marking the article as reviewed, I marked the assessed the article as a 'Start' class (under WikiProject Video games), whose description can be found here. Likewise, I cleaned up the article's citation formatting and added a 'Reception' section. I also added an 'External links' section with a link to gameplay footage on YouTube. As a small detail, I also removed the stylization of the word 'Alphabet', as Wikipedia almost never uses the stylization of a subject to describe it within the article. I'm not sure if the characters under the letters in 'A͈L͈P͈H͈A͈B͈E͈T͈' are supposed to represent the legs and feet in the title screen, but I nevertheless kept that in the lead as "stylized A͈L͈P͈H͈A͈B͈E͈T͈".

I didn't feel I needed to make basically any changes to the lead, 'Gameplay', or 'Releases' section, though I did add a story from Polygon about PS Vita skins distributed by Dengeki.

When creating about video games in the future – or, for example, movies and TV shows – I'd highly recommend that you include a 'Reception' section, as it's a cornerstone of articles like this, both because it both expands the scope of our encyclopedic coverage of the subject and also because it's a huge reason why many readers visit an article about a game, show, movie, etc. in the first place.

With all that out of the way, I think you did a really good job writing the article and wanted to thank you for your work in making it. =) TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 21:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the stylization is meant to look like little legs, yeah. Thanks for the corrections; I wasn't sure about how Wikipedia handles stylized titles within an article- Scarling does it the other way (with a full stop after the word throughout the article), and probably needs changing then. I'll make sure to include a reception section in any more of these I write. It was quite an interesting topic to dive into; I remember seeing the Kickstarter and so on at the time but heard nothing until I looked into it recently. Thanks very much for your help.--ERAGON (talk) 09:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sawbones (podcast) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sawbones (podcast) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Desertarun (talk) 21:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of early cases of COVID-19 in the United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 00:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Super Mario Bros. Super Show!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zelda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geek & Sundry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pathfinder and Brian Foster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I have noticed that you have had your request to have the redirect "Dragon Ball AF" declined due to you making the request in the wrong place. I have decided to take the liberty of reposting your request in the correct place on your behalf. Please feel free to edit or remove my request if you feel it is inappropriate or unwarranted.

49.194.27.2 (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Dragon Ball anime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harmony Gold.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Addams Family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Cox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Repartition of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conflict.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, DJ Cutman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. Right now, there is only one. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining that, I was not aware that interviews were not considered to meet GNG. There may not be sufficient articles available in DJ Cutman's case to meet GNG. ERAGON (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2022–2023 United Kingdom railway strikes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There Great wall of China has been damaged. Can you please enter this into the article? The article is locked. But the article "History of the Great Wall of China" is open. 123.103.210.115 (talk) 06:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done! It's not locked, but rather a semi-protected article. In any case I read a news article about the damage yesterday so I've gone in to update the article. --ERAGON (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops! I thought locked is the same. Thanks though! 123.103.210.115 (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --ERAGON (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OlifanofmrTennant were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Several of the sources are the vidoes themself. Addiotnaly some of them are only passing mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monster Factory (web series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLIfanofmrtennant 14:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ERAGON! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OLIfanofmrtennant 14:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Addams Family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Adventure Zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Bishop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ERAGON. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Cybertronic Spree, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TipsyElephant (talk) 03:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. RL0919 (talk) 13:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of years in video games, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of recessions in the United Kingdom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:11, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ERAGON. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monster Factory (web series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Student loans and grants in the United Kingdom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]