Hi SanchoIII! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janire Nájera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janire Nájera, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw your post on MurielMary's talk page asking why she didn't consider Washington Post, etc to be reliable enough of sources for Wikipedia and deleted your entry accordingly. Reaching out not to stir up contention but hopefully to collaborate and learn together, she has also deleted the first entry I ever created, claiming the same re: sources. My entry cited USA Today, Los Angeles Times, Marie Claire, National Public Radio, and others.

It seems to be as though we're possibly facing the same problem: Are you experienced enough on Wikipedia to know how we can handle this or if there's any way to help each other, thanks? Kentuckian in NY (talk)

Hi Kentuckian. SanchoIII didn't delete the post on my talk page, you did. Is there one person running both SanchoIII and Kentuckian editor accounts? This is not permitted on Wikipedia. However, in terms of "how to handle this" my advice stands as already stated - edit the draft and re-submit for another review. MurielMary (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, MurielMary. Not sure where you're getting "delete the post on my talk page" from. I have not deleted anything here or on your talk page. If you go into the history view on your talk page, if something was deleted, you should be able to see the user name of that person. My comment above was in reference to your having deleted an entry SanchoIII created about Janire Nájera. To answer your question, though, no, I do not know SanchoIII. If I did, would I be on their page introducing myself? Not very likely. As further proof that we're not the same person, we don't use the same syntax or write/edit entries on the same things.

Also, while we are chatting, I would like to gently please remind you of this line from Wikipedia's ethical code: "Stay civil. When you cannot see a good way past a conflict, take a break, bring in more editors, take a deep breath and try to find new creative ways to assume good faith." You've made an accusation here that's fairly serious without absolutely any reason to do so. May I suggest you please consider taking that breath and maybe not seeing my and this other user's questions so personally? I don't know this person, but in the good faith the code promotes, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that they're trying to solve the same problem I am: How to make MurielMary happy. Kentuckian in NY (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that I confused the parties in my comment above where I say "SanchoIII didn't delete the post on my talk page, you did." Correction: SanchoIII made a comment on my talk page and then reverted it, but in the above post, Kentuckian says that he/she noticed SanchoIII's comment on my talk page and deleted it. Something's not right here?? MurielMary (talk)

The article Janire Nájera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable artist; no evidence of meeting any of the notability criteria listed at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MurielMary (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]