Thank you for your contributions to Specialist Operations (New South Wales), but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use your sandbox instead. Thank you.  —Smalljim  19:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that this was knowledge, where Wikipedia was a place you can enter factual knowledge. It is fact state and federal police use these processes in controlled operations, this is not for humour purposes. Einsteinsgreatesthits (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I might re add the information under truth serum. It may be more useful. Einsteinsgreatesthits (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Australian Federal Police. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ternera (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

to get source for this information, you could get it from freedom of information. Einsteinsgreatesthits (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

Per a complaint at WP:AIV. EdJohnston (talk) 20:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]