Archives

Archive 2009 Archive 2010 Jan-Jun Archive 2010 July-Dec Archive 2011 Jan-Jun Archive 2011 July-Dec Archive 2012 Archive 2013 Archive 2014-2015

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Babyrousa celebensis - Crane.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh - and all the best for 2014. Since the beginning of the year, the updates to the New Articles list and the DYK list have not been displayed on the WP Architecture page. Something must have gone wrong with the mechanics. I'm sure you'll be able to fix it.--Ipigott (talk) 08:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Ipigott and Happy New Year! When I checked it today there were some January items displayed but not all. There seems to be an unusual delay at the moment with the updating of page transclusions. This is a server issue, and I experienced it also on other pages. The local fix is to request a page purge either by pressing this link (did it for now and works nicely) or if the problem persists could add a Purge button into the bulletin with Template:Purge. --ELEKHH^T 22:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year to you too. Everything seems to be working fine again today, without any artificial purging. Maybe the servers have started to catch up. Particularly in the case of DYKs, I think it is important to be able to see the most recent ones. And while I'm here, I was wondering whether we should not have a drive on the Top importance stubs, in particular Contemporary architecture, French Renaissance architecture and House-building. There are also quite a few in the High importance category that deserve attention although many seem to be over-rated. Perhaps the most important should be listed as articles needing attention? The automatically generated lists there at the moment are rather overpowering.--Ipigott (talk) 09:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good idea. There has been a 'renaissance' of editing at architecture so maybe is the time of the year more editors might join in. Agree that article importance ratings are problematic as we do not have a detailed criteria, and there is a general tendency for editors to self-rate their articles as high-importance. So importance rating is also something to be improved. Of the three stubs you're suggesting the contemporary architecture has the highest number of views. A fourth list to consider is Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture/Popular pages. Another idea I had is for a GA drive. There are quite a few articles you worked on that are very close to GA quality (Utzon, Bagsværd Church, etc.), but I am time poor at the moment. --ELEKHH^T 06:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Austria - Göttweig Abbey - 2015.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Simon's 1888 Gothenburg map.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 02:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Schottenkirche St. Jakob Innenraum Unten.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good catch. I don't know why I didn't spot that half the sources for Charles Rohaut de Fleury spelled it Rohault de Fleury. I just went ahead and merged the two articles - obviously the same person, and Rohault de Fleury is obviously much the more common spelling. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was just... how I say this...--AldNon^Ucallin?☎ 22:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perhaps you just want to nominated it at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates. --ELEKHH^T 22:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's already there, yes thousand people being evacuated right now, I think I will focus on the article rather than there (sand everywhere I was excited for a while sorry for my childish behavior).--AldNon^Ucallin?☎ 22:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Berlin Museumsinsel Fernsehturm.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 3, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-03-03. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:RhB ABe 4-4 III Kreisviadukt Brusio.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 20, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-03-20. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:C Class Tram, Melbourne - Jan 2008.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. The Bushranger One ping only 08:42, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Stockholm Central Station September 2013.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:SNCF TGV Duplex Viaduc de Cize - Bolozon.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 13, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-04-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Roadkill on Route 170 Okatie Hwy by the Chechessee River, SC, USA, jjron 09.04.2012.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 14, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-04-14. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for adding the tag, hopefully that will deter from further vandalism as it's a clear acknowledgement of their opinions. Also it's good to see another Nick Cave fan on Wikipedia, such an amazing man --Drowninginlimbo (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Barrow Offshore wind turbines NR.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 20, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-05-20. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Narbonne Cathedrale Saint Just et Saint Pasteur.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 21, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-05-21. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Lorentz National Park map-en.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 30, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-05-30. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:04, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Ambassador,

I am seeking input on your experience as a mentor to new Wikipedians. This survey is designed to provide insight for the development of a new mentorship support tool on Wikipedia. If you have a moment, please take this survey, it should not take more than 10 minutes of your time to complete.

https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4V2SSrhU2NFOVAV

Also, if you are able to, I would greatly appreciate it if you would send the following survey to the mentee you worked with:

https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4V1quUdMZ1By3Ah

Thank you in advance for your participation, Gabriel Mugar 13:33, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Crossrail BR 185 Hohtenn.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 11, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-06-11. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh.

Thanks for submitting a leaflet. However, there are some changes that I would like you to make.

We're doing our best to make these leaflets intelligible to non-wikipedians, and we think your leaflet could be confusing for them; try and include a clearer "call to action" - what are some specific ways they could get involved? We think Wikiproject Military History is a good example to follow.

Adikhajuria (talk) 11:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Adikhajuria, and thanks for your message. My aim was to create a first draft in the hope that others will improve it. Hence I invited WikiProject members to contribute, but there seems to be no volunteers. I am not interested in doing this all alone, so if you think is below standard please remove it, or feel free to improve it. I am also slightly puzzled by your link as I don't see much difference to the WPMH leaflet. --ELEKHH^T 12:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Adikhajuria: I'm surprised you were so dissatisfied with Elekhh's efforts here. I've tried to make one or two improvements to help things along. I certainly think Architecture should feature strongly in your efforts. It's a popular area for both editors and readers with a vast potential for improvement. Please let me know if any further help is needed.--Ipigott (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Nice tramway place Garibaldi.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh, Thank you so much for that nomination! It was a very nice surprise :) --Myrabella (talk) 10:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thank you for taking such a good picture and sharing it with the world! --ELEKHH^T 13:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thanks for taking the initiative on my proposal! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the sign of appreciation! It's a pleasure cooperating with you :) --ELEKHH^T 11:04, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I have created a simple site plan for Bara Imambara, as you requested it in the talk page. Feel free to translate it https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plan_Bara_Imambara.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillaume 1995 (talk • contribs) 10:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

I received an email from you stating that our content has been removed for copyright violations. I am the authorized representative of the company Tata Power Solar, for posting the information & as per our knowledge, we did not post anything which does not belong to us. Could you please help us understand your actions.

You can connect with me on prashant.tandon@tatapowersolar.com or media@tatapowersolar.com Regards Prashant Tandon Deputy Manager - Marketing & Communications Off: +91-80-6777-2341 | Mob: +91-963-224-5188 Tata Power Solar System Ltd.

1. 78, Electronics City, Phase-I, Bangalore- 560 100

www.tatapowersolar.com Tps 25 (talk) 10:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks you! We will work on it & update our page again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.7.58.10 (talk) 12:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh! I am looking for two online ambassadors to help with a course I'm teaching in the Education program. More specifically, I'm hoping to find a few ambassadors who can review student proposals for possible edits and sources from July 25th to July 30 and then review article drafts from July 30 to August 11. I'm working on putting the full schedule up on the course page but those would be the main duties of the ambassadors involved. Think you'd be interested? Matthewvetter (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Matthewvetter. Unfortunately I am flat out currently and would not have the time. But thanks for the invite and wish you the best! --ELEKHH^T 10:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I think this would be best moved to a taskforce of architecture (rather than tourism). It's not a strong enough project with enough interest to constitute it's own project and then a new parameter could be added for hotels to architecture. Also suggested on hotel project talk page.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure if this would work because it is an old project with over 30 participants over the years and many might be more interested in hotels as tourist destinations. --ELEKHH^T 02:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh, do you have a clue what to do with Serten. He just doesn't stop manipulating sources, see [1]. First it was 215 pp, now it is page 90 and page 163. Just this is ridiculus. And again the claim is wrong, because there is nothing on page 163 which states, that wind energy is not soft path! In fact you can only read that turbines get larger and are deploied in larger numbers and that there are some who critizise them, including some environmentalists. But he draws the conclution that wind energy therefore is not soft path, which is absolutely not backed by the source. Given the fact that he did this multiple times the last few days only Environmental impact of wind power and his history in the German Wikipedia, I am deeply concerned. You cannot work with an user who again and again tries to manipulate sources and who shows absolutely no signs of understanding that this is a huge problem [2]. Do you know a way how to stop that? This is a clear and deliberate vandalism. Are there notice boards for this kind of vandalism? I don't know enough of the structures in the English Wikipedia, but I know that it cannot go on like this. We don't need manipulators, to state it very carefully. 84.170.173.71 (talk) 14:01, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Look at it, it is incredible! He is editwaring about a citation that is made up! Because he makes a synthesis out of two sentences on page 90 and 163! And claims that a citation of page 163 is correct, because on page 90 the word "soft path" is mentioned. And there is nothing, absolutely nothing about a soft path on page 163, nor is there something that wind turbines are not soft path. This has to stop. Immediatelly! 84.170.173.71 (talk) 14:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't add that comment. I added the tags to the top. Miracle Pen (talk) 09:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, my error. Now corrected. --ELEKHH^T 13:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Elekhh,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Neues Rathaus Hannover abends.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 13, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-10-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Urban studies & Planning

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Urban studies & Planning for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (soliloquize) @ 12:00, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template_talk:Succession_box#RfC has a discussion on succession box usage. You had previously noted or opined at Template_talk:Infobox_officeholder/Archive_18#RfC_on_successor.2Fpredecessor_where_a_district_is_not_reasonably_viewed_as_the_same_after_redistricting thanks. Collect (talk) 21:33, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

it's true what I wrote in vienna ethnic groups I found on a German site, the site is called http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/bevoelkerung/bevoelkerungsstruktur/bevoelkerung_nach_staatsangehoerigkeit_geburtsland/index.html and then when you get to that site you go down and press Bevölkerung am 1.1.2014 detailliertem Geburtsland und nach Bundesland and then you see it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikolaserbboy1995 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. You seem to be confused about why your edits have been reverted. The problem was that you removed useful and referenced information, replacing it with a list that does not follow Wikipedia guidelines such as WP:PROSE and WP:MOSFLAG. Furthermore you're confusing citizenship with country of birth. --ELEKHH^T 06:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd like to ask about your edit to Victoria (Australia) on 17 December. Why do you think the Greens should not be referred to as left-wing but the Labor and Liberal parties should be referred to as centre-left and centre-right, especially since whether Labor is centre-left appears much more debatable than whether the Greens are left-wing? Colonial Overlord (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See extensive discussions and consensus at Talk:Australian Greens#Left Wing, Talk:Australian Greens#Ideology and Talk:Australian Greens#Political position. It is not only that the left-right political spectrum is simplistic and misleading, but is particularly not useful when comparing traditional parties (that themselves use the left-right spectrum) with green politics. I support avoiding the use of the left-right spectrum entirely on Wikipedia, as is an outdated 20th century simplistic model, but on that broader topic there is no consensus. --ELEKHH^T 06:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at Template talk:Infobox officeholder/Archive 18#RfC on successor/predecessor where a district is not reasonably viewed as the same after redistricting. Please see a related discussion at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#RfC Congressmen's tenures in infobox. Kraxler (talk) 15:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for adding a map to Château de Coulans. Could you please add one to Château d'Apremont-sur-Allier? How do you figure it out btw? Perhaps I could learn...Zigzig20s (talk) 03:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done! Each template (in this case Template:Infobox building) supposed to have a documentation that explains how to use it. Unfortunately, over the years these have become more and more complicated and less user friendly. For a minor fix like this, an easy way is to simply follow the example of a similar article that has a more complete infobox. The coordinates you can find either in the corresponding French wiki article (or any other language), or with a Google Maps search. Hope this helps. --ELEKHH^T 06:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you please add a map to Manoir de Vrigné? The French coordinates look very different.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also the Château du Bois-Rouaud please.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

More, if you don't mind: Château de la Verrerie (Saône-et-Loire) and Château de la Verrerie (Cher).Zigzig20s (talk) 07:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Also Château de Mutigney and Château de la Muyre please...I would like to figure out where to find the coordinates on google map, as I would like to create many more stubs about French castles (all good candidates to end up as a feature articles), and adding the map really improves their pages a lot, but I don't see where they can be found...Zigzig20s (talk) 07:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Château de Villemolin, Château de Bertangles, Château d'Heilly, Château de Virieu (Loire), Château de Virieu (Isère), Manoir de La Côte, Château de Trousse-Barrière, Château de Meillant, Château de Zuthove and Château d'Hénencourt please. (Sorry, I don't mean to overwhelm you!)Zigzig20s (talk) 22:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've created some more still, but I don't mean to be rude...Zigzig20s (talk) 09:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy to help, but as you can see I seldom have time. If you have more time, can also do it yourself by simply filling in the coordinate fields with the data from fr:Liste des monuments historiques du Nord (A-L) (or related pages). Cheers, --ELEKHH^T 01:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]