Hi Eli185! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Another possibility is to View history of an article and see if an editor or two have been actively editing recently. Then leave a note on their Talk page that you have started a discussion on the article Talk page. If article shows little recent activity, then just start editing the article. This may elicit reactions by editors who Watch the article even though they have not recently edited. David notMD (talk) 17:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Eli185!

Hi Eli185! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to discuss an article with other Wikimedians?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

I'm not convinced that Erna Menzel is so notable as Menzel v List, the Supreme Court case which is the subject of the majority of this article. Would you consider reframing this article in the format and style of the many other SCOTUS cases listed under Lists of United States Supreme Court cases?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erna Menzel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Erna Menzel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 16:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eli185! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Did I create a page or is it in limbo?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Menzel v. List, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 00:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hello, I created a new article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Deutsch Hans Deutsch but it doesn't seem to appear in searches, and I can't seem to link it to the German language version https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Deutsch_(Rechtsanwalt). I created in draft then moved it. Have I made a mistake or is there something else I should do? thank you. Eli185 (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC) Eli185 (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both things happen eventually (I do see that the de-wiki version has been linked now). The page will not be indexed by search engines until it has been reviewed by an NPR. If you want more help, change the ((help me-helped)) back into a ((help me)), stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eli185, re [1]...thank you so much for your research and contribution, but having though it over, think the material is better suited to a new stand-a-lone new article rather than all in the bio. Such a new article is something I very much look forward to seeing; you have pretty much already written it, and once its there, we can, in the spirit of wiki's summary style, link back to it on the bio. Ceoil (talk) 22:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion at Talk:The New York Times International Edition about your recent split of International Herald Tribune to a new article. I'm not saying it was wrong, but I do think there should be a discussion to establish consensus on this matter. Please do add your voice to the conversation. _``` t b w i l l i e _{`</sub> $1.25 <sub>`} 20:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eli185! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can another Wikipedia user simply ORDER me to make a separate article -without discussion and without answering my objections?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing ((bots|deny=Muninnbot)) here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Max Emden, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Definitely notable, but English WP requires sourcing to meet WP:VERIFY. If left in mainspace, most of the article could be deleted, since it is uncited. I felt it better to move it to draft so that you could work on the sourcing. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eli185! Your additions to Max Emden have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eli185, I've taken the liberty of moving two of your recent article creations to more appropriate titles. The pages affected are:

• Max Fischer (Art Collector) --> Max Fischer (art collector)

—With the exception of proper nouns, disambiguating particles should be in lowercase

• Fritz Nathan (Art Dealer) --> Fritz Nathan

—No need to disambiguate here, as (unlike dewiki) we have currently only one Fritz Nathan on this project

Happy editing! AngryHarpy‍^talk 13:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Thank you Eli185 (talk) 16:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed List of claims for restitution for Nazi-looted art. A really excellent piece of work - well done! If you ever need any help please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing. Mccapra (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!!! Eli185 (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi — regarding your recent article Gerling-Konzern, I wanted to ask two things:

1. The article name has 'Konzern' in it, but the article then goes on to call it by the English 'Gerling Group'. I'm assuming it was known as the latter in international contexts, and therefore a user of the English-language wikipedia would probably search by that name. In which case, I would suggest moving this to Gerling Group. Or what do you think?
2. While the sources look pretty solid, large sections of the article are unsupported by citations. I was tempted to move this to the draft space so that you can add more cites, but I thought I'd ask you first what your intentions were?

Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I don't really have an opinion concerning Gerling Konzern versus Gerling Group. I favor whichever is the clearest when trying to document the history of the various subsidiaries and mergers. Either is ok as long as both point to the Wikipedia page.

Concerning the parts of the text without sources, they are holdovers from the German. I'll look for sources today and remove whatever text I can't source. Please don't move the article. Will be fixed ASAP.

Comments to improve quality always appreciated. Eli185 (talk) 08:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adolf Weinmüller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belvedere. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Johanna Margareta Stern-Lippmann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Eli185: When translating an article from another Wikipedia, it needs to have a trans tag added to the talk page, on here. I would suggest you put one in. It is normal practice. scope_creep^Talk 19:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Oskar Reichel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creep^Talk 20:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this tag (A7 is for articles like "Bubbles is my pet cat etc. etc.") and added some citations to books I found. Thank you for helping to document these important cases of injustice served by the Nazis which still cause problems today. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Eli185 (talk) 18:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to List of claims for restitution for Nazi-looted art has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Oskar Reichel, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the "Installation" section in the linked script. If you follow it, after you refresh the page in the browser you should have a new option in the pull down menu, which will display a form you can fill to nominate your article. You can also do it manually following the instructions at WP:DYK but I find the script much friendlier (once installed). Do let me know if you run into technical troubles. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Oskar Reichel, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like ((WikiProject Keyword)) to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC) Thank you for the suggestions. I'll try to add them. Is there a list of projects I should add? (If so, I'll add it to my user page for quick reference) Can I add more than one project? Thanks again! Eli185 (talk) 11:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185,

Thank you for creating Martha Nothmann.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Many of the references are unreliable, such as the one from The New York Times

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Qwerfjkl)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Qwerfjkltalk 07:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerfjkl: Which New York Times reference do you consider to be problematic as a source and for what reason?

Is there are problem with: A Nazi Legacy Haunts a Museum’s New Galleries https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/11/arts/design/kunsthaus-zurich-buhrle-collection.html  ?

'In his book, Keller voices misgivings about the foundation’s research, calling the provenance reports on its website “a filter which withholds decisive facts.” He cites an 1879 Cézanne work, “Paysage,” as an example. The foundation’s website doesn’t mention that its prewar owners, Martha and Berthold Nothmann, were Jewish; it says the couple “left Germany in 1939,” instead of spelling out that they fled persecution.'

Eli185 (talk) 07:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC) -[reply]

I apologise, that was in error. Sorry for any confusion! ― Qwerfjkltalk 17:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Eli185: Howdy. I noticed you had a newbie sign still up on your user page. Would it perhaps not be worth taking it down? I noticed you have a 100 articles, on the go now. Impressive. scope_creep^Talk 12:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eli185,

as a German native speaker I recently wrote an article in the German WP about the painter and graphic artist de:Willi Sandforth. I then translated it into English. This version can be found here: User:Gisbert_K/Willi_S

Unfortunately my knowledge of English is not good. Therefore, the text may contain errors and inadequacies with regard to the use of the English language.

I have seen that you are, among other things, the author of the article Emil Nolde in the English WP, so you know something about the subject. Therefore, I ask you to take a look at the draft of my intended English article and correct it where necessary. If you think it is appropriate, you can shorten the article. Many thanks in advance.

With kind regards Gisbert K -  Gisbert ツ (talk)  Illustrate Wikipedia !   06:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185

Thank you for creating Josefine Winter.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs more references and some images of the artwork.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Scope creep)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 18:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this very interesting article. Could you just confirm whether it was the Portuguese Wikipedia that you translated it from? Ingratis (talk) 08:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Apologies - I've just spotted the relevant edit summary - please disregard. Ingratis (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recently created article is a rough translation from German Wikipedia. Please do not translate unless you are efficient in the language you're translating from. Also, you did not attribute the translation. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

Edit: I noticed you attributed in the summary, although using translated template in talk page is a better option.

Tame (talk) 13:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is not correct: the attribution in the edit summary is the important thing to do; the tag on the talk page is a nice extra but not so important. (and this was not a "rough translation"! I've removed the tag). Ingratis (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eli185,

please see the following source with an outmost of information about Kurt Grawi: https://www.beratende-kommission.de/Content/06_Kommission/DE/Empfehlungen/21-03-26-Empfehlung-der-Beratenden-Kommission-im-Fall-Grawi-LandeshauptstadtDuesseldorf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3

Seems we have similar interest: You already translated and edited my article: https://de.Wikipedia/wiki/Johanna_Margarethe_Stern - Very much appreciated!

Did you see my article about the business of Johanna Margarethes Spouse? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graumann_%26_Stern

--Peerse (talk) 17:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)--Peerse (talk) 17:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peerse,

Thank you for your message and the source. I hadn't seen the Graumann Stern article. I'll try to translate it to English. Please let me know if there are other important articles that aren't in English yet and I'll do what I can. Eli185 (talk) 17:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Further sources referring to Irma Neumann, the sister of Kurt Grawi: https://wiener.soutron.net/Portal/Default/en-GB/recordview/index/105561

                                                             https://www.geni.com/people/Irma-Neumann/6000000173908782821

--2003:D4:4F16:9738:D455:941C:C770:9125 (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_August_Neumann --Peerse (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eli185,

Are you translating articles about artists as well??? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Dilling https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bernhard_Dilling,_Rock_%27n%27_Roll.jpg

would be highly appreciated. --Peerse (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't usually translate artists but can give it a try. Are you a German native speaker? This wikipedia is missing a German version https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Gutmann Eli185 (talk) 06:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look for Friedrich_Gutmann. yes I'm a German native speaker --Peerse (talk) 15:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)--Peerse (talk) 15:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Found https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_M._Gutmann the Brother of Friedrich in the German Wikipedia --Peerse (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)--Peerse (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Meules de Blé, Vincent van Gogh 1888.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the copyright, but this photo is small, low resolution and used this one time. Is there a "fair use" tag? Thank you. Eli185 (talk) 03:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georges Mandel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cornelius Gurlitt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185

Thank you for creating Tietz Department Store (Elberfeld).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185

Thank you for creating Lederfabrik Heilbronn.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:43, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185

Thank you for creating Franz Clouth.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185,

Thank you for creating Bankhaus Adolph Meyer.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article could use a project tag on its talk page - as could the German original!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Alexandermcnabb)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. Added a project tag for Jewish history. Maybe should also be added to banking history? Eli185 (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

((subst:Sentnote-NPF|1=Valerie Eisler|2=Onel5969|3=Other the [this source, all the other articles are simple listings or mentions of her. Not enough in-depth coverage to show she passes GNG.))

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185. Thank you for creating ReKa. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Prisunic to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you.

Bienvenu(e), et merci de votre contribution de la page Prisunic à Wikipédia. Bien que vous ayez introduit cette page à la version anglaise de Wikipédia, elle n'est pas en anglais et elle a donc été ajoutée à la liste des pages en besoin de traduction. Nous vous invitons à la traduire vous-même, mais si elle n'est pas traduite d'ici deux semaines, on proposera sa suppression. Merci. GoingBatty (talk) 14:28, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eli. I was just wondering about the article Arnold Baumgarten as part of it seems like a direct translation of one of the sources [2]. Is that content in the public domain, or do we otherwise have permission to use it? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll rework it. Eli185 (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185. Thank you for your work on Margarete Tietz. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I sincerely hope that you will write more articles in the future! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:29, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Toni Aktuaryus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ilse Bernheimer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francesco Grimaldi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which you wrote, the second paragraph, you started off writing in English, then it proceeds to French. It seems odd, what are you trying to do with that paragraph?? Govvy (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eli185. Thank you for your work on Robert Graetz (art collector). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]