New to this. Hoping for feedback on my comments about the role of enzymes in the cell. Maybe it goes here, if not on the discussion page of the article. -Emhale 17:54, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I saw your comment. First, welcome to Wikipedia. Maybe the Wikipedia article about enzymes should link to Chemical reaction right at the start and then discuss the point you made about how enzymes allow cells to be selective about which chemical reactions take place at a significant rate. --JWSchmidt 18:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"put a link to Chemical reaction in the enzyme article and then discuss my point" <-- that is what I was suggesting.....and Be bold in updating pages. --JWSchmidt 21:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure what kind of diagram you have in mind. You might want to participate at Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Diagram guide. --JWSchmidt 22:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"My guess is It would take me a while to learn how to put it into the article; I'll probably go without it for now." Take a look at Wikipedia:Images. If you need any help, let me know. --JWSchmidt 15:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Another wiki project that might be of interest to you. --JWSchmidt 03:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

i tried to do a little tidy up on your paragraph in the article. Maybe if we go back and forth on this we can reach a great parapgraph. I'm not completely happy with what i finished with. I would like to see how you could improve it further. David D. (Talk) 15:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You asked me how to comment on a thread that has gone to archives. Protocol is that you should not add comments directly to an archived page... Note: being archived usually means a discussion had ended, but occasionally it does happen that a slow moving discussion is archived prematurely. If this has occurred with the discussion you are talking about (and I assume it has or you would not have asked about this) you will need to reopen it ... start a new thread on the noticeboard, and include a link to the previous (archived) discussion. Blueboar (talk) 12:24, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Emhale, first, let me express my condolences to you regarding the death nearly 50 years ago of your brother Malcolm. And second, my apology for taking out the link to the talk page in the process of editing to refer to the 1968 accounts and the finding of the earliest description of an accident found via Google books. And finally, thank you for your kind message. I tried to stick to the facts about accounts without passing judgment or expressing an opinion, since I know that first reports are not always correct (the Natalie Wood drowning is a good example, contrasting between the official accounts in 1981 vs more recent revelations concerning Robert Wagner). I limited my look at Google to "preview available" books, so I'll see if I can expand my search. Mandsford 23:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Emhale-- Following up on yesterday's post, there's no bar against bringing your comments directly to the article's Talk page; indeed, that's the main way to generate discussion. Second, I agree with you that the 2007 book author (Michael Largo) most likely was alerted to the circumstances by the Wikipedia article, although a good author would not rely on Wikipedia alone, suggesting that he may have found a second source for verification. Generally, mass market book publishers don't devote additional space for footnotes and often limit the documentation to a bibliography. You might try contacting him directly-- he's got a Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/michael.largo.73/ and I imagine that he would appreciate the fact that Malcolm was your brother. Mandsford 16:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]