This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
EurovisionNim,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks mate, I am in Hanoi on a holiday, feel free to ask any questions :) --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 23:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
EurovisionNim,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Liz, I am in Singapore, sorry for the slow reply --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 11:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hey Nim, Thanks for changing your image slightly, Not gonna lie your photos are alot better than I expected! :), BTW Happy New Year :) –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 08:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
FYI, you can use this service to check the vehicle details for Singaporean cars. Just use any date for "Intended Transfer Date". I fixed up your Audi A7 files already. OSX (talk • contributions) 09:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
The Photographer's Barnstar | ||
Thanks for adding the many files to Wikimedia Commons of cars in Vietnam and Singapore. These high quality images are very much appreciated. Keep up the good work and happy Australia Day! OSX (talk • contributions) 10:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC) |
You just made my day, I am about to have dinner @OSX:. What are you doing now :D --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 11:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
I was patrolling some changes lists, and saw that you reverted an edit to Volkswagen using rollback and without leaving a description in the edit summary. Remember that using rollback without a description in the edit summary (except for reverts made to sandboxes, your own user space, etc) is allowed only if the edit is blatant vandalism - in this case, it was not. I do it occasionally on accident myself ;-) - just remember that if you mistakenly do it, leave a dummy edit; then you're good ;-). If you have any questions, please feel free to leave me a message. Happy Thursday, and happy editing! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that in December 2015 you replaced the lead image of the Volvo V40 with a picture of the car in its natural surroundings. However, I have reinstated the studio shot, because, in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Automobiles/Conventions#Images, it says the lead photo should be """against a simple and contrasting background. Such an image is always to be preferred over a lower-quality image, such as one that shows photoflash glare or a distracting background""". However, the picture that you added the article is useful for showing a later model year, so I included it in the article instead. Thanks for understanding. dllu (t,c) 01:40, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Brianhe RfA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for participating at my RfA. Your support was very much appreciated even if I did get a bit scorched. Brianhe (talk) 02:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
Hello.
Thank you for your edit of Hackney carriage. You've ensured diverse representation on Wikipedia. --Muzammil (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Nim. How would you classify this car if not as a hot hatch? Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Thank you for always coming up with compromises inregards to images, I've reverted you a few times over images and and you've always found solutions to our problems, |
@Davey2010:, Thanks, sorry I was asleep when you replied. I am at school now, what are you up to now. Note I flirted on a girl, in front of her boyfriend. Yeah, boyfriend is my mate :) --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 00:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Car classification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Falcon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there,
Your revision was undone because there is a directive under the WA Department of Transport not to issue 1F series see the newspaper article - http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/the-wa-department-of-transport-number-plates-deemed-too-rude-to-issue-20160222-gn076u.html
People in Western Australia have reported that they have seen 1GAD, 1GAE, 1GAF in the past few weeks so there won't be any 1FAA-1FZZ blocks as Transport Departments in Australia do skip some blocks for example in New South Wales they did not issue FAA-FNZ, IAA to IZZ for general series, Victoria for MAA-MZZ as it is reserved for the government and QA-QZ motorcycles.
Thanks.
Glenn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.181.14 (talk) 13:33, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Regarding your comments at AN/I here, there is a history of which you are completely unaware that was the reason behind my comments.[1] -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 11:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Just FYI the user is now indefinitely blocked, you may get another nasty response on Aono's talk-page but the best thing to do would be to ignore it. Take care! - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
About the edition change in the page Honda City?
201.81.64.163 (talk) 23:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC).
You wrote that I think we shall use one image for each section. Wikipedia isnt a 'idea' website.Every writer is doing somethings to make bigger the wikipedia.But you are deleting photos without reasons.Only you are expressing ur 'idea'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cicekoguzhan (talk • contribs) 21:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Nim, there's reason to believe the description below this photo is not quite correct. I know it is a couple of years later but is there any way you can check with the car's owner or a club? Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 07:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honda Accord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proton Perdana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Nim, with edit such as this, you have been writing year ranges with a regular dash "-", when they should actually be en dashes "–" which are a bit longer. This is covered by WP:MOSDASH. To see which keyboard shortcuts to use, please take a look at Wikipedia:How to make dashes. Thanks, OSX (talk • contributions) 03:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi EurovisionNim! I saw that you removed a message you left on my talk page. I apologize for the delay getting back to you; as you can tell, I have a lot of messages to catch up on and respond to (especially given recent events ;-)). That's awesome dude!!! I hope the date continues to go well, and (as always) it's great to say 'hi' and talk to you! Keep in touch, and I hope the removal of the message doesn't imply that you think I don't care; I'm going to be delayed with my replies until I catch up ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi EurovisionNim, You should read WP:BRD, (You were Bold, You were Reverted and now you need to Discuss it),
Please don't take this the wrong way but some of your image additions/changes aren't improvements to the previous ones, You need to make sure the images you're replacing are better which unfortunately with some of them they're not,
I would kindly suggest you discuss it on the talkpage or you could end up blocked,
Thanks & Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 12:33, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Davey2010, I think that incorrect wheels are an important factor to change a photo. After all, should we not be showing cars in original condition? If we prioritise a photo with aftermarket wheels, then why not one with extra body kits and custom paint? The images should (where possible) illustrate the vehicle as the manufacturer intended. There are an infinite number of possible modifications that could take place. Other than that, I agree with your premise the Nim needs to be very careful to ensure the new photos are better then the previous. This often is not the case.
However, at Nissan President, Nim's choice of photo is better in my view. It is of higher resolution and has correct wheels. The only downside are the window stickers which I'd be happy to edit out if you want.
Also, I'd be careful about dismissing WP:CARPIX. This is a guideline based on widespread WP:CARS community consensus, the content of which has been upheld and modified over the years. It is not one person's pet project. Just because it is not official WP policy does not make other consensus decisions worthless. OSX (talk • contributions) 03:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey..Thanks for signing my guestbook.I just checked out your collection of cars.It was really awesome.I too love cars.I liked ur collection.Nice work :) Bhootrina (talk) 07:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC) |
Hello Nim I noticed you are well versed over Toyota Fortuner. You might want to add in the best of TOYOTA Launch of Fortuner. You can find the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vwVzcwq1ho or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4OomK26kH0
Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toorumer (talk • contribs) 10:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi EurovisionNim,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, EurovisionNim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
LOL....long subject-line, I know. Hello EurovisionNim. So, this is my silly question...and, I will note, I have looked at several tutorials and this specific issue of mine isn't directly addressed. How do I, while editing in either format offered (and I do seem to prefer the Visual Editing format), preserve already-existing links and citations? I need to know which physical tools I need to use while re-working a sentence which contains one or both of these. I'm a quick learner but I need this to almost be as if I am sitting in an office, learning a new job, and someone tangibly points me to the way to do something specific. Each time I ask the question generally or look at a tutorial, it seems I'm being told how to create a new link/citation...or is this, in fact the way I preserve existing ones too? Can you help me on this? I would so appreciate. Thank you. Ahiroy (talk) 12:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ferrari 488 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia! |
Hello! I see you did some edits to Ferrari Mondial page. The new picture of the Mondial t cabriolet shows a car with aftermarket chrome wheels. Could we put the earlier pic back? That car is all original. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzm (talk • contribs) 18:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Good afternoon. I see you changed the Mondial t cabriolet picture. That car also is non-standard as it is sporting yellow Scuderia Ferrari badges on the front fenders. The Mondial was not badged that way at the factory. Also, in general it is best to avoid license plates where possible and this one isn't even photoshopped. Could I ask you again to put the old one back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzm (talk • contribs) 03:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Not a problem mate. I checked Changomo's deletion request and it's not on there; didn't think it was. I will just switch back the old name. ____ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzm (talk • contribs) 04:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)