Archives

Archive 1

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communauté d'agglomération Pau Béarn Pyrénées, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Movement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DPL bot I have now fixed the issue. Excellenc1 (talk) 07:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Lightbluerain❄ (Talk. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).

Thanks for uploading File:Novembre (2022) Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax: It was previously used in Novembre (flim) but it was draftified recently. If this image gets deleted, can I re-upload it? Excellenc1 (talk) 14:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the draft gets accepted, yes. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax: It was draftified because it isn't notable as of now (movie isn't released yet). So yes, it'll be accepted. Excellenc1 (talk) 14:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know you deleted your message on my talk page but I thought I'd reply anyway. The question of whether the Principality of Sealand is notable or not has no bearing on whether the Grand Duchy of the Lagoan Isles is notable: each article is judged on its own merits and not by comparison with another article which might or might not also be notable. However one difference between them is that when the German government raised a diplomatic dispute with the UK about Sealand, the UK Foreign Office replied that it was nothing to do with them. There has also been a court case about it, although I've forgotten what was decided. There is nothing equivalent (as far as I know) about the GDLI. My point in the AfD discussion was not just that it began as a school project, but that it never amounted to anything more than that later on.

By the way, you're not supposed to recreate articles after they've been deleted. Another editor has turned it into a redirect. Richard75 (talk) 12:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard75: That's the reason I deleted my message on your talk page, I saw it has become a redirect. Also, I didn't actually know that AfD articles are not supposed to be recreated, so thank you. Excellenc1 (talk) 15:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angèle Préville, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Excellenc1,

I noticed that you have quite a few drafts that are already of pretty high quality and could be moved to the mainspace, such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Parc_du_Thabor. Is there any reason why you keep them in draft? Even if they are not finished yet, I feel it would be helpful for many people if they were made public (potentially marked as a stub if required), and keeping them in draft mode also makes it harder for other editors to contribute. In particular, I noticed that some of these drafts (such as the Thabor park) have barely been touched in many months, so could be at risk of getting deleted. 7804j (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@7804j: Well, I have not completely added citations to the whole thing so I thought I'll do it gradually. But I also like your idea of keeping the cited part as a stub and later adding content. Excellenc1 (talk) 07:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Excellenc1, do you think we could publish the article now? You could always continue working on it after it is published. I see the draft hasn't had too many edits in the last few months, so I would want to make sure it doesn't get forgotten and deleted 7804j (talk) 19:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@7804j: Wouldn't it get deleted anyways after publishing due to lack of sources? Excellenc1 (talk) 14:12, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I had not realized that the translation of most of the sources was still missing -- my bad 7804j (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Meesho requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meesho. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 13:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DMySon: But on what basis!! My article clearly has 20 citations, all from reliable sources, back then it was deleted maybe because the person who made it then did not meet the needs. Also, my article does not have promotional content or anything. I clearly hate the policy of not letting the recration of AfD articles even if they are now perfect! Excellenc1 (talk) 14:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have contested deletion in the talk page. Excellenc1 (talk) 14:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its clearly indicates in Afd, that the topic does not meet Wikipedia's Companies Notability guidelines. You should talk to the deleting admin Star Mississippi. DMySon (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DMySon: Star Mississippi is in a wikibreak. I have still put a message in her talk page. Excellenc1 (talk) 16:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Excellenc1! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:20, Sunday, April 3, 2022 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
52		Regional council (France) (talk)	Add sources
12		House of Bourbon-Maine (talk)	Add sources
4		Departmental Council of Hauts-de-Seine (talk)	Add sources
34		Armorial of France (talk)	Add sources
15		Departmental Council of Seine-Saint-Denis (talk)	Add sources
1		Departmental Council of Meuse (talk)	Add sources
73		Rotwelsch (talk)	Cleanup
20		GR 34 (talk)	Cleanup
61		Luxembourg Stock Exchange (talk)	Cleanup
188		Languedoc-Roussillon (talk)	Expand
25		Regional Council of Brittany (talk)	Expand
2		Jean-René Lecerf (talk)	Expand
17		Château de Brest (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
125		Rowing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
169		Algerian Arabic (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
18		Teletica Canal 7 (talk)	Merge
812		Neocolonialism (talk)	Merge
20		Semantic dispute (talk)	Merge
148		Vannes (talk)	Wikify
54		Louise Marie Adélaïde de Bourbon, Duchess of Orléans (talk)	Wikify
27		Chirayinkeezhu (talk)	Wikify
3		French Great South-West (talk)	Orphan
2		Tournament of the nine provinces of Gabon (talk)	Orphan
7		Opération Persil (talk)	Orphan
3		Recouvrance, Brest (talk)	Stub
3		Departmental Council of Pyrénées-Atlantiques (talk)	Stub
2		Departmental Council of Aude (talk)	Stub
9		Winter Hymn Country Hymn Secret Hymn (talk)	Stub
1		Departmental Council of Hérault (talk)	Stub
26		Canet-en-Roussillon (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kolawole Olagboyega and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kolawole Olagboyega, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Celestina007 (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Nourhane. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. When you encounter an edit conflict, it is your responsibility to resolve it appropriately so that you preserve the other editors' work. You have not done so at the Nourhane draft, instead overwriting my edits (contrary to the instructions at the edit conflict window) and doing so again after I reverted you initially. This is inappropriate for a collaborative encyclopedia. Please redo your edits from the present version so that you are not inadvertently reverting my contributions. ((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 18:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sdkb, I still did not understand what part I did was wrong. An edit conflict? With whom? Excellenc1 (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Excellenc1, an edit conflict happens when two editors try to edit the same page at the same time. The first time, you may have gotten a screen notifying you of it when you tried to click publish. The second time, it looks like you switched editors in the middle of an edit, so the editnotice probably told you you were editing a past version of the page. The interface could use some improvement to make handling edit conflicts easier, but in general, just pay attention to the notices and you'll be fine. Feel free to make the edits again, working from the current version, as I'm no longer editing it, so you shouldn't run into any edit conflicts. Best, ((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 18:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Excellenc1! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:06, Wednesday, April 13, 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Excellenc1

Thank you for creating Punta de Astorg.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of bays of France, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 11:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about List of bays of the Philippines, List of bays of South Africa and List of bays of the United States? These are similar articles with no sources. Please draftify them as well. Excellenc1 (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of bays of France, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 10:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Teahouse.
Message added 18:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 18:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1

Thank you for creating List of bays of France.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1

Thank you for creating Fathia Youssouf.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1

Thank you for creating Canton of Novion-Porcien.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1

Thank you for creating Departmental Council of Ardennes.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs explanatory prose added. it doesn't even say what it's role is in the governing process. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: So do you mean to say I have to add the functions of the council? Excellenc1 (talk) 15:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping/. So I brought up two issues:

The article should be about 50% text. Yours is only about 5% text, the rest is table and stats. So your need more text type content

I assume that it is some sort of governing or law-making body body for Ardennes, but you never say that. So you need to add a sentence that says that.

Happy editing! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 18:29, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Well it does say at the start that it is "the deliberative assembly of [...] Ardennes", but I guess I have to add some more info regarding it. Thanks! Excellenc1 (talk) 07:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, click on your deliberative assembly link. It talks about their method of discussing, and does not define a role/ their role. Happy editing! North8000 (talk) 11:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lil-unique1 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone of this article is overly promotion and lacking in prose. A series of bullet points about acquisitions and mergers to not constitute WP:NCORP. Coverage does not go beyond the existence of the organisation in its current format. It needs to be re-written to consider all points of view and read less like a list of achievements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meesho and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Meesho, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 20:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1

Thank you for creating Canton of Roubaix-Est.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Everything refers to it in past tense....the article should say what7 happened to it and when. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Since it is a former canton, everything is in past. And it does say what happened when like when was it created, when was the last general councillor elected, when was the population counted etc.

Maybe I misread your comment, do you mean to say I did a good job by putting everything in past or you're asking me why everything is in past? Excellenc1 (talk) 05:36, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I wrote it in a confusing manner. I meant that you should add something that says how it ended. What process or event ended it. . North8000 (talk) 11:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Novembre (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Vosges Matin logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of the sources are not independent. Others are not in-depth or are local.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alsace20 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pollicitation in French civil law, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pollicitation in French civil law".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parc du Thabor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Parc du Thabor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Excellenc1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Departmental Council of Vendée, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be interested in French topics, which is nice to see. There are a group of us who get together from time to time to work on various French topics; interested in joining us? Lately, we've been busy on Black market in wartime France, and related articles. I see you're also interested in topics of French law. I'd love to have someone interested in that as well to collaborate with. I have numerous articles and drafts in the works on that topic.

Also, here's a tip which might help you with your current draft: I see that you've created several Légifrance citations for your current draft on Pollicitation, and you might like to know that there are three templates that make writing these citations easier. You could look at ((legifrance)) for starters, and it will lead you to the other ones. If you'd like to see examples of these templates in use, the Glossary of French criminal law uses ((sfn legifrance)) extensively. Thanks for helping to expand English Wikipedia's coverage of French topics! Mathglot (talk) 10:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot, Thanks for the invitation, but I'm actually inactive these days due to exams and stuff. I'll still try to work with the group as much as possible. Also thanks for the template, that helps a ton! Excellenc1 (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]