Hello...

Hi, Fabi Fuu 76, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages - A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's good I'm glad you are enjoying using Wikipedia. If you need halp in the future please feel here to post on the feedback dashboard again or on my my talk page.

Callanecc (talk) 03:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that an edit be made to the fully protected user page at User:Fabi Fuu 76. (edit · history · last · links · sandbox · edit sandbox · sandbox history · sandbox last edit · sandbox diff · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately. Edit requests to fully protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

Change: <done>

To: None.

Reason: personally identifiable information Fabi Fuu 76 (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fluffernutter: as you have FP'd this page citing OS already. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, @Primefac:

I'm active again on both the Indonesian (id) and English (en) Wikis. Could you please re-enable editing on my user page? I'd like to give my account a "new life" by updating my profile to show my current Wiki activities. Thanks in advance for the help! Thanks! Fabi Fuu 76 (talk)

Reping Primefac since the previous ping appears to have failed since it wasn't signed properly. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabi Fuu 76,

Thank you for creating Library Münstergasse.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating the article. Wikipedia would be glad if you could add some more inline citations

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Paradise Chronicle)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, The Oxford Companion to British History, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, The Oxford Companion to Medicine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabi Fuu 76. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Oxford Companion to British History, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabi Fuu 76. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Oxford Companion to Medicine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabi Fuu 76. Thank you for your work on Deutsches Literatur-Lexikon. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Solid little article on a needed topic! Thanks for the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Moriwen)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! I will expand the article later, both here in Wiki en, and adding some references in Wiki de (it desperately need in line citation!) Fabi Fuu 76 (talk) 18:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabi Fuu 76. Thank you for your work on Der kleine Brockhaus. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks you for translating this from the German version of the article. However, please remember to acknowledge the translation; see Help:Translation#License requirements. One other issue is that there is no claim of notability on the page, so its unclear why it warrants a page. Might there be some independent, reliable sources that demonstrate the importance of this work?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Klbrain)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: Hi Kibrain.

Thanks for the review. I have added the template ((Translated page|de|Der kleine Brockhaus)) in the article.

For the notability, since Brockhaus Encyclopaedia is one of the biggest encyclopedia in Germany, I think the "mini" version, published by the same company, is notable enough and deserve its own page. Similar to the Oxford English Dictionary and its multiple edition of "mini" version. I will add this into the artcile lead section. Fabi Fuu 76 (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]