DTM/FONSP's Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Please? Otherwise you may be blocked. —Kusma (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact cawikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).—Kusma (talk) 19:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is open. Per this discussion, COMPROMISE is doubtful Now we need to take a fresh look at the prospect of unblocking. Previous unblock was with these conditions, which have been breached. I could restore talk page access and send user here to request unblocking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. Restoring talk page access.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FacetsOfNonStickPans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I cannot argue the validity of this block and the reasons that led to it. However I request a reconsideration and reversal. It has been nearly four months. I ​understand that building back credibility on the basis of Wikipedia's rules and regulations from this point on is no easy feat. I understand that this block/unblock process also involves my previous unblock criteria. If unblocked I intend to make a number of constructive edits across existing pages I have started (Atmanirbhar Bharat, Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in India) and expanded (Lakes in Bangalore), as well as take part in DYK processes. I started and expanded 'Guns don't kill people, people kill people' and would like to take it towards a Good Article nomination. I would also like to continue making minor gnome-like edits as well. FacetsOfNonStickPans (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were already given a second chance after the last round of intentional disruption, and then did the same thing again. I do not see anything so extraordinary here as to warrant a third one. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ponyo: @Deepfriedokra: pinging involved admins. FacetsOfNonStickPans (talk) 06:44, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A member of the unblock review team will consider your request.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade: You are looking for something "extraordinary"? Consider "intentional disruption" as self harm. (The first and second sentences are disconnected) FacetsOfNonStickPans (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade: @Deepfriedokra: Please could you reconsider my unblock. FacetsOfNonStickPans (talk) 03:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have already received the answer from me, and know how to make a new unblock request. Please do not ping me again. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't fault Seraphimblade's reasoning. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent experiences have soured me on third chances. And there is no way we can know there won't be a relapse to what you describe as self harm. You might be seized by the Wikipedia equivalent of an "irresistible impulse" or something. Please use a fresh unblock template to gain consideration from someone less jaded than I.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Thank you for all your hard work --evrik (talk) 16:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amit Malviya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Malviya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]