![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fila3466757 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
Your recent edit to Bo'ness railway station (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 16:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
But it was my article!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I Made it!!!!!!!!!!!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to British Rail Class 314. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Signalhead 14:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
On YouTube,it say that the class 314s are gonna get scrapped!!!!!!!!!! 'I MEAN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'''
Hi, I am writing this in regard to your Edits to dalgety bay railway station...Not only is the information you add Irrelevant and unconstructive you dont spell check and your grammer is terrible...Please stop editing like this as it is seen as vandilisim.... --Djt2k6 20:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
I can spell terrribly well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND IT IS NOT ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Addhoc 10:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Addhoc 11:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
'''''''''''''''''''GO AWAY.'''''''''''
Would you please stop adding incorrect information regarding the number of platforms in use at various railway stations. I don't know what you're using as your information source, or if it is sheer vandalism, but the edits that you have made have been wrong in most cases, possibly in every single case. Signalhead 17:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
NO.'
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Manchester Victoria station, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. └and-rew┘┌talk┐ 05:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Manchester Victoria station, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. └and-rew┘┌talk<up>┐ 06:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
''''''''''''''''ERM,IT SAYS THAT ON MOST OTHER ARCTICLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!''''''''''''
Please be aware that you made an inaccurate edit to the article for Lockerbie railway station. This station is one of a small number which is not served by trains on the managing TOC. The reference attached to the operator provides the source of this information. Before you make an edit, please be sure of your source and when in doubt ensure you can provide a citation to your source. --Stewart (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Please desist in making incorrect edits on this article. As is noted in the article (by the reference to the manager in the infobox), and the clarification note I have re-inserted, having been deleted several edits ago, Lockerbie is not managed by the TOC whose trains stop there. --Stewart (talk) 12:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Your user talk page is a place for others to leave messages. You can't have a message there telling people not to leave messages. Please contact me or any administrator if you need help. Please remove the message. --John (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
MAKE SURE ITS NOT ANYTHING BAD.
NEVER EVER remove a picture from a railway station. It is very annoying. Youre recent removing of images from Ebbsfleet International and Kingsknowe railway stations were Innoproprieat. Please give them a image now.
I dont know who did it! Do not remove images limke that. They were entirely 'Inappropriate'.
Stop putting near Bo'ness on Birkhill station!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Next tme you do that it shall be reverted into this:
Birkhill,Falkirk (council area).
Hi. Another editor has asked me to review your edits. I have reverted quite a few of your recent edits as they were factually incorrect. Please discuss in article or project talk if you wish to make further sweeping changes. Could you also remove the message on your user page? It is quite legitimate for others to use your talk page to communicate with you, as I am doing now. Thanks in advance. --John (talk) 16:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
OK THATS IT. IF I GET ANYTHING LIKE THAT I MIGHT REVERT THE EDITS!!!!!!!!!! AND ITS THE STUPID COMPUTER IT DOES NOT ET ME DO ALL LETTERS.LIKE UP THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No.
One thing..........
I am unhappy with your removing of the image of Salisbury railway station. It was extremley inapropereat.
See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fila3466757 for evidence. Jehochman Talk 22:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)