When warning me, use the user warning templates instead of having to type all of the template's contents, followed by your signature.

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Enzo Enzo. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 03:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Faster than Thunder. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 17:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Qwerfjkltalk

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enzo Enzo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Enzo Enzo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Faster than Thunder! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Faster than Thunder,

You opened two separate discussions on WP:AN for non-urgent matters, just to ask questions. This a high profile noticeboard and I think if you have questions about Wikipedia policy or how it is implemented, you should bring them to the Teahouse or go to an individual administrator's User talk page and ask them. They are not questions that need to be addressed by the entire administrator community and doing this just serves to draw attention to you. You're still a relatively new editor and I don't think it is beneficial to draw administrator attention to yourself unless you are facing a real problem, like an irresolvable conflict with another editor that could benefit from administrator intervention. I'm not telling you what to do, just letting you know that your behavior might not be perceived in a positive way. Really, the Teahouse can answer most of your questions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give User:Faster than Thunder a different title by using the DISPLAYTITLE magic word. This functionality is for changing the formatting and presentation of the title only, and does not work to change a page's title to something meaningfully different. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else.

I have struck out the magicword to remove the error message, but feel free to revert me when you have fixed it. '' Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:136.228.56.130. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:34, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:115.164.200.110, you may be blocked from editing. If you have an issue with the warning level, please ask them to clarify on their talk page. Do not just go around and change it without their permission. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 19:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not move your user page. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I did not. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 20:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Truesdale (surname), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

do not try to coach other users. You need to gain more experience first. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Deepfriedokra:What about my recent warning to User:Historcorretor? Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 20:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There's a difference between leaving a warning and telling folks how to leave warnings. Primefac (talk) 10:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enzo Enzo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Enzo Enzo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Faster than Thunder. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tuttle Twins, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Faster than Thunder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tuttle Twins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you created Draft:Warburg (surname) using content that was copied from Warburg (disambiguation). Please note that you need to give proper attribution if you copy text from one Wikipedia page to another. You can learn more at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, specifically the "Proper attribution" section. I've already done the necessary attribution in this case (in this edit summary), but please do remember to do this on your own in the future. Not giving attribution for copied text is a copyright violation which Wikipedia takes very seriously. Bennv123 (talk) 16:42, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Warburg (surname), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ülo Varul, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Faster than Thunder. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Enzo Enzo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Faster than Thunder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Enzo Enzo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It may have appeared I was vandalizing, but trust me I was not. Lina211_{Follow your dreams} 02:32, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You were not vandalizing. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 02:37, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not use whatever warning the software tells you to without carefully consulting past warnings. Lina211 wasn't even vandalizing, it was just a WP:BOLD edit that ended up being incorrect. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 03:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read and understand our policies on notability for businesses that determines what is required for an article about a business to be included in the encyclopedia. Currently, this draft fails to provide any such notability assertions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iboss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 21:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Faster than Thunder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

204.110.220.0/22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

original block message

• Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Confirmed proxy. Please disable your proxy and wait a full 24 hours. Yamla (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not in charge of the proxy, so I cannot disable it. Can you make me exempt from IP blocks instead by giving the role for that to me? Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 23:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would not be comfortable doing so. You've demonstrated you can edit, recently. You have not demonstrated an exceptional, compelling need to use the proxy. And a meaningful number of your edits appear somewhat problematic. Others may feel differently, though, so you are welcome to apply. WP:IPBE has the details. --Yamla (talk) 23:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Faster than Thunder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 204.110.220.0/22. I am not in charge of the proxy, so I cannot disable it. When I try to fight vandalism at school, I unfortunately cannot. I try to make non-problematic, good-faith changes from school. At home, where I am not blocked, I can only access Wikipedia on Sundays. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 18:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

I suggest you go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow those instructions to request IPBE by email. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 18:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I found this page on Category:Requests for unblock, and although I didn't recognize you, I clicked, and read, and I figured that I'd chime in. Yes, things like this happen allll the time on school networks now. They load the computers and laptops with proxy/web monitoring services that the user of the desktop (the student) cannot alter because the means to are also blocked. Although I can't discern what your school might be running on yours, it must be similar, and I recently got IPBE for my case of this. So, is this also your case? ~ GoatLordServant^(Talk) 18:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think so. The monitoring services at my school include DyKnow, which teachers use to monitor students' screens, and Securely, which blocks websites automatically for teachers. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 19:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Never heard of those, but after some quick lookups, they are similar to Senso Client (screensharing) and IBOSS (web censoring & proxy), which my public school utilizes. There's a whole market for these. ~ GoatLordServant^(Talk) 20:10, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mathseeds and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]