Please leave messages for me in a new section, at the end of this page. I will usually respond here, unless asked to do otherwise. Thank you.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Hi, I see you’re a participant in the WikiProject for Finance and Investment and are currently active on Wikipedia. There are some corrections and important updates needed in the article about Digital Currency Group, one of the major players in cryptocurrency. I’ve started a discussion here. I have a COI, as fully disclosed on the page. Given the nature of the topic I thought this might be of interest to you as a participant in the Finance and Investment WikiProject. Thanks very much for your time. CertifiedTurtle (talk) 23:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, CertifiedTurtle. Thank you for letting me know about this. I will go have a look at the discussion today or tomorrow.--FeralOink (talk) 05:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi FeralOink, sorry to bother you on your Talk page but I’ve been trying to reach you about the proposal you weighed in on. Since the discussion about the proposal appears to have concluded, I was wondering if you would be able to implement the changes I suggested? Please let me know if I can be of any help, within the parameters of my COI. CertifiedTurtle (talk) 16:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you sure that the photo on your page is not a Javelina? 2601:681:C00:CCF0:8080:C1DB:55E5:C42D (talk) 18:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes! It IS a Javelina! Wow, you knew. Thank you so much for your comment! Given that you're an IP user with no talk page, I do hope you have an opportunity to read this reply.

I love pigs and javelinas. The latter might not quite be pigs, taxonomically; however, they are known as "New World Pigs". That's close enough, I think. Javelinas go feral-ing around near where I live, without causing harm or fuss. Bigger feral pigs, more boar-like ones, have a worse reputation. The boars live a few states to my east.--FeralOink (talk) 19:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Devon Archer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devon Archer. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Notrealname1234 (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here's our problem with this article: at FAC the reviewers thought that it relies too heavily on one biography, and wanted more general statements about the Air Force or NASA programs, and especially about distinctions/firsts... augmented by other sources. (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Eileen Collins/archive1#Source review) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hawkeye7, yes, I noticed the dependence on a single source. Thank you for taking the time to explain the background re FAC to me, here, rather than reverting me a second time! Now I understand your motivation. I concur. BTW, I added another source and am about to add a second one now, along with some content about what she did after her retirement. When possible, I will try to rely on other sources instead of that biography!--FeralOink (talk) 23:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wasn't going to revert you a second time... if you can dig up some more sources for the "Astronaut" section, we can co-nominate the article for Featured. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A while ago, you edited Sixteenth Air Force to replace "inactivate" with "deactivate." Inactivate is the proper term for organizational actions for USAF units. See the glossary of terms in Maurer, Maurer, ed. (1982) [1969]. Combat Squadrons of the Air Force, World War II (PDF) (reprint ed.). Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History. ISBN 0-405-12194-6. LCCN 70605402. OCLC 72556. Retrieved December 17, 2016. or Ravenstein, Charles A. (1984). Air Force Combat Wings, Lineage & Honors Histories 1947-1977 (PDF). Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History. ISBN 0-912799-12-9. Retrieved December 17, 2016. Lineagegeek (talk) 12:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lineagegeek, thank you for letting me know, and sourcing it. There was at least one other word like that, i.e. a proper term that had the appearance of being ungrammatical because I wasn't adequately informed of the military use / context. I tried to go back and repair the damage I had done. I didn't even know about this one. I'm sorry! The military articles are NOT easy to edit in general! I learned my lesson that day, as I spent hours realizing that things like air forces get retired, then resurrected, moved to other home locations etc.!--FeralOink (talk) 16:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wouldn't call it "damage", even semi-official sources do the same thing. Lineagegeek (talk) 19:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC) BTW, (in view of your username) are you aware of a tactic used by the Luftwaffe during World War II, called Wilde Sau? Lineagegeek (talk) 19:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh wow, thank you so much for sharing that with me! I love piggies, boars, oinkers of all kinds. That was a clever name AND tactic by the Luftwaffe in WWII. Too bad it wasn't more effective, but it was worth a try. I feel guilty a bit for saying that, but Wilde Sau and the Desert Fox were kind of awesome.--FeralOink (talk) 14:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello I saw you have recently commented on the Clearview AI page. I just did a major rework and I am hoping you to get your input? Czarking0 (talk) 20:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for stopping by, Czarking0. I'm glad to hear that you did some work on the article. I had made some superficial improvements but realized it needed a major re-write, or better yet, rework as you phrased it. Clearview is distinct as it has a high degree of accuracy per NIST, unlike some alternatives in that space, e.g. DataWorks+ (if I got the name right). I'll mosey over right now and have a look at your work! I'll leave feedback on the article talk page, in a new section or a relevant existing section if any.--FeralOink (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

I saw your ping with questions about the Knowledge Equity Fund, but for the life of me I cannot find the the page today. Can you please give a me a link to it? Thank you. Victoria (talk) 08:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FeralOink:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you see people posting personal information like at Talk:David Barnea, the appropriate thing to do is revert the edits and then contact Wikipedia:Oversight to make sure the information is hidden from public view (I've already done that here). Posting to WP:AIV just makes the information more visible (and no blocks are necessary especially since it's been a few months since the IPs have edited). Galobtter (talk) 17:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Galobtter, ah okay! I didn't know what to do. I wanted to get rid of that information, so that it wasn't publicly visible, ASAP. The article itself is highly-viewed. It didn't occur to me that posting to WP:AIV would have the unintentional effect of alerting others (internally, so to speak), en masse, about the existence of the information! I have never used WP:Oversight before as I am weary of being chided for making a fuss over something improperly, despite having been an editor for almost 12 years. Thank you for being helpful and doing so in a friendly manner!--FeralOink (talk) 18:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi FeralOink, I'm working on updates for Steven Tananbaum, hedge fund manager and chief investment officer at GoldenTree Asset Management. I noticed that you are a member of WikiProject Finance & Investment and WikiProject Economics, and thought you may be interested in reviewing my edit request on Steven Tananbaum's talk page. I'd be glad to discuss any of the points and appreciate your assistance. Thank you, Alexandra at L Strategies (talk) 15:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alexandra, I'll be glad to review your edit request. Given your user name, I gather that you are a COI editor. That's not a problem. I don't see any indication that you are a COI editor on your talk page, but let's continue discussion on the article talk page.--FeralOink (talk) 15:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I am a COI editor and have disclosed here and on Steven Tananbaum’s talk page. I look forward to your input at the article talk page. Thank you! Alexandra at L Strategies (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, FeralOink. Thank you for working on Steven Tananbaum's page. At the time, you mentioned that you had made some clean-up edits to the article and that you'd look at the remaining requests on the talk page in the next few days. If you have time to review, I would really appreciate your input and assistance with implementing the edits. Thanks so much, Alexandra at L Strategies (talk) 22:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Alexandra at L Strategies I will have another go at it in the next few days. Thank you for reminding me! I'll ping you when I'm done.--FeralOink (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi FeralOink, thank you very much for taking the time to review and implement my requests. I am working on further suggestions for the page and plan to post a new edit request on the article talk page soon. I hope to be back in touch then. Thanks again! Alexandra at L Strategies (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi FeralOink, thanks again for your previous work on Steven Tananbaum. I recently posted some additional requests on the article talk page. I'd greatly appreciate your input on my suggestions and assistance with the edits. Thanks so much, Alexandra at L Strategies (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey @FeralOink, I was cleaning up my talk page archive and stumbled onto a couple of our previous threads. It reminded me of all the work you do here and how kind you were to me in the past. I hope this year brings you growth, and happiness. If you ever need anything from me my talk page is always open. Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devon Archer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devon Archer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 16:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thank you for your thanks lol. It’s the first time anyone has ever thanked me for trying to accurately label anti-semitism there. That article is actually the reason I refused to edit Wikipedia for years, due to the bullying I received. I would suggest you’re potentially putting yourself in a precarious position editing it. That article is hated by Left-leaning editors. People will argue all day & night about whether it’s really anti semitism. I provided dozens of additional sources and my edits were still reverted, removing hundreds of lines of sourced wording Manboobies (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]