Hello, Fieldmarshalgoldenboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Fieldmarshalgoldenboy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type ((help me)) on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Fieldmarshalgoldenboy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. S0091 (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the reason why it is been deleted Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 22:33, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:UPNOT. S0091 (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change the date of an "unreferenced section" tag in the article Iwo, Osun to June 2003? The article didn't even exist at that time, let alone have that tag in it. JBW (talk) 22:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have not answered my question, and have removed the tag for references, even though nothing in the section is referenced except the post code. JBW (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have now checked the reference cited for the post code, and it does not mention Iwo, so in fact nothing in the article section is referenced. I shall therefore restore the tag; please don't remove it again without providing citations to reliable sources for a significant amount of the content of the section. JBW (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me to removed the unreferenced section, i wanted to remove the section but it was a mistake that I input the date. Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 07:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I accept that the thing about the date was a mistake. Thanks for explaining that. We all make mistakes, but at first I thought you must be doing it for some reason that I didn't see.

I probably can't give you much help with the unreferenced section, as I don't know anything about Iwo, and I'm not willing to put a lot of time into learning about it so that I can edit the article, but I'll have a quick look, and if I find anything that seems to me to be useful as a reference then I'll add it. JBW (talk) 17:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I don't understand anything like unreferenced section in the page. So as to no more about the reference section because I am from Iwo. And I know in and out of the city, and I am also a prince from Iwo. Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking an article should contain a link to another article only if one or other of the following two conditions applies: (1) the linked article contains further information about the subject of the linking article, or (2) readers are likely to need explanation of the meaning of the word or expression to which the link is attached. Neither of those applies to your link to Education: that article contains no information about Iwo, Osun, and it is reasonable to assume that all or nearly all readers of the article will know what education is. Adding such links is not only unnecessary, but harmful, as it can cause confusion, and studies have show that the more irrelevant links there are in an article the less likely it is that readers will follow the relevant ones, where clarification may be helpful. JBW (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for modifying my work and exposing me on what is relevant Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 16:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Osun State has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Osun State was changed by Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859401 on 2020-11-23T07:31:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't be certain why ClueBot NG reverted your editing there, but it may be because you added a list of people without any sources. You really should provide references to sources for such information. JBW (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Yoruba football team, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Torpedoi (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Oduduwa Republic (Yorùbá Nation), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 01:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was unable to put more word of documentation so as to put references. Can you help me with that Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 04:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of colleges of education in Nigeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iwo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nyanardsan was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I dont know if this is notable or not, or if the said republic is real or not, but please prove its existance by adding more sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oduduwa Republic (Yorùbá Nation) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oduduwa Republic (Yorùbá Nation), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nyanardsan (talk) 23:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fieldmarshalgoldenboy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nyanardsan (talk) 23:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Oduduwa Republic (Yorùbá Nation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://unpo.org/members/22105. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 00:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Yorùbá Nation. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – History of the Yoruba people. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of the Yoruba people. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 2A01:4C8:64:C8BC:880E:ED5B:6406:DB59 (talk) 18:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am having issue with putting of reference. I have the source and reference please bear it with me until I solved the problem facing my system so as to succefully incite the references Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also this one is different from history of Yorùbá because this one is a sovereign country Yorùbá people are agitating for Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 19:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Fieldmarshalgoldenboy, I want to show my appreciation for your interest in being a new contributor to the Yoruba people article here at Wikipedia. If you have any questions, I will be glad to offer you assistance as a fellow editor. Godspeed

I want to create another article for Yoruba people titled Yoruba Nation a soverign state yet to get independence. But I will be using the history which is similar to Yoruba people. And I will kindly like your help. To move this article forward because they used to delete my article because it's has the same motive with others but it's different. Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 06:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Yorùbá Nation, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yorùbá Nation is not a vandalism of any pages but an independent page which is the country the Yoruba people are agitating for. it's different from the history of Yoruba and others Yorùbá people Wikipedia page and if you deleted it. it will be like you are definitely declare a total war of human rights to the Yorùbá people. it's better you remove the speedy deletion. Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure that the article is not a hoax, and the speedy deletion nomination as a hoax has, rightly, been removed. However, it is not yet suitable as an article, for at least two reasons: it reads like unambiguous promotion of the concept of "Yorùbá Nation", rather than being written from a neutral point of view, and it is not written in coherent English. Although the speedy deletion nomination as a hoax has been removed, the article could still be speedily deleted as promotional. To give you a chance to prevent that from happening I shall move it to Draft:Yorùbá Nation, where you can work on it to make it suitable as an article, and then submit it for review when you think it's ready. It also seems that WIKIPEDIA:Conflict of interest may apply to you, so you should read it (if you haven't already) and be careful to follow its advice. JBW (talk) 21:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft claims it's a sovereign country, but there are no sources backing that up.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yorùbá Nation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yorùbá Nation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 20:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yorùbá Nation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yorùbá Nation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft which I requested to be converted to an article was written based on the rules and was written on a neutral edge. Which references contains verifiable website, journal and publications Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 16:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Think Yoruba First and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Think Yoruba First, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft which I requested to be converted to an article was written based on the rules and was written on a neutral edge. Which references contains verifiable website, journal and publications

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero changes made after previous submission. If this happens again, then the draft will be rejected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Think Yoruba First and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Think Yoruba First, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 16:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Minor improvements made, but still highly promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Think Yoruba First and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Think Yoruba First, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 20:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Think Yoruba First, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft article is talking about the meaning of what is written in the article. Crossed check it very well Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 20:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Yorùbá Nation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my first nor my second article Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 21:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might copy this content to a User space sandbox before it gets deleted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

Deb (talk) 09:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know with the statement you just used, you are praticalizing racism because where is the page that I abuse. I edit a page based on a real reason and you are telling me that I abuse a page which abuse did I used you better watch your statement next time. Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Bbb23 (talk) 22:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• If you make another statement like the one above, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been trying to improve Wikipedia with the use of my experience with things, I have not been able to go outside my area which I think it's important to contribute about it. Also I know Wikipedia can't know everything it's the people in the background that sees what is happening in the localities through a verified source the Wikipedia have been able to grow. Also I have been contributing for the past year with the aim of developing the Wikipedia, also I have not have a personal interest nor attacking a personalities but during when I am drafting and creating my nineth article I was been attacked before been blocked because I was fighting for my right. I wish that you for seen what I have passed through during my contribution days thanks for your understanding. Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not for documenting personal knowledge, but for summarizing independent reliable sources. Since you only seem interested in fighting for your rights, there are no grounds to remove the block. When you understand that you have no right to edit this privately operated website, and that this is a collaborative, civil environment, you may then request unblock and tell us how your behavior will change going forward. 331dot (talk) 20:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Removed your duplicate requests. 331dot (talk) 20:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]