Ratings template: Hi, the current albums rating template has been changed to Music ratings template. Check template:music ratings--Majash2020 (talk) 09:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

warn[edit]

Y ur warning me? stop vandalizing my talk page. I'm adding reception for the page Billa Pandi. Monhiroe (talk) 09:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). —Kusma (talk) 09:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

To follow up on the above blocks - it appears you are using automated tools to revert well-meaning editors. Even if you are unblocked, I strongly suggest that you do not continue disruptive use of such tools, or you will likely be re-blocked by any uninvolved admin. - jc37 09:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Finbar Alma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You appear to have made a mistake, I was reverting vandalism. Please rectify this immediately or I will sue for damages

Decline reason:

You have now made things worse by making a legal threat, which is not permitted. We cannot stop you from using your country's legal system according to its laws, but you may not make legal threats on Wikipedia or edit if you have a legal action underway. You can pursue your grievances in the courts or using Wikipedia processes, but not both. You will now need to unequivocally withdraw your threat as part of being unblocked. 331dot (talk) 10:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll let someone else decline the above, but you may wish to edit your request per WP:NLT - jc37 09:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. I said what I meant and I meant what I said! Finbar Alma (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were reverting edits at a rapid rate, without checking whether they were vandalism or not. This is not helpful. —Kusma (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't checking because I was specifically using the Recent Changes filters provided. How is it my fault if these are not setup correctly and fail to omit good edits? How is it fair to block me without even giving me a chance?!? Finbar Alma (talk) 09:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocking you to prevent disruption to the encyclopaedia. You rapidly made bad edits and sent out incorrect warnings, claiming that people were vandalizing Wikipedia. —Kusma (talk) 09:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are abusing your power and you know it. You could have pointed out that I was reverting good edits and given me a chance to rectify (I didn't know the RC filters don't work properly). But instead you decide to block me forever. How is that not a gross abuse of power? You should be ashamed! Finbar Alma (talk) 10:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Finbar Alma this editor is vending others talk page. As I'm adding the reception for the page this editor come and vandalizing. This should block. Monhiroe (talk) 10:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In English? Finbar Alma (talk) 11:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Finbar Alma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Very well then. Without prejudice, I unequivocally retract my threat of legal action

Decline reason:

You need to withdraw with prejudice. Without prejudice means you retain the option to resume that specific legal action and essentially means your threat is still active. Additionally, the comments you have left above make it impossible to lift your block at this time, even if you properly withdraw your legal threat. Yamla (talk) 11:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Finbar Alma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As you wish Yamla, I withdraw with prejdice. I can categorically declare that there will be no legal action taken against Wikipedia or any of its editors. I apologise for any comments left above, I was extremely frustrated at the time but am now calm enough to see the errors of my ways. I will not be blindly reverting any changes at all in the future without full inspection of the quality beforehand. Please consider giving me another chance

Decline reason:

Confirmed LTA. Please do one Hamish. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]