Hello the recent edits made in the personal life section are not correct. Can u please have a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.23.240.29 (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you should read the Hindustan times article properly, it is explained that he leaves the show because he wanted, and because the contract was over, grover also said that he could file a defamtion suit against the channel, also I don't think it is necessary to put the name of the person who replaced him. That is not relevant to his biographical page. That person continued with the show he left. He has no link to Karan Singh Grover what so ever. Please do reply soon. I did make an edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I-am-unwritten (talk • contribs) 15:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tiger Mom.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! みんな空の下 (トーク) 04:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! FireflySixtySeven, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chromotropism.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! みんな空の下 (トーク) 09:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tiger Mom.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 11:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger Mom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Mom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I am One of Many (talk) 19:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ain't nobody got time for that, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Technical 13 (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, FireflySixtySeven! Thank you for your contributions. I am Prabash.A and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type ((helpme)) at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Prabash.Akmeemana 12:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ebba Tesdorpf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to German and Hanseatic

Basic dress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Accessories

Heinrich Schnee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Reichstag

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfred Lichtwark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Altona and Eppendorf

Gustav Ehrhart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to University of Frankfurt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gottfried Wilhelm Fink (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to German

Leo Arons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to November Revolution

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gustav Langenscheidt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Phonetic alphabet, James Hamilton, Henry Lloyd and Daniel Sanders

Charlotte Bühler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diaries

Langenscheidt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daniel Sanders

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ernst Peschl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Brunswick and Complex variables

Rudolf Berlin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Extirpation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jeremias Friedrich Reuß (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Provost and Denkendorf

Molly Cramer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Primroses

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Moritz Ludwig Frankenheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Reciprocal and Crystallographer

Georges Valmier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to French

Gotthardt Kuehl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Art Academy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruffinihaus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Canopy and Spiral staircase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I've begun my editing of your draft, but as it led me to question the quality of the infos, I would urge you not to publish it in main yet. I've asked the original author of most on the French article for clarifications, but, for example, I can't find any mention of "François Matt Cabaner" anywhere but on WP mirrors. There is a truncated version of his name there, so I don't say it bogus, but I'd like a confirmation first.

Regards, Esprit Fugace (talk) 10:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's okay, the author put the exact quote from his source in the article, it's much clearer now what he meant. I've finished editing your draft. Regards, Esprit Fugace (talk) 19:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elsa Neumann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polarization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited C. Alfred "Chief" Anderson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ardmore and Patrick H. Brady (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erika Fromm, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gestalt theory, University of Frankfurt and Intuition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iris Runge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electron tube (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hilda Hänchen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fritz Goos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Absorption, Emission, Gymnasium and Current

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Margarete Kahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gymnasium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruno Schiavi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian embassy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marga Faulstich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Binocular (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. You may want to take a look; I'd say it's ready for the mainspace. Huon (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Knowledge of human nature, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Character, Intuition and First impression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

why were my edits deemed "unconstructive"? Can my edits be reinstated? ~~Negritaboricua — Preceding unsigned comment added by Negritaborica (talk • contribs) 23:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) There are a couple of reasons why those edits were not helpful.

• The first source of the "Fame in Virtual World" section predates the YouTube video and thus cannot discuss it. Thus it's irrelevant to this article.
• The "Spread" section and the remainder of the "Fame in Virtual World" section were mostly based on primary sources: The source for her appearance at X is a video of her at X, not an independent source discussing her appearances.
• Even worse, parts of those sections were a mix of speculation and original research, such as the comments about how one may be led "to assume she has in fact taken the reigns of the redistribustion of her image and catch phrases".
• Knowyourmeme is not a reliable source by Wikipedia's standards; it's not subject to editorial oversight. Neither is YouTube.
• The tone was inappropriate. Wikipedia articles should never address the reader ("if you go...").

For all of these reasons combined, your edit was reverted. Huon (talk) 00:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, that seems to be gone. Thanks for tagging the copyvio. I've no idea whether you should have listed it on today's list or the older one, I'm sure someone will sort that out. But - just for another time, if ever there is one - you should really have notified the editor. There's a pre-formatted message for that purpose which appears in the copyvio template after you've placed it. That then gives that person 7 days to respond. Thanks again, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PureWow, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Liz Smith and Bob Pittman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Peter's Cathedral (Osnabrück), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romanesque and Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I did not send out your code because I could not identify your past accounts and confirm the status, please ping or message me when you can or if you would do this to confirm your accounts. Thank you. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 7 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anatol (play), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the first act of the 1893 play Anatol earned playwright Arthur Schnitzler the title of "psychological depth researcher" from Sigmund Freud? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anatol (play). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

German personalities in art and science
Thank you for quality articles such as Anatol and Nikolaikirche, Stralsund, for gnomish work, improving articles on German personalities in art and science, adding categories, moving pages, for welcoming new users, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A year ago, you were the 849th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Six years ago, you were recipient no. 849 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johanna Schopenhauer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FireflySixtySeven. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 14:34, 14 May 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nariman Mehta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How do i submit an article and approved draft to article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.18.241 (talk) 04:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Group mind, Power, Object, Church, Trend and Impulse

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FireflySixtySeven. You have new messages at Zambuk074's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

I added some info to the george hanley post that should make the subject's notability more clear. Contented300 (talk) 17:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 17 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Adele Schopenhauer, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Adele Schopenhauer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FireflySixtySeven. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — ((U|Technical 13)) ^{(e • t • c)} 14:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

Well... Not what I was hoping for using Twinkle... This should be a "Please see" request for your interaction on WP:THQ#Account Verificaction. Thanks. — ((U|Technical 13)) ^{(e • t • c)} 14:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Paul Patterson (neuroscientist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pasadena and Depression

The Bunker Diary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Young adult

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If these userpage edits are unwanted and you would like to have your userpage protected, please just say. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the note, Anna Frodesiak. While those edits are certainly unwanted, the ones by 115.69.215.26 and Mahabubul222 seem unintentional; they seem to have got confused between my userpage and Crystal Ball (fashion brand), which I declined at AfC. The one by Favonanizoonanian seems like vandalism. I'll keep your offer in mind and ask you to protect my userpage if this continues, but for now I think I will let it stay as it is. FireflySixtySeven (talk) 16:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Absolutely. I wasn't sure how you felt about it, so I thought I'd offer. Best wishes and happy editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Relativityman (talk · contribs)
  • User:Relativityman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The first review of my article has rejected it, "needs edit". But I cannot find it or the reviewers remarks. Where are they? Relativityman (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) The reviewer's comments are at the top of the draft, within the red "submission declined" message box. I'd add that the draft reads like original research to me, something Wikipedia is not the place for. For example, "In many text books, for example^[10] both mass and speed are increased when energy is added, which violates the principle of conservation of energy and is a confusion of frames of reference." Says who? Surely not the textbook you provide as an example? Or "G changes with elevation" - says who? Are you sure you aren't confusing the gravitational constant G with the gravity of Earth g? Huon (talk) 11:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Steven C. Price (talk · contribs)
  • User:Steven C. Price (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Steven C. Price 18:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

This process is confusing! I was "talking" with another editor, trying to address their concern, but then you rejected the re-submission without any explanation, and my conversation with the previous reviewer is still "hanging," as far as I know. That reviewer had said that if there was a media review then this would put the article in the "notable" category. I supplied a link to the media notice, but have not heard back. Unless your rejection is a statement in itself. Steven C. Price 18:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You may want to check out WP:BIO, the notability guideline for biographical articles. Of your four references, Goodreads is user-submitted content, not a reliable source with editorial oversight; Riddle's website clearly is not an independent source on Riddle, and http://ebookfriendly.com/top-kindle-indie-bestsellers/ is some automatically-updated page which does not represent significant coverage - it doesn't even write a single sentence about Riddle. Those sources don't show that Riddle has been written about in some detail in reliable third-party sources, as would be required. In fact, authors of only self-published books are rather unlikely to meet Wikipedia's standards of notability. Huon (talk) 19:17, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Geometric Poisson distribution

added a link pointing to Expectation

Richard Stuttaford

added a link pointing to William Thorne

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hay, I have made editions to the article - included more sources and notability proofs, could you come by to give your opinion please. Ethan Cresdee (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:06, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) The draft has been submitted again, but it still has severe problems. For example, many of the references discuss Fantastic Services, not Fantastic Cleaners. Is the latter a subsidiary of the former? Dit the company change its name, and if so, what's the current name? The article doesn't say, and at a glance the sources don't say so either. Even worse, quite a few of the sources are only passing mentions, are not reliable or are not independent. Those will not help establish notability. Yet worse, significand amounts of (rather promotional) content don't cite any sources at all. Huon (talk) 15:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Leaning Tower of Toruń at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FireflySixtySeven Could you narrow down the reason for rejection of Evolution, entropy and the second law of thermodynamics? 'What Wikipedia is not' has eleven categories of what is not to be published. Some I can eliminate but I’m not sure if others are applicable or not. LEBOLTZMANN2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LEBOLTZMANN2 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) @LEBOLTZMANN2: Your draft reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. We already have very well-developed articles on entropy and evolution; the intersection of those topics is not itself notable enough for yet another article. Furthermore, parts of your draft look like original research, particularly when you claim that non-living open systems cannot show a significant decrease of entropy. Do you really think Saturn and its rings, or the ice-covered oceans on Europa, show more entropy than the dust clouds they developed from? Which reliable source supports that part of your draft? Huon (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 14 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leaning Tower of Toruń, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that legend has it that a Teutonic Knight built the Leaning Tower of Toruń as punishment for falling in love with a woman, the tower's tilt signifying his deviant conduct? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leaning Tower of Toruń. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ontario County Courthouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ontario County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited C–H···O interaction, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Directionality, Armstrong and Dipole moment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Mustansariqbal (talk · contribs)
  • User:Mustansariqbal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Mustansar Iqbal 15:58, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Hi there,

i have updated the article but got declined from the admin on the basis of adequate reference. I just discover that there is a way of acceptability for notable company, but wondering how should i establish the company is notable. Regards

(talk page stalker) Notability is established by showing that the company has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources such as newspapers or reputable trade magazines. For example, the Mirror article would be a good source for the allegation that the company systematically scams its customers - but somehow that didn't make its way into the draft. I wonder why not? Instead you wrote "WeBuyCarsToday stick with their word" - something explicitly contradicted by a reliable source which says company executives have ordered the employees to offer "up to 30 per cent LESS than the website price". Huon (talk) 20:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peurise Awe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Plait and Bushing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Fixed (t) Josve05a (c) 22:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Horizontechs (talk · contribs)
  • User:Horizontechs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Horizontechs (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

HAVE THE REFERENCES REQUESTED WHICH ARE FOR WIKEPEDIA USE ONLY, NOT TOBE PUBLISHED.

(talk page stalker) I'll reply on your talk page. Huon (talk) 18:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monika Kapil Mohta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Eichmann Before Jerusalem, FireflySixtySeven!

Wikipedia editor SantiLak just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good article, just remember there is always room for expansion

To reply, leave a comment on SantiLak's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Umemulo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zulu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Double Tower, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gateway and Oblong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FireflySixtySeven. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Adam Matthew account signup.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

HazelAB (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, With regard to the above (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reginald%27s_Tower) I have a reference from a recently published book by the Waterford City historian and Director of the Waterford museum saying that "Reginald's Tower is the oldest civic building in Ireland" and it also states that "The tower is the only urban monument in Ireland to retain its Norse of Viking name" - McEneaney, Eamonn (2001). Discover Waterford. O'Brien Press.p. 70. (ISBN 9780862786564.)

I would like to place that in the first paragraph since its present form depreciates its true story. I would like to replace the present text with those two lines. Nmwalsh (talk) 09:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 14 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reginald's Tower, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Reginald's Tower in Ireland has served as a fortified tower, a mint, a prison, a military storehouse, an air raid shelter, and a museum? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reginald's Tower. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Both the box width and the potential copyvio. Many thanks. I used Earwig;s tool and it never showed the copyvio up at all. The other tool does. Fiddle Faddle 20:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FireflySixtySeven. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using ((db-g12|url=URL of source)). If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with ((subst:copyvio|url=URL of source)).

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).Reply[reply]

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• William A. Kelley (talk · contribs)
  • User:William A. Kelley (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

You just failed my article, and I have questions.

First, I wrote the article because when I followed citations to this book, many of the citations were not in the book. So when I say these citations are not in the book, that is certainly verifiable, not opinion, nor is it original research. They are easily verified by text search.

As to the verifiable source. This book is Carnot's only book period, and Kelvin's section is his take, not mine, on Carnot's work. It is available from multiple sources, primarily google books, which are public and not being challenged for authenticity.

While the book is several hundred pages, I have read it several times, done multiple searches, and instead of finding text supporting various citations back to this work, instead I find many passages directly contradicting other wikipedia citations. The most notable contradictions I cited as a quote, also easily verifiable.

So I would much appreciate knowing in some more detail which sections you found unsupported, or being my opinion rather than the book's contents.

I'm more than happy to pair down the article to as pure a reflection of the book as necessary to satisfy guidelines. It would be helpful to know what parts of the article you found objectionable.

It was my intent to make clear article covering what the book did and did not say about come key points it is often cited for. It is often cited on wikepedia and elsewhere, and often incorrectly, and it is indeed those other wikipedia citations which are unverifiable, because they directly contradict Carnot and Kelvin's book.

thank you for taking the time to review my article.

William A. Kelley (talk) 04:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) I think you may be misinterpreting Wikipedia's concept of "original research". For example, you claim, in a bold headline, "Unfortunately, many of those citations are incorrect." - says who? Yourself? The source for that section is the book itself, which I rather don't expect to discuss the correctness of citations to itself. There are multiple other parts in the draft I'd immediately tag with a ((citation needed)) tag. Take for example, "For a compressed air engine, the "Carnot Limit" is 0%, meaning they don't work at all." - says who? Wouldn't the correct explanation rather be that, while the compressed air engine works, it's not a heat engine? I could go on and point out other examples, but the basic problem is that your draft largely does not discuss Carnot's book, explaining its content, history, impact and assessment by the scientific community based on third-party sources, but rather is an essay that argues significant parts of modern physics are wrong ("Talk to your engineer, not your physicist, to improve your engines"), based on your personal interpretation. Huon (talk) 11:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (consult) @ 21:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FireFly67, some time ago you added a notability tag to an article I submitted, title=Susan_Anderson_(psychotherapist). I have added additional references. Could you please take a look at the article again and remove the tag if the notability standard has now been met? Thank you. Livingmegler (talk) 01:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) At a glance I'm not sure those additional sources help much. You now have multiple sources for the same statements, but on the other hand, entire paragraphs still don't cite any sources at all - and those seem to be the paragraphs that actually focus on Anderson herself, not her work. And while I haven't checked them all, I don't think many of the sources discuss Anderson in any detail. For example, this source gives one quote and doesn't say more about Anderson than that she was the author of that quote. Huon (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 7 Cups of Tea, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Y Combinator, Startup and Emotional distress. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your extra sources don't add any meaning to the article. It still doesn't say anything except how beneficial it is.Rathfelder (talk) 19:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) Those sources suffice to establish notability. You're welcome to expand the article. Huon (talk) 20:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There's nothing wrong with saying how beneficial it is if sources have reported on that. I don't see what the problem is. The burden lies on the one who wants it kept, though. ekips39 (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agnete Bræstrup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FireflySixtySeven,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:

• Please make sure that you can still log in to your Newspapers.com account. If you are having trouble let me know.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. Also, keep in mind that part of Newspapers.com is open access via the clipping function. Clippings allow you to identify particular articles, extract them from the original full sheet newspaper, and share them through unique URLs. Wikipedia users who click on a clipping link in your citation list will be able to access that particular article, and the full page of the paper if they come from the clipping, without needing to subscribe to Newspapers.com. For more information about how to use clippings, see http://www.newspapers.com/basics/#h-clips .
• Do you write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let me know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you,

Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FireflySixtySeven,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Adam Matthew through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:

• Please make sure that you can still log in to your Adam Matthew account. If you are having trouble let me know.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Do you write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let me know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you, Wikipedia Library Adam Matthew account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 13:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You should have received an email from me regarding AAAS a few weeks ago - can you please fill out the form linked from that email? If you did not receive the email (check your spam folder), let me know. Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 17:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Nikkimaria, I've filled out the form, sorry for not attending to this earlier. FireflySixtySeven (talk) 18:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your free one-year account with Newspapers.com will end on August 20 2015. Newspapers.com has offered to extend existing accounts by another year. If you wish to keep your account until August 20 2016, please add your name to the Account Renewal list here. I'll let Newspapers.com customer support know, and they will extend your subscription. If you don't want to keep your account for another year, you don't have to do anything. Your account will expire unless I hear from you that you want to keep it. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions there. Please stay engaged so that we don't end up with an article that sweeps critical facts under the rug. --PPX (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clara Belle Williams, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Las Cruces and Booker T. Washington School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi F67, I'm curious about this edit. Where's the watermark in this image? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Cyphoidbomb, the image at that time was the older version of this commons image, which has a watermark. FireflySixtySeven (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm an idiot. Thanks Firefly. :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Firefly67 - how are you liking your access to AAAS? Just wanted to remind you that it will be coming up for renewal in June, so if you find access beneficial, add your name to the account renewal list here. Thanks --^{Atsme📞📧} 00:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Stronger Together (book), FireflySixtySeven!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating!

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, FireflySixtySeven. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would really like to know what the issue is with a non-bias version. Those who convert back to the conclusion of "thus proving herself to be out of touch" contribute no insight to what self-help books are in general. An editor should not form these conclusions on a Wikipedia page because they are absolutely bias and you can see right through it (this because of her privilege). Please, lets work on a solution. Miadolcevita1 (talk) 21:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Miadolcevita1: Welcome to Wikipedia! The content in Wikipedia articles should follow the verifiability policy, which states that content should be attributed to a reliable source. Another editor has expanded the section and added more citations to sources with other opinions. If you think that the article should say something different, you should support your changes with a source. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 21:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. FireflySixtySeven, thanks for creating Lewis Wolberg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've tagged this article as it needs a bit more work on it, please. Please add further information from the NY Times obituary to support notability, including his academic positions (professor/dean etc), and a fully referenced selected publications list. Any other references you can supply would be of use, too. Many thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 13:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. FireflySixtySeven, thanks for creating Hypnoanalysis!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for creating this article. As it stands, the article doesn't convey a notable branch of a medical science deserving of its own article. If you want to avoid criticism, and nomination for deletion, or merging with psychoanalysis or hypnosis, may I suggest you expand on it and demonstrate that there are enough reliable sources to show it's not just a fancy name for an existing process. I know nothing about the subject, but it surprises me that there is not already an article on it if it is a genuinely notable subject. Sorry to sound so negative, but hopefully this feedback will be of help. You might find that using your own user sandbox to develop an article before it goes 'live' can be a way of avoiding criticism before you've finished actually creating the content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meddlesome priest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meddlesome priest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SkyWarrior 16:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest? is an obvious WP:COATRACK. It would help if you would actually develop the idea and write decent content rather than leave us with another sad-looking article, of which we already have too many. The AfD nom should not have been withdrawn. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Firefly67. I just wanted to drop in and encourage you to keep working on the section that you had initiated. It's good work that deserves to be integrated into the article. --[[PPX]] (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating What Happened (Hillary Clinton book), FireflySixtySeven!

Wikipedia editor Megalibrarygirl just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I hope you'll be expanding on this stub! The book was trending on Twitter, so this will get a lot of hits.

To reply, leave a comment on Megalibrarygirl's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, just a little note you can add book covers easily using WP:FILEUPLOADWIZARD. Thanks for the new Arundhati Roy novel article. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FireflySixtySeven. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FireflySixtySeven. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Hustle culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence for general use of this term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hustle culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hustle culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nariman Mehta, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nariman Mehta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]