This user may have left Wikipedia. FockeWulf FW 190 has not edited Wikipedia since 2 November 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi FockeWulf FW 190! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have message at the Teahouse. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 19:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FockeWulf FW 190 (nice user name), and welcome to Wikipedia. Based on your edits, I think it'd be a good idea for you to check out the military history Wikiproject, a place where editors interested in Military history can ask each other questions and work together. I'm part of it myself (my interests are primarily naval history) and I think it's well worth joining. Howicus (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: ((WPMILHIST Announcements)).
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 07:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your edit on TDL-4. Note however that you shouldn't delete citations just because the URL is dead; instead try to repair it. ··gracefool 💬 20:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at FockeWulf FW 190's talk page. Thanks for the information gracefool :) FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I reverted some of your last revisions, because these things are already present in the navbox in bottom of the article. So there's no reason to double it. Anyway thank you for your interest in editing these articles! --Rezonansowy_akaRezy (talk | contribs) 15:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Instead of this you can consider to add a new item to the list in the navbox, it's right here: ((Hacking in the 1980s)). For example: 1260 (computer virus), has been created in 1989, it can be included in this navbox, so I added it and included the navbox in the bottom of that article. --Rezonansowy_akaRezy (talk | contribs) 16:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I found a nice guideline on it – MOS:SEEALSO. It's a part of a Wikipedia's Manual of Style. There are many tips how to improve the Wikipedia and deal with articles issues. If you have any questions, just ask me! --Rezonansowy_akaRezy (talk | contribs) 16:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the tips Rezonansowy I really appreciate it. It will improve my editing . FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I definitely think it's worth doing. That said, I also definitely don't have time in the foreseeable future. If you led the charge, I'd probably join in.  :-) Risc64 (talk) 23:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FockeWulf FW 190: Thank your for your contributions in Computer virus, that was a neat edit, did not focus on that, any way, I would like to make that article reach good article standards, I have done some improvements that makes it a B class article right now, can you please guide me on that? it's my first GA goal. 967Bytes (Contact) 17:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Glad you liked my user name, and I hope you know what do I mean exactly by 967Bytes :) . As for the article, Yep, the article really needs some focused work, and that's why it will my first GA project in WP. This is the current structure first the definition then the content:

1. Vulnerabilities and infection vectors
   1. Software bugs
   2. Social engineering and poor security practices
   3. Vulnerability of different operating systems to viruses

1. Infection targets and replication techniques
   1. Resident vs. non-resident viruses
   2. Macro viruses
   3. Boot sector viruses

1. Stealth strategies
   1. Read request intercepts
   2. Self-modification
      1. Encrypted viruses
      2. Polymorphic code
      3. Metamorphic code

1. Countermeasures
   1. Antivirus software
   2. Recovery strategies and methods
      1. Virus removal
      2. Operating system reinstallation

1. Historical development
   1. Early academic work on self-replicating programs
   2. The first computer viruses
   3. Viruses and the Internet

OK so I suppose I should

• redefine the computer virus, where I will make the shortest most effective definition then a full stop followed by important information and facts in the first section.
• as for the structure (outline) it's most important for me to know what contents to write before starting the project, here is an outline draft:

the definition (shorted)

1. Background (about overall computer/network security)
2. Overview (overview of a virus/ reason for making viruses)
3. History (Historical development)
   1. Early academic work on self-replicating programs
   2. The first computer viruses
   3. Viruses and the Internet

1. Virus operation/function
   1. Virus parts
      1. Infection mechanism
      2. Trigger
      3. Pay load
   2. Virus life time
      1. Dormant phase
      2. Propagation phase
      3. Triggering phase
      4. Execution phase
   3. Virus challenges
      1. Performance challenges
         1. Code optimization
         2. Double-infection checking
      2. Antivirus challenges

1. Virus classifications
   1. By target
      1. File infecter
         1. resident/Memory resident
         2. non resident/direct
            1. Overwriting virus
            2. Companion virus
            3. Parasitic infectors (Prepending, Appending)
      2. Boot sector Viruses
      3. Operating system virus
      4. Macro viruses
      5. Program/File Infecter
      6. Multipartite/multiple characteristics
   2. By infection mechanism/concealment strategy
      1. Encrypted/Armored virus
      2. Stealth virus
      3. Polymorphic virus
      4. Metamorphic virus

1. challenges/Vulnerabilities and infection vectors
   1. 1. Software bugs
      2. Social engineering and poor security practices
      3. Vulnerability of different operating systems to viruses

1. Countermeasures
   1. prior infection
      1. Practices and policies (training & backup)
      2. Antivirus software
   2. upon infection
      1. Recovery strategies and methods
      2. Virus removal
      3. Operating system re-installation

+images of infections + example codes of viruses + pictorial clarification will be used. 967Bytes (Contact) 18:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great job noticing the "badware" in the article malware, I visited that website and was suspicious and was about to remove it, searched books about it and did not find any, though of good faith and left it there :D . 967Bytes (Contact) 18:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Computer virus wont be soon a featured article, it will take more time than I thought :/, English good/featured article standards are way too amazing ^_^, I have downloaded so far Kali Linux latest version and started making virus source codes in order to post it in the article, but the encrypted virus -in order to make stealth virus- consumes a huge amount of power for long time in order to encrypt the virus, it's rain season, and as a 100% dependable on solar power (after Saudi_Arabian-led_intervention_in_Yemen bombarded all electricity power plants to pro Houthi areas) I have to stick to eco friendly applications that does not consume CPU resource :D. any ways, I am reading those books I have downloaded, I think you noticed that by the references I used:

1. Computer Network Security and Cyber Ethics - 4th Edition
2. Computer Viruses - the gist of it - Erwin Calamer
3. Guide to Computer Network Security 3rd Edition
4. Hacking Bootcamp - How to Hack Computers, Basic Security and Penetration Testing - David Maxwell
5. How to Hack Computers_ how to h - Joel Tope
6. Computer Viruses for Dummies (ISBN - 0764574183)
7. Computer Security Principles and Practice (2nd Edition)
8. Computer Security Fundamentals 2nd ed. - W. (Chuck) Easttom (Pearson, 2012) BBS
9. The Giant Black Book of Computer Viruses

can't ready them all, I just search every book for the topic I am writing on to use it as a reference, which seems they cover most of it so far. If you have any suggestion or any other good book to use please don't hesitate to post it's name here, and I will obtain it in some way :) 967Bytes (Contact) 11:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kevin Mitnick comes to mind, his books may have some information on the social aspects of a computer virus.

I'm not sure if this helps FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 15:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, FockeWulf.

I moved the list of attack tools you added to resource exhaustion attack to the above new article.

Thanks for the contribution. For what it's worth, though, it needed a lot of scrubbing. Specifically:

• there were many grammar and spelling errors
• you didn't always use full sentences
• none of the references have any information other than URLs (they should have titles, website names, access dates, etc.)
  • this problem still exists, so it'd be great if you could add the additional info (there are third-party web apps that automate this)
• some of the additions may not be notable
• relevant terms weren't wikilinked

Best, Risc64 (talk) 03:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for improving the article and creating the list.

I appreciate feedback and see some things I need to improve on.

Also could some information be shared on where I may find the web applications for references?

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 03:58, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Mobile virus a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hut 8.5 19:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Edits to CloudFlare

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, but please do not delete entire sections without giving a proper justification. There may certainly be good reasons to remove entire sections from articles, but doing so requires justification. Valid reasons for blanking sections include (but are not limited to):

• Violations of the Biographies of living people policy
• Violations of the Neutrality policy
• Violations of the No Original Research policy
• Information that does not rely on Reliable sources

Please note that I don't like it is NOT a valid reason for removing information from Wikipedia.

You may cite your reasons in the edit summary, or in the article's talk page if you need more room than the edit summary affords.

Thanks again,

Mjsa (talk) 09:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Mailinator, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TJH2018talk 20:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Page hijacking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For your work defending computer virus articles against the technical support scammers.

Since I locked them out of their favorite article, Koobface, they have been spreading to other virus articles. I protected Conficker just now. If you see another article that is getting targeted by the scammer, please leave me a note and I will semi-protect it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re your message: Done! Zombie (computer science) is likely the next one that needs semi-protection. I have put it on my watchlist. If another IP or account does the usual thing, I will semi-protect it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re your message: Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. I've been very busy outside of Wikipedia. Most of those accounts have been inactive for a very long time. The recent articles have mostly been moved to the creator's user space. I would recommend just cleaning up whatever else is suspect on the other articles. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just thought I'd let you know there are more efficient ways to revert multiple edits. You can go to the history page, click the timestamp of the last good revision, click the edit tab, enter an edit summary explaining your revert and then save your edit. Or to make it easier, you can use Twinkle or request rollback permission. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi FockeWulf FW 190. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re your message: Done times three. =) I also blocked the accounts involved with the spamming. I left the IPs unblocked as they are dynamic and no point blocking them now. I'm sure they will now move on to a different target. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I've noticed you fixing some wikilinks to avoid redirects - per WP:NOTBROKEN, there's actually no need to worry about this, in most cases. --McGeddon (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FockeWulf FW 190, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Please take care using WP:HG. The edits you rolled back were not "tests". ... richi (hello) 16:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, you removed my edit from Blitzkrieg about Pervitin. Then perhaps you should also remove that claim from page [1] ?

And did you check the Spiegel reference which I have linked therein [2] ?

I am not going to try to put it there again, I am seriously tired by wikipedia reverting every useful edit.91.232.52.167 (talk) 10:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've removed proposed deletion from the Mailinator article, as I believe the subject to be notable and improvement to be possible. I note that Spamgourmet and TrashMail also have their own articles and I think Mailinator is equally notable.

Merging all three services in to Disposable email address might make sense, but I think the best thing is to improve the article.

Zwilson (talk) 11:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Welcome!
	Welcome to the Tanks WP! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We have moved from a WP to a special project of Milhist, feel free to add yourself as a participant. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Focke-Wulf Fw 190 used as an account name seems unnecessarily militaristic and POV. Would you consider changing it? K.e.coffman (talk) 00:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please disregard - there's nothing wrong with your username. K.e.coffman is on something of a crusade around here. Parsecboy (talk) 11:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FockeWulf FW 190. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The portions of the article that you have removed seem to be very similar to present portions that can be seen on many other related articles, including CloudFlare. I do not see this as being "advertising" in either case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Austintwoods (talk • contribs) 19:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FockeWulf FW 190. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Indoona as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because it is only for articles on real persons or groups, individual animals, organisations, web content and organised events. This article's topic is not within the ambit of that list. Adam9007 (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FockeWulf FW 190. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hacking: The Art of Exploitation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

May I ask why you are removing my edits to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_LAN_messengers?

s!mpL3 LAN Messenger is a lan messenger and has a place on the page.

Thanks AoRaToS (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Could give me an explanation about removing Softros LAN messenger on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_LAN_messengers

It was here a few years, I've updated all information about this app. If my updates has any issues, let me know.

Thanks.

Viperrey (talk) 16:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To whom it might concern,

We had our social network software - mooSocial listed in the Comparison of social networking software page for a while now. We have been keeping it up to date as possible. We believe it is in the same categories with the products listed in this page. It came to our attention which you were doing cleanup of this page and removing our product listing. Could you please let me know why it was removed and if possible, what I should avoid to keep our listing from being removed in the future? Thank you in advance for your assistance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_social_networking_software&oldid=758638207

Regards, Ryan N — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryannguyen999 (talk • contribs) 08:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17#Hacking incident that arose from this plane shootdown incident. Mamasanju (talk) 15:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for removing one of the last links to me in Wikipedia! The Greg Lindahl page has been deleted like 5 times already. Greg (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FockeWulf FW 190. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Comparison of BASIC dialects".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello FockeWulf FW 190. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Minger Email Address Verification Protocol, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not an eligible subject for A7 speedy deletion. Thank you. SoWhy 14:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of tools for Denial-of-service attacks, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the speedy notification. However your text say "you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion".". There is no such button. Also the text is somewhat misleading, since it links "Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable." Speedy isn't about notability, it's about "credible claim of significance", which is basically a criterion about whether the thing actually exists or not. You may want to fix up your text, while I contest this speedy. Thanks! --grin ✎ 07:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FockeWulf FW 190. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of tools for Denial-of-service attacks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 13:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FockeWulf FW 190. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.Reply[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, FockeWulf FW 190. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord teamReply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]