Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rational number, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 07:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw your recent extension of Inequality (mathematics). You might wish to use the template ((under construction)). And you should have a look at partial order, etc., in order not to insert too much repetition. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did look at partial order, I copied because it simply is the best definition. I will change the wording, but is there anything else that needs to be done? I understand why repetition is not good, but what should I write instead? Fr.dror (talk) 11:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think a brief overview, like yours, is ok. - As another issue, you should keep in mind that the article also covers "≠", not just ordering relations. So requiring the po-axioms for "every kind of inequality" is too broad. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of countries by ratio of GDP to carbon dioxide emissions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I suggest this article is not useful to readers because: 1) The stats in the article are very detailed and out of date. 2) I doubt anyone will want to spend time updating the stats. 3) I don't think carbon intensity is a useful way to measure countries: because a very poor country with low emissions could have the same value as a very rich country with high emissions - however the poor country may need to increase its emissions without necessarily increasing its GDP - for example certain changes to the way people grow their own food to make sure they get enough to eat. Similarly some rich countries, e.g. Japan, may have much less renewable energy resources than others.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]