• Tis a shame. [1] You'll be missed. Good luck. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 14:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Wishing you all the best, wherever the future takes you.... FreplySpang 14:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hope everthing works out. Will miss seeing you around. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• WHAH? Has Francs2000 left? How come, dude? 88.105.47.17 18:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Most of his wiki friends will miss him a lot include User:Moe Epsilon.

• P.S I wish you come back to Wikipedia. *~Daniel~* ☎ 00:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hope you come back when the stress stops; I'll miss you. —Nightstallion (?) 12:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• *tear* You were the first user to welcome me way back in the day, I'm very sorry to see you go. However, much luck with your MBA and real life, I hope all goes well. -- Natalya 01:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hope all goes well for you; I'm sorry to see you go, but do what is best for you. Take care, and thank you for all your work on the project. Antandrus (talk) 15:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I can't believe you have decided to throw in the towel after so long, and so many valuable contributions. Have a rest, have a beer, and come back soon refreshed and invigorated. Giano | talk 22:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey Francs. Well, it appears another great editor has left Wikipedia. Daniel (above) was right, I will certainly miss you a lot. You cheered me up greatly whenever I was feeling blue, and made my day better whenever we talked. I hope you return one day, but until then, wherever you go, I hope you have a great time doing it. Cheers and good luck mate. — The King of Kings 21:45 July 16 '06

• See you around, Francs2000. :) Syrthiss 23:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I hope this is not another Gator1/Katefan0-type situation...05:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• I'm sorry you feel the atmosphere here is getting in the way of your ambitions. Your contributions to the project will be missed. Angela. 15:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh dear. You will be sorely missed, but first things first. Please feel free to drop round from time to time. -- ALoan (Talk) 18:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll miss our discussions on nationalistic issues :) Good Luck in life and hope to see you again some day. I also have MBA things going on. Let me know how things turn up. --Gokhan 20:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry to see you go, but I fully understand. I was gone for over a year before I finally got my steam back up and decided to re-enter the cesspool that parts of Wikipedia has become. If you never come back, take solace in the good work that you did here. If you decide to come back, you will be welcomed. User:Zoe|^(talk) 20:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Aw man, this sucks. You will be missed. the wub "?!" 22:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know you , but I've seen the work you've done. You've done a great job and will be remembered. Hopefully you may decide to come back one day. --huntersquid 22:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• You have been a great editor, administrator. You have done a lot for Wikipedia, and your legacy will always remain here. We will all miss you. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 04:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Good luck. Noisy | Talk 09:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm also really sorry to see you go, but I understand fully, the real life is always far more important. Best of luck, and hopefully we'll see you again someday. All the best -- Banes 10:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Again, sorry to see you go... Hope you return some day. All the best! —Nightstallion (?) 16:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia is having a major break down right now. I can understand francs leavin for a good cause. But Moe, things that are brought up by him are in his favor, he is correct every single time, and why I dont spend too much time on here, its true, wikipedia upholds its great laws then allows someone to break em and nothing is goin down. Shame... I only check to see how yall have yet again...made some error, against moe, i aint on much but, i do care that moe has left...Hope he comes back, he will b hearin from me by e mail. Well, if i have anymore rants, you will hear from me.....a dang shame (I would say damn but, I dunno if yall like censor or things like that).---Slipknot222 09:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I feel bad that you left. In fact, I had come to wish you on the ocassion of your first edit day. I think that real life issues are important, but still continuing the association with wikipedia would have been no impediment to your real life ambitions. Let the vandals do their tricks, we are capable of dealing with them. All the best in your real life. You may respond, if you so wish, by sending me an e-mail. Thanks and reards. --Bhadani 00:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I enjoyed our conversations. I just came back myself after a long selfemposed leave of absence for similar reason. I may leave again. --71Demon 21:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• And you're the one that welcomed me to wikipedia :( PseudoNym
• I know its late to say, but i have also recently returned. It is sad to see you go esecially since you gave me such a great welcome. Hope you achieve your goals. --Duck6 —Preceding comment was added at 10:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Um, get yer arse back here. We need you. Kingturtle (talk) 13:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Do administrators get support?, if not how can this be organised? Snowman 18:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Francs2050 is claiming you blocked this username for similiarity to his own. He has sent an e-mail to the unblocking list asking to be unblocked. He is a man with Frank as his first name and a surname begining with S and appears a legitimate new user to me. What username would be acceptable to you?Regards. Capitalistroadster 19:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The user with IP addresses beginning with 4.224, 4.225, and 136.165.88 are suspected to be associated with this vandal (a/k/a Brando03, Brandon03, The Br03, and other sock puppets): Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse#Unemployed.2C_living_in_basement.2C_aka_Brando.28n.2903.2C_aka_Louisville_Vandal.due to vandalization of the same user pages previously vandalized. --Chris24 00:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Why don't you come back (if only for an hour) and copy-edit this Talk:Architecture of Aylesbury so your name is in the history where it should be. Hope all is well and you are happier now. Giano 19:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Materialization (science fiction). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

I only just noticed (stalking Giano, below). I'm glad all is going well. Wikipedia will be here if / when you want to come back more regularly. -- ALoan (Talk) 02:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...but I have a worthy cause and want to help save a building. I've lost your email address, and need an edition number and page number in orfe to ref a page - just read the local rag (if what I'm told is true) you will know what I mean! Giano 20:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aha we have it, I had forgotten Image:ExchangeStOfficesAylesbury.jpg

Would be glad to answer if you return---Chief RZ

Do you have any local history books - we must crusade! Giano 20:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mammary intercourse, by 71.243.205.127, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mammary intercourse provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mammary intercourse, please affix the template ((hangon)) to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Mammary intercourse itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LOGO ragnarok.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Defense of Naboo, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Defense of Naboo is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Defense of Naboo, please affix the template ((hangon)) to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 02:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated "Demand Promissory Note" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Floaterfluss ^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "((prod))" template to the article User talk:Yordzam X, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:User talk:Yordzam X|its talk page]]. If you remove the ((prod)) template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.

--SMS ^Talk 03:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Flag of Buckinghamshire.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. role^player 01:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article for the upcoming Cory McAbee's film Stingray Sam is nominated for deletion. Please contribute to the discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 03:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Grange Primary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable primary school

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Computerjoe's talk 19:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Aylesbury Youth Action, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aylesbury Youth Action. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've history merged all the edits from your old talk page archives, but the archives are still deleted. User talk page history should almost never be deleted, especially in the case of bureaucrats or former bureaucrats. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 04:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Francs2000! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,590 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the ((unreferencedBLP)) tag. Here is the list:

1. Philip Henry (artist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Peter Gouldthorpe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Gulnazar Keldi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Lady Alexandra Etherington - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Principality of Sealand/Sealand, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Principality of Sealand/Sealand and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Principality of Sealand/Sealand during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Winterbourne, Gloucestershire , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Skinsmoke (talk) 11:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Philip Henry (artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 15:22, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Philip Henry (artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject is not notable enough to warrant an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 11:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philip Henry (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Henry (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 13:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hughi Arie lombok98 (talk) 16:39, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 22:39, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. I understand that you have left WP (I feel sorry about this) and your account may be inactive. However it seems that by the time you were active, as an administrator you had deleted the article page José Ortiz-Echagüe, most possibly because it was a stub. Following the rules of WP, I am asked to inform you that I am about to recreate this page and provide more information in it. Thanks for your attention{LeonCR (talk) 15:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the bureaucrat policy that alters what you were told at the time of your decratting. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until February 1, 2013 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFB. Until February 1, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 01:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect what you were doing was standard practice in 2006, but I've mentioned you at [2] because nowadays I think people might be uncomfortable with the way these deletion summaries have been presented. Wnt (talk) 23:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UKCOTW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect *West Los Angeles Baptist School. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 4#*West Los Angeles Baptist School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 01:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Independent catholic church usa and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Independent catholic church usa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 00:07, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Francs2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kim Iversen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Francs2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kim Iversen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caldecote, Buckinghamshire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caldecote, Buckinghamshire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Marleeashton (talk) 02:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Explode(song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 30#Explode(song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chiltern Forest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

whole article is factually incorrect

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Autonomous regions with special statute(Italy) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 20 § Autonomous regions with special statute(Italy) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect List of Some Japanese secret agents(1930s to ww2 period) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 18 § List of Some Japanese secret agents(1930s to ww2 period) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Axborough is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axborough until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PamD 22:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]