Hello, GWA88! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 19:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank you for all your work at Portal:Current events so far. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 00:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wall Street Journal is effectively subscriber-only. Get some 'free' articles but not for a month like other media, it's for a much longer time. Haven't been able to read WSJ since late August. Don't have idea when (or if, unlikely) they'll let me in again. Anyway, added second reference to Turkey story. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 19:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Current Events Barnstar
		I had just finished writing Malheur incident and was heading over to nominate it for In the News and was pleasantly surprised to find you'd already handled that - thank you! LavaBaron (talk) 11:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once a speedy deletion tag is placed on an article such as 2016 Nevada wildfire, it should not be replaced. Instead, WP:PROD or WP:AFD may be used to discuss the article further. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heyo! Thanks for adding the Bluecut Fire to the list. I made one change to your addition. I trimmed down the notes dramatically. While I do feel that what you added is of great significance, I feel strongly that it belongs on the article page for the fire itself, not in the notes field. At the moment a "unknown number of structures have been destroyed" according to InciWeb. Once they (or someone else) release good solid number, that should absolutely be included in the table. But specific structures I don't think should go in the list. Otherwise that table is going to blow up! Does that make sense? Let me know your thoughts. Keep up the great work! --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions are appreciated. You are very welcome here. However, I have encountered possible copyright violation(s). Some or all of the content you added in a recent edit to 2016 clown sightings in this edit(s) appears to have been copy pasted from this source and has been removed.

Please remember that you must write in your own words. We cannot copy and paste from other websites. If I have made an error, please accept my apologies.

For further information, please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More

I have encountered more copyright violations:

• Your addition to Wikipedia: [1]
• Source: [2]

Please go through your past contributions and remove any other copy pasting, okay? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for explanation

Looking through your contributions, I see you are quite an active member of the community. Could you please explain why you have been copy pasting? Surely you know about policies here. What can you say about all of this? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More

I have encountered more copyright violations:

• Your addition to Wikipedia: [3]
• Source: [4]

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up

I must say that I am disappointed that you just ignored my request for some sort of explanation and instead just carried on editing. I spent half an hour finding and removing your copy pasting. No "I'm sorry". No "Thanks for cleaning up my blatant copyvios". Nothing. Did you even review your own contribs to see if I missed anything?

I would appreciate at least some some assurance that none of your Reuters-sourced Portal:Current events additions were copy pasted. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Anna. I apologize for the lack of response, I would of done this earlier but I had family things going.

As for my copyright violations. Yes, I can see how I definitely should of checked before hand before making those edits. Especially the one on 2016 clown sightings. As you can see by my contribs, I went back and put up the same story, but this time without the violations. As for my edits in general, I believe my copyright violations are only on some particular articles I have created and edited on, such as the ones you highlighted. My edits on Portal:Current events (going back to 2014) are usually quite brief. I've checked through the last couple of months and I haven't seen any obvious copyright violations.

I'll try to be more careful in the future. Thanks Anna. GWA88 (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Are you sure there are no more?

Please, from now on, no more copy pasting. You know how seriously Wikipedia takes this sort of thing. It is really breaking the cardinal rule, and you must have known that. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've now looked through more contribs and I can't see any. I honestly didn't realize I was doing it. I thought you were allowed to copy-paste the odd sentence from a news article. My bad. Again, I'll take this lesson into consideration when I make future edits. GWA88 (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking and thanks for your understanding. Best wishes and happy editing. Oh, and keep up the good work at current events. I know you do a lot there. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GWA88. Thanks for the information and for correcting the Portal:Current events/2016 October 14 entry. Fixed Portal:Current events/2016 October 16 using Yemini Crisis. I picked up the insurgency head from the Current Events right sidebar listing, Ongoing conflicts, Middle East, Yemen. The Houthi rebellion link leads to the Houthi insurgency in Yemen page. Perhaps that should be changed. Appreciate all your work and this constructive advice. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 02:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of sidebar link.RaqiwasSushi (talk) 03:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Science and technologies

For the first time the German Wikipedia contains more than two million articles.--Bluemel1 (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GWA88. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fifth-generation jet fighters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 08:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask why did you revert my edit on the Current Events box for the Haiti bus crash, it was obviously a double entry - best case would be moving it from disasters to crime, but you simply reverted? Skycycle (talk) 16:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was clearly a case of double entry but you removed the former entry, not the latter made by Capitalistroadster, which included far less details of the incident than the previous entry made by myself. Clearly Capitalistroadster failed to notice it was already included, it happens, I've done it before a few times, and you didn't bother to look at the portal's history to see which one was included first. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2017_March_12&oldid=769962721

Apologies if my revert offended you in someway, I just want what's best for the reader. GWA88 (talk) 20:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GWA88, I saw you translated my German Wikipedia article about the movie when it was in an early state. I wrote more about the plot. Feel free to translate the new sentences, to add them here. Greetings from Germany. The real Marcoman (talk) 01:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. GWA88, thanks for creating Tires, Portugal!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider adding more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Megalibrarygirl. GWA88, thanks for creating Ogba Zoo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi! This page is a good start, but needs more reliable sources, like this one [5]. Please add more and help improve Wikipedia. :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GWA88. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. GWA88, thanks for creating Coordination of Azawad Movements!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please ((ping)) me. Thank you. -TT

Thanks for creating Ain Zara, GWA88!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Do please add some sources to support the factual statements you've made about this town. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 23:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GWA88. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gatwick Airport drone incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:09, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Drone barnstar
	For your excellent work in starting the Gatwick Airport drone incident article. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gatwick Airport drone incident, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that reports of drones at Gatwick Airport led to the disruption of over 1,000 flights and delays for about 140,000 passengers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gatwick Airport drone incident. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel. 2600:1700:BBD0:8050:3C78:A0BB:680D:657F (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GWA88. It isn't necessary to put every event under a subheader. Normally that is only done when the event is part of a larger event or current issue. There's no need to add subheaders for general topics (for example Animal welfare and rights in Australia). Otherwise, thanks for your continued contributions to the page! Kaldari (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you Sir for paying attention to my eedit request, can I further ask that Argentina be included in the infobox as designating the military wing of Hezbollah as terror? Thanks to you Sir, --CoryGlee (talk) 12:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Ecuadorian protests, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 05:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

recent events

Thank you for beginning quality articles about recent events such as 2019 Ecuadorian protests, Gatwick Airport drone incident, Marielle Franco and 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire, for updating the articles of others and maintaining the portal, for service from 2014, - global activist, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2314 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GWA88. You seem to be a good editor on Portal:Current events, so I wanted to invite you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elijahandskip. I would be happy to help out where I can. Editing this portal has pretty much become a daily hobby for me anyway. GWA88 (talk) 05:46, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GWA88. Clap for our Carers, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 01:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GWA88,

Thank you for creating Jordan Goudreau.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Adding neutrality tag, events are disputed

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Jamez42)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Jamez42 (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clap for Our Carers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Britons are being urged to clap for their carers every Thursday evening during the country's COVID-19 pandemic? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copenhagen Marriott Hotel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copenhagen Marriott Hotel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events format is currently being updated. However, one new change is a section for "Current discussions". The Portal:Current events has debates all the time to determine if things are notable for the portal (international news) or if they are better suited for a place like 2020 in the United States. In the past, small 'edit wars' have taken place between editors over topics. This new section on the WikiProject is a new place where editors can discuss between each other and have an easy access to 'outside opinion' from other participates. Members in the Current Event WikiProject are welcome to invite other editors that have disagreements to start the discussion on the WikiProject. (Unlike RFC's, discussions about topics would be about 1 week or whenever the topic is no longer relevant from the WikiProject).

Thank you for reading and thank you for participating in the Current Event WikiProject! (Current Event WikiProject Coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 H5N8 outbreak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bird flu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before entering into a possible avoidable dispute, I will give you my opinion about the latest editions in Current Events and see what we can do. I understand that the importance of the post-Trump cabinet of the United States is recognized and everyone has followed the nominations. But is it really necessary that every confirmation has to be posted? I could come to understand Lloyd Austin's, and even Deb Haaland's, but personally I don't think this is the place to post something that implies that it looks more like a timeline of the early days of the Biden presidency. And the same is my opinion about the Trump edits, but at the time he was not very active. I do not know what is the line that Wikipedia follows in this regard, so if you know I will be happy for you to explain it to me. A greeting. Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, Alsoriano97. Firstly, I appreciate you leaving this message for me rather than just reverting me for another pointless edit war, so thanks for that. Regarding the confirmations of Biden's cabinet picks, I would say, and this is based on the fact most if not all of Trump's cabinet picks were covered on the portal, and the fact the confirmations often gain international coverage, for example the Lloyd Austin confirmation which you removed, was covered by the The Guardian, it has also been covered by the Financial Times and Al Jazeera. Again, clearly notable. I would of course draw the line at senior cabinet members, lower level administration officials would be definitely pushing it in terms of notability. GWA88 (talk) 22:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Journalists killed in Venezuela requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Utilita Energy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prepayment meter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We do not know if all the attacks are committed by jihadists so leave the title as it is or open a discussion on this topic. Cerberon-900 (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I know we have crossed paths every now and then on the Portal:Current events, so I wanted to invite you to a new WikiProject, the WikiProject of the Twenty-Tens decade. It was proposed near the end of May, but it was officially created today. Not sure if you would be interested, but I thought I would drop you an invite and say hi. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear GWA88, I've started a discussion here. If you have time, please take a look and add your thoughts. Regards, MattSucci (talk) 11:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Carter00000 (talk) 11:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Conduct on Portal:Current Events and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Carter00000 (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration case to which you were a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The declining arbitrators felt that the request was premature. For the Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The filing is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Alsoriano97. Please provide any information on background or specific incidents if you would like to. Carter00000 (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GWA88. I reverted your edit because the satellite might not have crashed in Kyiv at all. It is very unlikely that the green explosion observed over Kyiv was the satellite, and we should probably wait for more reliable reports. More evidence is needed before it can be determined if the satellite fell in Kyiv for sure. — Nythar (💬-🍀) 22:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I know your revert was a good faith edit. However, The Guardian is now reporting it is the NASA spacecraft Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI).^[1] GWA88 (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True, The Guardian did report that; however, NASA has now denied that the object over Kyiv was its satellite. BBC News Nythar (💬-🍀) 02:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. GWA88 (talk) 13:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is GWA88. Thank you. Carter00000 (talk) 11:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm astonished you restored this [6]. We should not amplify these false narratives, particularly those by the Russian government, during this sensitive period. Your text appeared to be just a copy-paste of Russian propaganda, for tricking its own citizens into thinking the government is "strong". You even admit it is propaganda in your revert. Really not sure why you think it's acceptable for inclusion. Marwanaircalm (talk) 15:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The statement was from the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, thus it can be included there as it's the official Russian position. I wouldn't include some statement from a random Russian propagandist on a talk show. Regardless you shouldn't even be editing this contentious topic as you have less than 500 edits. @Cryptic told you this recently with regards to the Israel/Palestine topic. GWA88 (talk) 15:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would think that propaganda, or at least propaganda which matters, is released by the government. It is exactly what the government says that matters in Russia. The "official" Russian position is propaganda. A "random Russian propagandist on a talk show" will parrot the "official" Russian position. I'm surprised you don't understand this. I'm also not sure on how Israel/Palestine is related to Russia? I'm aware that I'm not allowed to edit that topic yet and I have not done so. Marwanaircalm (talk) 16:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because both are contentious topics you are currently not allowed to edit. GWA88 (talk) 16:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The notice I got on my user page says its only for the Israel/Palestine. I'm not sure why you feel it has anything to do with Russia? Marwanaircalm (talk) 16:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upon reviewing the list of contentious topics again it would seem you are allowed to make edits related to Russia. I do apologize for that confusion. However, the news you removed does fall under the Eastern Europe category (Bulgaria) which is listed as a contentious topic. GWA88 (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GWA88 and Marwanaircalm, some topic areas have an extended-confirmed restriction: WP:A/I/PIA and WP:GS/RUSUKR do, WP:ARBEE doesn't.

A user needs to be informed about the specific restriction on their user talk page (not just in a random discussion elsewhere such as here) before it can be reasonably enforced. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(and the tables you're looking for are at WP:General sanctions) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for the advice and assistance. I've read the relevant policies and understand that certain topics should not be edited by new users. I am eager to contribute more before editing those topics again. @GWA88 I look forward to discussing this more with you once I am a qualified editor under the relevant policies. Marwanaircalm (talk) 10:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, some advice though, I noticed a majority of your edits do not include anything in the summary box. If you could start using the summary box to explain the changes that your making that would be appreciated. GWA88 (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this advice. Going forwards, I will start using short explanations in the summary box. I can see that's the norm with most editors who are not new and I'd certainly like to fit in with the regular editors. Marwanaircalm (talk) 18:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion on the inclusion of an item for the page Portal:Current events/2024 March 1 is currently underway. 33ABGirl (talk) 15:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be informed that I've made an update to the discussion. 33ABGirl (talk) 17:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have already responded to you with my reasoning for its inclusion, and I don't appreciate the blatant wikilawyering. GWA88 (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged several relevant users who participate on the current events portal for their opinion. It's pretty hard to achieve any consensus on a dead talk page. GWA88 (talk) 00:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that you are required to seek a consensus for the inclusion of desired content. This is particularly important for content related to contentious topics, which applies to the content you restored. Please revert your restoration and initiate a discussion on the talk page to reach a consensus before restoring the content again. 33ABGirl (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per BRD: When reverting, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary and use links if needed.

I clearly made my reasons clear for the revert in the edit summary. GWA88 (talk) 00:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]