/Archive

2015

User:Gamweb/sandbox4, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gamweb/sandbox4 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Gamweb/sandbox4 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 20:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Just to make you aware you do need to work on it otherwise it'll be back at MFD, There's no point in keeping something if you're not gonna work on it .... Anyway thanks ,–Davey2010^Talk 21:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Do not delete any of my "sandbox" pages unless I specifically request it. This defeats the purpose of having a sandbox area. Wikipedia users are encouraged to keep a sandbox are for unfinished items. Gamweb (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I'll delete anything that's not being worked on - Your sandboxes included, Yes they are but they also need to be actively working on it otherwise it'll get deleted. –Davey2010^Talk 21:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I consider your threat to be harassment. If you have any special privileges at Wikipedia, they need to be removed for abuse of power. Gamweb (talk) 13:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Ukrainian American Veterans, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 02:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Gamweb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aluma Shield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aluma Shield until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:FL Congress 07 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]