/archive 1 /archive 2 /archive 3 /archive 4 /archive 5 /archive 6 /archive 7 /archive 8

new comments at the bottom of the page please

Thanks for editing: please see my comment on the talk page. You added to an existing section, but fundamentally this is very odd because "Phase 1b" is on a different canal, the Stroudwater. So I think this is odd. Incidentally, I could not find any confirmation that the bid has actually been made on the Cotswold Canals trust site; are you sure the reference you gave is accurate? Can you share anything online? (Please reply here) Imaginatorium (talk) 08:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty confident that navvies is correct. The current edition isn't online yet.©Geni (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The bid is mentioned on their site here http://www.cotswoldcanals.com/pages/posts/saul-to-stonehouse-restoration-funding-bid-809.php?p=5 .©Geni (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Am I correct in thinking that you took the photo at File:We177 science museum.jpg at the Science Museum, London (and not some other science museum)? And if so, that means its safe for me to list that museum as another home for a surviving example at WE.177#Retirement, right (it wasn't some special travelling exhibit that you saw)? -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 00:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Mute Swan Emsworth2.JPG is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on March 2, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-03-02. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni,

I must say your photographs are amazing! I have been experimenting myself with light painting and am just wondering if I may use this photograph in the background of my photograph. Of course I will credit you by posting a link in the description of your page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Southampton#/media/File:Southampton_docks_at_night_4_seconds.JPG

Thankyou in advance.

Aidanr97 (talk) 03:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uri-Geller.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikipe-tan-in-seaside3.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikipe-tan-in-seaside4white.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni, I counted the transclusions of ((Infobox US university ranking)), and it appears it has less than 390 transclusions, which does not make this highly visible in my opinion. Note the thresholds described by Template:High-use and Template:High-risk. I've seen templates at indef semiprot while citing Wikipedia:High-risk templates, and believe that semiprot should suffice. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 16:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. I now believe the level is acceptable both to prevent unregistered vandalism, and to encourage discussion. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 17:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Royal Pier, Southampton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Royal Pier, Southampton, used to have a station at the end of it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Pier, Southampton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni

As I am now doing volunteer work restoring the Wey and Arun Canal, I feel it is my duty to get its article up-to-date.

I have updated the map (several times) and made some other changes, with more to come when time permits (as the article is badly lagging the restoration progress).

Anyway...

You uploaded a photo of a lock on the canal, but it does not identify which one. Can you try to work out where you took the photo, please? (I know it was 10 years ago!)

Cheers! -- EdJogg (talk) 17:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fort Victoria (Isle of Wight)

added a link pointing to Car ferry

Keyhaven

added a link pointing to Car ferry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Dendrogramma enigmatica sp. nov., holotype.png is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 17, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-09-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The image has been rescheduled.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Huge thanks for blocking Bensaw11 for blatant vandalism of this article. The Ink Daddy! (talk) 02:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Huge appreciation for your actions against blatant vandalism. The Ink Daddy! (talk) 02:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geni. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Biber find in The Netherlands.

Dear Geni,

With regards to the biber attack on the bridge at Nijmegen i think i can provide you with additional information. As it happens the remains one of the subs used in that attack are now on display in the Fort of Pannerden. A fort located very close to the location of the find. I work there as a volunteer and as such I think I could lend you a hand getting some information. With kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigifrith76 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I've not worked on that article in years. If you have stuff to add I'd suggest raising it on the talkpage or adding it directly to nl:Biber_(onderzeeboot). Alternatively you could try contacting wikimedia Nederland who are probably in a better position to work with you.©Geni (talk) 16:29, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Medway Queen (ship, 1924).

As we were discussing.--ClemRutter (talk) 09:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you mass-protect every template used on "the Hillary page"? Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

too bad we don't have Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Cascading_protection for levels other than full. Frietjes (talk) 21:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you have added extended confirmed protection to Template:Obama cabinet and Template:US First Ladies, though those pages have not been vandalized recently. Note that the announcement above from September 23rd states that "Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort." Additionally, Hillary Clinton itself is semi-protected, so preemptively protecting subcomponents with a higher level of protection is odd.

I assume this was a mistake, perhaps a misclick. Would you mind changing the protection level of these templates to semiprotected? Mamyles (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ThinkPoint is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThinkPoint until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a pair of admin eyes on a couple of Commons procedural things that have stalled? Thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01

43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

On 27 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Craigievar Express, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Craigievar Express (pictured) is driven by a steam engine previously used in a sawmill? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Craigievar Express. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 01:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geni, thanks for taking the time to review my post. I'm just wondering, which pieces of information are lacking reliable citation? I have attempted to provide as much citation as possible but I will continue to edit the page until I've met your requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:5CA0:D4C:C030:63D8:48CE:6912 (talk) 10:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All of it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQPq1VLXY7U is a self published video. Heat street is never a reliable source. http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/2104057-Zarna-Joshi-is-now-crowdfunding-because-of-Hugh-Mungus is forum thread which again aren't considered reliable sources. Neither are go fund me pages or individual tweets.©Geni (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given the context of the post, referring to YouTube videos and GoFundMe pages, those actually do provide proof that what the Wikipedia entry is claiming is 100% true. For example, when I say that a YouTube video was created on a certain date by a certain creator and refer to that video as proof, it is credible evidence that what I'm claiming is true (same with the GoFundMe page).I have edited several of the sources to be more reliable, and I believe it's a matter of opinion that Heat Street is not reliable. In this case I believe the opinion is wrong, because Heat Street provides links and videos that serve as proof to the claims made in the Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:5CA0:D4C:C030:63D8:48CE:6912 (talk) 10:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are talking about a wikipedia article not a forum post. Different standards apply. Specifically WP:RS. Forum posts, and self published youtube vids do not meet them. The rest runs into problems with the No original research Policy. That leaves you with Heat Street and that isn't a reliable source at the best of times and certianly isn't a reliable source for Biographies of living persons issues.©Geni (talk) 10:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upon some searching, both Heat Street and h3h3Productions' videos have been used as citation on other Wikipedia articles about this incident. Once the internet grabs a hold of this story, I will be able to replace the youtube links and twitter posts with articles about them. Once again, simply saying Heat Street is not reliable doesn't make that true; the articles I've cited from Heat Street are indeed reliable sources on this topic/incident. This happened only hours ago, so primary sources are really the only source at the moment. I didn't realize Wikipedia was against primary sources of information, which seems odd to me considering the citation leads readers directly to the source and provides ample evidence that what the Wikipedia entry is saying is indeed true.

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geni. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geni. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geni: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Class455 (Merry Christmas!) 17:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use ((subst:Season's Greetings1)) to send this message

Happy New Year!

Geni,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (talk | stand clear of the doors!) 17:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

WS is now slowly developing with less conflicts. I guess you have moved away to other things, but would kindly like to ask you to support with vote here, so we can reach the 25 votes minimum rule in order to be able to get local Checkusers, and get a local policy for CU, which will be the first step of developing more local solutions on WS. Dan Koehl (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni. You changed Breitbart and another source to the FT which is subscription only. I replaced it, not in disputation but so that the story could be understood by those who can't access the FT site. The story looks to be uncontroversial and reported in a straight forward way. Clearly you don't like Breitbart (though I confess I can't see any problems with this article), would you perhaps expand the wiki page then so that it can be understood without needing to read the FT site? At the moment it reads like a bit of trivia. I'd have raised this on the article's talk page, but I wouldn't want to publicly criticise and admin or an editor of your standing. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Geni a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caterpillar inflation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Water colour. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caterpillar inflation, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that caterpillar inflation is a gut-wrenching process? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Caterpillar inflation. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southampton Common, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Itchen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Blue Funnel Group ... appreciate any comments. Despite it being Draft AfC i'm probably more likely to just move it into position myself. Thanks Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, will you lower the protection level for Template:United States presidential election, 2008? You rightfully locked it down back in October but it seems like overkill to keep it as such 6 months later. Thanks!--TM 01:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		When rumours fly, it's good to know someone is holding the gate until the official word comes through. Or doesn't, as was the case here. Thank you.

There are a number of templates you protected as a result of a template vandalism to HRC's page last year during the 2016 US election campaign and elections. Do you believe that all of these templates still deserve TER? I'd like to see them demoted to semi- or even unprotected, given that the immediate risk has lessened due to her more-or-less removal from the public eye. (This post inspired by a TER I responded to at Template talk:C-SPAN.) --Izno (talk) 12:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tanners Brook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Millbrook. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geni. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

--Muzammil (talk) 18:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geni. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you protect Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain too please? --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 05:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also Guillermo del Toro, The Room (film), Tommy Wiseau‎ and Mads Mikkelsen‎. --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 05:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Konami‎ and What Remains of Edith Finch please. --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shitposting, Electronic Entertainment Expo 2017, and Kopps. --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Soulcalibur VI, Transgender sexuality --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 06:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aryan, Polygon (website), Bethesda Game Studios. --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic game, ETV Network. --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 06:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] and [2] were responsible for some of the vandalism, idk if you guys can affect them on Twitter. If not, remove my message. --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 07:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all your work changing the protection level of pages today! Thanks! Vanstrat ((🗼)) 06:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ********* Lane. Since you had some involvement with the ********* Lane redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Jamie Waylett shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --KirkVHouten (talk) 13:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Geni a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you edited recently, are you still around? Kindly ping when replying. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018 Milestone for mix'n'match[edit] Around the time in February when Wikidata clicked past item Q50000000, another milestone was reached: the mix'n'match tool uploaded its 1000th dataset. Concisely defined by its author, Magnus Manske, it works "to match entries in external catalogs to Wikidata". The total number of entries is now well into eight figures, and more are constantly being added: a couple of new catalogs each day is normal. Since the end of 2013, mix'n'match has gradually come to play a significant part in adding statements to Wikidata. Particularly in areas with the flavour of digital humanities, but datasets can of course be about practically anything. There is a catalog on skyscrapers, and two on spiders. These days mix'n'match can be used in numerous modes, from the relaxed gamified click through a catalog looking for matches, with prompts, to the fantastically useful and often demanding search across all catalogs. I'll type that again: you can search 1000+ datasets from the simple box at the top right. The drop-down menu top left offers "creation candidates", Magnus's personal favourite. m:Mix'n'match/Manual for more. For the Wikidatan, a key point is that these matches, however carried out, add statements to Wikidata if, and naturally only if, there is a Wikidata property associated with the catalog. For everyone, however, the hands-on experience of deciding of what is a good match is an education, in a scholarly area, biographical catalogs being particularly fraught. Underpinning recent rapid progress is an open infrastructure for scraping and uploading. Congratulations to Magnus, our data Stakhanovite! Links[edit] Wikipedia goes 3D allowing users to upload .STLs for digital reference, Beau Jackson for 3dprintingindustry.com, February 22 2018 WikiCite report (video) Formal publication and announcement of ISBN citation dataset, see Twitter post, February 23 2018 Plotting the Course Through Charted Waters, workshop on data visualization literacy from Mikhail Popov, Wikimedia Foundation Using Wikidata to build an authority list of Holocaust-era ghettos, Nancy Cooey, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, February 12 2018 Why Should You Learn SPARQL? Wikidata! Mark Longair, blogpost November 29 2017 Back to the future: Does graph database success hang on query language?, George Anadiotis for Big on Data, March 5 2018 To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below. Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...needs protection. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 19:52, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Stilt (ceramics) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 20:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 20:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KKR 25, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Local group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stilt (ceramics), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some stilts have been designed to be used within saggars? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stilt (ceramics). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you protected the page World War Z (video game)

There are now two products with the same title (new is at World War Z (Sabre Interactive video game), and the later product appears it will have similar or greater impact than the original.

Cold you take a look at the two pages, and consider renaming the original page to World War Z (2013 video game), and the second to World War Z (2019 video game), with the original page used as a disambiguation.

This seems uncontroversial to me. I leave it to your judgement. There is no real problem with the current state. Thanks.Xoool (talk) 20:02, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit2] [edit] - I can't add the hatnote needed at World War Z (video game) to link to World War Z (Sabre Interactive video game) .. Xoool (talk) 20:03, 23 August 2018 (UTC) .. seems I can .. Xoool (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. All fixed now . Xoool (talk) 20:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Basil Mott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to River Itchen

Itchen Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to River Itchen

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geni. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redrose64 🌹 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding ((subst:Xmas6)) to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:GLAM/Conway Hall

I understand that we can include text (C&P) from sites with a UK Open Government license. Can you look at [[3]], it links to to four pdfs with architecture's plans that I would like to use. Are these covered by the tag on parent page? Is the a standard way to display the attribution? --ClemRutter (talk) 09:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:20, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You handled that smarter and more robustly than I was proposing to do. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I'm saying this was a good unblock. An admin does not have only two choices: (1) indef block with no talk page access, or (2) supporting harassment. Talking to a long term productive editor with a clean block log like he's a human being, telling him what he's done wrong, not to do it again, and if he does he's going to get blocked and unlikely to be unblocked again, that's the mark of a good admin. Nobody here "supports" harassment, nobody here "basically told someone to find a new way to harass other people", and to say that Geni did so is gaslighting. Gaslighting from a different end of the spectrum than I'm used to seeing it, but gaslighting. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well said Floq. Geni, the last thing we need is another of our more conscientious admins resigning. Hopefully no one will even want you to once things have calmed down a little. FeydHuxtable (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for unblocking me, Geni, I appreciate it. I hope you will address the concerns of the other editors below, because I don’t want that any harm to you (or anyone else) he caused from this matter. You have my assurance that I have (and had) no intentions of harassing anyone. starship.paint (talk) 01:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked you on IRC, but I'll make it official: please resign. You violated policy by unblocking both against the consensus of administrators and without talking to the blocking admin, who objected, and was engaged in an unblock discussion. You also made it easier for people to harass others. This isn't good, and only makes our project worse. You basically told someone to find a new way to harass other people. That's not okay, and I'm honestly shocked that any administrator here would do so. I won't push it further, but I do want to make the request on-wiki. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with this. There’s a difference between a user demonstrating that they understand and will not do it again and blindly unblocking while most of your colleagues disagree. By unblocking with no actual assurance from the user and in spite of opposition, you’re effectively condoning the behavior. You are proving WMF right isn’t their statement that the English Wikipedia is unable or unwilling to deal with this type of behavior and as someone who’s been on the receiving end of it, it makes me sick. Praxidicae (talk) 22:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think your resigning over this is more than is necessary. However, I echo that this was a real, considerate, and destructive mistake. This was a good block and a consensus for how it could be reversed had been agreed to. Starship showing some understanding of why the block was levied is an important protection of important behavior policies. As I noted here and to you on IRC, I think this kind of rogue use of the toolset makes life for those of us who are here in good faith, but lacking the buttons of being a sysop, a worse place. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll echo Tony's request here. Administrators like you who ignore consensus and enable harassment by trying to brush stuff under the carpet like you did with your unblock of Starship.paint is the reason we have such an atmosphere of abusive behaviour on the project. It's the reason that the Foundation are now having to step in with office actions to deal with it. It's the reason this project is becoming more and more unwelcoming, and why we're losing so many people. The requests that we made of Starship were fairly easy for them to meet, and designed to push them towards better interactions with fellow editors; instead you've basically taught them that if they get in trouble, they just need to wait a while for another admin if the first few on-scene don't immediately unblock. It makes you look like you like harassment, it makes you look like an enabler. Is that really the persona you want to show off? Is that really what you thing the community as a whole should be doing? stwalkerster (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with everyone above. Performing this unblock when you have been inactive for so long shows how out of touch you are with the way things should be handled the and the respect that you should show to the other administrators. It is clear that you do not understand that, so you should revert your own action or resign. Nihlus 23:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On one hand, we can't afford to lose more admins with so many asking to resign at BN. On the other hand, Doc James said repeatedly that he was reviewing this block and would unblock once he got assurances that Starship.paint wouldn't out any more WMF staff and you preemptively unblocked him first. Why, why would you do this when another admin had taken responsibility for reviewing this block? Bad, bad move. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We can't afford to have rogue administrators who condone harassment. Period. Praxidicae (talk) 23:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae, I doubt Geni is condoning harassment. I also still don't think they should resign. But these sorts of rogue actions are indeed why we operate on consensus and Geni should have participated in the ongoing discussion among sysops (and others) rather than taking unilateral action in a way against general procedures for this thing and in a way that made it impossible for those respecting discussion and consensus to reverse. As such, I do look forward, in the spirit of WP:ADMINACCT to reading Geni's response to the concerns presented here. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:12, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eh its 4am here. On balance things seem stable for the time being and I don't really want to risk a debate that might complicate that. How about next weekend?©Geni (talk) 03:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Considering you haven't edited your talk page in years until now, I don't think that's appropriate. You should either make a full explanation here, or you should go to WP:BN and resign. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly wasn't expecting a response immediately. I was hoping for a response before a week from now, and admit to a little bit of additional concern that you would take a clearly controversial action knowing you wouldn't be around to explain yourself, but also do understand that real life intervenes. As such I continue to look forward to your thoughts at your earliest Wiki convenience. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:34, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• You have misused your tools and position.--MONGO (talk) 01:12, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Please don't resign Geni. How about an arbitration case on Ballioni's block and Geni's unblock to clear it up? There are comments that Balloni's talk page access removal was undue and that the indef block was excessive and comments that Geni's unblock was incorrect also so there is a value in the arbs looking at this. Govindaharihari (talk) 03:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, WP:AN would be the first place, but that makes little sense for a block I don't want restored now that an explanation and commitment to not harass has been given. But an explanation does need to be forthcoming. He hasn't edited his talk page in years before this so "I'll wait until next week" isn't really helpful. I'd even be fine with "Look, I messed up, I won't do it again" or "Tony was completely wrong and an idiot and I won't be apologizing for these reasons." but he does need to explain why he went against policy and consensus. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:34, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Resign please. Your unblock shows absolute lack of judgement. Five administrators had warned against a unilateral unblock – and you went and actually did that! Please resign immediately and this doesn't need to become an elongated ArbCom case. If you don't think you can respond to our messages in a timely manner, but can unblock in an untimely manner going against admin-consensus, that's reason enough for you to stop using the bit. Lourdes 03:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• As currently the community are so highly charged on this issue, I'll open an arb case request to sort this out. Govindaharihari (talk) 03:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Govindaharihari: please don't. Allow Geni time to respond. While an arb case might be required in the near future, I think it is premature to open one now. Killiondude (talk) 04:06, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Govindaharihari, That seems highly premature. ArbCom likes the community to have exhausted all options first. We have not exhausted all options yet. My concerns are not letting process and reasonable discussion (aka our attempts to form consensus) come to a natural conclusion in one place, let us not make a mistake by failing to let it play out in a second place. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:06, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment the community is so focussed on this that imo as you can see on this page massive requests for Geni to resign that dispute resolution with the usual user channels is impossible to be neutral, only arbcom remain neutral at this time. Govindaharihari (talk) 04:28, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Govindaharihari, no one but you wants this. This is the last thing the community needs at this time. I’ve said above I’m willing to not go further if there’s some explanation. Lourdes is asking not to have a drawn out case. Seriously, just let us talk this out. Dispute resolution hasn’t been exhausted, and ArbCom is a last resort. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no neutral dispute resolution in this case, you are asking for her resignation, if you continue to do that there is currently only arbcom that is neutral, no dispute resolution is available. If you retract your request that she resigns I won't post it. Govindaharihari (talk) 04:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Govindaharihari, through discussion we can reach consensus. Perhaps after reading more from Geni some of those who are suggesting Geni resign will change their mind. Things can happen slowly on Wikipedia. That's OK. Barkeep49 (talk) 04:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Tempest in a teapot. Tony was a bit heavy handed with both the duration and taking away talk page access. A simple 72 hour block would have been sufficient to get the point across. Geni was extraordinarily bold, but this place has gotten to where everyone gets butthurt over an admin being bold. It didn't used to be that way. If any admin is going to be bold, better he do it to unblock someone who is likely to not repeat the mistake, such as the case here. Admin are going to step on each other's toes sometimes. Making a big deal of it seems rather petty. I've been here long enough that I've been on both sides. When someone unblocked my block (and yes, the person was blocked soon after), I voiced my opinion and moved on. When I've unblocked someone against the wishes of the admin, they were pissed off but moved on. Big Fucking Deal. We don't own our admin actions, we do them on behalf of the community. Had I not turned in my admin bit, I would restored the TPA at a minimum myself, so Doc James and I agree on that as well. There are no bad guys here, just some overreactions on everyone's part. Admins bump heads sometimes. Move on like professionals. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 12:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm not here to ask you to resign. I'm spending some time with my grandson, and I was amazed to see that when I was away from the computer for just a few hours, I came back to see starship.paint with an in-deff. I finally found some time today to look at the history, and as I started reading that editors talk page I was very impressed with the discussion. (Particular kudos to Doc James) especially in light of heightened current tensions, that page started out as a model of how disputes should be handled. Tony had legitimate concerns, and participants were working through issues and you could see it headed toward a successful resolution… then you stepped in. I find it difficult to believe that you read the entire back story and didn't reach the same conclusion — namely, that this small issue was on its way to a fine resolution. I can't think of anything other than two options — one option is that you jumped the gun without doing appropriate homework, and the second option is that you did some homework and still thought barging in was the right option. Neither option speaks well for your judgment. That said, it is a tense time, and my hope is that you will read carefully what led up to the situation, and come back with an appropriate statement. Take some time, there's no rush.S Philbrick(Talk) 13:52, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• I get that harassment is of particular importance under the current climate, I also get that there needed to be a discussion about the appropriateness of interjecting in a claimed unblock, the concerns over the kind of judgement that lead to this decision being made and whether there were any violations of policy and accepted procedure… But in future, can everyone please leave out the ad hominem imputations, the hyperbole, the poorly substantiated assumptions and the premature demands requests for resignation. There was no reason this couldn’t be approached in a measured, factual and professional manner. Promethean (talk) 13:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, welcome back to editing this month. I notice that, leave this month, you've contributed only around 190 odd edits since early 2012. This may be a good time for you to read up on what has changed in our policies and guidelines since you were gone and how the community perceives these issues now. Thanks, Lourdes 17:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lourdes: what edits are you talking about? Acc. this they've made ~3,000 edits since 2012...were you thinking of their unblocking? ——SerialNumber54129 17:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the welcome back Lourdes and for the concern about whether or not I'm up-to-date on policy. Although I haven't been editing during the time-frame you've indicated, I have been keeping relatively up to date with en-wiki affairs. I initially understood your response as being related to the civility related concerns, but it occurred to me after that you were probably addressing the concern that the request for resignation may be premature. On that topic, please see my response to Tony below; My only interest was in ensuring Geni was heard following people noting their profound objection, prior to those people making requests for resignation. I believe this is a fair and reasonable approach, but readily concede that there may have been more conversation on that point than appears here; If that is needed the case, please accept accept my apologies. Promethean (talk) 01:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Serial Number 54129, I think Lourdes was referring to Promethean. Since this is directed at me, I'll respond: Promethean, I don't think this is premature or hyperbolic. Geni's unblock sent the message You can be blocked for an unequivocal violation of the harassment policy, have multiple reviewing administrators agree the block was justified, and then have a random admin come out of nowhere and unblock you without requiring any commitment to respect other people. I think that condones harassment, and as Lourdes said, isn't really how unblocks are done anymore. Cowboy unblocks are much less socially acceptable now than they were 7 years ago. At least two other administrators and a global sysop agree with me on this, so it isn't like I'm alone in this view, and documenting it on-wiki is important in my opinion
  That being said, I'm of the view that that there's a big difference between "should resign" and "ArbCom should force it" and like I said in my initial post, I had zero intent of taking it beyond making the request here. Geni has responded to Barkeep49 on their talk page, with an explanation I don't agree with, but at least it was an explanation. This has been documented if it happens again, and that's important. Like I said above, I'm willing to let this go, with my personal view still being that we should not have administrators that condone harassment through their actions, either intentionally or unintentionally. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the explanation TonyBallioni; Being completely honest your contribution to this thread wasn't of any concern to me in terms of civilty. In expressing a desire for a more civil conversation, I was more concerned by comments containing imputations such as that Geni acted in bad faith, that they were a harassment enabler/supporter, or that their decision-making was everything that's wrong with the project. These three things were, in my view, bordering in infractions of WP:AGF, WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL respectively, as well as being unsubstantiated hyperbole in the latter instance. With regard to the requests for resignation being premature, the main concern was that it didn't appear that Geni had the chance to further explain their action in light of people having raised their profound objection, prior to those people requesting Geni's resignation. Promethean (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#User:TonyBallioni's block of User:Starship.paint and User:Geni's unblock and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,— Preceding unsigned comment added by Govindaharihari (talk • contribs) 04:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geni, just a reminder that some Arbs are waiting for your statement at the above case request. starship.paint (talk) 12:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explanation of the unblock. I am responding here because other discussion has been held here and so keeping it in place with the rest seems useful. Your message is certainly thoughtful and reasonable. It is one I still must disagree with and will register that here but please feel no need to further respond if you don't care to.

You message frames it as one (banned) editor against one sysop. This is not what the history shows in my reading as it was not one sysop who felt something. It was multiple. There were, in fact, multiple offers of people who offered language that starship could give to remove the block, though admittedly one of those who made the offer lost their ability to follow through due to resignation. I also continue to find your thinking that action is necessary over communication and consensus to be one that makes me feel less. That someone could track down other accounts of mine and make demands of me is of concern to me as someone who does not edit under their name. My guess is that you are correct that starship will not repeat this, but that does not make the original issue not an issue. I have more to say but have already prattled on long enough so I will just conclude with an additional thank you for the response. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Geni for your understanding and empathy during my block incident, I really appreciate it. I didn't back down initially because I hadn't fully understood the policy, I would have once I did (and it was eventually explained well enough by Levivich so I did understand). All the best! starship.paint (talk) 08:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The request for arbitration User:TonyBallioni's block of User:Starship.paint and User:Geni's unblock has been declined by the committee. The arbitrators' comments about the request can be viewed here. – bradv🍁 03:44, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't people add the Non-free music video screenshot tag instead of a delete?The Unbeholden (talk) 08:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any third partly reliable sources showing that a change of ownership has taken places?©Geni (talk) 19:12, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

reply

registered under new ownership on Uk public records under company house

19:16, 7 July 2019 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.212.109 (talk)  

canal mute swan

Thank you for quality articles from List of canals of the United Kingdom, for a good-faith unblock, for a spectacular photo Mute Swan and image holotype of Dendrogramma enigmatica, for advice on how to win an edit war, and knowing about the ambiguity of words, - repeate from 10 years ago: you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2260 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Tesseractslow.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni, could you have a quick look at this section and the attending "ban" subthread? There are some issues which may pertain to commons, and I think you're an admin there as well. Thank you. — Ched (talk) 22:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Vanstar
		Thank you for your work in underserved area of uncrewed spaceflight. Kees08 (Talk) 22:20, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Hello Geni:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 05:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static))) to user talk pages with a friendly message.

On 12 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kate Griffiths, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kate Griffiths was elected member of Parliament for Burton in the 2019 UK general election, replacing her estranged husband? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kate Griffiths. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Celtic currency of Britain, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first Celtic currency of Britain consisted of iron bars? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Celtic currency of Britain. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you told BasketballAmericans that they were banned from Wikipedia when they were actually blocked from Wikipedia. A ban is a formal prohibition against a user editing; a ban is a technical prohibition against editing that can enforce a ban. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Geni a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! Bobherry Talk Edits 13:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user put the Men's rights movement in the Anti-sex page and you removed it and changed Feminism to Pro-feminism, a small edit war ensued. Please look into the discussion page Yoramus (talk) 15:24, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Electricar DV4 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I want to help with Template:Did you know nominations/Electricar DV4. Please see the suggestions I made there. Hopefully we can get this to the main page soon. Cheers! Flibirigit (talk) 00:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please have a look for this user ExperiencedArticleFixer which seems to spam his job cross wiki. Thanks. --Ignisdelavega (talk) 11:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just passing by to say that I deem all my additions legitimate, constructive, relevant to the respective Wiki articles, and very well sourced. Cheers. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 12:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Someone, not a wikipedian, complained to me about the Thrive Market article and when I went there I discovered that you had voiced similar thoughts. I have started removing stuff sourced to Instagram and Facebook and that sort of place, as well as removing sections where the article content is not supported by the reference given. Please feel free to re-visit the article and do a little editing. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:16, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Electricar DV4, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a DV4 electric dustcart (example pictured) continued to run after being hit by a bomb during the Second World War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Electricar DV4. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I rmeoved that material from list of current pretenders because (a) no reliable source identifies any of those listed as a pretender, it relies on WP:OR, and (b) there is in ny case no Brazilian Imperial throne to which to pretend, and hasn't been for well over a century. That article might eventually get renamed to something that is less insane. Perhaps that will fix the problem. Guy (help!) 08:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. doktorb _words^deeds 04:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• AryaUSASubway (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Might hitting Special:Nuke so I don't have to tag all the pages? See Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Aryashahnaughty. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 06:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ididn't know there was a test7. Stopped counting at 5. --Deepfriedokra (talk)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Geni, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:06, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding ((subst:Seasonal Greetings)) to other user talk pages.

		The SPFLT Achievement Patch
		I don't see you as a member of the Project, but you certainly deserve this patch anyhow! Neopeius (talk) 03:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed that back in 2016 you gave Template:Obama cabinet template-level protection as a lock-down of everything transcluded on Hillary Clinton. As Hillary Clinton's article is now only semi-protected, dropping the protection here would probably be appropriate. The template only has 56 transclusions - not widely-used. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 05:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

done.©Geni (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You appropriately blocked MRunco1. Given the discussion on that user's talk page, I'd like to lift the block. Thoughts? Objections? --Yamla (talk) 14:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Geni, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! bop34 • talk • contribs 14:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Though I'm advocating for a longer block on the IP, as explained here [4]. This is a long term disruption, with plenty of copyright violations lined up in their article drafts. Hasn't acknowledged the previous messages and warnings. Cheers, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Going beyond 31 for a first block is kinda iffy.©Geni (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated--I think they've worked long and hard to earn a stronger block on the basis of all the plagiarism alone. But the history suggests this won't be their last vacation. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I was confused why the block log was clean up it is what it is.©Geni (talk) 18:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		Thank you for helping out at CCI. Your help is greatly appreciated! Keep up the great work :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to remove e-mail access for [This account you just blocked]. Another user, FloorMadeOuttaFloor, is reporting threats by e-mail from that user. Here's the [talk page for FloorMadeOuttaFloor if you need it]. Crboyer (talk) 05:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nasal Sex, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nasal Sex".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Kings (Bramantino) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 14:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A token of thanks Hi Geni! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, ((u|Sdkb)) talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey... I love Wikipe-tan here and think she is an idol on Wikipedia. The issue is when it comes to custom made artwork soon we will have 500+ images in one section alone. Wikipe-tan has been a thorn in the side for a-lot of editors and I don't want to make waves through another WP:MfD (See: WP:PRJDEL). - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shame it got deleted. What was it even about? Maybe recreate as a humor page? :) Dronebogus (talk) 12:43, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Geni! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 18th anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! ((u|Sdkb)) talk 01:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Geni a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to know, that’s all 85.66.125.107 (talk) 14:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of operation. What limited operation we have seen of captured Russian equipment by Ukrainian units has been by national defence units.©Geni (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So if Igor posted a video of himself operating it, would he be allowed on the list?

I can absolutely understand why he wouldn't be, but I quite like the idea of some guy in Ukraine getting to be on this list... Britishpersonguy (talk) 20:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If a reliable source covered him operating it then probably although given its a multi person system and should be password protected its unlikely that any operation could take place outside the context of national defence units.©Geni (talk) 06:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Geni! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 18th anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! ((u|Sdkb)) talk 01:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 01:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Template:QR target has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 03:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Extreme porn and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 19#Extreme porn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QR location has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 I invite you to please join the discussion at the nomination page.

The file File:Battle of kedah.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of several problems found about it.

I asked you to discuss it because I see that you have a concern about the factuality of the information presented on the page Chola Navy. Surijeal (talk) 05:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

204.197.177.31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Please revoke their talk page access. Thank you. Nythar^T.C 02:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Queue, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Queue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Queue, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that people queued in a queue to queue in The Queue? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Queue. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Queue), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article The lettuce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"The lettuce" could refer to any lettuce, or even lettuce in general. No indication that the Truss resignation lettuce is the primary topic for this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QueenofBithynia (talk) 07:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The lettuce and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 23#The lettuce until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QueenofBithynia (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni. Thank you for your Contribution! I think this is a good idea if you remove the beginning (the common sense) but leave the rest of the text and the quotation box there. Please, also check the references for more information. Regards, H. K Kioumarsi (talk) 09:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Foden 1930 steam wagon GDSF 2022 139.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 08:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I raised this issue at ANI but it has gotten a slow response, so I thought that maybe you could help. User:GigachadGigachad is making a pretty rapid slew of destructive edits and I'm hoping that someone can step in soon. A few people have responded but only one is an admin, and even she hasn't decided on a path forward. Thanks in advance for your help. Cpotisch (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit to All Saints Church, Fleet. It's very helpful to have an update. You don't happen to have any photos of the church post-restoration? It would be good to include one if you do. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I see you changed at least one of the lead images of a Foden wagon on the Steam Wagon page. Editorially I wonder if a photo of a wagon on solid tyres might be a better choice? Given that pneumatic tyres only really appeared around 1940, so for the last 5 years of the “prime” steam wagon era (say - 1905-1935), then it seems like we are unbalancing photos relative to the history.

In an ideal world, I suppose the best range of pictures might be an early Foden on solids and a late six wheeled wagon on pneumatics, ideally with both on the road (from personal experience I know steam wagons are like a fish out of water on a grass field!)? EddieWalters (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Vampire killing kit at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I mentioned Sally Taylor to you and Thryduulf on Sunday, commenting that Taylor had not been seen for some time - she's on tonight's South Today. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vampire killing kit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a vampire killing kit (example pictured) was donated to the Mercer Museum in the 1980s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vampire killing kit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vampire killing kit), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 27,402 views (1,141.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That article is so cool, nice job! BuySomeApples (talk) 08:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Weston's Cider, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the Daily Telegraph article, the shooter is mentioned by name as David Kozak. It is also known information that said shooter has been eliminated. So I’d like to ask why you removed this information. 188.231.9.162 (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

didn't see it in a scan of the header and the rest didn't load.©Geni (talk) 18:57, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geni, I'm spamming everyone from the Portsmouth meetup last year. I'm hosting a meetup in Brighton on 3 February 2024 if you're interested. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:29, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Geni,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you back! I hope that the Unreferenced articles drive would help you satisfy your gnoming addiction :) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Geni! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:38, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Template:Celtic coins of Britain has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DB1729^talk 03:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you didn't like our IUPAC definition box in the Absorption article, and removed it in this edit back in September. I quite understand that, because article changes made its placement ugly, and it looked much nicer when originally placed. We're currently debating the best format for these, and I'd like to get your ideas on how best to present these, while taking into consideration:

1. We cannot use word-based definitions, because these tend to get deleted for plagiarism, even if the editor is the original IUPAC author. IUPAC only uses CC-ND copyright for its word-based definitions, to avoid definitions being altered, and that is unacceptable to WP.
2. It took five years of negotiations to get IUPAC leadership to allow an image version of its definitions to be released under a CC-BY-SA license acceptable to WP.
3. Since IUPAC is the official authority for chemistry, any decent WP article on a chemistry concept needs to include the relevant IUPAC definition.
4. Our group of chemists hope to add a few thousand such definitions over the coming years, so we want to get the format right.

I wanted to ask how you think these definitions should be done, given the above constraints? We have a range of options in my Sandbox page, so by all means let me know which format you like (plus any you don't like!). Our preferred format currently is Image with caption link. If you have any alternative formats, by all means add them into my talk page so we can take a look.

Many thanks, Walkerma (talk) 18:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And your point is? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Geni! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! MolecularPilot (talk) 03:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your amazing contributions to Wikipedia during your time as an Admin! MolecularPilot (talk) 03:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Geni for collecting more than 5 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Non-free Philippines government has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Qurna Queen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Qurna Queen's tomb may be the only complete royal burial exported in its entirety from Egypt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Qurna Queen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Qurna Queen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Geni! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Geni,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]