Gjirokastra15, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Gjirokastra15!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!


This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Albania

What do you mean that "There is nothing controversial nor anything was removed."? Examine the diff. You removed 479 bytes which included a citation. Removal of citations deserve an explanation. See Wikipedia:Content removal. Jim1138 (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously , what is so hard to understand ?

The sentence from > Albania has been a potential candidate for accession to the European Union since January 2003 and it formally applied for EU membership on 28 April 2009. The Commission granted it candidate status on June 24, 2014. <

was re written like this > It is also an official candidate for membership in the European Union. <

It is the exact same thing . There is a detailed thread about the Accession of Albania to the Eu , which is also linked in that sentence . The citation while correct is out dated , because Albania was granted the European candidate status some weeks ago , thus the lead sentence was re written exactly as it is written in the lead for other official candidate countries in EU ( like Serbia , Montenegro etc. ) .

Gjirokastra15 (talk) 18:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You keep stating "it is the same thing", but you neglect to mention why you deleted the reference. The reference seems perfectly pertinent to the information, so it should stay there. Which I just restored with your current sentence structure btw. If you want to delete the reference, please state WHY in talk:Albania per wp:BRD. Jim1138 (talk) 19:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You revert

Albanian national census states that 16.99% are Christians not 17.02%. Correcting estimates does not mean religious propaganda. Furthermore, your edit history shows that you are probably a sock of user malbin.Mingling2 (talk) 07:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No the Albanian national census does not state that . The 16.99% is for the catholic,orthodox,and ungjillor ( protestant ) community . But there is also a 0.30 % jehova witnesses and other christian communities , that you ignore and if you would take the time to go and see the detailed instat census you would see it ( although i doubt about you being an albanian )

Now please go and continue your religious indifanda somewhere else . From my limited knowledge of Wikipedia your edit warring with 4 different editors and your history have you very close on the verge of getting banned .

In addition i have absolutely no idea of who Malbin is . This is my last warning to you before reporting you for 3RR . Gjirokastra15 (talk) 11:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian Air Force

Hello. The official web site you added to the article doesn't include any numbers at all, so until you can provide a reliable source, with numbers, we'll keep the lower numbers. Thomas.W talk 20:20, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources will be found then , and numbers will be put accordingly . Gjirokastra15 (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


new editor?

Hi,

Are you new editor or returning old one?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop this massive spam attack of my wall , with non based accusations . Instead , answer to the thread i have opened in your wall , for a consensus to which you have responded nothing until now . You must be well aware , that you will be held responsible for this in case of failure to prove them ( the accusations ) , when i will forward it to the A.N.I if this continues Gjirokastra15 (talk) 19:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Himarë may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mother Teresa may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]