Welcome to Wikipedia, Gorden 2211! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type ((help me)) at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 11:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National symbols of North Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign Languages Publishing House. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chollima-091, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gorden 2211 reviewer of p-Entropy Sept. 25,2021. I have edited / merged p-entropy into the Wikipedia page labeled Lp spaces, all went well until I attempted make some minor edits which caused ClueBot NG to rollback to the prior edition suggesting I was a vandal. p-entropy includes inline Wikipedia references for assorted authorities,subjects,theorems. Wikipedia: does not precede these page titles. You and other reviewers suggest an edit to Wikipediaa:Lp space which includes a rather extensive section on the p-norm as well as the animation of unit p-norm spheres over a range of p values. This spherical motion is a major feature of p-entropy. I don't have mathematics software which exports animations in Wikipedia format; Hence editing Lp space works well here. I assume ClueBot NG will vandalize my edits. Can you or some reviewer control ClueBot NG? Should inline references be reiterated? Help! RalphZero (talk) 21:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I suggest going to Wikipedia:Teahouse because I can't control what the bot does. Or just use the report false positive option, since I've haven't dealt with math pages before so I don't know what triggers the filters. Gorden 2211 (talk) 00:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Lasersharp (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Getac (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Gordon, thanks for your review of Draft:Getac, I've since revised the article and added reliable sources for your consideration, please take a look if you get a chance. Lasersharp (talk) 04:04, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's ok now, but could you just add a bit more on the history? Gorden 2211 (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, I've added some more history and references. Lasersharp (talk) 11:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gorden 2211. Thank you for reviewing Draft:Samsung Developer Conference. I've revised context of the article including history and added reliable references accordingly; please kindly go over attached draft above. Thank you for your cooperation!

Hi Gorden 2211! I've revised and added the contents (overview & events section) as you suggested; please kindly go over attached draft above. Thank you for your cooperation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by William Alvin (talk • contribs) 08:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The sources you put in the KN-23 page (http://www.b14643.de/Spacerockets/Specials/Pukguksong_GLBM-2/index.htm http://www.b14643.de/Spacerockets/Specials/Pukguksong_GLBM-3/index.htm) are problematic. They look to be original research from a non-reputable website (which has trouble with grammar in English). While they look informative they make claims and assertions not supported by any other material. I don't think information from them which could contradict or not be found in better sources should be included in the page. America789 (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not so concerned about it, he has been quoted in other websites: https://defense-update.com/20171201_hs15.html

Anyways, the KN-23 missile is clearly bigger than the Iskander and it's not that contentious; he just goes a step beyond others by saying that the motors are not based off the Iskander.

In a close study of the photographs, he makes a fairly compelling case for the missiles. Gorden 2211 (talk) 00:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Sir,

I am Anshuman Tiwari Indian Musical artist from Dehradun Uttarakhand. My question is why didn't you approve this Wikipedia Page? The sources of the book are also included in this Wikipedia Page. All reliable sources are included in this Wikipedia Page.

I have also seen many such pages in Wikipedia, there is no source on them. Even then that page is published on Wikipedia.

I don't understand why you do this. When will you publish my page?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anshuman_Tiwari_(musician) Officialanshumantiwari (talk) 09:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see WP:OSE.

Also, when I reviewed it, there was only one source. Even now, the sources are inappropriate for a biography. Gorden 2211 (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gorden 2211. I saw the comment you made in my recent page Draft:Tulagino. I would love to have more sources from the corresponding article in Russian, however, many of them do not exist anymore, since the links go to 404 error pages. I would as well love to credit the wikipedia article in Russian, I just don't exactly know how. I don't think I am meant to use a direct citation, and I don't know my way around wikipedia, so any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apexelite3303 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright, so see if there are any saved versions on archive.org; also look up the page on copying with within Wikipedia

@Apexelite3303 Gorden 2211 (talk) 21:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 28 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1977 Yili fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1977 Yili fire, the deadliest since the founding of the People's Republic of China, was caused by a special jumping firecracker? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1977 Yili fire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1977 Yili fire), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template ((db-afc-move)) has been created - this template is similar to ((db-move)) when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gorden 2211:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]