Hi. When you recently edited Štivor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prnjavor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited In the Place of Fallen Leaves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You edit to the Halo Burger article was reverted because it is clearly false. Halo Burger was founded as Kewpee in 1923 and changed its name to Halo Burger in 1967 with the same management and food. Only the name was changed, everything else remained the same. Even Halo Burger's logo says "since 1923." Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries, thanks for that :) GrahamHardy (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome. Now I'm trying to avert an edit war, but I need help with the Halo Burger article as I reached 3RR. Can you help? Steelbeard1 (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've got a question about this file and others like it: File:AnneOfAvonlea.jpg. This book was published in the USA before 1923 and is two-dimensional, so I'm wondering why it wasn't uploaded to commons? I've uploaded 100+ USA book covers and title pages using the commons tag (((PD-US))):

"This media file is in the public domain in the United States. This applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1923".

INeverCry 20:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Old Queens, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Old Royals, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Highest points of English counties‎ and several other categories, which you created, have been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. __meco (talk) 09:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Minor barnstar
	Hi Graham! This minor barnstar is for the major project you have been undertaking regarding categories and artworks - you come up frequently on my watchlist while updating the categories about public art! Thanks so much for your great work! Sarah (talk) 18:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's a bit late now, but is it actually a good idea to put sculptures just into a "by year" category? One of the main uses of categories is for searching for articles you can't quite remember the name of, and if they are tucked away only in a date category covering just a single year, this is likely to be impossible. I would have left them in the main category myself, or at least left them also in some larger category. They should at the least also be in a "by country" or "by city" etc category as well; please do this. Before embarking on any future schemes like this, please seek comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts (or whatever the appropriate project is). Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 19:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you're right - I'll go back and add country categories GrahamHardy (talk) 23:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! --Jgmikulay (talk) 00:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Johnbod (talk) 00:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're a boss categorizer! --RichardMcCoy (talk) 01:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

rip through my watchlist of sculptures at an amazing rate, doing good work all the way. However, I think that the travesty (opinion) National Monument to the U.S. Constitution‎ is made of silicone bronze, and I am not sure at all that this qualifies as bronze. And I am not a in aplace to check it out. Could you at leasat think about it, or I'll try later? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

According to http://www.thefreedictionary.com/silicon+bronze it is bronze with 2-3% silicon... GrahamHardy (talk) 17:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

```Buster Seven Talk 07:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Dark Star Safari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rift Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Unbearable kundera book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:08, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Someone else undeleted it for you and it's now ended up in your userspace at User:GrahamHardy/Carol Topolski. If you don't want it you can just request speedy deletion, of course. Regards, Bencherlite<sup>Talk</sup> 01:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Bridges completed in the 1120s, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 22:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheLostPrincessOfOz.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Heaven Lake (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scribner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Porky (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure if it was intentionally done, but many thanks for going through most of my created articles and categorising them properly! (I count 20 in the last month!) Nikthestoned 11:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your message. I agree with your views. I have now removed the tag. Thanks Shyamsunder (talk) 12:23, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The joke kundera book cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

reinstated usage GrahamHardy (talk) 15:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, GrahamHardy. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 05:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of female detective/mystery writers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Anne George

The Atmospheric Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Helen Simpson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fixed GrahamHardy (talk) 10:02, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BeingThere.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheMagicFinger.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coronado: Stories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Male and Female (book) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Morrow

What a Carve Up! (novel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Interiority

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Land of mist.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Riddley Walker cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WilliamWetmoreStory.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just to clarify why I tagged this one: it's not the cover as such that's copyrighted (it's pre-1923, so it's public domain, or might even be ineligible in the first place because of its simplicity). But the photograph is copyrightable, as it's a 3D photograph and not just a mechanical reproduction of a 2D page. BTW, is it actually really an original cover? It looks like a library binding to me. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:56, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Having just started a Colin Bostock-Smith article, I was doing a quick check for references to convert to links and noticed that you have a "todo" on your user page to create the same article. Obviously that's not possible now (I got there first, sorry :-) ), but I thought you'd like to know so that you can contribute to it yourself if you like.

All the best! Ubcule (talk) 22:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Queen and I (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Methuen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SharpesChristmas.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheHeroWithAThousandFaces.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Christmas Tree (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheTaxInspector.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Susan Elderkin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, first of all I want to say I have read your contributions and I congratulate you for the excellency of your work. I would be exceedingly grateful if you could help editing an article. The book I refer to you is the Autobiography of a Yogi. I will try to make a small résumé of what is happening. The book was published in 1946. This first edition is being widely reprinted and can be freely read and downloaded (for years) in many sites, including the Guttember Project. One of the publishers, Self-Realization Fellowship (SRF) made literally hundreds of change in the text after the author´s death - without providing any proof of the author´s wishes to change the content of the book. They also removed and inserted photographs, changed photographs of yogis dressing them, etc. So, the book SRF publishes and sells can only be called a version. The article does not have a neutral point of view because its main editor (Red Rose) removes any of the controversy about these changes and the trajectory of the book. For you to have an idea, SRF even changed the author´s signature many years after his death wich makes us wonder if the other changes were his wishes. These are facts, not subjective opinion and SRF admits and even tries to explain the changes. Also, since there are many publishers reprinting the book - which is in public domain - the article could not be illustrated by the cover of one of the publishers (SRF) only. Either all of them should be included in the article, or only the original cover. I keep asking for an editor with experience in book articles to take a look and help to improve the article. Which is being used to advertise SRF´s version of the book, thus giving the impression Wikipedia sponsors SRF´s edition in detriment to the others. The text of the article is terrible. Since my English is not perfect, it would be a great help to have you rewriting the article. Just in the beginning it says: "Autobiography of a Yogi" is an autobiography. This is redundant and I cannot change this ugly repetition of words because they say it is a Wikipedia´s guideline to categorize the article. But I was reading well written articles and when the title of the book mentions the word "autobiography" the text goes on sayig something like: ... Autobiography of ... is a book written, or it is a mémoire, etc. Another point is the encyclpedic list of reprints of the book. Technically I think there could not be any new edition (book) of the book after the death of the author and without evidence of explicit instructions left by the author. Hoping to hear from you, I thank you for your attention. Tat Sat (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC) PS The cover of the first edition which is in public domain (as I have already mentioned) has just been wrongly marked for deletion, due to Red Rose mere opinion it could be copyrighted, without the presenting of any uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertion made by reliable sources. Red Roses allegations are buffling editors with good faith. I could upload it as fair use but then I would be giving a wrong information because no one detains the copyright of the first edition of the book. Thank you again, Tat Sat (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm afraid I have very little understanding on the whys and wherefores and have no appetite for an argument; all I can suggest that if you fail and the image is deleted then let me know and I'll try uploading a smaller version of the actual original book (as at http://www.biblioteca-ga.info/50/toon/165/26 ) and try using the simple book cover template and see how that goes... Sorry I can't be more positive but I am more than happy to have a go separately myself if required, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 19:51, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for your answer. The problem is not the size of the cover but the false allegation of copyrights. Instead of portraying the book as a literary text, the article advertises a sect. So the intention is to use the cover of SRF´s version. Nothing stirs people to such a frenzy of shame-faced excitement as unreasoning zeal. It´s so tiresome few people have the time to help improving the article. By the way, the first edition was the only book in Steve Jobs´ ipad - as you can read in his biography. It gives the book some near present notoriety. For 3 months now I have tried unsuccessfully so far editing the page. Do you have any suggestions of what I could try to do? Also the cover you found is the cover of a reprint. I uploaded the original one, since I own the first edition. How can I use the book cover template, please, and how can I tag the article as an autobiography without saing the "autobiography" is an autobiography? By the way, I do not belong to any of the sects involved in the book publication. But the changes made in the book have wrecked the minds of a couple of friends. Until they found out that even the author´s signature was forged they lost so much time... I am delighted with your help and wish you could edit the article but I don´t have the heart to insist since you would be in for not one, but many arguments. Thank you very much and sorry for the typos. Tat Sat (talk) 21:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The image further down the page at http://www.biblioteca-ga.info/50/toon/165/26 appears to be the first edition. I have no real advice I'm afraid; happy to try uploading the image if your's is deleted. GrahamHardy (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:IsisUnveiled.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sonnenfinsternis.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:04, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:DarkLaughter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:40, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham. I'd like to thank you for your positive contributions to a number of pages I've extensively edited (Brian Moore), or created, e.g. several of Patrick White's novels, Rosemary Timperley, etc. Cheers! - Fanthrillers (talk) 22:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Catwings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scholastic

The Act of Creation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hutchinson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see you deleted "Nothing Gold Can Stay" from the list of Frost's works at the end of his article. Would you be willing to add A Boy's Will to that list? As his first full-length volume of published poetry, it certainly should be there. As a non-registered user, I can't add it myself. (Yes, yes, I know, I should get an account....) 206.208.105.129 (talk) 19:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done !GrahamHardy (talk) 20:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! 206.208.105.129 (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actually, looking back at the entry, it looks like you added an entry for the 1915 (Henry Holt) American edition, rather than for the 1913 (David Nutt) British edition. I hate to trouble you again, but could you switch it around? (The text of the article, incidentally, does give the correct date.) Thanks again for your help! 206.208.105.129 (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done GrahamHardy (talk) 09:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fantastic! Thanks! 206.208.105.129 (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MontezumasDaughter.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Doomsday Conspiracy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Giant, O'Brien, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Holt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Railway stations opened in 1829, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Makecat<sub>Talk</sub> 02:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, GrahamHardy. You have new messages at Legoktm's talk page.
Message added 03:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Legoktm (talk) 03:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheBattleOfDorking.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adrienne Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scribner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

After the Fire, A Still Small Voice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Peter Carey

The Skating Rink (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chris Andrews

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Writer's Barnstar
		Thank you for creating the new Ripley Bogle article, and for improving Wikipedia's coverage of novels. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ripley Bogle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ulysses and West Belfast

Tarring and feathering in popular culture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to West Belfast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Guildford Arts Book Prize has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence in reliable sources of this being a notable prize.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I see you are cat'ing Viking Press books. Do you know whether Harmondsworth: Kestrel Books was a Viking Press imprint? (always or from what date?) Covering award-winning British children's books, I have wondered asked about this and compromised about linking "Kestrel" to Viking Press.

Here is one extended example: Thunder and Lightnings (Kestrel, 1976); Talk: Thunder and Lightning#Kestrel Books (July; my September reply to self is a red herring); Talk: Viking Press#Imprints.

Is there a group working on books by publisher? --P64 (talk) 23:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No idea I'm afraid - my intention had been to do the obvious pubishers first and move on to trickier ones later ! Suspect Kestrel will be a subcategory of Viking Kestrel (assuming some books were published under "Viking Kestrel") which in turn will be a sub-category of Viking Books which is a subcategory of Penguin ! But I'm only doing the easy ones first... GrahamHardy (talk) 00:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Skimming your top page I see "illustrate Category: Newbery Honor winning works". Are there any example categories you have "illustrated"?

Please accept this point of entry to my concern about category prefaces --such as the time period and geographical setting categories for British fiction. (Let me insert a new section here altho it is no longer the bottom of the page.) -P64

Category:Novels set in sub-Roman Britain has a good preface. Many ancestor and neighbor categories have trivial prefaces that I am inclined to improved --motivated partly by evidence that I and others have made some mistakes around here, but this is a pet peeve of mine about wiki categories.

Please visit Talk: The Stronghold when you have a chance. It's the partly accidental place for many specific observations and questions. --P64 (talk) 17:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well done! Thanks Headhitter (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Reluctant Fundamentalist.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheJoyLuckClub.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JohnLeCarre TinkerTailorSoldierSpy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.137.43.188.209 (talk) 15:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheIncongruousSpy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:53, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, GrahamHardy. You have new messages at WP:HD.
Message added 08:08, 1 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Pratyya <sup>(Happy New Year)</sup> — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2024. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2024 goes well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding ((subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year)) to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

A very big thank you for your category fixes on the Tasmanian and Western Australian railway material. Much appreciated. Have a good new year!! SatuSuro 02:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Sayer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Milford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You posted this book cover file from a book dealer's scan. The book was published in 1916, that is, before 1923, and the original image is Public Domain. Non-creative derived works of public domain 2D images are not copyrightable under US law. In particular, US courts have ruled that "slavish reproduction" and "sweat of the brow" are not protected. See, Wikipedia:Public domain#Derived works and restorations of works in the public domain and Wikipedia:Fair use#Legal position for Wikipedia reliance on this policy, and references to the relevant US court cases.

I fixed the licensing information for File:MountainInterval.jpg to reflect this, and mentioned the above facts/cites on the talk page.

I notice you've uploaded some other public domain cover images with totally unnecessary fair-use rationale for pre-1923 images (eg, Our Mutual Friend).

I have no idea about other countries' laws. In particular, I have no idea about suitability of these images for WikiCommons.

As an aside, I noticed you mentioned (indirectly) on File:WinnieThePooh.JPG that you cropped the original image (which showed spine and cover) to just the cover, and that this somehow bypassed bookseller copyright claims (well, I think that's what you're saying). Actually, it doesn't. 90% of someone's copyrighted image will generally still be copyrighted, but he doesn't have claims period (in the US). As it is, the book came out in 1926, and if the image is still under copyright, the other reasons Wikipedia requires (which you provided) are controlling. Choor monster (talk) 19:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you sure the orange cover is the first edition cover? I'm 99.999999999% sure that both the first and second editions were Louis Darling illustrations. http://cd.pbsstatic.com/xl/86/8286/9780590118286.jpg http://img3.etsystatic.com/000/0/5169979/il_fullxfull.279239399.jpg

I believe that cover is the Alan Tiegreen cover. I didn't want to change anything without checking with you first, though. LoomisSimmons (talk) 06:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll check shortly, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you're right, which of the two you provide is the 1st edition ? Thanks, GrahamHardy (talk) 22:30, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor wishes to remove the "nationality column" and the flag icons from the Booker prize article. You edit many literature-related pages and so I seek your opinion on the article's talk page: Talk:Man_Booker_Prize#Flags.3F. It seems rather premature to do an RFC when only two editors are involved in the discussion thus far. Thanks. - Fantr (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, GrahamHardy. You have new messages at Talk:1906 (novel)#Merger proposal.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Thanks for uploading File:ATasteOfBlackberries.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:31, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Re the last two Chrestomanci books by Diana Wynne Jones.

Do you have a copy of either UK first edition (or equivalent) that identifies the cover artist? S/he is distinct from the illustrators of UK (Slater, Rostant) and US (Newbold, Craig, Dorman) "recent" covers in the series --2000 to date. It's necessary to visit more than one title in the series at ISFDB because some entries that do identify cover artists are not linked to images. --P64 (talk) 03:24, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

http://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=5129058955 says that the Conrad's Fate illustrator is Tim Stevens; I have added this to the Infobox GrahamHardy (talk) 20:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

http://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=8806819709 says that The Pinhoe Egg has Tim Stevens as both illustratoe and cover artist; I have added these to the Infobox GrahamHardy (talk) 20:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Twelve Tribes of Hattie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Migration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

113 sub-categories of Category:19th-century fires and Category:20th-century fires, three of which you have created (Category:1915 fires, Category:1951 fires and Category:1960 fires), have been nominated for merging. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Waltham, The Duke of 17:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your helpful contributions to Targeted Killing in International Law, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

literature
Thank you for quality articles around books, including authors, illustrations and prizes, for expanding our knowledge on train wrecks, such as Shepherdsville train wreck, for taking care of images and for working as a category gnome, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A year ago, you were the 450th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 450 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

in future please leave an edit summary to show what you did in the edit. To this day, I still get really scared if someone edits one of my articles.--Launchballer 17:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(I like the section heading but it fits the first paragraph only. Thus the bold heading.)

The subcats of Random House books for RH imprints or divisions or acquisitions, such as Chatto & Windus books, are also in cat Books by publisher. Is that double listing general so that the latter shows all the publishers/divisions/imprints whose books by publisher categories have been created? If not, is it general to the smaller number such as Chatto & Windus that were once independent publishers of some books covered by wikipedia articles?

Book series

Shouldn't we put Harry Potter books in Bloomsbury Publishing books and Scholastic books and remove the individual Harry Potter novels? I have in mind book series categories and articles, not Novels by J. K. Rowling if it happens that there has been one publisher for all them. Do you agree? Or disagree because there is one auxiliary Harry Potter book, not one of the famous novels, from a different publisher: The Tales of Beedle the Bard? (For Rowling among others, we have a novels by writer category that includes book articles on non-novels. I have no problem with it, at least for today.)

Series articles such as The Chronicles of Prydain may also be placed in books by publisher categories. Are you doing that at least where there is one publisher for a series? (Holt books have no category yet, iiuc.) I don't believe that categories need to be renamed for books and book series but I would say "Books and books series" in the Books by publisher category prefaces.

--P64 (talk) 22:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I noticed you added the category Category:24th century in fiction to the Fahrenheit 451 article. Could you explain how the 24th century figure is calculated? I don't see it from the novel itself. I started a discussion about this on the article's talk page. Please reply there. Cheers, Jason Quinn (talk) 04:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Gift of Rain may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | cover_artist = [http://carolinetomlinson.com/ Caroline Tomlinson]] for [http://www.jellylondon.com/ jellylondon.com]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Last Orders may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], [[Gravesend, Kent|Gravesend]], [[Rochester, Kent|Rochester]], [[Chatham Naval Memorial]]) and [[Canterbury Cathedral]]. The title 'Last Orders' not only refers to these instructions as

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Dressmaker may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• co.uk/Books/Dressmaker-Audio-Beryl-Bainbridge-Jacqueline-King-Read-by/9781860426100 fishpond.co.uk]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Post-Birthday World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Last Orders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rochester, Blackheath, Chatham, Gravesend and Dartmouth

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Graham, I saw you edit to Up in the Air (novel) and thought it was rather ironic that you added "Category:Doubleday books" on the anniversary of the date sale plummeted. --Dan Dassow (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EndOfTheRoad.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. "Preferred", I'm almost postive, means that an image from the 1st edtion is preferred to another edition. Since the image wasn't replaced with one from another edition, there is nothing to be preferred. I removed it basically because the image doesn't actually contribute to the article—it's not strongly associated with the book, and it doesn't contribute to understanding the article. Do you really believe the image makes "a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone"? Rather than a "significant" contribution, it seems to me that it makes no contribution at all. Fine if it were free, but hard to justify when it's a Fair Use image, I think. Curly Turkey (gobble) 21:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just follow Wikipedia:WikiProject_Novels/Style_guidelines#Images which appears fairly clear, or at least always has done till now... GrahamHardy (talk) 21:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It does appear fairly clear: "do you know why you are choosing that image and can you justify it?" Why was this image chosen? Does it improve the article? Does it improve the reader's understanding of the article's contents? Does it help the reader identify the book? If it were out of copyright, there'd be no issue, since it wouldn't actually harm the article, but it's pretty hard to rationalize how it improves the article. Curly Turkey (gobble) 00:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, as appeasement to the disinfobox crowd, I prefer to keep infobox parameters to a minimum. For example, are there any editions besides the first that are 230 pages? I have two copies (ISBN 9780553125160 and ISBN 978-0-385-24089-5), neither of which are 230 pages. This parameter is no more than misleading clutter. Ditto the publisher: it's been put out by Doubleday, Penguin, Anchor, Avon, and Bantam that I know of—quite likely several others, as well. Curly Turkey (gobble) 00:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moved the debate to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels talk to be continued for wider debate...Hope that's OK GrahamHardy (talk) 08:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not that I have any problem with it, but I think there was probably a more elegant way than just copying & pasting this whole discussion there. Curly Turkey (gobble) 12:13, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dying, In Other Words, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harvester Press (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wild Seed (novel) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | cover_artist = John Cayea<ref>http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?198157 isfdb]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Borrowers Avenged may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Viking Kestrel]] (UK)<ref>[http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Borrowers-Avenged-Mary-Norton/dp/0722658044/ amazon</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seriously, man, this is just obnoxious. You're well aware that I am not the only one objecting to this. Curly Turkey (gobble) 20:52, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is a pretty foul image I'll admit - moved into Publication history GrahamHardy (talk) 21:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The issue, as I've already talked to you about, is not the placement of the image. If a cover image is going to be used, the infobox is probably the best place. The issue is using a Fair Use image when the image itself is never talked about at any point in the body of the text. If it were a Free image, it would do no harm—it would be decorative, anyways, if gratuitous.

Of course, there are the issues of the other parameters you added, as well. As other editors have pointed out, the interpretation that Infobox book must be about the first edition is highly suspicious, and is counter to the WikiProject Infobox guidelines that an infobox is to be "a quick and convenient summary of the key facts about a subject". As the discussion is still active, I think it would be best to cut back on these sorts of edits until consensus has been reached. Curly Turkey (gobble) 21:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Let me begin with a belated "heads up" where I should have notified you five weeks ago. Recently at Template talk:Infobox book#Illustrator and cover artist, reviving a theme you raised last year, I suggested that when we do have a cover image we should use the image caption to identify the cover artist, as for The Borrowers (current version) and The Borrowers Afield (previous version, but the image no longer fits). When the cover artist is the illustrator, this replaced my previous suggestion that we use surname alone in the cover_artist field (the suggestion now holds only when we show no cover image). Either way, this affirms we know the cover artist of the image we show. One editor approved; no other replied.

I hope you will begin to use "F/first edition" rather than "1st edition" in the caption field of infobox book. A numeral should not begin a caption, as it should not begin a sentence. The infobox documentation elsewhere shows "(first edition)" for illustration and it uses '1st' only in documentary talk and code, not for illustration. I don't now find this point in the manual of style but I'll suggest somewhere that we not use ordinals such as '1st' at any position in prose (something now under discussion regarding dates).

When you do replace {infobox book} image and caption, that is commonly (on my watchlist) because you have first edition content to replace something else. Please read the old caption and cover_artist field. A caption that begins "Frazee cover ..." suggests a cover_artist field that names Frazee, as at The Borrowers Afield. On my suggestion at Template talk:Infobox book#Illustrator and cover artist, the latter will be true, and you will create a mismatch, whenever you introduce first edition content.

--P64 (talk) 16:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red Branch (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Times Without Number, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Brunner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work. Keep it up. Rainbowsix1999alpha1 (talk) 16:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

we should team up. im new to this, but i would like to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbowsix1999alpha1 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 12 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, can I ask, have you read Personal Demons (Desrochers novel) series? If so, can you create articles for the Personal Demons sequels, Original Sins and Late Rites?--NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Famous Impostors may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *Witchcraft]] and Clairvoyance

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Family Arsenal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Graham, I have removed the reference you inserted to a Brokernet anniversary, since this was unfortunately only available to those with an i-Law subscription Chrisj1948 (talk) 09:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Barbosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Information (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mariana (novel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eton

The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Radio 4

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Go Down, Moses may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | media_type = Print ([[Hardcover|Hardback]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gone, Baby, Gone (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I am conducting a survey of most active Wikipedians, regarding reasons they may reduce their activity. I would be very interested in having you participate in it. Would you be interested? (If you reply to me here, please WP:ECHO me). Thank you for your consideration, --<sub>Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here</sub> 11:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marry Me (collection), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Mosquito Coast (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Memos from Purgatory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zip gun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheNakedFace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moonlight Mile (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Perfume (novel) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | cover_artist = [[Antoine Watteau]] detail from<br>"Nymphe et satyre", 1715-16<ref>[http://www.blogartnu.com/tag/rococo/ Retrieved 2014-02-24</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Portrait of a Killer: Jack the Ripper—Case Closed may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.Reply[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• murders were made known to the general public at the time. Cornwell cites Sickert's artistic genius] as useful for crafting the Ripper's letters by disguising handwriting and varying sketching styles.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red Dog (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knopf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GrahamHardy - Ref your recent change. You do know that File:SandPebbles.jpg is not an image of a first edition dust jacket, don't you? I'll fix it later today. - GroveGuy (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheRedPony.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You've, um, probably noticed by now that I've put up a 600dpi scan of the cover, File:Rudyard Kipling - The Fringes of the Fleet (cover).jpg If you want anything else from either the book or sheet music for Fringes of the Fleet, I own both, so just ask. Adam Cuerden <sup>(talk)</sup> 18:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sigh. Another discussion about a tiresome topic. Why oh why did you have to unlink United States and English language? The Way of Kings has the same layout, and I imagine Wikipedia would be glad if we linked these pages. So can you argument your change or revert it? Much appreciated. Greetings, --J.A.R. Huygebaert (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)J.A.R. HuygebaertReply[reply]

I just used the model example given in Template:Infobox_book. I've seen MOS/OVERLINK cited also, give me a while to dig that out...GrahamHardy (talk) 17:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here it is Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_not_be_linked which states that the following sghould not be linked "the names of major geographic features and locations; languages; religions; common occupations", hence I unilnked United States and English, thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:APersonalRecord.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheSoundAndTheFuryCover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to SS-GB may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• s political manoeuvrings against Huth. Undeterred, Archer travels to an English manor house] to witness the arrival of an American agent who arrives to negotiate with Mayhew over the King and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MS Port Link may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Ships of Stena Line]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grits (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Listener (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi GrahamHardy. Could you please check your edit, [1], back. Is it correct? Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fixed, not sure what happened there ! GrahamHardy (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Cruel Bird Came to the Nest and Looked In (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

Timoleon Vieta Come Home (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vieta

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I see that you've blanked the article with the intention of deleting the article since it appears to be a copy of another article. First, it should be noted that you were correct in pointing out that the article should be deleted as a duplicate article. However, please be aware that blanking is not tantamount to deleting. For recently created duplicate article, the correct avenue would be to tag it with the WP:CSD deletion criterion WP:A10. For non-recent articles, other avenues are WP:PROD and WP:AFD. In this case, A10 should work, so I've tagged the article for deletion under that criterion. If you have questions or comments, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. KJ <sup>«Click Here»</sup> 13:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Three Chinese Poets may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:ThreeChinesePoets.JPG|thumb|First edition<br>publ. Penguin/Viking)]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Starfall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Started Early, Took My Dog (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WPC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Chapman & Hall books, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:18, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Started Early, Took My Dog (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Terraplane (novel) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | media_type = Print ([[Hardcover]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Room 13 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | cover_artist = Mark Robertson<ref>[http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?14495 isfdb</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Winkie (novel) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• He is first called "Marie" in the hands of Ruth, his first owner. By then Marie was just a toy], albeit already having consciousness and feelings. Marie is then passed on to Ruth's five children.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to La sombra de Heidegger may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• an image produced a deep impact in Müller's conscience, and he started to feel profoundly guilty]] about the death of that single man.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Black Gryphon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Series—Sequence of events by Valdemar reckoning((Citation needed|date=May 2010))</ref><ref>[http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?5511 isfdb</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Last Enchantment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheEnglishTeacher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 19:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wild Boy (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, GrahamHardy, thanks for adding cover images for D&D-related novels! I would note that on Preludes (Dragonlance series), those same images you added were previously removed, and they may be removed again at some point for the same reason. However, if you would like to help out by adding cover images for D&D-related novels I could make some recommendations for cases where they are less likely to be argued about? I would request Artifact of Evil, for one. BOZ (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought they might not remain, I was sent there by the presence of Kendermore in Category:Novel has infobox needing 1st edition cover which I am working thorough, as it appears the talk pages still remain. The talk page Talk:Kendermore also says the novel is of Mid Importance so its curious it was merged, anyway I'm not arguing, if the image goes then it goes, althogh all the captions should be removed from the infoboxes...ThanksGrahamHardy (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ganymede Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ganymede Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. --Bejnar (talk) 15:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Graham Hardy, Thanks so much for getting the first edition book cover for every one of the twenty novels in the Cadfael Chronicles.

This is something I have not learned how to do, in particular the copyright stuff, and you did it all. The articles are so much better with those covers. It is interesting to see how they change in style over time, too. The Monk's Hood cover in particular, hard to see what the intent was -- showing the making of the external-use-only salve, or the small bottle that was tossed out the window? The others are clearer to me, at least. First edition cover for Virgin in the Ice, most impressive, artwork exactly to the point. Thanks! --Prairieplant (talk) 05:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ColorPurple.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The480Novel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheSignOfTheFour.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Time of the Great Freeze may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''' is a [[science fiction]] novel by American author [[Robert Silverberg]], first published by [[Holt, Rhinehart and Winston in 1964. The novel concerns a group of explorers, living in an

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are adding this for theaters completed in categories. However, this is probably not correct since all theaters are not commercial buildings. Many of these are associated with schools and are therefore not commercial. This would violate WP:CAT. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries GrahamHardy (talk) 07:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham, I am unsure of your additions of 2 categories to the Sandygate Road article. I cannot understand why it should have 2 completed in categories. Regards. Keith D (talk) 11:47, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rochester Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sporting Life. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Graham:

I took a very splendid photo last summer (2013) of the Verdi monument in Verdi Square, at W 73rd St and Broadway in Manhattan, and would like to release it under the GNU license system for use at this article and for the article on Verdi Square, the editors of which have been crying out for a good photo. It's been a long time since I sourced photos for other articles (never my own photo), and I know from experience that it can be tricky. Many photos I sourced completely within the guidelines of WP were summarily challenged and then deleted.

This time I would like to go about it in the right manner. If you have experience and knowledge of this sort, and can help make sure I am credited as the photographer, I would gladly work with you to get the photo into the article. I will also reach out to other editors of this article with the hopes that someone can step up to the plate and get the photo up properly.

Thanks,

paul klenk <sup>talk</sup> 14:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello GrahamHardy/Archive 2! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women writers, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women writers on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:50, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello GH. I am sorry that I have removed the red cat that you are currently adding to our biography articles. Would you please take a moment to create the category so that it isn't a red link. That way it will keep other editors from making the same mistake I did. Thanks for your time and your editing here at WikiP. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 16:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries ! GrahamHardy (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Many thanks. MarnetteD|Talk 16:28, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article 21 Sceptre Classics for the 21st Century has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable series

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 14:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Polyester sculptures, which you created, has been nominated for Upmerging into Category:Fabric sculptures. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linda Bangs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waverly, New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joe Lhota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lindenhurst. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia Portia Royall Inness-Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nassau County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thanks for all your wonderful work on categorization recently. I just wanted to let you know that this subject category is misspelled by one letter. It should be Pewee Valley. Cheers! Stevie is the man! <sup>Talk • Work</sup> 12:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Renamed ! Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 12:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oscar M. Corbin, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hopkins County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, GrahamHardy. You have new messages at WilliamJE's talk page.
Message added 23:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

...William 23:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you remove Category:People from Anne Arundel County, Maryland from Dennis Callahan? -- Pemilligan (talk) 18:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joseph I. France may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:People from Port Deposit, Maryland]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:23, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	For your work on Categorizing people by location. ...William 17:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burton C. Mossman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamond A Ranch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Langford (golf), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austin, Illinois. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Samuel A. Cherry may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ((DEFAULTSORT:Cherry, Samuel A))))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re your addition of Category:People from South Whitley, Indiana to the Will Cuppy article: Cuppy spent summers at his grandmother's farm near South Whitley, but he was born in Auburn and grew up there. I recommend removing the South Whitley category from this article. (p.s. - Cuppy's namesake uncle and his father are buried in the South Whitley cemetery. Cuppy's grave is in Auburn. --Cuppysfriend (talk) 19:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just made deletion myself. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 16:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Saqi Books has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable publisher and books store, which, apparently does not exists any more (its domain name is on sale). Almost unsourced article: the sources consist in 4 dead links, a blog post and a photo with one line of text provided by Saki Books itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. D.Lazard (talk) 14:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just wondering if you have any thoughts re: the idea of WMF hosting a genealogy project. If so, feel free to contribute to this discussion. And apologies if I have made this request before. ---Another Believer <sub>(Talk)</sub> 16:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A page you previously contributed to, Joe Williams (jazz singer), had many prior revisions deleted due to copyright issues. For details please see Talk:Joe Williams (jazz singer). Your prior version may be temporarily restored upon request if you need it for reference to re-incorporate constructive edits that do not make use of the copyright infringing material. Please feel free to leave me a talk message if you need this done. Happy editing, — xaosflux <sup>Talk</sup> 22:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Clay, Alabama, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William 01:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Cordova, Alabama, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William 01:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:People from Heflin, Alabama, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 15:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:People from Adamsville, Alabama, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 17:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I have noticed that you are an expert uploaded so I have a favor to ask of you. I am currently working on a page for a musician named Barbara Robison which is on my user page. She performed in a band named The Peanut Butter Conspiracy. Anyways, I was wondering if you could upload the finished draft. You will only need to properly place references that I will gather for you. I am not too interested in credit, just getting her name out. I would message you again when the whole project is completed. Thanks for the consideration! Peace to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGracefulSlick (talk • contribs) 01:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi GrahamHardy. I am Piotr Konieczny (User:Piotrus), you may know me as an active content creator (see my userpage), but I am also a professional researcher of Wikipedia. Recently I published a paper (downloadable here) on reasons editors participated in Wikipedia's biggest vote to date (January 2012 WP:SOPA). I am now developing a supplementary paper, which analyzes why many editors did not take part in that vote. Which is where you come in :) You are a highly active Wikipedian (64th to be exact), and you were active back during the January 2012 discussion/voting for the SOPA, yet you did not chose to participate in said vote. I'd appreciate it if you could tell me why was that so? For your convenience, I prepared a short survey at meta, which should not take more than a minute of your time. I would dearly appreciate you taking this minute; not only as a Wikipedia researcher but as a fellow content creator and concerned member of the community (I believe your answers may help us eventually improve our policies and thus, the project's governance). PS. If you chose to reply here (on your userpage), please WP:ECHO me. Thank you! --<sub>Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here</sub> 23:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham. My name is Bryant Nelson. I saw that you were the last person to edit me and I would like to add a few things if that's ok with you. This is going to be my legacy and how a lot of people will judge me and my career.. Thanks for your time. Hope to hear from you soon. Yours Truly Bryant Nelson

Why was removing the Defaultsort Necessary?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sjokz&diff=656253518&oldid=655951021
--- :D Derry Adama (talk) 22:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So that the article appears in the correct location within the categories, if you want Eefje Depoortere to appear in the categories also I am happy to create a redirect, please advise, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is already a redirect, Eefje Depoortere, so if it's better to do what you plan, certainly go ahead --- :D Derry Adama (talk) 20:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All done, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 21:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	For uploading all of those book covers, I have probably deleted the old revisions of hundreds of images that you have replaced with a better version. James086Talk 08:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham, how are you?

Please note that Brazilian and Spanish footballers may have a different sorting system, as explained in WP:MCSTJR. They may be known by different names.

Thank you, MYS77 <sup>✉</sup> 03:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you PLEASE READ what I wrote to you before? Thank you, MYS77 <sup>✉</sup> 03:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I do read, I leave most as they are, but changed this one because of Template:Clube Atlético Paranaense squad which has E Junio... GrahamHardy (talk) 07:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see. Although it was written in the intro "known as Edigar Junio", but thanks for your reply. Cheers, MYS77 <sup>✉</sup> 03:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I saw you changed the DEFAULTSORT in Haliru Mohammed Bello from "Haliru Mohammed Bello" to "Bello, Haliru Mohammed". I think this is incorrect. The Hausa/Fulani do not have surnames in the European sense. Local newspapers may call the subject "Mr. Mohammed", as in [2], or may call him "Bello", as in [3]. The BBC calls him "Bello Mohammed Haliru", so do some local sources, e.g. [4]. Another local source uses Haliru Bello Mohammed [5]. Whatever you choose as the sort key is wrong. It is probably best to just use the article title, which is also wrong. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

undone Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 13:00, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Thanks. I forgot to mention "Bello Haliru Mohammed" and "Mohammed Haliru Bello". It is impossible to get it right. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham,
I'm curious about the cover illustrated here. The caption says that it's from the US first edition (which the text says was published "14 March 1924 by George H. Doran, New York") but this [6] has "A.L. Burt Company" with no mention of Doran, and on the Doran wikipedia page there's no mention of A.L. Burt, so I'm confused. Is there some information missing somewhere? Thanks --TyrS 03:34, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Didn't look right, I have changed it ! Hope this one is correct GrahamHardy (talk) 09:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for that Graham. I do think there's a connection between AL Burt & Doran but haven't been able to find documentation.--TyrS 03:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hartmut Vogtmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberwil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Ghana! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 3,474 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in Ghana.

• Browse the new WikiProject page
• Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've just undone your attempt to move Janine Gordon via cut and paste. That's not acceptable, because it breaks the chain of attribution in the edit history. I'm looking to see if the situation is clear-cut enough to move the page without discussion; otherwise, you'll need to open WP:RM discussion about the title. —C.Fred (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looking at the article, it seems like Jah Jah is her common name, but that's in use. I don't think it's clear-cut to move to MC Jah Jah, so I suggest starting discussion on a requested move to get broader consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 12:50, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Mr. Hardy>. I hope you are good and happy. I'm translating the article Death in the Afternoon into Arabic but I face a problem, the first picture can't be used in my Arabic Article> Would you kindly help me? Have a nice day Mr. Hardy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esraa Gamal 37 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Modern Baptists, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dbpedia.org/page/James_Wilcox.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You changed the sort key of some articles about individuals with arabic names, under the authority of WP:namesort. You probably meant WP:NAMESORT, which refers to the (under-referenced) wikipedia article Arabic names. It has been considerably updated since I last looked at it. Note: it specifically discludes the names of individuals from Saudi Arabia. Geo Swan (talk) 02:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re the categories by year, I have added navigation templates to the series for "Buildings and Structures" and "Sports venues" eg Category:Buildings and structures demolished in 2010 and Category:Sports venues demolished in 2010 Hugo999 (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So i see you repeatedly change the default sort on 4-5 articles like "Mascara Dorada" as if the last name was "Dorada". It is not, his name means "Golden Mask" and should not sort by Dorada. Just like."Green Arrow" should not sort by "Arrow" or "Lone Ranger" not sorting by "Ranger". Even if sme article uses just "Dorada" that does not make it his last name. Please stop changing these, they are correct already.  MPJ-US  00:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Same here: [7] and [8]. I had to undo those edits. 91.152.204.249 (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Most dates for Renaissance paintings are guesses by scholars, which quite often change, or are disputed. Please don't waste everybody's time by categorizing them too precisely. Johnbod (talk) 00:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohamed El Ghanem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Rome. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, GrahamHardy/Archive 2. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 15:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Blues People

added a link pointing to William Morrow

The Paying Guests

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm puzzled by this. It certainly does not seem to meet wp:Minor, and the edit comment seems incorrect. "To my missionary critics" was published in the April 1901 issue of The North American Review (available on JSTOR). If there is something else published between, then should that something else not have been inserted in lieu of the deletion? LeadSongDog come howl! 22:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]