This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stralsund station, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.archive.org/stream/977uboat001463mbp/977uboat001463mbp_djvu.txt.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Neckar-Alb Railway, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. BabbaQ (talk) 13:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC) --BabbaQ (talk) 13:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The German Project Barnstar.
		Awarded as a thank you for the tremendous contribution you have made to German railway articles. Keep up the good work! Given by Bermicourt 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Seconded. Its invaluable!! Keep up the superb work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey- I nominated Plochingen station for DYK, but the reviewer suggested that the article include more inline citations (at least one per paragraph). Is it possible that you could add those? You can see the nomination here: T:TDYK#Plochingen station --E♴(talk) 22:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

...is currently a being reviewed - all help with any sources to fill the article with citations would be insanely appreciated. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Russell Drysdale The rabbitter and his family 1938.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Marbach (Neckar) station, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.fsmmali.org/nation/n+gauge.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you think this article might merit inclusion in wikiproject finance or economonics?842U (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As you participated in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Timeshift9, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 June 5#User:Timeshift9. T. Canens (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham. Sorry, I may have screwed up the display of images when I amended the DB Bahnhof template last night. Of course we can either fix the template to take the bare filename or require the full entry. I slightly favour the former because it means no extra work when transferring the data from de.wiki, but can live with either. --Bermicourt (talk) 18:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh dear, you seem to be right. That's only happened in the last few days or so because it was there last weekend when I wrote the article. I think I'll remove it as I doubt it will come back. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 13:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Australian Politics for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Would you mind looking at this little article? I have trouble seeing what's not notable about the place and what's wrong with the references. Doug butler (talk) 23:19, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Doug butler (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Grahamec/Archive 3! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article Duisburg-Großenbaum station--The content seems pretty substantial.However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: some of the article's Wikilinks are broken. Jipinghe (talk) 03:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. --LauraHale (talk) 07:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Kinzig Valley Railway (Hesse) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to German states

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for adding the WikiProject Australia tags to several of my articles talk pages.

I have added further text, references and images to the Sunbury earth rings article now- could it be worthy of promoting above stub class now and how is this done ? Garyvines (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you take a look at Australasian Law Teachers Association. It seems worth keeping to me. --Greenmaven (talk) 03:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. In Mannheim Hauptbahnhof, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Eberbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec, thanks for adding the wikiproject Australia link to the talk page of Quadrilateral Security Dialogue. I see that you've rated the article as C-class, meaning that it is "useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study," and that it "is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material," and "should have references to reliable sources." I've provided 27 references from major global papers and the most relevant American think tank, giving one reference at least to support the material in each paragraph. Could you please provide a few quick and concrete suggestions regarding how I can improve the article? Perhaps I should try to cite a number of Chinese sources and have a "response from China" section? Thanks for your help. -Darouet (talk) 19:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Wuppertal-Oberbarmen–Opladen railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German states (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for adding the "Supported by WikiProject Australian Sports" tag to the talk page of the Western Australia Roller Derby page. I'm a newbie to this, and I have a quick question - someone has raised an issue regarding the notability of the organisation, and of Rollerderby as a sport more broadly. Could I use this tag to "politely disagree" by raising the point that there are others that disagree with the assertion that rollerderby is not notable?

Vector.Ward (talk) 03:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Vector.Ward (talk) 08:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited South Harz Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silberhütte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Do you know how one invokes the 3RR rule, in relation to what you rightly described as the "management claptrap" about project management? He must have re-inserted it more than half a dozen times now. Thanks, -- Alarics (talk) 14:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Further to that, Luk has now invoked 3RR but the IP is only blocked for 1 day which I suspect will not solve the problem. -- Alarics (talk) 16:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Zollernalb Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danube Valley Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of railway stations in Saxony-Anhalt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
	Thank you Grahamec for working on tagging the pages I create. I will be starting to tag my own pages that I create on places on Victoria because I will be create many more! David. S 07:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for working to improve Wikipedia with the new article you created, Weil der Stadt station. Your efforts are appreciated. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Tauber Valley Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lauda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Grahamec, I saw that you've previously contributed to Nukunu http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nukunu&oldid=246486739 & as I've just substantially searched for other online literature, collecting, collating it into that wikiArticle, I'm wondering if you too would care to take a look & help me progress it further? Kind regards, Matthew (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Crailsheim station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lauda

Lahn-Kinzig Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nidda

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Aar Valley Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porphyry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just wanted to thank you for all the terrific work you've done on my posts!Dutchy85 (talk) 02:05, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brilon-Wald station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brion

Wiesbaden Ost station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Main

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Lübeck–Bad Kleinen railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schönberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec. I am here to register my outrage x4 at the four rankings you have put on this new article's talk page today. I know ACT is isolated, as a non-Australian I had not understood just how isolated it must be. What is to be done about this? Sincerely yet to my own surprise good-humouredly, Eddaido (talk) 09:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair enough, I reverse my ratings.--Grahame (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for that. What do you think about the change of name of the article? I think it is not correct. Eddaido (talk) 06:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Hardt Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phillipsburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Freiburg Central Station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Höllentalbahn and Trans-Europe Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

```Buster Seven Talk 12:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your article translations into the English wikipedia! Rosiestep (talk) 03:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am puzzled as to how you rate this article as a "c".

A "C" article = Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.

What gaps, and what cleanup issues? It considerably more complete than most of those that have been rated "B". As usual, I am amazed at the apparent irregularity with which articles are rated.

Amandajm (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your speedy response! Amandajm (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, I did something stupid, early on, and put up several articles for FA review simultaneously, without realising what a horrible process it is, particularly if someone appears to resent your contributions. I've never done it again. I might try it with some article that is not of major importance. Many of the articles that I've written, being large and generic, get a lot of hits all the time and need to remain as stable as possible.

Have you any idea what the policy is on articles of long standing, and importance which are well written and researched but don't have adequate references for today's Wikipedia? Th two articles to which I refer are Architecture and Cathedral.

Whoever wrote "Architecture" in the first place chose the scope carefully and wrote it well. It is relatively brief, but encapsulates what "architecture" is and has been over the centuries, without touching on matters of style, or giving any sort of detailed History of architecture. It does what it ought to do as a lead article: it summarises. However, every architectural student on the planet wants to enlarge the "contemporary" section by adding the name of their own favourite architect or theorist. It's all dealt with (or can be dealt with) in all the other articles about "green architecture" and so on! But it is always the "big one" that is under attack, and has random snapshots shoved into it!

Anyway, the original editor did a great job, to which I added info that filled a few gaps, or broadened the scope a little. But it is barely referenced.

Cathedral is a generic article with exactly the same problem. Whoever wrote it knew their stuff. And it is hard to come along at a later date and fill in references for a generic article, that attempts to state what cathedrals are and how they function, across denominations and around the world. If I want specific and detailed references for Cologne Cathedral, there are a thousand to be had..... but "cathedral' pure and simple, is a problem.

The question is: Do we have a Grandfather clause to accommodate old but good articles? Amandajm (talk) 03:20, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, Maybe I didn't make myself completely clear.. this is about two different matters!

I know it is a hopeless case to try to get either Cathedral or Architecture to FA, or even GA, with such limited references. They would be demolished in the processed.

I am just concerned that they may be demolished anyway by someone stickler for the rules coming through and deleting anything not referenced. It does happen.

On the matter of FAs, I notice that when people get on to a winning formula, they stick to it: Cyclone seasons, Australian birds and a number of other such things on which one can write monographs. I'm not really interested in point-scoring, but it would be nice if some of the articles about significant subjects had higher ratings.

Sometimes I am amazed at the gaps, and at the poor quality of articles of top significance.

Cheers! Amandajm (talk) 13:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That is so depressing! Well, I'm still here! I seem to have fortitude! But I keep looking at things and seeing challenges everywhere!

I have to admit, sometimes I just shudder and go away! History of Architecture was a mess for years, and I felt quite guilty about it! At last some nice soul overhauled it! About the time I was overhauling Ancient Greek architecture and writing Romanesque secular and domestic architecture. That was, in fact, the biggest challenge I have ever faced. What came out of it is possibly the definitive work on the subject in the English language. Yet I am very much aware of its shortcomings, as the remaining buildings are scattered, the German buildings are restored beyond belief, the French don't know what they've got (I mean, seriously, when I was in France in 2006, I discovered a street of Ancient Roman shopfronts, the remains of a Roman temple, and the recycled pieces of a Roman villa in the space of two days, either unrecognized or wrongly identified!) As for Italy, so much Romanesque architecture remains that a great part of it is unregistered. I just love the photo of a splendid Romanesque doorway, which (if it was in England) would be renowned.... but its in Italy, and since it is wide, it has had an automatic telling machine fitted into it! If the English had a few more remaining Norman houses, then the whole subject would be better studied! I wish I read German! Whinge, whinge, whinge!

Go and look at this, if you want to know how I amuse myself when not writing on Wikipedia: Leonardo da Vinci and the Virgin of the Rocks. The National Gallery, London is trying very hard to ignore this, but every now and then, someone gets online from some country or another and finds it so diverting that they read the entire article. Someone from Ecuador was going through it yesterday, and had read 9 pages, when I last looked. Amandajm (talk) 14:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Axes" is a puzzle. Is it "axes" as in "axises"? What is the German, exactly?

Sometimes translations can be close, but confusing. I came across a document that kept talking about "lapidary" marks in relation to an architectural work. It took me a while to figure out that it meant "mason's mark".

Amandajm (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Axes If I were you, I would look at your pic, and interpret, because translating it exactly isn't working well. The whole concept isn't translating. It seems to refer to either a bay, or an opening, and may be interchangeable. A bay is an architectural unit, that is repeated horizontally in more or less the same form, e.g. the bays of the nave of a church. A facade can also have clearly defined bays. But in the case of this railway station, it doesn't. So presumably the word referes to the openings.

I would tend to just simplify it to "There are 5 portals on the ground floor with five windows above them on the first floor", or however it should be described. The facts are still coming from the German article, but the expression must be made to work in English.

Amandajm (talk) 17:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)Reply[reply]

I've just moved Michell Group of Companies from userspace (with a redirect G. H. Michell) and find there's already a Michell Pty Ltd for the same mob. Any suggestions on the best way to combine them? Doug butler (talk) 16:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Darmstadt Nord station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eberbach

Groß-Umstadt Wiebelsbach station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eberbach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Had been meaning to go back to cleanup (South Perth Esplanade) - cheers SatuSuro 02:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Hessische Landesbahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nidda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for copyediting the 8th of March Revolution article, I really appreciate it! :) --TIAYN (talk) 09:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is probably a bit rude of me, but could you take a look at the 1966 Syrian coup d'état?? Its a DYK nom, so I would appreciate it you helped me bring it into decent shape. --TIAYN (talk) 10:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. --TIAYN (talk) 12:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hegau-Ablach Valley Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mengen

List of the first German railways to 1870 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mengen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Timeshift9, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Timeshift9 (2nd nomination). Cunard (talk) 06:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec. This question is not aimed specifically at you but, as I don't know who to ask, I am hoping you can help. I write articles on local history in Wikipedia. Soon after I have started them, project banners "magically" appear on the Talk page eg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:George_Watson_%28mayor%29 which you put there. These banners quite frankly mystify me. I have now seen a lot of them but have yet to really comprehend what they mean or what I should (or shouldn't) be doing in response to them. I must admit to finding the constant rating of "Low importance" and "Start Class" to be somewhat offensive, especially when there was never a single specific comment/suggestion on which I could act. Simply saying "not good enough" isn't very helpful :-( However, I had the impression that since one or more projects seemed to be saying they were taking an interest in the article meant at some time I would see others working on the articles or offering advice or something, but it doesn't seem to happen. Despite doing further work on many of these articles, there is no evidence that the project has done anything to re-assess them, or provide any feedback. Is there something I was supposed to have done in response to these banners appearing -- if so, what was it? I am feeling very discouraged by the constant appearance of these banners, given the amount of time I put into researching and writing the articles. Who or what are these projects and what does it mean when they "claim" an article and provide these non-specific criticisms? My intention was to try to complete the set of biographies on Brisbane mayors but, if the topic is considered so unimportant as each set of banners would seem to be saying, am I just wasting my time? Kerry (talk) 06:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If projects are not active, why persist with these proect banners? I keep seeing all the talk about declining editorship on WIkipedia, and I have to wonder why people can't figure it out. It seems to be pretty obvious to me why new editors don't hang around; it's the constant negative feedback and unconstructive criticism. I don't want some randomly awarded barnstar (every child wins a prize) but I would appreciate it if criticism was in the form of specific suggestions, e.g. Pointing out other sources that might be consulted, etc. Does anybody ever think about the impact of project banners on editor retention? Kerry (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wasn't talking about positive feedback. I was talking about unhelpful criticism. The project banners say the article is not very good (despite being assessed once usually within a day of being created first -- why not wait a month?) and without a single specific suggestion on how to make it better. We might not be able to create a positive feedback culture on Wikipedia, but I think we can stop a negative feedback culture. Don't leave criticism unless it is constructive. Kerry (talk) 21:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Berek. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Stuttgart Neuwirtshaus station, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Berek

Thanks for the work on Gibraltar Peak (Canberra).

LauraHale (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you please explain to me the reasoning behind rating 1982 Escort Cup as being of Start quality? The Start Class definition is: "the article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted."

The article has each game and incident individually referenced, so cannot be said to be lacking referencing. The prose is formal and straightforward, so certainly encyclopedic. There may be an MoS improvement to get the results tables in a better form, but I would not describe the MoS compliance is non-existent. Notability and verifiability are confirmed by there being a couple of different types of sources, including a book and newspapers from different states. Aspirex (talk) 06:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Charters Towers, Queensland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mattinbgn (talk) 23:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there. I'm pinging you as an active Australian editor who I know is pretty experienced. There's stuff going on at Australian Christian Lobby and talk page that could use some attention. I don't have the energy for full-blown participation but thought perhaps a range of experienced editors could help sort it out as a team. Regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 23:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 9 January 2013 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.

Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

There is a discussion on AWNB concerning a template that you redirected that may be of interest to you. Lankiveil <sup>(speak to me)</sup> 11:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buchloe–Memmingen railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SBB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Immenstadt–Oberstdorf railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for tagging this article for notability back in 2008. It's still tagged; you may want to take it to the Notability noticeboard or AfD to get it resolved. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would welcome your input on Proposed changes to Main Southern railway line, New South Wales and its associated route diagram template which you created or substantially expanded. Dbromage [Talk] 08:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 24 February 2013 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.

Details and attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mühldorf (Oberbayern) station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burghausen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Munich Central Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burghausen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have doubts about the copyright permission for the first two images in the above article, under GNU. What do you think?

Sardaka (talk) 08:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree. It's not a proper name for the line; it goes against Wiki practice and quoting one railway mag isn't decisive. A formal WP:REQMOVE is the only way to reverse it. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought it doesn't make it clear who the photographer is. Since it's taken from a publication, the photographer is probably not the uploader, since the photographer would have the originals and wouldn't need to use the reproduction from a publication. Also, GNU seems to apply to documents, manuals etc, not photos, as far as I can see.

Sardaka (talk) 07:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All this applies to the other shot too: File:Seidler pool.jpg, but it's not at commons. I couldn't see how to list it for deletion at WP. Sardaka (talk) 07:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nuremberg–Roth railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of railway stations in Hesse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hainburg, Nidda and Herborn

Nuremberg Ring Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gräfenberg

Nuremberg–Feucht railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roth

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to ((infobox road)). Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Grahamec! I see you've written an article about the Glan Valley Railway (Glantalbahn), a link to which now appears in the Offenbach-Hundheim article. I also notice that you've inserted a link to the Lauter Valley Railway (Lautertalbahn). Furthermore, there is the Landstuhl–Kusel railway link in your new article. Are you planning to write articles about these two thus far red-linked railways? Kelisi (talk) 01:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• (Discuss) – Leipzig Central Station → Leipzig Hauptbahnhof Bermicourt (talk) 05:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glan Valley Railway, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Glan, Homburg and Lorraine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Blaubach may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lauterecken-Grumbach station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulmet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gare de Sarreguemines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lorraine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Girod may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '), [[Siershahn]]–[[Montabaur station|Montabaur]]–[[Limburg (Lahn) station|Limburg]]) at which stop regional trains roughly every two hours, run by the Vectus Verkehrsgesellschaft. The

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Siegburg/Bonn station may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Siegburg/Bonn''' – (Limburg Süd) – (Montabaur) – Frankfurt Airport – Frankfurt (M) Hbf}}
• |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Montabaur station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dernbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Staffel station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Limburg

Vectus Verkehrsgesellschaft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhein-Niers-Bahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duisburg-Ruhrort–Dortmund railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dortmund–Duisburg railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dorsten station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borken (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec - thanks for adding the defunct unions category to my new article on the NSW typo assoc. Much appreciated. --Kattekrab (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Schwerte (Ruhr) station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Bahn]] || [[Dortmund Central Station|Dortmund]] – '''Schwerte''' – [[Iserlohn station|Iserlohn]])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cologne–Overath railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bundesbahn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec,

You seem to be a very knowledgeable and active Wikipedian interested in Australian pages and working with the assessment program here. I'm sort of new to substantive work on Wikipedia, but have worked quite hard on the Stanley Bruce over the past months. Well its now been through a fair bit of peer review to get GA status and now to try and get to FA status, and it is almost there but its nomination to FA status just needs a few more supporting voice to get it over the line. If you had the time and wanted to have a look over it and add your support, or review/criticism if it needs more work, that would be really helpful! Thanks heaps, Unus Multorum (talk) 02:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Europe and Australia
Thank you, railfan, for quality articles such as Janszoon voyage of 1606 and Dieringhausen station, connecting Europe and Australia, also by your translations, for great images and for missing people, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A year ago, you were the 637th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:54, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 637 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hagen–Dieringhausen railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agger Valley Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oberbergische Bahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oberbergische Bahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Essen-Hügel station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Essen-Werden–Essen railway]] (((Kursbuchlink|Region=400-499|Nummer=450.6)) ((S-Bahn-NRW|6))

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Essen Stadtwald station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Essen-Werden–Essen railway]] (((Kursbuchlink|Region=400-499|Nummer=450.6)) ((S-Bahn-NRW|6))

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Grahame, very helpful. Clare. (talk) 00:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 17496-8840.htm |title=Federal Election 2013 - Polling Place Yarralumla|publisher=[[Australian Electoral Commission|accessdate=6 January 2014 )) </ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Liberal Party]].<ref name=actelec01>((cite web|title=ACT Election 2008 - Polling Booth Results (Yarralumla, Canberra |publisher= [[ACT Electoral Commission]] |url= http://www.elections.act.gov.au/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rahden (Kreis Minden-Lübbecke) station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravensberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of railway stations in Lower Saxony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norden station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for uploading all these pictures of the Belconnen Town Centre, unfortunately until the article gains more text those images will be need be removed from the article because it has turned into an image gallery which violates the Wikipedia guideline on image galleries. Your images will still be accessible via the Commons link in the External Links section and when more text is added to the article the photos can be embedded throughout. Thanks again. Cube00 (talk) 13:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ainslie, Australian Capital Territory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Garden City

O'Connor, Australian Capital Territory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Old Parliament House

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kingston, Australian Capital Territory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• -+Kingston+and+Thereabouts+Through+a+Box+Brownie&aspect=subtab13 |accessdate=24 February 2014))]</ref>
• matrix01.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/148427/484.pdf |title= 20109. Causeway Hall (Entry to the ACT Heritage Register |date=23 February 2005 |publisher=ACT Heritage Council |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Forrest, Australian Capital Territory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |title=Heritage (Decision about Registration of St Andrew’s Church Precinct, Forrest) Notice 2014) |publisher=ACT Heritage Council |date=10 February 2014 |accessdate=16 March 2014))</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Griffith, Australian Capital Territory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Blandfordia 5 Precinct southwest of Manuka began in 1926 and 1927. In 1928, southern Blandfordia (named after the [[Blandfordia |Christmas Bell]] was renamed Griffith and northern Blandfordia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barton, Australian Capital Territory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Australian strongmen, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi

any chance you could review the Wyangala page again - it is no longer stub class.

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fvalzano (talk • contribs) 01:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Updated, how's that?DirtDigger 02:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fvalzano (talk • contribs)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wabern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Animalparty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Last Chance to See Cuba, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. --Animalparty-- (talk) 01:29, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Any chance you could rerate the Wyangala page? It's undergone significant revision and i think i have addressed your previous concerns. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fvalzano (talk • contribs) 11:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lüneburg station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dannenberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hildesheim Ost station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turnout (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weser-Bahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just wanted to say thanks for giving my Wyangala article a B rating. The article has evolved significantly in the past month or so and I've nominated it for GA status. Would you be interested in evaluating the article again? CheersDirtDigger (talk) 07:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahame, Thanks for helping with Classic 100 Baroque and Before (ABC). Now that User:GFHandel has retired, we have lost a very knowledgeable and speedy editor for these articles and I was worried they would not continue. Cheers, Whiteghost.ink (talk) 04:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grahame dear, Margaret Rodgers was one who supported the notion of the "Priesthood of all believers". But she was not a priest. Never, never, never suggest, in the Anglican Diocese of Sydney that Margaret might have been a priest. She wasn't and she couldn't. She chose to remain there, and work with the system, instead of fighting it, or getting out.

One woman who wrote a short bio when Margaret retired as Archbishop's Media Officer, actually went so far as to refer to Margaret's llustrious Her-story. We do little plays-on-words in Sydney, to remind ourselves that this person isn't quite up there with people who have testicles, so what she achieved, for a female, really is remarkable, isn't it? You would wonder how, more than thirty years after Germaine Greer, anyone could use such twee and discriminating language, but, "Welcome to Sydney!"

Margaret was a deaconess. I thought that she had been made a "deacon", but apparently she hadn't.

If you look at the various things that have been written, you will notice the heavy emphasis on her most recent role "Archbishop's Media Officer" to Peter Jensen (bishop). The emphasis on this role in all the current Sydney Anglican media, makes it clear that, ultimately, a man was in charge. Do I sound bitter and resentful? Amandajm (talk) 02:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Warnemünde station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rostock Hauptbahnhof may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Rostock Hauptbahnhof''', also '''Rostock Central Station''' (from 1896 until the turn of the 20th century called ''Rostock Central-Bahnhof'', is the main

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're always the one that does it. I'm not complaining, i'm just wondering how you do it? Do you stalk my contribs? :P Timeshift (talk) 02:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ahh well there ya go. Always nice to know how behind the scenes stuff works :) Timeshift (talk) 02:51, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your kindness in rating this article: the "start class" rating has rankled me for some years now. Adamm (talk • contribs) 06:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trebnitz–Leipzig railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FRG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of railway stations in Saxony-Anhalt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ((Bf-Zeile|[[Roßlau (Elbe) station|Roßlau (Elbe)]])|[[Dessau-Roßlau|DE]]||5|||X|X||[[Bahnstrecke Roßlau–Falkenberg/Elster|Roßlau–Falkenberg/Elster]]<

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lutherstadt Wittenberg station may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |volume=1, Sachsen, Preußen, Mecklenburg und Thüringen |publisher= Transpress-Verlag |year=1980) |page= 160 |language=German)) </ref> After the destruction of the Second World War only the outer
• station|Cottbus]] and Hoyerswerda. [[Intercity-Express]] and [[Intercity (Deutsche Bahn)|Intercity)]] trains also stop in Wittenberg. The historic town centre is about one kilometre away from the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham. I have added a number of additional secondary sources to the Don Ranson article - it should be OK to remove the notability tag now.Garyvines (talk) 06:12, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec, the Wyangala article is currently listed as unknown importance for NSW. Given the extensive impact the village has had on the state (it was necessary for the construction and upgrade of Wyangala Dam), I would suggest it be made mid importance. Thanks. DirtDigger (talk) 10:14, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for fixing the lead to the Roderic Quinn article. Always grateful to have another set of eyes checking the work. I'll use this as a template in future. Cheers. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 22:19, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks so much for your work going around and correcting these following the redistribution. It's a hell of a job and one I've been dreading. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In that case, I have something for you!. Incredibly useful data file buried somewhere obscure on the VEC's website with the electorate(s) (among other things) for every locality in the state. Where a boundary runs through a locality (Archerton was the first example I could find), it'll have two (or three!) listings for that locality, each with the amount of electors in that part of the locality in each electorate. That's been a lifesaver doing this - and it's been updated for the new boundaries. The Drover's Wife (talk) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec. And thanks for all the great work you are doing for Australia (not to mention railways). Thanks too for adding WikiProject tags to many of Kerry Raymond's articles. Maybe you could double-check the "living" parameter on the bios as it's quite an important one. I've corrected a few from yes to no today. I know how easy it is to introduce errors like this with cutting and pasting — I could quite well have made similar mistakes myself. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 13:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Croydon South, Victoria

added links pointing to Electoral district of Croydon and Electoral district of Ringwood

Croydon, Victoria

added a link pointing to Electoral district of Croydon

Mooroolbark, Victoria

added a link pointing to Electoral district of Croydon

Ringwood East, Victoria

added a link pointing to Electoral district of Ringwood

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec, thanks for adding tags to articles and talk pages. Should I be doing this myself as a matter of course? I am mainly filling in gaps in industrial history and archaeology in my local area, but appreciate any other interested parties in this. All the best, Garyvines (talk) 03:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Graham, I've never been able to get my head around tags but I'm pleased you are always looking after me. Likewise I'm not sure what is happening when I'm told you have "patrolled" my work but it feels safe! As you can see I struggle with a lot of things and so haven't even created my own user page but it doesn't hold me back. One thing that really annoys me is "alma mater" in info boxes (why isn't it just education in all of them?) but I've no idea how to get around that problem. Regards Scott Castlemate (talk) 00:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion but I suspect that is all way too hard ... I just like adding biographical articles. Castlemate (talk) 00:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Graham, I'm sorry to bother you but I've created a bio for Benjamin Penny but for some reason it isn't quite working nor have my efforts to wiki link his name in articles or references been successful either? The article is up but as you can see from this comment alone it isn't connecting. Any thoughts? Castlemate (talk) 01:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks ... I'm clearly loosing it! Castlemate (talk) 08:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
		For creating and contributing to countless Australian related articles
		this WikiAward was given to Grahamec by Adamm (talk • contribs) 22:15, 25 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Grahamec,

Thank you for patrolling Richard Sanders Rogers.

Gderrin (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Killoran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cape York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Infobox Deutsche Bahn station has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox station. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use ((ping|Jc86035)) to reply to me 12:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Nuremberg S-Bahn has been nominated for merging with Template:Rail-interchange. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use ((ping|Jc86035)) to reply to me 04:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham,

I appreciate your work tagging the Queensland Heritage Register articles currently being rolled out, but I've been wondering if you could hold off on doing them until they've been up a while. At the moment (and this has happened a number of times now) you're blocking any talk page conversations about articles from showing up in people's watchlists, because you run through and tag them as a bloc, and any talk page with actual discussion shows up in people's watchlists as just being another talk page with only tags. It gets a bit frustrating when I'm trying to get article issues discussed and the only way editors in that area know that there's actually real discussion on that page if they're reading my user contributions page. The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Grahamec,

I have been writing pages about Australian plants and I've noticed then when I do, you mark their talk pages with a quality and importance rating for the Australia portal. Thank you very much for doing that. I am happy for you to continue doing so but it must be an onerous (boring?) job. You nearly always rate them Start Class, Low Importance - I'm fine with that too but if you would like me to rate them myself, I can do that. It's nice getting my work looked at by somebody else but I'm happy to save you work if you like. Peter coxhead has suggested I do so for the Plants Portal. Let me know. Best wishes to you and thanks again for all your work. Gderrin (talk) 02:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings. I recently published a new article on Warrick Couch, and you kindly tagged it as part of Project Biography, with a rating of "C" on the Quality Scale. Thank you for taking the time and effort to do that. My question is - where to go from here? Looking at the Quality Scale, "C" means that "The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup." The scale's editing suggestions really are not terribly helpful, just saying that "considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems." I would dearly love to know what specific problems the article has and how to address them - both to improve this article, and also to guide my work on future articles so they are higher quality. Is there any way to get some more specific feedback about what the problems are?--Gronk Oz (talk) 04:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For continuing to do such great work Dutchy85 (talk) 01:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, what's the deal with tagging "Ministerialist party" articles? There was a specific consensus not to party tag these articles at WT:AUSPOL like a week ago. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Ministerialist party members of the Parliament of Queensland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks heaps for the cleanup you're doing on these (I have to say I burnt out a while ago and am still working up the energy to get back into it). Do be careful about people like Albert Field and David Charleston, though, who were never Labor members of the federal parliament (their Labor involvement was either organisational for Field or SA Parliament for Charleston). Frickeg (talk) 03:39, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think the article as it stands is making a valid point, just rather inelegantly. It does point out in the next paragraph that Field was automatically expelled from the ALP for standing against an endorsed candidate (i.e. before he was appointed a senator - the act of standing was what saw him expelled). Frickeg (talk) 07:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Lang Labor members of the Parliament of New South Wales, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for trailing around and tagging new articles for wikiprojects, especially following me around the Australian bush finding lost settlements, minor highways and defunct railway lines. Scott Davis Talk 06:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for tagging my templates (Australian political results)! :) Hshook (talk) 08:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, I failed at making this template on my Sandbox, and with someone elses help there is now a proper one - called Template:ANZ Championship Ladder 2015 - Australian Conference - so what i would really like to do is just delete this template entirely, but i am not sure how. Can you remove it please ? Matilda Maniac (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hunsrückquerbahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windesheim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teltow railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Barnstar and Wreath
		For all your hard work on new page patrolling. Thanks! Ham105 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To Grahamec

Thanks to added the links of talk page Aaron DeTommaso.MarkHerson (talk) 03:41, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Frankie Thomas (cyclist)

Thanks for adding the various banners to the talk page. I am a bit confused about the living person reference however. I don't believe Frankie Thomas is alive - he would be 111, but I have been unable to find any information as to when he died. Any suggestions on how the article should reflect this ? Thanks Find bruce (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham, I'd like to ask if you would consider assessing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission page. It's come a long way since you created its Talk page, and I'd like to see it upgraded from Start class if you think it deserves it. --Danimations (talk) 15:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham, I wonder if you would be so kind as to assess Olympic Dam Task Force and create a talk page for it? You're usually pretty hot on my heels with Australian pages, but this one must've slipped by you. Thanks for all your great work. --Danimations (talk) 14:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Borsdorf–Coswig railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freie Presse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for adding the WikiProject info to the County of Cumberland planning scheme, Sydney Region Outline Plan and Sydney Into Its Third Century talk pages. I have expanded the articles significantly, but am unsure of how to have them formally promoted beyond stub/start class. Can you help? (Also, any feedback on the content would be gratefully received.) Mqst north (talk) 13:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS As these strategies defined the shape of Australia's largest city, I also think they're of more than low importance, but perhaps only the Cumberland Plan has genuine profile within the community. I realise "importance" has a limited and specific meaning in this context, happy for them to remain low if that's more appropriate. Just thought I'd ask. Mqst north (talk) 13:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec

Wondering if you could have a look at this article and see if you have a view on its notability, which has been proposed for AfD, and if you don't think t gets there yet, whether you have any suggestions for possible sources that might help, thanks Garyvines (talk) 01:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I noticed you had added the Wikiproject Australian television template to a couple of television related articles I had created in recent days, such as The Nation with David Speers and Saltwater Heroes. I had just wondered if I should add this template to new articles I create and mark their importance and quality levels myself, or is that only to be done by an editor who hasn't created the article? In any case, thanks for adding the templates. User:Whats new?<sup>(talk)</sup> 01:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, thanks for tagging the Bushranger films cat. I was about to categorise all the relevant films when I realised that the Australian Western (genre) films cat has covered the same ground. But from what I can tell, these films are most often referred to as bushranger films, not westerns. This is especially true for the silent film era and many films that followed. "Western" seems like an American name mapped onto the Australian equivalent which is nonetheless distinct. What should be the next step in addressing this? Cheers. - HappyWaldo (talk) 12:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How'd you work that out?. -- Jack of Oz <sup>[pleasantries]</sup> 09:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec, yes "trainway" is total nonsense and I think you were very restrained not to put a vandalism notice on the editor's talk page. I've initiated a WP:MOVEREQ to revert the title. Should be a no brainer. Well done for all you do on German railways. I've concentrated on other areas in the last couple of years, but still take an interest and keep a watching brief on it. Cheers. Bermicourt (talk) 08:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec. I've seen you working behind the scenes at WP:AUS quite a bit, so I was wondering if you would mind closing an A-class review at WP:AUS/ACR? The article is Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics, which has met the criteria (3 supports from prose reviews + image review + source review), but has not yet had an uninvolved editor close the ACR – archive the discussion, change the article's class assessment, etc (the 'Closure procedure' listed at WP:AUS/ACR#Closing_a_discussion). If no-one closes it in a few days, I'll do an WP:IAR close myself (I was involved in reviewing the article), but I think it would be better if it could be done by an neutral uninvolved editor. Cheers, and thanks for your hard work across the various areas of the project - Evad37 [talk] 01:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 16 October 2015 for companies, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America<sup>1000</sup> 16:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 19 October 2015 for Disability-related articles, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America<sup>1000</sup> 18:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When categorising always check that the title of the article has been defaultsorted...thank you...Paul venter (talk) 09:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Tireless tagging
	You light up my watchlist! Kerry (talk) 03:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Graham. I agree with Kerry - thanks for the tireless tagging and monitoring of new articles, reviews etc. Since you seem to be a major contributor to the lists of active reviews, what is needed to get the FA Review of O'Bahn Busway closed. I believe that all of the concerns have been addressed, but nobody seems to have closed it out. Thanks, Scott Davis <sup>Talk</sup> 12:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Canberra Meetup Next: 17 February 2016 This box: view talk edit

Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee (talk) 01:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harvey Broadbent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhine Bridge (Worms), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caisson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neulußheim station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offenbach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:Australian Air Defence Areas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Australian Air Defence Areas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ian Rose (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Iamfighter. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Müllheim (Baden) station, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Iamfighter (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your reminders Grahame, I would have let that slip through if it wasn't for your help, which I'm sure I would have regretted. I hope you are well, Clare. (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am so sorry, you did say your father was not doing well and I had wondered how he was going, but was a little afraid to ask. I can't imagine it would be easy, no matter how expected. Look after yourself. I hope we meet again. Clare. (talk) 13:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can I get your help here Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 April 12 ? I have 2 guys that cannot come up with consistent alternatives to categorizing places within a local government area. some of these local government areas are cities others rural areas. They are using Bots to change categories. Please help if you can. Mmunji1 (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I cannot see how Jenna Jones and Emily Beecroft can be classified as a stubs. The articles are complete, have structure, and are fully referenced. Each has an infobox and an image and is complete in every way. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sieg Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Push-pull. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bad Friedrichshall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Democratic Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec, thanks for adding the Greens Candidate tag to the article I created about Alexandra_Kaur_Bhathal . I wondered if you could help advise on the subsequent current flagging of the article for deletion.

I had created the article because, as a resident in the electorate, I couldn't find an aggregated summary of the information (eg policies, heritage, profession) that had been in numerous news articles over many years Bhathal has been a prominent voice and notable repeat political contender in our community.

I'm not a member of any political party and I think the article is written factually (and has been through three reviews before being accepted for publication) and copiously references unbiased, non partisan sources (and there have been more articles recently, eg https://theconversation.com/election-podcast-the-greens-fight-for-batman-and-wills-60340 and http://www.theaustralian.com.au/federal-election-2016/federal-election-2016-feeney-would-have-lost-without-lib-help/news-story/fb3bf78052aa5a5006bef4ac6b41a363 - does that give it a chance to escape deletion?

Thanks Vsolomon (talk) 00:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)vsolomonReply[reply]

Err, yes, bit of a dumb thng to do really. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll fix it. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 04:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahame, good to know I could help you learn something new! I've got an exam on 15 June so I'm in full procrastination mode... How are you? Clare. (talk) 11:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your holiday sounds great - when do you leave? I'm planning a short holiday to the Balkans leaving mid July which should be nice. Clare. (talk) 12:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perhaps we can catch up before you go and you can teach me what you do and how, and I can try to keep it up for you? Sounds like an outstanding trip - you are lucky to have so many siblings to holiday with around the world! Clare. (talk) 12:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Just a reminder that in just over a week at Wikimania there's going to be a cross-Wiki discussion about the systems of control of new pages. This is a round-table rather than a presentation or a lecture. On the agenda are reforms to the new article reviewing systems and ways to help new users better understand our content policies. If you are going to Italy and would like to take part, please check out the conference schedule, and I look forward to seeing you there. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You might be interested in keeping an eye on the article Boßler Tunnel being edited by an unexperienced author. See also its talk page, please. NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:06, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo Grahamec

Ich sehe mit Besorgnis, dass User:Buchbibliothek in den letzten Tagen viele maschinenenunterstützte Schnellübersetzungen durchgeführt hat, deren Qualität noch weit unterhalb des auf Wikipedia üblichen Standards liegt. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn Du mal ein Auge darauf werfen könntest, und eventuell Hilfestellungen geben könntest bzw geeignete Maßnahmen in die Wege leiten könntest:

• User_talk:Buchbibliothek#Qualitätsprobleme
• Wikipedia:Requests for page importation

Viele Grüße aus dem Ammertal und Spessart --NearEMPTiness (talk) 23:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee (talk) 11:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec! I'm working on a translation of de:Erzbergbahn as my first project. I'm very interested in learning from editors involved in producing good rail articles, so I put a notification on the Wikiproject Trains talk page.

I've noticed your work on e.g. Mittenwald Railway: since you were doing exactly the kind of work there that I'm now doing on Erzbergbahn, I'd value your comments and input on the article I'm working on, if you have the time. Ssptwriter (talk) 09:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Grahamec. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thanks for putting the tag on the talk page. I assume the spelling in the article is ok; I put a use Australian English tag on there. I mean, she was born in England, but it would seem churlish to use British English. If I have made errors, then I apologise. Hope the weather is good where you are. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 12:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should have been speedily deleted - it is utter codswallop - I think project tagging is encouraging a deletable item, HNY anyways JarrahTree 00:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The tag in no sense endorses the article.--Grahame (talk) 00:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec, thanks for the thanks and for you perseverance with German railway articles. It has taken me a long time to decode the German terminology around Moor but in putting together the recent translation for the raised bog article, I think I finally unlocked most of it. In particular that Niedermoor is really "fen" and that Hochmoor refers to the bulging shape of the bog and not to its elevation above sea level! Whew! --Bermicourt (talk) 14:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating the talk pages for (it would seem) all of my "stub" articles. It is appreciated. Sincerely, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Grahamec, you may be interested in the discussions about Template:Infobox German railway vehicle which are taking place here. --Bermicourt (talk) 20:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there - is this person notable Josh_Manuatu? Noticed you added the tags so figured that you have, in some part, interest on editorial oversight of Australian wikipedia content. Solidmolidbarista (talk) 11:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, tagging doesn't indicate notability; it is done to keep track of articles.--Grahame (talk) 11:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Was prof emeritus from uwa - how does that not be 'academic' ? JarrahTree 01:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hahaha in the era of fake information such an assumption is dangerous - whatever indeed... JarrahTree 01:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Au (Sieg) station

added a link pointing to Diez

Division of Hume

added a link pointing to Penrose, New South Wales

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Just a reminder that ((WikiProject Film)) does not cover biography articles such as actors and filmmakers. This applies to all of the film task forces as well, which means that the Australian cinema task force does not include articles about Australian actors, directors and filmmakers, and consequently should not have the |film=yes parameter on the ((WikiProject Australia)) banner. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 03:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mannheim–Saarbrücken railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neustadt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Winnweiler station

added a link pointing to Palatinate

Wörth (Rhein) station

added a link pointing to Palatinate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lambrecht (Pfalz) station

added links pointing to Tramway and Homburg

Frankenstein (Pfalz) station

added a link pointing to Homburg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not an expert on things Roman Catholic but I don't think Bodkin was a priest but rather a monk. He is referred to as Brother Bodkin rather than Father Bodkin. As far as I can see, he was a teacher and carer for orphans. I certainly didn't turn up any reference to him being ordained in any of the bios I found. But I certainly don't claim any special knowledge of the guy; I'd never heard of him until yesterday where he just turned up a few times in quick succession in my researching of other topics in what appeared to be "notable" ways and so I thought I'd do a stub article for him. Kerry (talk) 04:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mannheim–Saarbrücken railway

added links pointing to Homburg, Palatinate, Eberbach and SBB

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schopp station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palatinate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,
Is there an official designation for the loading gauge and structure gauge for the rail lines around and within Sydney? Peter Horn User talk 15:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for moving the article and doing the update! Best wishes, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 11:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As you are in Canberra - where we have not had a Strategy themed meetup - and you have probably fed back into the system in more than one way or other regarding the strategy - is there anything you would like to add in any way to the Australian conversation in relation to the Cycle 2 stage - either on wiki or off?

I do think your contribution is important due to your strong edit history and presence in the Australian editing community - I am trying up my report in the next day or so - so I am not asking for an essay - any words in relation to what the strategy or anything that you think is important relative to strategy, I would be interested to hear about - thanks JarrahTree 01:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Grahamec, Me-123567-Me has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Smile at others by adding ((subst:Smile)) to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hello, Grahamec. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alohas Sandals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Grahamec I have rewirtten the whole article Classe365 ‎ and removed all the content which was looking as promotional. I do not have any relation with it , I added article on the base of its notability in the Educational Tech solutions. Kindly look in and remove the speedy deletion Tag. Grahame, If you think it is still promotional looking, kindly help to solve it. EShami (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Grahamec. As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 21:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I accepted Energy in the Australian Capital Territory, But for future use please note the best practices for copying within Wikipedia as outlined in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is apparently content forking. I shall go back to deal with German railways.--Grahame (talk) 14:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Grahamec. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Grahamec. AfC submissions Random submission ~6 weeks 1,700 pending submissions Purge to update v t e I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 02:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Main–Spessart railway, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Main and Neuendorf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]