Thanks for creating Formula Vee at the SCCA National Championship Runoffs.

User:Willsome429 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the page, much appreciated!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Willsome429)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2020 United States Senate election in Illinois, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of IndyCar Series teams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Byrd.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm reaching out because you've been the lead editor of 2020 Illinois House of Representatives election. I maintain Portal:Illinois, including the News section, and I want to be correct about this: Was the last election to be counted and called the one in District 68, Vella vs. Cabello? I just want the date for when the composition of the House was known. Fishal (talk) 03:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fishal: Thanks for pointing that district out. I did not make that edit but I must have missed it when I was going through. According to my sources (WGN & the Chicago Sun Times) the race is too close to call and in fact Cabello is leading. I will remove a winner from the section and will update it accordingly when the race is called. Grahaml35 (talk) 06:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was called for Vella on November 17, according to the Rockford Register Star and WIFR. Fishal (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do see that, but that is the only source that has called it that way and the only source that has him winning. I will wait and encourage everyone to wait til it is official and called results come in from the majority of sources. Grahaml35 (talk) 04:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it looks like that election has been updated to show a Democratic gain. Does that mean that the box at the top needs to change? Did Republicans gain a seat, or is the composition the same as before the election? Fishal (talk) 22:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What new sources are there other than the 2 you listed? Additionally it would stay the same. Grahaml35 (talk) 23:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one that sums up several races. It has Vella winning by just 239 votes, but the Republicans still pick up a seat, so some other races need to be checked. The official data are now certified, so they're at il.gov; this should be the basis for numbers on the article, I would think, since they're the official results. Fishal (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

– Muboshgu (talk) 16:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of IndyCar Series teams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grahaml35! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Felix Rosenqvist that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. This trivial matter aside, great photo! TylerBurden (talk) 22:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Apologies, thank you for the info. Grahaml35 (talk) 23:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you reverted my edit on the Indiana elections page. What "standard" are you referring to for caps? I'm operating from MOS:JOBTITLES, where job titles (e.g., congressman, senator, mayor) are only capitalized under certain conditions. You would say "President Joe Biden," but not "Barack Obama, 44th President of the United States," because "president" is referring to the office, rather than Obama's personal title. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 23:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• This has been a debated issue for a long time. In political election like this in the US it is always capitalized and considered a title. Look around other pages to see the similarity. Grahaml35 (talk) 23:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to help with the Indiana election pages. Please let me know if the map I put on the 2020 pages is alright. I can make modifications. I will be making the maps 2010-2020 and posting them on my user page. Hoosier24 (talk) 01:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, what articles are you referring to and what kind of maps? Grahaml35 (talk) 15:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a map to the 2020 Indiana state house election page[1]], and on my user page I have maps for each Indiana state house election dating back to 2006. I can also do the Indiana State Senate. --Hoosier24 (talk) 17:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I believe those are beneficial. My only critiques would be 1.) can you just number the districts and leave all inside the map and not label the cities 2.) if not, could you clean up the sides. I am knit-picking at that point, but they look great and thanks for contributing!

I noticed you were editing the F2000 championship page. Are there no Radon chassis in 2022? Springee (talk) 04:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, just a lot of Van Diemen's and Elan's. Grahaml35 (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So a lot of Van Diemens and Van Diemens :D Springee (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Nitro Rallycross Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Carlson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addding an infobox to this article. I notice, though, that some of the details seem to be a little different from what's in the article. What was your source for what's in the infobox? We should probably try to reconcile the sources. Just for instance, the infobox says he was appointed to the Indiana Supreme Court, while the text says he was elected. Brianyoumans (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I have done some research. I think that probably he was both elected AND appointed to the state supreme court - he was elected for the term 1871-6 (technically January 1, 1877), but it looks like he may have been appointed to the court in November 1870 to fill a vacancy. So, both stories are true. (See [2] for the existence of the certificate appointing him.) As to the "briefly elected Speaker in 1863", I picked that up from sources online, but it looks like what they meant was that it was for only one session of the legislature. OTOH, saying he served from 1862 isn't really correct - a New York Times article says the Indiana legislature opened their session on January 8, 1863 and Burkirk was elected Speaker that morning. I will make some revisions so that the text and infobox agree and are more accurate.Brianyoumans (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John S. Benham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indiana State Normal School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Carmel mayoral election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Carmel mayoral election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SecretName101 (talk) 06:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable as WP:NPOL but the lead is mostly unsourced - so declining per WP:BLP. Need source for DOB, when assumed office, etc - if no source remove. Once updated resubmit and should be acceptable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan Dernulc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grahaml35! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Dernulc, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 18:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Excellent. shelovesneo (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! Grahaml35 (talk) 16:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grahaml35. Thank you for your work on 2024 Indiana House of Representatives election. User:Shelovesneo, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Possible cut and paste from [3], otherwise it's very informative

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Shelovesneo)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

shelovesneo (talk) 15:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shelovesneo: Which aspect do you think was cut & pasted? None of is, but we of course can make edits to better reflect that. Grahaml35 (talk) 15:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Grahaml35:, analyze the page with copyright vio detector, it's a minor, i think the page is good. Thank you! shelovesneo (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Grahaml35: Just checked it out and it seems a lot of it seems to be the phrase "Indiana House of Representatives" and the numbering of districts which is not copyrighted. Thanks for the heads up though! Grahaml35 (talk) 17:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Grahaml35, we need experienced volunteers.

• New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
• If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
• If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
• Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grahaml35. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Grahaml35 for collecting more than 200 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given in recognition to Grahaml35 for collecting at least 7 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Grahaml35,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Grahaml35, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bowls New Zealand, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]