If you leave a message here, I will respond here. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 11:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Passengerpigeon (talk) 10:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)I recently came across the articles you started on Dichromatic symmetry and Polychromatic symmetry through the link on Magnetic space group. I appreciate your work on them, particularly with the nice figures. It is a fairly technical and not a very well-known area, but I think you've done a good job tracking down reliable sources and explaining the basics. I enjoyed reading through it, and I know that must have taken some time to put together. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 00:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, GreatStellatedDodecahedron,
Thank you for creating Tilings and patterns.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please follow the format at WP:NONFICTION. Examples to follow are also listed there.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|ARandomName123))
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 17:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
You have asked me to improve Tilings and patterns by following "the format at WP:NONFICTION. Examples to follow are also listed there."
As requested, I have carefully reviewed the content of WP:NONFICTION. I find that none of the examples given are mathematics books and so are not directly relevant to Tilings and patterns. Also the sections titled "General reference books" and "Non-fiction science books" are empty.
As there is no specific advice on layout for a mathematics book article, I have reviewed the general advice for non-fiction books. The recommendation is to include the following sections:
As you have reviewed the article and tagged it as needing layout improvement, I would appreciate it if you could explain why you tagged it, and what specific changes you consider are necessary to remove the tag. Thank you. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 23:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
@ARandomName123: Hi, thanks for your advice. I have made the following changes to the article:
I know that the table is a non-standard section in the layout for a non-fiction book article. However, I do think that it provides value to readers of the article as it 1) provides an overview of what subjects the book covers, and 2) provides quick links to follow up specific areas of interest.
Please let me know if these changes address your concerns with the article. Thanks. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
@ARandomName123: Hi, thanks for helping me to improve this article. I have removed the tag. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
hello! Very sorry to bother but based on your username and some of the articles at New Articles I've seen created under your username, I thought you might be able to help. I got sucked into a rabbit hole at Taylor circle that led to the creation of stub Eutaris that led to the creation of Henry Vuibert. I downloaded an image from a book he wrote to use as an illustration but I don't speak much French, or much geometry for that matter, and I'm dissatisfied with the Google translation rendition of the caption. Any chance you could recommend an appropriate article to link for this shape? Please and thank you in advance for any guidance you can offer. Best, ~j jengod (talk) 21:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi GreatStellatedDodecahedron. Thank you for your work on Mass Media Stars. Another editor, JSFarman, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for writing a thorough article that's neutral and concise.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|JSFarman))
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
JSFarman (talk) 19:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi GreatStellatedDodecahedron. Thank you for your work on Acqua Fragile (album). Another editor, JSFarman, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
...just please don't ask me to listen to any prog rock. (Thanks for writing the article.)
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|JSFarman))
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)