-- coding courtesy Eleassar, thanks alot :-)

Note: We all make mistakes. If you would like to leave constructive criticism regarding my performance on Wikipedia (technical issues, tone of discussion, etc.), please feel free to leave them on my own request for comments. Please leave my talk page for content-related issues.

• Admin Coaching

• User talk:Gryffindor/Archive1 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive2 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive3 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive4 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive5 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive6 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive7 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive8 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive9 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive10 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive11 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive12 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive13 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive14 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive15

Submit a new message by pressing this button:

On 25 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Villa Albergoni, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Villa Albergoni, a 16th-century Italian country mansion, was featured in the 2017 film Call Me by Your Name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Villa Albergoni. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed you haven't been around. Hope all is ok. Johnbod (talk) 02:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Gryffindor;

I've posted a proposal to modify or remove some material you added to Deadwood bonsai techniques a little while ago. The description of what I have in mind is on the related Talk page (Talk:Deadwood bonsai techniques or here[3]). I look forward to your feedback or other involvement. Thanks!

Sahara110 (talk) 22:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gosanke, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gryffindor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:SDAPÖ logo.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved with (Visconti of Milan) has content that is proposed to be removed and move to another article (Visconti di Modrone). If you are interested, please visit the discussion at Talk:Visconti of Milan#Visconti di Modrone branch members. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Karl Frisch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL and almost certainly an WP:AUTOBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 01:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Humayun's Tomb does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Tamravidhir (talk) 05:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewelry retailers of Japan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Gurdwara Sri Guru Singh Sabha, Delhi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please, if there isn't copyright, someone can upload here the photographies from these Italian sites about the most important protagonist about that disaster on commons: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Thank you very much. --87.4.70.228 09:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Harshat Mata Temple at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MX (✉ • ✎) 21:34, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hello, if there are no more tasks for Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Illustration_workshop#書道_Shodō then could you please close the request? thx Mrmw (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you do not know what to do?

please use the template ((Resolved)) to close the request --Mrmw (talk) 21:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gryffindor,

Thanks for the recent addition of the link to 'Dame' on the Agatha Christie bio page. As the link is also provided above Agatha's picture to the right on that page I'm hoping you would agree to leave the initial 'Dame' in the text unlinked please - I think it just looks better to have that initial presentation of her full name and title all in bold and unlinked. What do you think?

In this context, the same could be said for the linked 'DBE' which also appears with the picture and is also essentially linked later in the first paragraph of the page. Can we remove that link in the first line of the bio too? RLO1729 (talk) 19:53, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Harshat Mata Temple at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You moved this page from "Jo-an (teahouse)" back in 2017 -- this appears to be an error, because the reading is じょあん (syllables: jo-a-n), not じょうあん (syllables: jo-o-a-n). I wanted to make you aware of this, in case for example you had the misconception that everywhere "jo" appears it should be "jō". Imaginatorium (talk) 04:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note your recent edits. The criterion for using italics for a term is that it is definitely seen as foreign rather than English. This means that terms borrowed from other languages which are in wide use and effectively assimilated into English, like Divan (Persian), Chaise longue (French), Influenza (Italian), Yoga and Asana (Sanskrit) and so on are not italicised. Etymology alone is no guide to this: English has thousands of once-foreign words in its dictionaries. I do hope this is clear. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chiswick,

The rule is stated here MOS:FOREIGNITALIC. Asana is not a term that is generally known or understood in English, unlike words like pizza or spaghetti despite their non-English origins. Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gryffindor, I know the rule, but Asana is a well-known term in English and has been in rather wide use for at least the past 50 years, if not 100 (Ngram). Merriam-Webster assures me that the term was first used in English in 1811, indeed, and since the advance of modern postural yoga from the 1920s by Yogendra, Kuvalayananda and others, it has become very familiar. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Gryffindor;

I've posted an answer to a question you left on Talk: Deadwood bonsai techniques. The answer's on the same page following your entry. It's probably supererogatory now, as I saw when researching my answer that you had already moved forward with my favorite suggestion. I hope that addresses the question for you. If not, I look forward to your feedback or other involvement. Thanks!

Sahara110 (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Austrian Trade Union Federation (OGB) logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BegbertBiggs (talk) 19:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your efforts to standardise word formatting on Wikipedia; many of your edits are certainly helpful.

However, there are numerous terms in Yoga and Hinduism that have been widely used for many years, and can be found in the major English dictionaries (such as Oxford, Merriam-Webster).

For instance, Brahmin has been used in English for centuries; from the 15th century as "Brahman", from the early 19th as "Brahmin".

I have previously explained this kind of usage to you, and the logic involved: when a term is widely used in English, it is no longer "foreign" whatever its etymology.

To save having the same discussion at 100 yoga pages, let's discuss this please at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yoga.

I am sorry to say that repeated application of your approach, given that you have been told the matter is, to say the least, not agreed with other editors, is becoming disruptive. I will revert those of your edits that are clearly contrary to policy because the words are no longer "foreign", and hope very much that you will understand the reason for this. Many thanks for your co-operation. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harshat Mata Temple, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the main shrine of the Harshat Mata Temple depicts a royal figure and his consorts engaged in amorous activities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harshat Mata Temple. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

== Just copy the source code and paste it on the talk page of the user you wish to invite.

This user has been invited WikiProject Prussia please consider checking us out.

==

Kaiser Kitkat (talk)

A tag has been placed on Category:German crafts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gurdwara Sri Guru Singh Sabha, Delhi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gryffindor,

Wikipedia's "General Disclaimer" explains an issue that is also relevant to other user-generated websites, such as Fandom/Wikia. While the YouTube links, coming from the official channel of the series, might be fine as primary sources, the Fandom links appear to be unsuitable as references (WP:USERG/WP:RSP). The main issue with the YouTube links is probably their unsuitability to prove if Yu-Gi-Oh is really relevant to the Ikebana article. It would probably be easy to compile a huge list of series that contain Ikebana. Wikipedia, as a tertiary source, should ideally not rely purely on primary sources. Adding something to an article only because it appears in a TV series is likely unnecessary.

Thanks and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Ikebana#In popular culture. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Gryffindor, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Bobherry Talk Edits 05:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gryffindor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gurdwara Sri Guru Singh Sabha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kumagai Morikazu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 14:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Kumagai Morikazu should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Kumagai Morikazu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kumagai Morikazu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I've changed the only page linking here to use an ((interlanguage link)), which will link here if the page is ever developed. Ost (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I noticed you've recently conducted a lot of copyedits to various Japanese arts and culture pages, such as kimono and maiko.

These edits seem to be italicising words such as kimono, maiko and obi. However - as in MOS:FOREIGNITALIC - these words don't need italicising.

I appreciate your good faith edits, I really do, but these words all fall under loanwords that have common use enough not to be italicised. Some terms do - for example, furisode does in the kimono article, as it's not a common term and not well-recognised. But kimono doesn't. It's a well-acknowledged loan word. I think I've already spent time unitalicising some of the words in these pages before now, to be honest.

I'd really appreciate it if you could undo your edits, as I'm on mobile and genuinely cannot figure out how to.

I'm sorry to leave such a killjoy edit on your Talk page, but I had to say something. Thank you for your efforts anyway, though. They're appreciated and it's always nice to have someone else help out on those pages. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 13:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:Media in Naha, Okinawa. Since you had some involvement with the Category:Media in Naha, Okinawa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 07:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:Media in Fukuoka (city). Since you had some involvement with the Category:Media in Fukuoka (city) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:Media in Kumamoto, Kumamoto. Since you had some involvement with the Category:Media in Kumamoto, Kumamoto redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:Media in Kōriyama, Fukushima. Since you had some involvement with the Category:Media in Kōriyama, Fukushima redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:03, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Bamboo weaving: Collier 1974 missing a full reference
• Pim Brothers & Co.: Harrison 2018 missing a full reference (or has the wrong year), Robinson 2018 missing a full reference
• Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild: MacDonogh 2009 missing a full reference  Done

If you could add the full references to those article, that would be great. The easiest way to deal with those is to install Svick's script per these instructions. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Talk:Lalbagh, where it should have been in the first place, my bad. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Szczuka has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gryffindor. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Manik Bagh.
Message added 02:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Manik Bagh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the interior of Manik Bagh, a palace of the maharajah of Indore State, was filled with contemporary designer furniture by Le Corbusier, Eileen Gray, Émile-Jacques Ruhlmann, and others? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Manik Bagh. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be going mad adding these, even to uniquely English terms (Mezzotint) or those with uniquely English spellings (Aquatint). Please stop; it is nuisance having to revert them all. Please check what a top dictionary says, and even then usage often varies. We should only italicize if that is the only or predominate usage in English. Johnbod (talk) 22:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wimpffen has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Villa Wolf, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there are plans to reconstruct Villa Wolf (pictured) in Gubin, Poland, which was built in 1926 by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and destroyed during World War II? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Villa Wolf), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a question for you at Talk:Bonkei. Thank you for your attention. 21:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I made minor changes in Bonkei per our discussion at Talk:Bonkei. Sahara110 (talk) 02:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you edit from Minamichita, Aichi!

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hisato Nozawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable local politician

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Maharajah of Kashmir. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 2#Maharajah of Kashmir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sport in Limousin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Place Clichy (talk) 02:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Hotel Nagoya Castle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also reads- 'The "See also" section should not link to pages that do not exist (red links),' After all what is there to see also if no article exists?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is the justification for italics? Can you point me to a policy? I was not under the impression that common nouns of foreign origin should be italicized in titles. To me, it is incongruous with the capital letter. It makes it look like a title. Srnec (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Came here wondering this as well and like Srnec I'm not convinced there is a need for any of the italics you've inserted. Organum in particular I've never seen italicized; Virelai, Ballade, Rondeau were never italicized in the sources I used to write F. Andrieu or Grimace. Additionally, by only italicizing the first sentence and title, you've created inconsistencies throughout the entirety of these various articles. Aza24 (talk) 00:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't made up my mind on the italics yet, but you've made a few musical instrument articles inconsistent with their brethren. Jacqke (talk) 00:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating a large number of articles separately and at the same time raises concerns about WP:FAIT. Where your move requests have drawn independent discussion, such as Talk:Aldobrandini family and Talk:Colonna family, they have been opposed. In the future, when you want to propose multiple moves that have the same rationale, please group them into a single move request as explained at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_multiple_page_moves. (t · c) buidhe 04:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:
Regarding your move request here, I’ve just made a counter-proposal, if you care to comment. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 10:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Gryffindor. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 13:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Daf—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Wildhorse3 (talk) 01:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Speakers of the Hungarian Parliament indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ateneo Art Gallery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ateneo Art Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Banner talk 09:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate editors have different views on Media Appearances. Myself, I loathe them. But if they must be added, I appreciate them being cited - as yours are. But could you convert the bare urls. They look awful. KJP1 (talk) 18:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo KJP1, there is normally a bot that converts them. Gryffindor (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about that - have you tried this, [4]. KJP1 (talk) 20:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Amar Chitra Katha (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:30, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Emer Cooke has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Re: [5]. As far as I can ell from the translation you copied a quote from a translated bare URL reference at www.ots.at without attributing the quote. I AGF this was an unintended mistake but it had in some ways a semi-serious misattribution of the source which affected its weight in the article in my opinion. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve reverted you because (a) you are the one changing a long-standing image. The WP:ONUS is on you to get consensus for your change; (b) you have failed to join the talk page discussion on this. DeCausa (talk) 22:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your recent editing history at Maria Theresa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DeCausa (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find your interest in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 13:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Gryffindor! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 17th anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! ((u|Sdkb)) talk 05:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Hi Gryffindor! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On May 8th you created Aoi Oshitayashiki, citing a few Japanese sources. There was large overlap between machine translations of these sources and the article, in particular https://www.sumitomo-rd-mansion.jp/tokai/aoi/location03.html; here's a paragraph of the article compared to a machine translation of that source:

Article: The Higashi ward has prospered as a residence district lined with samurai houses since the Edo period. There are many temples, historical shrines, and sites connected to the Tokugawa family, and many business people and cultural people set up residence in this area east of Nagoya Castle.

The place name "Aoi" derives from the crest (mon) of the three-leaf aoi of the Tokugawa. The residence was built in 1679 under Tokugawa Mitsutomo (1625–1700), the second lord of the Owari Domain, stretching for about 64,000 tsubo as a place for rest and feasting. The vast estate featured a garden with a large pond and strolling paths in the south, with the residence in the centre, with another smaller garden with pond to the north. It was modified by successive lords from generation to generation to reflect the tastes of the times. In the era of the seventh lord Tokugawa Muneharu (1696–1764), a medicinal garden (Goyaku-en 御薬園) was established in the northwestern part to cultivate medicinal herbs such as ginseng.

Source translation: higashi ward has prospered as a residence district lined with samurai houses since the edo period. there are many temples, historical shrines, and temples connected to the tokugawa family, and many business people and cultural people have set up residences from the calm townscape, and the culture as a residential area has matured.

the place name of the address "aoi, higashi-ku" where this project is born is derived from the crest of the three-leaf aoi of the tokugawa family. in the past, this area was built in 1679 by mitsutomo tokugawa, the second lord of the owari domain, to build a vast "imperial residence" stretching for about 64,000 tsubo as a place for rest and feasting. the pond-spring strolling garden, which centers on the pond, has been modified by lords from generation to generation to reflect the tastes of the times. in the era of the 7th feudal lord, muneharu, there is also an episode in which a "medicinal garden" was established to cultivate medicinal herbs such as ginseng worshipped by the eighth shogun, yoshimune tokugawa.

Parts are directly copied, while others are closely phrased or are just rearranged. I understand that there is some confusion over whether or not translations of copyrighted material are still copyright violations (they are), but you have received some extensive advice and warning from Moonriddengirl back in 2014. These is also a CCI on you, Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Gryffindor has been open since October 2014, which has uncovered issues several issues, some of which date back to 2005. This has been a very long term issue, and I don't believe I have much choice other than blocking you in order to prevent future copyright violations. If you want to be unblocked, you must commit to no longer copying from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. Given the extent of issues here, I will notify the community at the administrators' noticeboard. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Gryffindor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hallo User:Moneytrees, I find this block unnecessarily harsh, a message would have sufficed. Concerning the issues you raised from 2014 these date back to almost 10 years ago now, I take these issues very seriously and am not aware of further problems since then. Machine translation was not listed as something to be watched out for (unless I missed that mention somewhere) and until now I was not aware about it, thank you for pointing it out. I would like to re-draft the article and would you be able to take a look at it to make sure it fits the rules this time? Gryffindor (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Accept per rewrite of Aoi Oshitayashiki and discussion below. Moneytrees🍔(Talk) 22:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Direct translations are derivative works and should not be copied in. The guidelines on copyright issues may not all explicitly say translations of copyrighted sources are not allowed, but they are included under the "do not copy text from other sources" umbrella. You can still edit the "User:" space, and could create a rewrite of the article at a subpage like User:Gryffindor/rewrite. I could even restore the references from the deleted article if you want me to. If you can create a rewrite with not copyright issues, it would do a lot in getting you unblocked. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A concern I have here is also about using machine translations, even you write in your own words. I don't know if you speak Japanese or not, but if you don't and can't verify the translation is accurate yourself, you shouldn't be writing articles based on sources in a language you can't speak. Galobtter (pingó mió) 01:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

I've checked the rewrite and it seems free of copyright issues, and I am considering unblocking. I would greatly appreciate it if you helped out at the CCI in some way, such as pointing out unattributed copies and articles with potential issues. Would you do that? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 04:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Certainly, I would like everything to be in order as well. Gryffindor (talk) 21:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, you have now been unblocked. If you have any question regarding copyright issues in the future, please feel free to ask me. Moneytrees🍔(Talk) 22:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Moneytrees for your offer of help, and I appreciate the trust. Gryffindor (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my delayed response to your request for me to look at Order of the Fish, I was very busy at the time; I see no copyright issues with the article (the most is the phrase "highest honour", but I think that's ignorable). It is an interesting subject, and reading the sources I realized that fishes actually don't have eyebrows... Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 04:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gryffindor

Thank you for creating Order of the Fish.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:25, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gaan people has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm stumped honestly. The only mention I can make of such a people is in the works of travel writer James Dorsey, which leads me to believe he's either got the name wrong (charitable version) or that he lies like a rug (uncharitable version). I balk at using a single reference to support the existence of an entire ethnic group, especially a single source from a travel writer, not an ethnographer or similar academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I am the author of the Masanao page. Just to let you know that the conventional way that this artist is mentioned is as follows:

‘Masanao of Kyoto’

This is because we do not know his actual name (‘Masanao’ was likely the artist name rather than birth name), and because there was another artist by the same name in another part of Japan, so this is an important disambiguating.

Unfortunately, when I created this article, issues were raised with this standard (as used for a hundred years of relevant art history) nomenclature, and I was forced to change it to ‘Masanao (Kyoto)’.

Just some context for you! 172.103.243.32 (talk) 06:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gryffindor, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sōken Kishō, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sōken Kishō.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Chris troutman)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bishopric of Trent has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Garde-Meuble de la Couronne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance or any source specified.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Xu Shoushang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to possess significant coverage and thus fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tarhalindur (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gryffindor. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request. You may view the reply here.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: ((resolved|1=~~~~))

PawełMM (talk) 08:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((GL Photography reply)) template.

PawełMM (talk) 08:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Palaces Mongolia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gryffindor,
When you created Arthur Curtiss James you wrote that his yacht Aloha II was broken up in 1938. Are you able, after all this time, to point me to a reference for that?
Best wishes - Davidships (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to just close RM and move it as WP:FRMOS. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy birthday message to you, Gryffindor, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ~Asheiou (talk) (they/them) 13:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Arimadanapura Palace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sub-stub unimproved in over ten years; the only source is primary. Fails the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 12:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sielecki (Sas) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gryffindor, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! œ^™ 05:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian silversmiths indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian metalsmiths indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Gryffindor! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]