This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

—cyberpower _Online^{Happy 2014} — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding ((subst:New Year 1)) to their talk page with a friendly message.

—cyberpower _Online^{Happy 2014} 00:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Cyberpower

--Guerillero | My Talk 07:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hezekiah Balch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presbytery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 15:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! If you ever want to collaborate on an article, please let me know. --Guerillero | My Talk 18:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

On 10 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hezekiah Balch, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hezekiah Balch helped found Tusculum College, the first American college west of the Appalachian Mountains? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hezekiah Balch. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Great job on this article. Bms4880 (talk) 00:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

@Bms4880: Thank you! I have worked on the subject since 2011. --Guerillero | My Talk 00:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
13		Hudson River Sloop Clearwater (talk)						Add sources
29		Cisco Houston (talk)						Add sources
14		Panagrellus redivivus (talk)						Add sources
24		Internet Icon (season 1) (talk)						Add sources
26		Louis J. Posner (talk)						Add sources
14		Fegmania! (talk)						Add sources
727		Do it yourself (talk)						Cleanup
121		YouTube Original Channel Initiative (talk)						Cleanup
245		Reeperbahn (talk)						Cleanup
24		Timeline of the 2013 protests in Turkey (talk)						Expand
26		Black Cobra (gang) (talk)						Expand
2,299		American Revolution (talk)						Expand
61		L.A.M.F. (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
11		Roberta Martin (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
41		Interstate 83 (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
97		Interstate 69 in Indiana (talk)						Merge
100		WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (talk)						Merge
170		Velocipede (talk)						Merge
101		Amer, India (talk)						Wikify
49		YOMYOMF (talk)						Wikify
6		Najbolji hrvatski tamburaši (talk)						Wikify
0		Trung Tâm Thiên Ân (talk)						Orphan
1		Spirit of Aloha Oceanfront Botanical Garden (talk)						Orphan
1		Gary Griffin (musician) (talk)						Orphan
26		Any Old Wind That Blows (talk)						Stub
57		High-top (talk)						Stub
21		DVD-D (talk)						Stub
4		Episkopi, Paphos (talk)						Stub
4		Ballons (talk)						Stub
12		Bald Mountains (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

I did not notice before, but it looks like the article's author moved this article to Flying Machine (promotional release) soon after Flying Machine (song) was sent to AfD, without making the original a redirect. I think this was done in good faith but was still wrong to do while AfD was open. I think that the result of the AfD should also apply to Flying Machine (promotional release) or, better yet, the Flying Machine (promotional release) should simply be deleted, as it is an unlikely redirect term. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Moved the page back to its original title without a redirect --Guerillero | My Talk 00:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Good Old Mountain Dew, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conductor, Eternal life and Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

if you don't have the knowledge of subject matter please consult the professional and please consider that u r not only the professional in this world. Don't like the review made by you.nShrestha 11:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirjal stha (talk • contribs)

• I was closing a discussion and have no opinion on the subject --Guerillero | My Talk 19:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Good Old Mountain Dew at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 21:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey!

You are invited to two upcoming events in DC:

• Meetup at Capitol City Brewery on Saturday, January 25 at 6 PM. Please join us for dinner, drinks, socializing, and discussing Wikimedia DC activities and events. All are welcome! RSVP on the linked page or through Meetup.
• Art and Feminism Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, February 1 from Noon – 5 PM. Join us as we improve articles on notable women in history! All are welcome, regardless of age or level of editing experience. RSVP on the linked page or through Meetup.

I hope to see you there!

(Note: If you do not wish to receive talk page messages for DC meetups, you are welcome to remove your username from this page.)

Harej (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Guerillero, thanks for your closure of the aforementioned AfD. Another editor mentioned, and I concurred, that some day, she may be notable. As such, would you mind storing a copy of the old article in my userspace (i.e. User:Go Phightins!/Cassie_McFarland_incubation)? The article was half-decent, so if she ever gets real coverage, perhaps it can be wholly decent. Thanks! Go Phightins! 11:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Done --Guerillero | My Talk 18:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Volume 7, Issue 1 • Winter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features 2013 in review The Moon is rising: our Lua progress so far Looking ahead to 2014 The Maple Syrup Report	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, GA, MI, OH, PA, UT, WA, and WV
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, Mr. Guerillero! Well, I have something to ask you, a little bit, but it's important. Why did you delete the page that I'd created? Are you mad bro? Or something's wrong with your unrelated terms? Are you messing my article? So, hopefully that you should or you must have a reply on my talk page, as you understand some violations you have or doing so. Anyway, I hope that you reached this e-mail for you and please, give respect to this message that, I'll gonna solve this big issue. Thanks!!! :) --The Game Expert (talk) 11:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I assume that, upon reviewing the arguments in the AfD discussion, he, and quite appropriately based on my quick scan, discerned that consensus as well as policy fell on the side of deleting the article. If you would like to work on it and find more sources, you can do so at articles for creation or in your userspace; just ask an administrator for a copy of the article. I am sure Guerillero has no ill will towards you. Go Phightins! 11:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

@Tambok0599: As Go Phightins said above, the article that you created was deleted as a result of a discussion that ended up favoring deletion. I have no opinion on the subject and I didn't delete the article to spite you. I suggest you read and listen to the advice given to you above, it is some good stuff. --Guerillero | My Talk 19:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok thanks for your good message. I was trying to get more updates, but unfortunately, someone closes the AfD discussion page and deleted the whole thing you know about. So, if there's something wrong, please feel free to sorry about, ok? Thank you! --The Game Expert (talk) 09:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey there! You recently reviewed my good article nomination for Enema of the State. You placed the article on hold for some further revision, which has been implemented in areas. I will however address several points in your review, such as the inclusion of images and sources deemed unreliable:

2b: Acclaimed Music is employed as a reliable source on current good articles (Me Against the World) and featured articles (Dookie). About.com is used as a source in the featured article Punk rock, as is Discogs. Discogs is also in use in the good articles on previous Blink-182 albums Cheshire Cat and Dude Ranch. I have replaced the AbsolutePunk link with a book reference, as the original interview (no longer online, apparently) is cited in the book.

I will accept your use of acclaimed music because you use it as a starting point. Discogs is user generates content and therefore does not pass WP:RS. For about.com you need to show that the writer has some expertise on the subject. The use in other pieces of audited content, as they stand right now, shouldn't be an argument for the use of a source. --Guerillero | My Talk 20:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

The Discogs and About.com links have been removed. Thardin12 (talk) 03:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

The Indonesia and Philippines chart references do not come from those chart’s respective sites, as those countries do not (to my knowledge) have a certification site, or at least one that would include an album released in 1999. For those certifications, an additional reference (found in the 'Sales/shipments' section of the box) is included, citing the band’s biography, in which they give the stats on the album’s sales worldwide (of course, the book was released in 2001… many of these are long outdated, but I feel it necessary to include them regardless). I’ve also removed Germany’s certification, as they did not achieve one there.

I don't fully know how I feel about this but I see that you are trying to use the best sources out there --Guerillero | My Talk 20:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

3b: The Reading photo was included because I found the image long ago and, as Reading is a famous festival and this was the band’s first performance at it (and the photo in question is FROM that particular year), I felt it notable to include. Reading wasn’t a particularly important moment in determining the band’s stature in the pop world and industry, of course, and the image is only there to spruce up the article a tad… when I find a better image representing the touring cycle, such as a photo from that tour, the Reading image will be replaced. For now, I’ve left it there, as numerous good articles (Animals, Emotions) and even featured articles (Mother's Milk) include images from tours not necessarily discussed in detail in the text.

You make your point. I remove this objection --Guerillero | My Talk 20:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

4: Only one review discussed in the text (NME) is fairly negative, and that respective review doesn’t give a score (I suppose one could include (negative) in the review box, but I’ve always disliked review boxes anyway [I feel they often give undue weight to the critical reception of an album] and including a (negative) looks out of place beside stars). I’ve left it as it stands, and have removed two reviews that seem more like blog posts than reliable sources (Punknews and Sputnikmusic).

Sounds good and I agree with you that the review boxes are horrible. --Guerillero | My Talk 20:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

6a: The image in question of the album cover does feature a slight difference in the capitalization of the band’s name; I nominated the article long ago and this image has since been added. I agree with your rationale; it has been removed.

Sounds good --Guerillero | My Talk 20:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

I am open to more changes if need be. Thank you for the review! Thardin12 (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

I am moving back into college tomorrow for the spring term. Request may take longer than usual to complete until the semester gets rolling. Thanks for the understanding. --Guerillero | My Talk 02:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

On 19 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Good Old Mountain Dew, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bascom Lamar Lunsford sold "Good Old Mountain Dew" to Scotty Wiseman for US$25 so he could buy a train ticket home? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Good Old Mountain Dew. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for helping the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

I'd like to restore the edit that was reverted here with a better source, but wanted to ask first if doing so would be in violation of your ban you placed upon me. --GHcool (talk) 07:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

While this is on the outer edges of your topic ban, that edit is still covered by it. --Guerillero | My Talk 19:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Would you mind doing it for me then if I give you the source? --GHcool (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

 Not done after much thought, I have concluded that it would improper for me to proxy edit in an area under arbcom sanctions while also participating in AE --Guerillero | My Talk 02:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Oh well. I'll rewrite the paragraph so it is general enough about the British Empire's involvement in the Middle East that it stays far enough away from the Arab-Israeli conflict that hopefully I won't get a slap on the wrist for it. --GHcool (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Toil, tools, tradition and trust
Thank you for quality articles such as Toil, Tradition and Jackie Hudson, for knowing about "no justice", for your focus on future, collaboration and tools, for trust, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (13 February 2011)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Oh wow! I am speechless, 100% speechless. Thank you Gerda. I am honored to be added to the list of wikipedians who have received this. --Guerillero | My Talk 19:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Move Like This
by 28bytes

Thank you, - I remember the feeling, 2010, and still have it on my user page ;) - danger on the German Main page: a blue duck attacks there, right now, - had to happen on the 28th ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)