Hi H8eternal! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Kmhkmh (talk) 08:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thx a lot. will check it out! H8eternal (talk) 09:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your dialogue on the talk page of the Dahmer article. I respect your patience alone in seeking the insertions. :) As you are the individual seeking inclusion of a music section on the Dahmer article, I personally believe you should be the one to open the dialogue on the article (maybe with the header Request for comment) and a few sentences explaining why you believe such entries should be worthy of inclusion. Give the poll sufficient time to attract a reasonable number of comments (you could search this aspect more as I have participated in several polls on Wiki. but never conducted one myself). As is the case (rightly), consensus governs. I hope you do not think I am being awkward here (the tag I mentioned in my most recent reply existed before or very shortly after I joined Wiki. in 2008), but I do personally hold concerns allowing even a concept album will "warrant" mentions in fictional crime series, hosted amateur YT podcasts, or suchlike. We will see how this goes.--Kieronoldham (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed the RfC you posted for Jeffrey Dahmer. The template should be positioned above the statement. As I understand how this works, the bot is unable to post the statement on the RfC page - it's missing - plus the RfC displayed on Dahmer's Talk page is out of order The order, then, should be: template on the first line, then the statement on the second. Allreet (talk) 20:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Easy to fix. If this were an ordinary posting, as opposed to a RfC, I would've simply fixed it myself. But now that I took a look, I see the bot already detected your error and removed the template. You can re-do it yourself - and must because I can't "sign" your post. Also, the bot "said" you entered an improper category ("rfc").

I believe it would be best to start over. First, click Edit on your improper RfC posting, and then copy your text but not the title. Then block and delete (NOT cut) everything from the title to your signature at the end. Once you click Publish Changes, your initial posting will be removed entirely so that you can start over.

Start over by clicking the New Section tab. Enter a title as before, enter the template first without the offensive "rfc" category, on the next line paste in your copied text (fix "discussion", it's mis-spelled), add your signature, click Show Preview to review what you've done, and if everything is okay, click Publish Changes. If needed you, can make as many changes as you want between a series of Previews and clicking Publish, so always preview your posts.

It'll take a while for the bot to complete the process once you publish but you should be good to go, Let me know when you're done and I'll review it to make sure. You can skip my last suggestion if you feel it's unneeded. Allreet (talk) 15:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]