Hello, HRShami! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((U|I dream of horses)) to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

The article Kevin Budelmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. While references are given they are in the main local coverage or not independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 09:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi HRShami! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello HRShami,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged HRShami/sandbox for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xx236 (talk) 09:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami,

Thanks for creating James E. Gentle! I edit here too, under the username Lopifalko and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

All the sources are primary, it needs independent reliable sources by which to demonstrate notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Lopifalko)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lopifalko (talk) 13:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Michael A. Schwartz.

User:DGG while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add additional material: his degrees and positions, chronologically, with dates. List also his major publications. It does relatively litle service to the encyclopedia to write stub articlesa s incompleteas this.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|DGG)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DGG ( talk ) 20:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami,

Thanks for creating List of members of the National Academy of Medicine! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Boleyn)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted. I will add some references and remove the tag. HRShami (talk) 04:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of members of the National Academy of Medicine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert L. Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fistly, thank you for wanting to add to the encyclopaedic content available on Wikipedia. I'm just a little concerned that you're simply reposting information available on the IEEE website without it conforming to our policies on constructing Lists. May I invite you to refer to Wikipedia:LISTPEOPLE to appreciate that List articles should really only contain entries about notable people who already have articles about them here? Whilst a few cited 'redlinks' about people who haven't yet got articles might be ok, you appear set to create dozens of these IEEE sub group list pages containing very few notable people. Whilst I personally value seeing the contributions of scientists rather than petty sportspeople here, I'm not confident your List articles will pass scrutiny per WP:NOTDIRECTORY You may be better simply creating shorter list pages just of those 'notable' Fellows, and simply linking to the IEEE website so users can find all the others. In addition, please rewrite the introductory paragraph to these lists as they currny pinfringe other organisations' copyight. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Nick Moyes. Thank you for informing me about this before I created all the lists. :D It is really a lot of work in getting the names of all the fellows, so I would have been bummed if all the lists were deleted after I had created them. I started working these lists because it says here at Wikipedia:Notability (academics) that anybody "who has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the IEEE)" is notable. So it means that every IEEE fellow is notable and deserves to have an article. Having said that, I did feel that most of the IEEE fellows don't have their standalone articles. So what do you propose I should do? I would hate to leave List of IEEE Fellows as is, with all those red links. Should I delete those pages?HRShami (talk) 03:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because I might br wrong, why dont we seek another editor's opinion? Let me sleep on it and I'll have a think who/where best to ask. Nick Moyes (talk) 06:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello again. My sincere apologies for the long delay in replying. You'll have seen a notification that I have asked another editor here if they would review my comment to you, and offer a second opinion as to the best course of action for you to take. I'm erring on suggesting that you create just one sortable list, naming only those people with articles on Wikipedia, and stating the section they belong to. Thus the list could be sorted by name or section, and new names added as other engineers have article written about them. Thus, I think all those red-linked List pages ought, indeed, to be deleted. But if they have a different view on this, I hope they will let you know directly. (I'm afraid I shalln't be around much for a while to give you further input on this. If you get no reply from Robert (and he does like to be supportive and helpful for page creators) you could ask one of my fellow Hosts at the Teahouse for their opinion. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 02:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Nick Moyes, User:HRShami - What is the question? Is it about the IEEE Fellows who are not the subjects of articles? If the issue is whether the red links are appropriate, because red links should only be used for what are thought to be valid future article subjects, then I see no problem with the red links, because (as noted above) being a Fellow of the IEEE is a highly selective honor indicating academic achievement. Did I answer the question, or was there some other question? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, that's the question we are discussing. Thank you for answering. I will go ahead and create the pages for these lists. I discussed this with another edits here who is also of the view that IEEE lists of Fellows should be created. HRShami (talk) 03:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berthold K.P. Horn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Bigelow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Brian M. Salzberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Research Council

List of members of the National Academy of Medicine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kevin Campbell

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James W. Stigler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pearson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your addition to Bhramar Mukherjee has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This was a relatively minor case of copyright violation. Nevertheless, copying information from a source that has not been clearly marked as open-source or with another compatible license is not allowed on Wikipedia. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am sorry for this. I was not familiar with this guideline. I will ensure that this does not happen in my editing again. I understand you have already removed the copyrighted content. Do I need to do something?HRShami (talk)

Nope, you're good to go. Also, in the future if you're leaving a message for someone who placed a template or who otherwise may not be watching the page you're writing on, you should put ((u|TheirUsername)) in the message to send them a notification. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted, Rosguill. Thanks.

Hello, HRShami

Thank you for creating List of fellows of IEEE Circuits and Systems Society.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Need a ref for each one.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Scope creep)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 21:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Scope creep:. Hello, Scope Creep. I started these pages of List of IEEE members recently and any help in this would be highly appreciated. As I understand from your comment, you want me to add references for each person in the list. I perused several similar lists to formulate the structure of this article. Most of the list articles don't have citations for each person in the list. For instance List of members of the National Academy of Sciences (Anthropology) does not list citations for each member. Given this, do you still think I should add references for each person? HRShami (talk) 05:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I think the single ref to IEEE Fellows directory is sufficient. There's no point in duplicating this same source a hundred times. Thanks, SD0001 (talk) 15:30, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami

Thank you for creating List of fellows of IEEE Communications Society.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Need a ref per name.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Scope creep)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 10:59, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stevan Arnold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corvallis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Massood Tabib-Azar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jerod Lycett (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami,

Thank you for creating Michael Hechter.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi thanks for creating this article. It needs more independent sources about Hechter and fewer authored by him. Also take a look at the ‘Cite’ menu on the edit screen to see how best to format web links as sources. All the best.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Mccapra)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami,

Thank you for creating Peter Cramton.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi I’m reviewing Peter Cramton. I’m passing it because of his Professor Emeritus status but the references you have provided are mostly not suitable for a biography. You’ve provided lots of sources by him when what we need is lots of third-party sources about him. If you can add any (book reviews, discussions of his work etc.) that will be great. Thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Mccapra)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actually, Mccapra, this was not good advice. The notability of scientists is based upon WP:PROF, which is entirely independent and bears no relation to the GNG: they are alternatives. . Notability of academics is normally shown by demonstrating the influence of someone's work, as proved by the extent to which thei papers are cited. There are also some shortcuts, and a named professorship is one of them, but Emeritus Profesor is not a title of a named professorship, but merely means retired professor. There is normally no need at all for rxplicit secondary sources to show the notability of an academic. The notability is shown by their workbut if you want to think in terms of secondary sourcing, it consists of the citations to they work. The facts of their bio and awardsare proven by any reliable source, which can be their university CV, though for major awards there usually are true independent secondary sources available and they should be used also. This distinction bwetween WP:PROF and GNG has held up without any exception at all for 12 years now, although I admit to some degree of bias in saying hat, because I was one of those who helped establish the standard. , DGG ( talk ) 09:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

,

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lewis Kim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jai49 (talk) 06:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Frakes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guilford High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami

Thank you for creating Shafiqul Islam (academic).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|North8000)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much for the appreciation.HRShami (talk) 10:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Budelmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Budelmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've gone through and made the names in the AAAS member lists into links. A fraction of them are red, either because the articles don't yet exist or, in many cases, because the AAAS data included them under a slightly different name than Wikipedia used. A middle initial might be present or absent, etc. I've started checking for those, but if you'd like to put more time into this, it's pretty undemanding maintenance work. I don't have a clever system for it; mostly I just search the web for the redlinked names and see if Wikipedia articles pop up. XOR'easter (talk) 07:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much! I would love to take on this work from here. It would also give me a lot of people to write about. Thanks. HRShami (talk) 10:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

HRSHami< I'm glad you want to work on these. It would be particualrly helpful if you followed what is the usual style for such articles : Make sure the article starts with the basic bio, and then the full sequence of degrees and positions, with dates; a complete list of books published, with year, date, publisher, ISBN (referenced to WorldCat), and links to published reviews of them; and, (in thesciences) the 5 most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them; any national level awards--(not junior awards or awards from their own university) Add major outside positions, such as president of major national organizations, and any positions of editor-in-chief ; Membership or minor offices in most societies, and service on editorial boards, do not count for much & are better omitted. Very sparse articles attract skepticism. as do those using vague claims and superlatives, or those that list all possible internal and external committes. Try to source the field of research from the papers, or the CV, not the press releases or abbreviated CVs put out by the universities. Listing the major work is sufficient, not every project.

If I can help you with any of thie , please let me know on my user talk page. DGG ( talk ) 04:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello DGG, when I started writing on Wikipedia, I had thought that I would neatly complete one part of Wikipedia and then move on to the next. By completing one part, I mean completing all the articles of academics. :D As I continue writing, I have realized that this is a never ending project. We might never have all the academics on Wikipedia. No matter how small a niche I try to pick, I just end up realizing that I will never be able to complete any part of Wikipedia. I try to follow the template that you have described above. I have been doing a few things incorrectly such as adding more than five papers and not adding the ISBN of books. I will fix those from now on.HRShami (talk) 04:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you please also give me the correct format for adding the list of books?

An article you recently created, John P. Miller (academic), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 05:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See WP:42 and WP:SIGCOV and add the relevant third party references which have significant covereage about the subject. Primary sources are not helpful. Regards. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 05:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I am actually working on the article right now.HRShami (talk)/

actually, this is not good adivce. The notability of scientists is determined by the influence of their work. It is assolutely correct and necessary to give their research, inbdicated their publications as principal sources, and demonstrating their influence in the usualway for WP:PROF., by showingthe citations to their work (and, when relevanttheir wawards. TheAafi, notability of scientists does not usually fall under the GNG. It is completely independent, because there are usually no significant secondary coverage of living scientists. The gideline here were established 12 yeasrs ago, and have held up consistently ever since. Please read the relevant sections of the notability guideline before you give further advice on them. DGG ( talk ) 09:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC) .Reply[reply]

Please try to write in a more condensed manner. I and another editor are presently engaged in a rather thorough rewriting of your article on Keith Dobson, to remove extensive overuse of the name, duplication, and wordiness. For example, you don't have to say "he investigated X/ He looks at factors Y and Z. He determined that Y and Z were related to Z. This has proved of clinical usefulness". Instead say, "He investigated Z, finding that factors X and Y were relevant to clinical treatment. Each investigation normally should normally get one sentence, and you should confine yourself to the most important investigations. Please don't divide an article into, for example, Studies of condition X. Studies of method Y. Treatment of Condition X. Use of method Y in treatment of condition X,. These are all related, and should go in a single section. DGG ( talk ) 09:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi DGG. I am sorry for the problem caused by my writing. I try to be succinct in writing the research section of the article. However, in this case, I guess I was strongly influenced by the fact that he has 25,000 citations. I felt that a lot of his research has been very significant, which is why I tried to mention a lot of the work that he has done. There was so much work in each area of his research that I ended up dividing even the depression section in three sections. I will ensure that the articles I write from now on are less wordy. HRShami (talk)

One more thing DGG. In a previous message you wrote that up to 5 scientific articles should be added to the article. Another editor has just mentioned that articles should not be added and only books should be added. Should I add articles or just add the books?HRShami (talk) 10:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If there are books, add them. The format for books is that used by WorldCat. Look at any of the bios I have edited. Also add the 5 most cited papers, in a separate section, call "Most cited papers" using google scholar, but only if the person is in science. Ignore conference presentations, and so on. . Use the Vancouver format. Do not add more than 5 papers. If anyone objects to adding papers, either ignore them or let me know. (sometimes it's worth explaining things, sometimes it isn't) If an article has been declined because of that, let me know. I will check and accept it myself, and then I will explain to them that it is necessary to have them because that's how we judge notability according to WP:PROF. DGG ( talk ) 20:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, DGG. That helps a lot. HRShami (talk)

It's 12 days later. I had expected you to go back and fix some of the bios by now. I will rewrite them if the people are notable enough,and I have already started, but it's your responsibility. DGG ( talk ) 23:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi DGG, I didn't know you expected me to rewrite the old ones as well. I am trying to make my writing more condensed since our last conversation above. I will be going to bios and checking to see what I can improve.HRShami (talk) 05:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed P. K. Ramachandran Nair. Thanks for creating such a good article! Happy editing. Mccapra (talk) 08:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much. I hope to see you around. ^_^ HRShami (talk)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating the article for Benjamin Sommer. You also added Sommer to the List of people from Teaneck, New Jersey. There was no mention of his connection to Teaneck in his article and there was no source in his article to connect him there. Categories were added to the article for Teaneck, for Hillsdale and for Pascack Valley High School, but there had been no mention in the article about these connections and no sources. Why not add the content / categories first, with sources, in his article, and then add him to other articles, with appropriate sources. Alansohn (talk) 15:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For example, I had been able to find sources to connect him to Hillsdale and Teaneck, but I can't find any reliable source to connect him to Pascack Valley High School. What source are you using? Alansohn (talk) 15:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I read this in some listing or online directory sort of site - may be it was LinkedIn. That's why I did not add it to the article and just added the category.HRShami (talk)

Material in articles requires reliable and verifiable sourcing, not vague recollections of where you might have seen something. If the source is available and its reliable then add the source. If you have concerns about the source, find a better source or don't add the content. Why should other editors be forced to track down sources for you? Alansohn (talk) 21:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Which is why I didn't add it to the article. I just added a category. I'll not be adding any categories based on such information in the future.HRShami (talk) 06:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Kevin Cokley.jpg — was tagged with ((OTRS pending)), indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami

Thank you for creating Alicia Bertone.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Celestina007)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for the appreciation!HRShami (talk)

Hello, HRShami. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Eric C. Rasmussen.jpg — was tagged with ((OTRS pending)), indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just wanted to commend you on your efforts to turn all those red links on your user page blue. I am slowly working through those listed at the National Academy of Medicine. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 11:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much. I am glad to have your company. If there are other lists you feel that need to be done, please feel free to add them to my userpage. I like working on academic awards and their recipients.HRShami (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see my edits on your new article on Joseph Vinetz I only dealt with style, expressing things more compactly; removing student and post doc awards, and not saying the asme thing in different sections. The next step is to condense the descipion of research to the msot improtant-- Looking at citations to the key publications will indicate which of his projects had major influence--the others should be removed--I leave that part to you.

Since you are working so extensively in this important area its worth the trouble to learn to get things right. I will typically try to look at every article on a biomed scientist, tho I miss some, but I expect the original author to write them better in the first place. . DGG ( talk ) 08:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted. I used to write the same thing in different sections since I thought that everything in the lead section must be mentioned in the article. And then having an awards section caused some duplication. In the research section, that's exactly what I do - pick the most impactful papers and then describe them. I will be further improving how I write.HRShami (talk)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elad Hazan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elad Hazan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 19:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Wonders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Wonders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Bob Evermon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aloolkaparatha (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello HRShami,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ali Dehghantanha for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edit to Alex Macario has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami

Thank you for creating Timothy Brennan.

User:FormalDude, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

In the Education and Career section, you need a reliable secondary source that shows the essay was widely cited. The current source is just the essay. The Selected Works section needs additional references. Also, I'm not sure what "selected" means in this context.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|FormalDude)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

––FormalDude talk 11:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@FormalDude:

Hi. Does Semantic Scholar count as a Reliable Source for proving the citations an article has received? Google searches show that the article has been cited over a 1000 times, but Semantic Scholar shows it has been cited around 350 times. That's still a lot of citations. In case of selected essays, I have chosen the ones I felt were most important based on citations, or translations into other languages. I added some from the recent years to cover most of the ideas he has written about.HRShami (talk)

That's probably not the best source, but you might want to ask at WP:Reliable Sources/Noticeboard. Also it seems like it would be better to say "Notable Works" and include sources that verify notability. ––FormalDude talk 06:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bob Evermon instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bob Evermon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bob Evermon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Helmut Koller, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 15:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've moved this article to draft as it doesn't seem to conform to the guidelines on Wikipedia:Advertising. Please work on it in draft before submitting for review. Deb (talk) 16:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Deb Draft:Helmut Koller has now been re-created as Helmut Koller Is there an applicable deletion criterion for such re-creations that block moving the draft to mainspace? Vexations (talk) 13:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I've protected the article so the necessity for review can't be bypassed. Deb (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Please don't create an article when there is already a draft awaiting review. Please work on it there and then submit for review in accordance with my previous advice. Deb (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Need help setting up my wiki page. I am listed in the “Paleotographer” wiki page. Can you help or refer me to someone who can? I was referred to you because you set up a collegue’s wiki page. Thank you. 74.197.247.18 (talk) 01:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure. Please drop your name here. If you meet notability criteria, I'll add you to my to-do list.HRShami (talk) 04:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, good to see you're creating a lot of new articles. Can I remind you that section headings should be sentance case as per MOS:HEADINGS. Keep up the good work overall. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I did notice that you were correcting the case for most of my headings. I'll be careful of this. Thank you for all your support.HRShami (talk) 04:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Bernadette Eberlein. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. intforce (talk) 12:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

≤== I have sent you a note about a page you started ==

Hello, HRShami

Thank you for creating Ruben Sanchez (artist).

User:Snow Rise, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I have no major concerns with the article as NP reviewer, so I am marking this reviewed. I will say that far too large a percentage of the sources are dubiously RS or well-suited to verification or notability purposes, being commercial or promotional media associated with the artist, or else one-off references in clickbait-adjacent blurb content. That said, there are more than a half dozen sufficiently quality RS that give the artist coverage in significant detail--as either the man focus of an interview or discussion, or at least a major component of a larger piece. It is therefore reasonably up-to-snuff for purposes of WP:N. The article does also lean a bit promotional in tone, but there as well, not to an excessively bad extent.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Snow Rise)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SnowRise ^{let's rap} 07:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. What links seem to be not right for this? Let's take them out.HRShami (talk)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MATTE Projects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MATTE Projects (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A loose necktie (talk) 07:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheLongTone (talk) 12:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Are you professionally connected with David A. Pizarro? I can't find the date of birth you added to the article. Thanks, Storchy (talk) 08:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. No. I am not connected with the subject of this article. I found his date of birth on his Facebook account.HRShami (talk)

Thanks. I can't find his Facebook account, have you got a link? Storchy (talk) 18:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Bachovchin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Bachovchin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

2006toyotacorrola (talk) 12:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @HRShami: I reviewed your article at Donald L. Patrick. I noticed you have been here for 6 years now and your using bare urls as though they are going out of fashion. Can you you take a look WP:REFB which is a small tutorial on howto create full citations. Your essentially shooting yourself in the foot, because these references are virtually useless as the average website page is only up for six weeks, so it makes the references decay in terms of quality over weeks making for a low-quality. It takes a lot of work for somebody else to bring this article to WP:MOS compliant article. Even the script is used is not ideal and it misses field, leaving the reference half-done. Can you please go back and repair these references. Reference 15 for example, has a doi on it. All you do is plug the doi into the doi field in the cite journal in the cite button, in the editor window above, and click the wee magnifying glass icon and it fills it in for you. It is very easy. scope_creep^Talk 05:04, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Sorry for that. I'll fix my referencing going forward. If I use the refill tool, would the references be okay or would I have to manually fill them? I'll fix the Donald L. Patrick references.HRShami (talk) HRShami (talk) 10:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Thank you for your work on Lyle Norman Long. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Helmut Koller, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami,

Thank you for creating Garth Ehrlich.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, thanks for creating the article. It appears to be orphan, could you link it wherever it's appropriate? thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Rejoy2003)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 06:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for creating Gregg Barak. It appears to be orphan, please do link it wherever it's appropriate. Good luck on your future articles!

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 13:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. HRShami (talk) 04:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Thank you for your work on Garth Ehrlich. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Thank you for your work on John Ballato. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:08, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Arthur Baroody requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Amthisguy (talk) 06:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Helmut Koller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami. Thank you for your work on Dwayne D. Gremler. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jodie Allen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, please remember that the References section should be a level 2 heading, not level 3, which I'd noticed you'd done in a few of your recent articles. Keep up all your good work with creating articles nonetheless! -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. I was confused whether it was a level two or a level three heading. Thanks for clearing that up. HRShami (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Dale Miller (academic) is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami,

Thank you for creating Thomas E. Müller.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Should have independent references writing about the person or their work

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Graeme Bartlett)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, HRShami,

Thanks for your efforts and works

Are you creating American architect Ines J. Pedras as your curational research projects Galloire (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, HRShami. I'm really glad to see you have added the Women in Red box to your user page. I also appreciate the increasing amount of editing time you have devoted to biographies of women. If you would like to become a full member of the project, you can sign up under "New Registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. I look forward in any case to many more biographies of women scientists and academics. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much for your message Ipigott. I just don't where to start. I have already started working on Ida Bull's article. She was listed in WIR. However, how do I mark that I have taken up her article so that someone else doesn't work on it simultaneously? I'll go and register for the project.HRShami (talk)

If you are referring to the Norwegian historian, I suggest you prepare your draft as user:HRShami/Ida Bull. I don't see any imminent danger of anyone else creating the biography as the Norwegian and German versions of her biography have been around for some time. Once you have made a solid start with three good secondary references, you can move it to article space and continue to expand it there. Please let me know if you need additional assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 09:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just noticed you have registered, so welcome to the project. You might find it useful look through out Primer. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the help and guidance. I'll surely reach out to you if I need any help.HRShami (talk) 10:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dimitar Ouzounov, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270 Online events: New: Alphabet run U, V, W | Disability | Women in Education | CEE women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman | See also: Wikimedia CEE Spring 2023/CEE Women - Wikimedia contest with postcards and prizes The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jacek Furdyna, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Elbio Dagotto, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273 Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y & Z | LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green: June 2023 GA Editathon event page Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride/2023 global campaign The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page George N. Rouskas, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:38, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276 Online events: New: Women in Red's 8th anniversary | Alphabet run A & B | Sports Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Look out for contributors interested in writing about women and invite them to join Women in Red Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hi HRShami, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 08:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much. This feels like an award. :) HRShami (talk) 08:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

J. David Hawkins

added a link pointing to PHD

Raghbendra Jha

added a link pointing to Queen's University

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Women in Red 8th Anniversary
	In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280 Online events: New: Alphabet run C & D | Indigenous women | Film and stage | Geofocus: Arab League Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region. Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shaomin Li, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shaomin Li, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Celtic nations Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jimmy Mays.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((permission pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Doron Levy.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((permission pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Women in STEM | Geofocus: Sub-Saharan Africa Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon Tip of the month: When creating an article, check to see if there is an entry in the sister project Wikidata. If your subject is listed, the Wikidata information can be useful Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289 Online events: New: Alphabet run I & J | Geofocus: Indian subcontinent | Women in Politics Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest Tip of the month: When translating articles from another language Wikipedia, don't forget to include attribution in your first edit summary. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jes Sanddal Lindholt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Iain Buchan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((permission pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Acceptor identity nucleotides of tRNA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Brooklyn Transitions.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Bruce A. Fowler.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Bruce A. Fowler2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:David Alan Hoffman.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Dietrich Busselberg.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Kristina Durate.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jarek Gryz.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Wesley E. Donahue photo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Bruce Fowler.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Richard Frankham.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jenny M. Lewis.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Ho-Young Kim.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Kenneth Ikechukwu Ozoemena.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:William E. Halal.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Asish Basu.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Georgios Rouskas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Emdad C. Haque.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Harry C. Dorn.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Frances Arnold, Stephen Hawking, Lyle Norman Long.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Helen Hansma.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Wesley Donahue.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292 Online events: New: Alphabet run K & L | Women who died in 2023 | Honoured Women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Avoid copyright problems by rewriting in your own words. You can check any article or draft with Earwig's copyvio detector. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296 Online events: New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023 Announcement In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part of the #1day1woman initiative! Tip of the month: Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Gerard Medioni.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Terence G. Langdon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: no valid permission after 30 days (ticket is ticket:2023100410007898)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Bing Li Academic.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jeffrey I. Cole.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission recieved with no VRT confirmation for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Erik Levine.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission pending with no ticket in the VRT system for more than 30 days

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcement Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event. Tip of the month: AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hi there, thank you for all your contributions and all the great articles you create! Please can I recommend not adding biographical articles directly to Category:Academics though, as that is only a container category and instead they should be categorised by their discipline, nationality, etc. It's only a minor issue, and I move them when I come across them as it's one of the categories on my watchlist. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Got it. Sorry for the trouble. HRShami (talk) 11:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For all the biographical articles you create! Kj cheetham (talk) 11:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! HRShami (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Robert L. Norton.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((permission pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Dimitar Ouzounov.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]