Hi, you updated [1] with the cover of the fourth edition. I think this is not the intended way of updating the file. May you please revert your change, upload the cover of the fourth edition as Clrs4.jpeg and change the cover in the article Introduction to Algorithms? Thank you. --ElLutzo (talk) 01:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you. Hadal1337 (talk) 13:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hadal1337,

You recently PROD'd this page for deletion. However, you failed to do two necessary parts of this process. Please leave an edit summary stating that you are PRODding an article (or say "proposing for deletion"). This is in case the tag is removed, we need to be able to easily see that the article has been PROD'd before and the easiest way to do this is by looking at the edit summaries on the page history.

Secondly, any time you tag a page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/MFD/RFD/etc.), you need to post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. It's common courtesy to let the editor who created the page know that it's been tagged for deletion especially in the case of PRODs where they can address the concerns and possibly improve the article. The easiest way to do these notifications is to use Twinkle to tag pages for deletion. It's a tool used by most editors who patrol pages and by many administrators. It's very simple to use and once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post these notices for you, on your behalf. It has a lot of other very useful features, like Twinkle will maintain logs for you of pages you have tagged for deletion which can be helpfu to review. I encourage editors to learn how to use it because it makes tagging pages for all sorts of issues very simple. Thank you for your contributions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, duly noted. Hadal1337 (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Draft:Alexandr Wang, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 00:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you have reverted by edit and then reverted back to my edit again. I have added a primary source for now while I continue to search for better sources. Hadal1337 (talk) 01:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You asked about this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Museum of Computing but that is not a suitable place to discuss this. In the first instant, one should take this issue to the administrator who gave the user the right, in this case User:Courcelles. However, Courcelles has not been active recently and may not respond. Generally, withdrawal of permissions are handled at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You will need to provide diffs of instances where the user has abused the autopatrolled right and make sure you inform the user that you have opened a thread. SpinningSpark 17:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hadal1337! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Leroy Cronin several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Leroy Cronin, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:11, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you must be mistaken, I have only reversed it once due to suspected vandalism. Hadal1337 (talk) 18:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the message is indeed not entirely accurate. You have unnecessarily joined an edit war, but you have not made multiple reverts. "Vandalism" means intentionally causing damage to the encyclopedia; I see significant disruption in the history, but not really vandalism. Did you take more than the minute between the edit and your revert to check if WP:BLPRESTORE may be applicable? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did a double check of the contents that I was restoring, and they seemed from good sources. I wasn't aware that there was an edit war going on. In the future, I will take more notice. Hadal1337 (talk) 07:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that does sound fine. No worries. You may like to join the currently-running discussion on the talk page of the article. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Akevsharma were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexandr Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 10:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hadal1337! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 10:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidEfraim was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexandr Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidEfraim (talk) 02:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hadal1337. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scale AI, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hadal1337. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scale AI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, GE Aviation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BilCat, thank you for the heads up. I noticed GE Aviation has changed its to name GE Aerospace on social platforms and its own website, leading me to assume the name has already been changed. Like you mentioned, I was unable to find an official reference to them actually changing it, so let's leave it like it is for now :) Hadal1337 (talk) 12:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was able to find a few sources for it, so I moved the article yesterday. I had not visited their website since the announcement, so I'd not realized that they had changed the name almost immediately. It all worked out. BilCat (talk) 21:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear! Hadal1337 (talk) 12:31, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I kindly request that you undelete the page so that there are a couple of edits I can do on it so that I can improve it to meet the standards of Wikipedia policies. with the news available ^[1][2][3][4] Zimula Carol (talk) 07:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]