September 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yuliian Romanchuk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuliian Romanchuk, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 14:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksiy Shevchuk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksiy Shevchuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksiy Shevchuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 20:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maksym Polyakov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Maksym Polyakov, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hanna Haid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I am a student and young wikipedist who is interested in Ukrainian outstanding scientific and historical personalities. Probably sometimes I can make some mistakes but still trying to write better for being a part of Wikipedia community. I want to unblock my account and will try to be more precise while chosing sources for my artciles

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hanna Haid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I am asking to unblock my Wikipedia account for several reasons: 1) I have thoroughly read 'Guide to appealing blocks' and administrators' statements about my articles. Henceforth I will use reliable sources of information such as mainstream newspapers, books and journals which were published by high-graded publishing offices. I will not use YouTube videos or other visual and textual unreliable sources for my research. 2) I will always use Draft option for submitting and editing my future Wikipedia articles. 3) My intentions to participate in Wikipedia are clear and fair: I want to write about Ukrainian and foreign talented and innovative personalities within the framework of history, politics and science whose contributions are important for society. For Yamla (talk), talk, talk, talk, talk

Decline reason:

It sounds to me that you will continue the same problematic editing that got you blocked, so there are no grounds to remove the block. You will need to explain your connection to the subject of your edits and indicate you understand WP:COI and WP:PAID. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of notes; pings do not work unless you sign the same post in which you ping with four tildes~~~~ which should be done for all discussion posts. Second, it is unnecessary to ping admins to an open unblock request, which is visible in a category of such requests to all administrators. 331dot (talk) 11:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hanna Haid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I've got acquainted with WP:COI and WP:PAID. So in order to avoid possible mistakes I will stop editing about Biographies of Living Persons and will focus on neutral topics as it is suggested for new users. I think you can trust me as I have nothing to hide and if I violate some rule, you can block indefinitely me. I just want a second chance. I like Wikipedia and don't want to be banned here. My connection to the subject of my edits is that I was translating from Ukrainian wiki into English about living persons by creating new articles. I'm not connected to Vano Teodor, Maksym Polyakov, Leonid Kadenyuk or Nazar Kholodnytskyi. I just translated them from Ukrainian. I'm also not connected with National Center of Control and Testing of Space Resources, but I love this topic and Ukrainian state authorities are interesting for me. 331dot

Accept reason:

I'm willing to accept this unblock request on the condition that you avoid editing BLP articles. This conditional block also includes content about living people in articles that are not biographies. You can appeal these restrictions at a later date either directly to me at my talk page or publicly at WP:AN; a strong history of constructive contributions will increase the chances that the restrictions are lifted.

I'll add that while I'm not formally adding this as an unblock condition, I would suggest that you also stay away from editing articles and content about active companies and organizations, as these are common topics for COI/PAID editing and will draw further scrutiny _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]