Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boston bag and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boston bag, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Happyecheveria! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amarna letters have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amarna letters was changed by Happyecheveria (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957107 on 2021-09-30T05:04:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Texas at Austin School of Undergraduate Studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Texas at Austin School of Undergraduate Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(t · c) buidhe 08:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Happyecheveria,

I was looking at New Year's Nation and say you had posted a PROD tag on the article. Just a reminder that any time you tag a page for deletion (whether CSD, PROD or AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), you need to post a notification of the talk page of the page creator. It's part of the deletion process. This process is made easier if you make use of Twinkle. You need to set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator" and then when you tag a page, Twinkle will post these notifications for you.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Happyecheveria. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boston bag, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint-Malo Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Postal & Philatelic Museum of Greece, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Postal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Clayton Farm Heritage Museum

added a link pointing to Bordertown

National Transport Museum, Bulgaria

added a link pointing to Ruse

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you know what you are doing here? I have had to revert several, & I haven't looked at them all. And County Cavan is NOT in the United Kingdom! Johnbod (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction. I am new to categorizing and will be more careful in the future. Happyecheveria (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It can look as though there are too many cats, but correct categorization by place, period, and type of object may all need a separate category, depending on the tree structure. Often you have to check out up and down the tree to see if a sub-cat is connected at a higher level. WP:OCAT is the governing policy. Johnbod (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. You just ripped through a whole bunch of UAE history/archaeology articles removing categories and adding more. While the additions would have been welcome, the removals don't seem to make sense and have been reverted. It would seem to me that more categories are better than removing key find sites across a whole nation from categories related to that nation's history and archaeology. Maybe check in future, or take it a little more slowly? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the feedback. I was trying to follow the guidelines in WP:PARENTCAT (section 3.1). Since the category Archaeological sites in the United Arab Emirates is a subcategory of Archaeology of the United Arab Emirates, I felt it was appropriate to apply the more specific category where relevant and remove the duplicative parent category. Happyecheveria (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for starting this! I was thinking of putting this up for WP:DYK - I can do the nom (co-nom for both of us). Are you ok with this? Johnbod (talk) 00:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for expanding it! I am not too familiar with the DYK process, but you are welcome to nominate the article. Happyecheveria (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Harvester Vase now up. Johnbod (talk) 03:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join WikiProject Phoenicia You appear to be someone who may be interested in joining WikiProject Phoenicia. Please accept this invitation from a member of the project. I can't wait for us to work together! el.ziade (talkallam) 07:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's go!

el.ziade (talkallam) 07:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harvester Vase, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Harvester Vase (pictured), a Minoan carved stone rhyton of circa 1550 to 1500 BC, includes a figure who may have fallen over drunk? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harvester Vase. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Harvester Vase), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Don't know why you didn't get this! It got 11,440 views, which is pretty good. Johnbod (talk) 03:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Great work. Happyecheveria (talk) 17:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]