| User | Talk | Archives | My work | Sandbox | Resources | News | Stats |
|---|
|
|
AWB "fix" is unnecessary and breaks link
Your recent edit to the article for Wyckoff, New Jersey used AWB to "fix" a link to Time (Magazine). The "fix" is both unnecessary here and the replacement added here and elsewhere is broken. Alansohn (talk) 00:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed it. That was the only instance of the fix being off. I might have accidentally deleted the pipe with a stray keyboard stroke. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:28, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bouncing ball
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bouncing ball you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reyk -- Reyk (talk) 12:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Reyk: Awesome! I'll be looking forward to it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Evolution theories
Template:Evolution theories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Plant communication
An article that you have been involved in editing—Plant communication —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Edaham (talk) 01:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
You have received this message as you are one of the most recent names in either the source or destination article's history page. This proposal serves two purposes, namely
- To suggest a merge (obviously
) of the overlapping material - To draw attention to the source article (the info to be merged into the destination article, which requires expansion)
Many thanks for your time! Edaham (talk) 01:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Skeptic (disambiguation)
Hello Headbomb. Your edits to Skeptic (disambiguation) are marked as copyediting, but I think what you've really done is merged The Skeptic with Skeptic (disambiguation). Shouldn't you now apply ((merged-from)) and ((merged-to)) tags per Wikipedia:Merging#How to merge ? In the meantime I have removed the circular See also link. Regards, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, the edit summary should have read 'Mergef from The Skeptic', but then I think I previewed and done some copyediting and went with that edit summary instead by mistake. I've tagged the talk pages. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
|
Editor of the Week | |
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your work on science related articles. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- Headbomb is an intelligent, passionate, 10 year supporter of the project with almost 200K edits with 65% of them in mainspace. A great asset to the encyclopedia as a work-o-holic in science-related articles where getting past quackery and pseudoscience pushers require a rare adroitness. A key player in getting Quark through FAC. Many substantive, exceptionally high-quality contributions to articles such as List of baryons, Bouncing ball and Planck's law just to name a few. He is involved with assorted bot noticeboards WP:BAG, WP:BRFA and technical areas of the Village Pump. He created WP:Article Alerts. Always ready to take action to support the normal standards and policies of Wikipedia, Headbomb deserves recognition as the next Editor of the Week.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
((User:UBX/EoTWBox))
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 15:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC))