For rants from yesteryear, see Archive1, Archive2, Archive3, Archive4. Thereafter I stopped archiving - it's all in the history.

Barring unforeseen circumstances, I'll reply to everything on this page rather than your talk page. Boilerplate messages will be responded to with the same consideration and attention with which they were left. :)

Hello. I have restored the request for citation about the "American-born" part in the intro paragraph, that you had removed previously. I have also detailed my rationale on the article's talk page. I would be very grateful if you could give more details before removing it again. Regards. olivier (talk) 08:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the note. I'm not excited enough about her birthplace to re-revert; I'd just note as an aside that "American-born" does not mean what you think it does. ;) Henry^Flower 09:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's OK, thank you. Not sure you know what I think. olivier (talk) 10:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 20:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings,

My name is John-Paul and I am a student with the University of Alberta specializing in Communications and Technology.

I would like to include your Wikipedia user page in a study I am doing about how people present themselves online. I am interested in whether people see themselves in different ways, online and offline. One of the things I am looking at is how contributors to Wikipedia present themselves to each other through their user pages. Would you consider letting me include your user page in my study?

With your consent, I will read and analyze your user page, and ask you five short questions about it that will take about ten to fifteen minutes to answer. I am looking at about twenty user pages belonging to twenty different people. I will be looking at all user pages together, looking for common threads in the way people introduce themselves to other Wikipedians.

I hope that my research will help answer questions about how people collaborate, work together, and share knowledge. If you are open to participating in this study, please reply to this message, on your User Talk page or on mine. I will provide you with a complete description of my research, which you can use to decide if you want to participate.

Thank-you,

John-Paul Mcvea
University of Alberta
jmcvea@ualberta.ca

Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 22:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, that would be fine. :) Henry^Flower 00:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank-you for agreeing to participate in my study, entitled “Online Self-presentation among Wikipedians.” I appreciate it.

As I indicated before, here are five questions that I would like you to answer. Please be as brief or as thorough as you like.

5 QUESTIONS

1. Are you a member of social networks such Facebook or MySpace?

2. In addition to maintaining a user page in Wikipedia, have you also written or edited articles? If so, about how many times?

3. What are the key messages about yourself that you hope to convey with your user page?

4. Have your Wikipedia contributions ever received feedback, such as being edited by others or commented on? Have you received a message from another Wikipedia user? If so, do you think your user page positively or negatively affected what other people said and how they said it?

5. Do you see your “online self” as being different from your “offline self?” Can you elaborate?

Please indicate your answers to these questions on your talk page, or on mine. If you like, you can email your answers to me instead (jmcvea@ualberta.ca).

Thank you again : )

Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

INDICATING CONSENT

By answering these questions, you indicate your agreement with the following statements:

• That you understand that you have been asked to be in a research study.

• That you have read and received a copy of the Information Sheet, attached below (“Additional Information”).

• That you understand the benefits and risks involved in taking part in this research study.

• That you have had an opportunity to ask questions and discuss this study.

• That you understand that you are free to refuse to participate, or to withdraw from the study at any time, without consequence, and that your information will be withdrawn at your request.

• That the issue of confidentiality been explained to you and that you understand who will have access to your information (see “Additional Information”).

• That you agree to participate.

ADDITONAL INFORMATION

Background

• I am asking you to participate in a research project that is part of my MA degree.

• I am asking you because you have created a user page in Wikipedia that other people can use to learn about you.

Purpose

• My research is about how people present themselves online.

• I will look at how people present themselves when presenting themselves to the Wikipedia community.

Study Procedures

• With your consent, I will analyze the language of your user page and gather basic statistics such as the count of words, the frequency of words, the number of sections, and so on.

• I will also read the text of your user page, looking for elements in common with ads posted by other people. I will note whether you include a picture, or links to other content on the internet,

• I ask you to answer my five questions, above. This will take about ten to fifteen minutes to complete. I will ask you to answer the questions within a week, and send your answers to me.

• Throughout my research, I will adhere to the University of Alberta Standards for the Protection of Human Research Participants, which you can view at http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/gfcpolicymanual/policymanualsection66.cfm

Benefits

• There is no direct benefit to you for participating in this research. You may, however, find it interesting to read my perspective on how you present yourself online.

• I hope that the information I get from doing this study will help understand how technology affects the way people come together into a society.

• There is no reward or compensation for participating in this research.

Risk

• There is no direct risk for participating in this research.

Voluntary Participation

• You are under no obligation to participate in this study. Participation is completely voluntary.

• You can opt out of this study at any time before October 10, 2011, with no penalty. You can ask to have me withdraw any data that I have collected about you. Even if you agree to be in the study, you can change your mind and withdraw.

• If you decline to continue or you wish to withdraw from the study, your information will be removed from the study at your request.

Confidentiality

• This research will be used to support a project that is part of my MA degree.

• A summary of my research will be available on the University of Alberta website.

• Your personally identifiable information will be deleted and digitally shredded as soon as I have finished gathering data about you.

• Data will be kept confidential. Only I will have access to the computer file containing the data. It will be password protected. I will not be sent by email or stored online.

• I will always handle my data in compliance with University of Alberta standards.

• If you would like to receive a copy of my final report, please ask.

Further Information

• If you have any further questions regarding this study, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Stanley Varnhagen, my research advisor for this project. If you have concerns about this study, you may contact the University of Alberta Research Ethics Committee at 780-492-2615. This office has no affiliation with the study investigators.

Thank-you again!

1. Are you a member of social networks such Facebook or MySpace?

Not actively; I do have accounts on several, but do not really see the point of them (for me).

2. In addition to maintaining a user page in Wikipedia, have you also written or edited articles? If so, about how many times?

Many thousands of edits by now, I think, though I don't know the exact number.

3. What are the key messages about yourself that you hope to convey with your user page?

None that I'm aware of; I don't think that user pages (or texts in general) are usefully construed as having 'messages' beyond what is explicitly stated. The closest I can say to what I think you're getting at is that I try to give an impression to other users of the kind of person I am and who they are (if they choose to) interacting with.

4. Have your Wikipedia contributions ever received feedback, such as being edited by others or commented on? Have you received a message from another Wikipedia user? If so, do you think your user page positively or negatively affected what other people said and how they said it?

Many times, on both counts. The last part of the question seems ambiguous; I can think of cases, for example, where people's comments have made hostile references to my user page, which in one sense is of course negative; on the other hand, that told me straight away that these people were not ones I was likely to interact with productively, and that knowledge was positive. On the whole though, such explicit reactions as there have been have been overwhelmingly positive, most often by establishing common ground between myself and the other users.

5. Do you see your “online self” as being different from your “offline self?” Can you elaborate?

I acknowledge that it is, but I try to keep it as little different as possible. In particular, I do recognise in some of my online interactions occasionally greater argumentativeness/aggressiveness than I would allow in 'real life' (a tendency which I think is extremely widespread online).

Do let me know if you think any of my answers need further clarification. Henry^Flower 16:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Henry Flower,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 22:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hi, i am going to re-creat Doupi, a local dish from Wuhan, Hubei, China. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azload (talk • contribs) 18:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks good, thanks. :) Henry^Flower 01:20, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Support. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. New questions? 19:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shostvcquote1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shost14m1fig6.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shost14m1b1to3.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Weinberg.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to the first ever Oxford Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Four Candles, 51 George Street, Oxford, OX1 2BE on Sunday 4 November 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Oxford related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:10, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Bot,

Please ask your owner not to be so lazy and to actually look at the pages he unleashes you on.

Thank you. Henry^Flower 04:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

please perform opnion in my section about (compare the term between of siamese and thais) --โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 19:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I declined your speedy deletion request for this article, as it contains a credible assertion of notability (i.e. Xi's status as the daughter of Xi Jinping). If you would like to take the article to AFD, please feel free to do so. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 17:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI, as this was your upload originally: commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pagoda.jpg. Rd232 ^talk 11:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Angkor Wat (estimated annual readership: 1,471,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Angkor Wat to Featured Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Henry Flower: I have been editing the Eleanor Lambert article and noticed your name in the history edits. Please would you direct me to some third-party sources. Thank you in advance. Geraldshields11 (talk) 22:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Henry Flower,

I would like to include your photograph of the Angkor Wat sculpture 'Vishnu Churning the Sea of Milk' (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Awatoceanofmilk01.JPG) in a textbook to be published by Thames & Hudson next year.

Would you be happy, in principle, for us to do this? I'd be happy to explain a bit more about the book. Please email me at pictures@hubner.co.uk so we can discuss this further,

Best wishes,

Pauline Hubner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulinehubner (talk • contribs) 14:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surin Elephant Round-up is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surin Elephant Round-up until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 10:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there! As a Wikipedian in Scotland I thought you might be interested in the Scottish Fairground Culture editathon taking place on 7 May at the Riverside Museum - drop me a line if you'd like to know more! Lirazelf (talk) 10:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh dear, linkfail! Here's the correct one... Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon Lirazelf (talk) 10:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Motorcyhangsample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fatehpurkiosk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Immersion of Ganesh murti at Chowpatty Beach, Bombay.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ubulake.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also at least one of the images at FFD, was there because they were apparently tagged as GFDL by a third party. If you are OK with 'free' licensing, please change the license to ((GFDL-self)) or something appropriate, if you took the photos concerned :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since neither of these is being used anymore, I don't think I'll be doing that. :) Henry^Flower 20:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The largest cities of Thailand. Since you had some involvement with the The largest cities of Thailand redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as ((own)), amending the ((information)) added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the ((media by uploader)) tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the ((information)) where appropriate).

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

{[subst:uw-imgclaim1|File:Immersion of Ganesh murti at Chowpatty Beach, Bombay.jpg))Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Mekongmembersangkor.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Actually it does, so it isn't. Henry^Flower 11:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Henry Flower. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Henry Flower.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Henry Flower. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Henry Flower. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fatehpurkiosk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. GXXF T • C 14:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Immersion of Ganesh murti at Chowpatty Beach, Bombay.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 08:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ubulake.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is already a discussion on the talk. Per WP:BRD: if a content addition is reverted, don't bring it back but discuss first. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Jintararooplaw.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ruplawlaimia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eleanor Mannikka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Mannikka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have helped me a lot, thanks :-)
PS. See the end of the talk.
PS2. I can help you with Polish - my mother tongue :-)
85.193.242.133 (talk) 04:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings. On 8 May 2004 @ 5:39, you wrote into the article that Shostakovich was a qualified association football official. I'm listening to a program about DS by Dr. Robert Greenberg, who stated that he never found the time to finish qualification—not surprising on account of his level of activity. I noticed that this factoid wasn't supported by a reference, unlike the other factoids in the very same edit. Please excuse me for having more faith in Dr. Greenberg than yourself. Could you please clarify this matter? Regards Tapered (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're not excused for your lack of civility, but I'm happy to give you Ardov p. 54 (quoting the composer's son). Henry^Flower 09:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's OK, there was no lack of civility to excuse! Since I haven't read Ardov (yet), I suppose you'll want to be the editor to include a reference. Regards Tapered (talk) 02:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Henry Flower. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm very sorry for writing very late. Thanks for you answer there Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Language/2017_October_20#Commons_Category:Paintings_by_name--Pierpao (talk) 23:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My pleasure. :) Henry^Flower 09:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, Henry Flower. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 07:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

According to this Aberdeen is actually the 3rd worst place in Scotland. Glasgow being the worst. I've heard people also argue those surveys are wholly pointless as most Scots tend to name their own city as the worst place to live, so that the 10 largest cities also end up regularly as the 10 worst places. Basemetal 19:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We have indeed come up in the world! Henry^Flower 22:03, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

...from insulting other editors in front of the OP. If you've got a problem with someone, take it to their talk page. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 18:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You slay me, sir, with your irony. Henry^Flower 19:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You would prefer I come after you in front of the OP??? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm pretty much indifferent. Henry^Flower 21:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you can take it as well as dishing it out, that speaks well of you. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And kudos to you for this.[1] :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 15:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Henry! I'm replying here to your query (as above) on the Science Ref Desk because the current protection prevents my doing so there (as I'm an IP editor).

I've been through the relevant list (which is very badly organised) in Wildlife of Algeria, and of all the snakes listed there, the False smooth snake looks to me to be the closest match to your picture. You'll know best if your photo's location matches its described habitat of ". . . evergreen temperate forests and Mediterranean-style scrubland."

Regards. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.218.14.42 (talk) 06:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for that. The habitat does sound right. I'll try to get round to sorting that list out! Henry^Flower 16:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Henry Flower. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I won't edit-war over your un-hatting of the question about Pulp Fiction. But maybe you're unaware of the banned user who frequently asks questions calling for interpretations of scenes in movies. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am unaware. But I (to take one example) frequently ask questions asking for various animals to be identified. Are you going to hat those too? I assume you don't have an objection to the user per se, as you left his other two questions hatless. Henry^Flower 18:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't need any unnecessary edit wars. As to your basic premise, the answer is no, because you're not a banned user. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 18:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If that was your reason, it would have been useful to mention it in the ES. Why you would hat one of a banned user's three questions I cannot guess, but then ours is a world of mystery and wonder. Henry^Flower 19:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I try not to feed that troll any more than necessary, ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 19:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:IsleofHarris.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gernsample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lamsample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Plaengsample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Now, Jintara Poonlarp (article write by your) is currently a Music good article nominee. I edit for complety to nominee. You can edit and help me about this article since now, thank you.--G.B.T. (Boonparit Thuanthai) (cn:Dr.Man) (talk) 07:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Henry Flower, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Bobherry Talk Edits 03:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lettersoftransit.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, did you ever find the novel you were looking for? DuncanHill (talk) 03:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Funny, I was thinking about this again just recently -- but no, no luck. I've tried searching Project Gutenberg for likely words, but nothing yet! Henry^Flower 08:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was just wandering through the archives and came across it. Had just had a book from my childhood identified on the Desks so I thought I'd ask. I'm afraid I haven't come up with any mor ideas yet. DuncanHill (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I came here as I felt there was a misunderstanding regarding the status of Hayabusa2's mission extension. Per the Hayabusa2 team,[2]

This mission and the budget must be approved in order to actually proceed with the extended mission.

Since the extended mission has been pinned down to one scenario, and the spacecraft remains in a healthy state, the last hurdle remaining is the approval of the budget. While I personally would happily go edit today to get rid of the 'potential' in the section title, from a neutral point of view, at the present it still isn't a finalized matter. Now, if my past edits have caused any griping, it is something that I did not have the slightest intention to. I'd like to see you edit the page Hayabusa2 from hereon too. Warm regards, Hms1103 (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for the message. :) And sorry if I was intemperate! I think we'll just have to agree to disagree about when a mission changes from potential to something more. Like I suspect most recent editors of the page, I just popped in to have a look and change something if necessary, so I'm content to leave it to others to work out. Henry^Flower 19:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, NASCARfan0548 ↗ 20:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for May 19, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or for Featured Articles promoted recently from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the message! It's some time now since I worked on the article, so I probably won't be doing any work on it, I'm afraid. If there's anything in particular I can help with though, I'd be happy to help. Henry^Flower 17:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you today fr the article, saying "I'd like to feature the temple, but featuring the article would be a decent second-best."! - Enjoy! - Kammermusik on the same page, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precious

music temple

Thank you for quality articles about Angkor Wat, Dmitri Shostakovich and Casablanca (film), for answering at the science desk, - Henry (or Mark?), "idealistic know-it-all with nothing original to say, ... soon attracted to Wikipedia": you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2598 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm honoured! Henry^Flower 14:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's tricky for me to do justice to those from the wonderful old days who had FAs before I even discovered Wikipedia ;) - The opera was Die Spieler (Shostakovich), and actually S wrote only the first act. I looked at the FAC for the Master, wow, how blissful short. My last one was longer. - Smaller scale: DYK Kammermusik (Hindemith)? - I never went to Angkor Wat, would love to. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! You have uploaded these 2 files with ((GFDL)):

1. File:Snake oran.JPG
2. File:Habibas from coast.jpg

GFDL is not a good license for photos so perhaps you would be willing to also add ((cc-by-sa-4.0)) like you did on for example File:Oranian spider.jpg? --MGA73 (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, done. :) Henry^Flower 18:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much. I added an ((Information)) template too. --MGA73 (talk) 19:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Elmiramotif.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Yuritemp. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 10#Yuritemp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

@Henry Flower: Greetings! Dmitri Shostakovich probably needs a FA review. If you are still interested in the subject, I recommend you take a look at Talk:Dmitri Shostakovich#Featured article review needed. Cheers - Wretchskull (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

@Henry Flower: I've listed Dmitri Shostakovich at FAR. Wretchskull (talk) 16:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precious

One year!

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello

AVR1H (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Henry Flower! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Henry Flower,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 14:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]