This is a reply to your comment on my talk page before you took it back: I do not have a personal issue with you, and I apologize for the incorrect revert. That was a mistake, and I have undid my changes. Sincerely, Tony Tan⁹⁸ · talk 03:26, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Heuh0. Now that it has been clearly identified who the proposer is on the Musk talk page, you might want to be sure you explicitly state your rationale, along with the proposal. At least that is where I've usually seen it done.

I'm sure it is explained in several places on Wikipedia, but when an outside closer comes in, they are not interested merely in the "votes" -- they want to see both the positions taken (SUPPORT, OPPOSE) along with the rationale for the position taken. That is why they call it a !vote, or "not vote". Generally rationales should be tied to wiki-policy.

This is very important for the proposer; but it is also quite important for each editor who weighs in with a !vote. When I eventually take a position on the two proposals, I will support/oppose, and simultaneously provide my rationale. For the nominator/proposer, I've often seen them leave it out and just say "SUPPORT, as nom" which will make it clear to the closer that their rationale was provided previously.

Cheers. N2e (talk) 22:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean just provide a short reason for Supporting or Opposing or as the proposer give a reason/rationale for creating the proposal? Heuh (talk) 22:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just provide a brief summary of your reason for your proposal, or your position. (You don't need to do it in both places for the same proposal.) You'll find that the folks who volunteer to come in and close a discussion, will tend to discount opinions that don't attempt to explain why a particular course of action is good policy.

I say all of this to help you be the most productive editor you can be in these sorts of discussions. I'm not necessarily for or against the proposals you've made. But I will learn more, and eventually put in my view.

By the way, the most typically used term for this sort of thing on a Wikipedia Talk page is a !vote, or "not vote". If you say "vote", you'll be telegraphing to folks that you may not (yet) understand how the process works. The reason wiki-editors say !vote, is to remind us all that it isn't a simple vote, where the one with the most votes "wins." The closer will look for consensus, and consensus based on the major elements of wikipolicy, like WP:V, etc.

Best wishes to you. N2e (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! Heuh (talk) 23:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I'm willing to make common cause with you with regards to complaints over TMDrew's constant editing of B-theory of time which seems to serve no other purpose than to give unsuspecting readers the impression that William Lane Craig's attacks on B-theory is somehow indicative of mainstream philosophy and physics. Any ideas on how to address this problem or others who might be enlisted as either supporters or mediators?

Currently, TMDrew seems to be solely running the show on B-theory, incl. reverting my edits which simply made explicit the age of the Eddington and Laird quotes and their connection to Craig (as I've already documented on the talk page). TMDrew has now also purged almost every reference to Craig despite not changing the text which is clearly based on Craig's objections. In this way, as I also pointed out on the talk page, Craig is effectively allowed to speak for philosophers in general. Mojowiha (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I've pretty much let the article alone for a couple of days (I don't care that much, anyway), and TMDrew hasn't reverted my yet again inserted details on the Eddington and Laird quotes and their context vis-a-vis Craig. I can also see that the article's ballooning criticism (aka Craig) section has finally drawn the attention of other editors, and expect the article will probably be reworked (and hopefully improved) now. Mojowiha (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.

If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.

Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

Thanks, have taken on some cases. DocHeuh (talk) 22:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heuh0, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! Mattwheatley (talk)

00:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Since you participated in the discussion at WT:Wikiproject Doctor Who, you may wish to post at Talk:Doctor#Proposed redirect. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 04:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do. DocHeuh (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please show me where in the Cenk Uygur article it says he "used to be" an Armenian Holocaust Denier and is not currently. The article just documents his repeated denials of the Armenian Genocide and no where does it state that he's changed his views. Please, either show me where it says he changed his views or undo your revert and re-add him back to the category or Armenian Holocaust Deniers. King of Nothing (talk) 04:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And you take that to mean that he is no longer an Armenian Holocaust Denier? An ambiguous statement from the Twitter feed of a co-worker is not nearly enough to state, by the standards of a BLP, that he has changed his position on the Armenian Genocide. Find a Reliable Source that states he's no longer an Armenian Genocide Denier, then alter the article content, and then and only then remove him from the category. I'm re-adding him to the category, I just wanted to give you the chance to show me I was wrong. King of Nothing (talk) 19:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The air dates you have been adding are not correct. Look at The Futon Critic episode guide for proof. They appear to be for another country which aired the episodes first. Please stop your disruptive editing. Dcbanners (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Do we have a Daesh (ISIL) sympathizer?-- Aronzak (talk) 13:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. DocHeuh (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At risk of getting into a long and boring political dispute at United States, I'd like to remind you to try and follow WP:BRD. That means when someone reverts your edit in an article, you should discuss it with them and other editors on the talk page so a consensus on the edit can be reached. By reverting again you risk starting an edit war which is generally seen as disruptive. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:3799160-dr -manhattan.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Elon Musk page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country#RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Elon Musk Blastar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Founders of Tesla Motors.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Founders of Tesla Motors.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 08:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Watchmen-Dr-Manhattan.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heuh0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Heuh0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heuh0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This RfC discussion might interest you based on your past discussion on this subject: Talk:Elon_Musk#Rfc:_Musk_as_an_engineer --David Tornheim (talk) 12:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Heuh0! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Heuh0/Userboxes/American terrorism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Heuh0/Userboxes/American terrorism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Heuh0/Userboxes/American terrorism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've accused me, twice now, of violating 3RR. No such thing has happened (your first accusation was after my first revert!). Given that you've actually made more reverts, I recommend you take further discussion to the talk page and leave it there until you have a definitive consensus. The DRN thread was closed as there wasn't enough talk page discussion on your part, and if you're not getting responses to the discussions you've already started then I suggest you start an WP:RFC to get a bit more attention, especially from WP:PLT. Thanks. — Czello 16:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:CANVASS. Additionally, edit summaries like this [1] are inappropriate. Stop accusing other editors who disagree with you of vandalism. Acroterion (talk) 00:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Heuh0/Userboxes/American terrorism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Heuh0/Userboxes/American terrorism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Heuh0/Userboxes/American terrorism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 04:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]