Thanks for all your work on Olympic athlete biographies and congrats on the write up in the Guardian! You've allowed me time to just sit back and enjoy the games this time around 🙂 SFB 11:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is that in the guardian already is it? I wasn’t sure whether to agree to it but was hoping it might be a good opportunity to spread the word of the joys of it Hildreth gazzard (talk) 11:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good luck with the task! Back before the Rio games I made a list of all Australian Olympians with a similar goal to yours. Excluding post-2016 Olympians (need to check all of them), we only have 7 baseballers left to do. I hope the GNG zealots don't start hacking away at your work. The-Pope (talk) 16:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Haha cheers. Once they’re out in the world it’s hard to keep track. I have so much respect for you and the likes of @Lugnuts who’ve been doing this for years before me Hildreth gazzard (talk) 16:08, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Awesome job. When I started reading the Guardian article, I wondered whether this was about Lugnuts but it soon became clear that it wasn't (their edit count is a tad higher), so I had to look up whose trying to step into those big shoes. Good on you! Sing out if you run into any trouble; I'm sure there are lots of friendly editors who would be willing to help. Schwede66 00:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Schwede66 thank you for your message, yes Lugnuts is the absolute master. In terms of help - there’s whole swathes of sports I personally haven’t even looked at that might be being covered but I don’t know - swimming, sailing, table tennis, boxing, skateboarding, climbing, archery, shooting.. any you have time to look at would be great!

"Lugnuts is the absolute master" - I've often been called that, well, I think it sounded like that... :D I read the Guardian article and felt a strong affinity with the line of "I was surprised by the amount of people listed as competing who didn’t have [a Wikipedia page] started yet". This was exactly my thoughs about 11 or 12 years ago when I stumbled down the rabbit-hole of missing Olympians. There were gold medal winners who didn't have an article, esp. a lot of 1920s fencers. I thought it was due to fencing not being all that popular, certainly compared to athletics and swimming, but found similar gaps across all Olympic sports. More than a decade on, and my goal is the same as yours - to have an article for every Olympian. I've helped to make a big dent in addressing that. Thank you for all your work - it doesn't go un-noticed! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have my own mission and that is to write quality articles for New Zealand rowers. I managed to get four rowers onto the homepage of Wikipedia via DYK during the Olympics and between them, they covered the five rowing medals that the country scored; I felt quite pleased how I had picked them. I won't take on any mass stub creation process but if you want to get some advice / guidance on rowing bios, I'm more than willing to answer queries.

By the way, if you want to ping somebody, you need to provide a signature and set up the ping in the *same* edit. No signature – no ping. If you signed a post but got the brackets for the ping wrong – no ping. If you fix that mistake by correcting the brackets in the next edit – no ping (got signed previously; you can only recover from that by also changing the time stamp of an existing signature). That's one of the million useful WP things to know. Schwede66 10:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Running Man Barnstar
	For not only your extensive Olympic bios, but for bringing attention to them and the mission of Wikipedia! Thank you! Kingsif (talk) 15:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Although the admins who have had to review my efforts deserve it more lol Hildreth gazzard (talk) 16:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Guy from France... We're also talking about your - good - job here : keep on writing and please let me know wich of your articles is your prefered ! Sg7438 (talk) 16:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks. A French Taekwondo practitioner was the first medal from a page I started! A favourite might not be the right word but the injuries Laura Collett suffered whilst competing and has come back from, and to be competing and be in the upper placings at an Olympics, I find is remarkable. Hildreth gazzard (talk) 16:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Getting you and your work featured in such a prestigious publication must be an honour! I would also like to ask you how you find athletes that don't have Wikipedia articles yet because I want to help out with your effort too. X-Editor (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message, very much more the merrier. There’s a few routes open. One can look for the events and see if there are any still needed, for example; Athletics at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification, or you can see what’s included via the individual countries; or via the long list of sports at the games half way through this page 2020 Summer Olympics. And if they competed and are ‘Red’ rather than ‘Blue’ than they can have a page as an Olympic competitor confirms notability in sports. Thanks Hildreth gazzard (talk) 22:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry I missed links Hildreth gazzard (talk) 22:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_competitors_at_the_2020_Summer_Olympics

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nations_at_the_2020_Summer_Olympics Hildreth gazzard (talk) 22:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hildreth gazzard: Just created an article, what do you think of it? X-Editor (talk) 01:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nice. His father selling their car so they got to travel and compete is very interesting! Hildreth gazzard (talk) 06:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yup. X-Editor (talk) 21:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wow! That's awesome to be featured on such a large website, how were you able to have an article written on your work? And apologies if I do come off as rude in edit summaries, I am just trying to give helpful advice and criticism to help improve your page creations, which have indeed gotten better lately! Seacactus 13 (talk) 16:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries, it’s fine. Not real life. It was funny, I was chatting to someone who does some freelance work there and he suggested he pitch it to the sports desk and I said sure, but didn’t think anything of it, and then I was suddenly being emailed and invited on zooms and stuff, I trying to turn it round so they were writing about the athlete’s amazing back stories but I couldn’t control the beast, it was like a puppy running down the stairs, just escalated Hildreth gazzard (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh nice, its not common to get such wide recognition from doing stuff on here! Seacactus 13 (talk) 23:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

Smallbones_(smalltalk) 20:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Natalia Romero (Spanish athlete) . When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Natalia Romero ), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 07:44, 3 August 2021

Ah, I've now seen The Guardian! Congratulations. I'm sure the hatnotes etc will be sorted out eventually. PamD 05:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I do try and remember everything but sometimes I get in such a pickle it makes it all worse Hildreth gazzard (talk) 05:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When I see articles for stub-sorting which have disambiguated titles I often check to see if the navigation is there - and it very often isn't so I drop the above boilerplate message along with fixing the specific example. We each have our niche. I've chipped in a few Olympians - some redlinked female flagbearers for a start, and created and assigned Category:Refugee Olympic Team at the 2020 Summer Olympics. PamD 07:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That’s fantastic. Great to give the flag bearing athletes the heroes in their own countries the representation they deserve. It was the refugee team that started me on this, I’m not sure they included it or not in the guardian article (I've not really been able to read it myself without cringing) it was the announcement of the refugee team that piqued my interest to read their stories and discovered only a fraction of them had pages Hildreth gazzard (talk) 10:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, Hildreth gazzard. Just a short word to thank you for including so many new articles on women in sport. This is important as we need to make sure they are not completely outnumbered by their male counterparts. Keep up the good work and perhaps think of joining WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to ensure better coverage of women and their achievements. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 16:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Idow Hassan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Idow Hassan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard

Thank you for creating Alfie Brown.

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Consider adding more summary to the lead.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Bruxton)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard

Thank you for creating Sam Campbell (comedian).

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Consider improving the reference style by following MOS:CITE

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Bruxton)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 20:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for creating Strange Way of Life. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article on the upcoming short

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Bruxton)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for creating The Fall Guy (2024 film). User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article on the upcoming movie

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Bruxton)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 01:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Anna (2023 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 14:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Fall Guy (2024 film) moved to draftspace 

An article you recently created, The Fall Guy (2024 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 01:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

• 1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
• 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
• 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eileen (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, The Idea of You (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources and it is too soon. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 23:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Football Barnstar
		For creating an article on Luuk Admiraal and for many more fine contributions to Footbal and Sports! gidonb (talk) 18:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good to see you have finally become a member, Hildreth gazzard. We look forward to many more biographies of women in sport. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 19:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250 Online events: New: Alphabet run K & L | Geofocus Southeast Asia | Women who died in 2022 Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Climate Change collaboration runs 1 December 2022 - 31 January 2023 Tip of the month: Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name, like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe O'Connor (snooker player), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254 Online events: New: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Geofocus East Asia Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2022 See also: Editing For Effie collaboration with the Smithsonian, January 8 & 9 (global event) Tip of the month: De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noah Naujoks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on J.C. Ngando. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Idea of You (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 03:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Malcolm Johnston (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

hasn't played a single professional game yet. Not even signed with a professional club, and wasn't a particularly high draft pick with fairly minimal coverage pre and post MLS SuperDraft

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not create a page in mainspace if a draft version already exists (like John-Kymani Gordon). GiantSnowman 16:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Sven Zitman. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Nicolás Vallejo. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Amet Korça. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Gabriel Segal (soccer). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Federico Gomes Gerth. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Ulises Ciccioli. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Francisco Marco. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Omar Taylor-Clarke. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Teun van Grunsven. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing this article! Hopefully you will write more articles!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Ibane Bowat. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing this article! Hopefully you will write more articles!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Enzo Geerts. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will write and create more article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Michael Adu-Poku, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Ryan Andrews (footballer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sigh - patently not yet notable, so I have draftified at Draft:Michael Mellon. GiantSnowman 13:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Pim Saathof, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lenny Rush, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Everyone Else Burns, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- GA Melbourne (talk) 11:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consecration (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scrapper (2023 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Narvik (film). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing the article! Hopefully your will create more articles! Have a good day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Marlee Francois. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women | Justice | Folklore Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name, married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname) Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please wait until principal photography has commenced and that details are provided for that. Saying it was supposed to start isn't quite the same. WP:NFF

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Here (2024 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Jack Currie (footballer). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I sincerely hope that you will write more articles in the future! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Nathan Opoku. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged and hope that you will write more articles! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santiago Toloza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estudiantes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, could I ask why there was a need to make a duplicate draft for this topic? this version I created in January was already in draftspace. Rusted AutoParts 16:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, no not at all, I must have missed it somehow I’ll delete it Hildreth gazzard (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Song Jin-kyu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Song Jin-kyu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Girl You Know It's True (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 13:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amy Gledhill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happy Valley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A Greyhound of a Girl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blackwater (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Palace (miniseries), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alisha Rees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261 Online events: New: Geofocus Mediterranean | Art + Activism | Alphabet run Q & R Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman | Folklore See also: #Visible Wiki Women Wikimedia challenge to add more images of women to Commons Tip of the month: Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine! Include something to keep people reading. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Boiling Point (TV series). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scoop (upcoming film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:04, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. You are doing too much "no name" athletes Mr / Mrs Hildreth gazzard, writing too much in body and too much in intro. Please use British English (also dmy dates) for European and African athletes (also write 'Athletics' instead of 'Track and field'), do not use flags in infobox per Template:Infobox sportsperson, and wikifyi links. Also article is nearly useles without personal bests. A good method to choose athlete notable enough for article to write firstly is to check current top lists on World Athletics site.
If you have time please do pl:Amber Anning, she timed 50.68 for indoor 400m this year (and have a few medals too) - she is seventh in the world this year, superb result for GB & NI athlete in the event.
As you now maybe understand she is much more notable than all your let's say Swiss athletes that have, let's say, country's NU20R records that are not worth much due to country being so small. Regards, Track1News (talk) 03:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Roman Kokoshko is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Hildreth gazzard, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Piggy (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Potts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amed Elna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amed Elna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:09, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Housni Thaoubani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Housni Thaoubani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements once the film is released (including WP:GNG, WP:NFF) but presently does not. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see referencing for beginners or the article Easier Referencing for Beginners. Please note that as the film is not yet released, on my reading it does not meet WP:NFF so would appear to be WP:TOOSOON. Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements then resubmit the page and ping me and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Untitled Judo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266 Online events: New: Gender studies | Health | Dance | Alphabet run S & T | Books by women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman | See also: Women in Red is supporting Every Book Its Reader through our Books by women event. Tip of the month: When writing about a book, check WP:NBOOK for notability, then see MOS:NOVEL, WP:NONFICTION or WP:POETRYSTANDARDS for guidance. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tiernan Brooks. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 21:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jake Bongiovi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Bongiovi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BangJan1999 20:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jake Bongiovi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Bongiovi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Santa (upcoming film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Last Rider, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UtherSRG (talk) 18:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copied from Special:Diff/1150710645 by UtherSRG at User talk:UtherSRG. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Apparently, IMDb still hasn't figured it out. As an aside, you really ought to think about setting up automatic archiving of your Talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270 Online events: New: Alphabet run U, V, W | Disability | Women in Education | CEE women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman | See also: Wikimedia CEE Spring 2023/CEE Women - Wikimedia contest with postcards and prizes The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Boiling Point (2023 TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MaxnaCarta (talk) 00:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jafer Chohan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page T20.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Boiling Point (2023 TV series) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boiling Point (2023 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273 Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y & Z | LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green: June 2023 GA Editathon event page Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride/2023 global campaign The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noah Naujoks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anna (2023 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Nina Radovanovic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. All sources mentioned in the article and others found through search are just passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 01:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at George Loffhagen instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please compare this draft and the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Loffhagen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276 Online events: New: Women in Red's 8th anniversary | Alphabet run A & B | Sports Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Look out for contributors interested in writing about women and invite them to join Women in Red Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Michael Dykes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eileen (film)/Jack Davies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eileen (film)/Hugo Grenier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ethan Bamber, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eileen (film)/Adam Finch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:An Unsuitable Game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grace Crompton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loughborough Lightning.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zaman Akhter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UtherSRG (talk) 12:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Draft:Bring Them Down. — Diannaa (talk) 21:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xing Zihao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Hamilton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Courtney Lindsey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Blade Artist (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. Thank you for your work on Raphael Bouju. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a nice day today. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by creating an article.

As your article have adhered to the policies of Wikipedia, I have marked it as reviewed. However, the article is orphaned and require a link from other article.

Have a good day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Would probably be deleted for being WP:TOOSOON. Feel free to move directly into mainspace if he appears for Man City in a meaningful game.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luca Fletcher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 09:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nico O'Reilly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 14:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Women in Red 8th Anniversary
	In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Spike Brits, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gordon Botterill. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Hildreth gazzard!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lucciana Pérez Alarcón, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Adamtt9 (talk) 01:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adam Finch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ethan Bamber".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mamadou Lamine Camara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280 Online events: New: Alphabet run C & D | Indigenous women | Film and stage | Geofocus: Arab League Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region. Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

The article Raphaël Collignon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Gauthier Onclin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Hildreth gazzard,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gauthier Onclin for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Gauthier Onclin to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Adamtt9 (talk) 16:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Hildreth gazzard,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Raphaël Collignon for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Raphaël Collignon to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Adamtt9 (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kian Breckin instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kian Breckin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Here (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joel Ndala. Thanks! Oltrepier (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Terrell Agyemang. Thanks! Oltrepier (talk) 09:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Did you mean to submit this draft for a review? I've noticed that another user stepped in to make some edits to the article and submitting it...

Oltrepier (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard,

How did a draft about Alex Matos become an article about a Jefry Valverde? I was just following a trail of redirects and wondered how this article changed subjects suddenly. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lautaro Daus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chijioke Aniagboso, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matteo Dams, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harry Manenti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harry Sullivan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Will Naish, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luke Charlesworth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joey Skinner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom Iorpenda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Adu-Poku, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sekou Lega, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dominik Šnajder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel de la Cruz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:José Klinger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harry Singh (cricketer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jamie Miley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Malamine Efekele, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the sources are very short and just talk about his contracts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terrell Agyemang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 04:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Callum Olusesi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Wickens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Delta Amidzovski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yekaterina Sariyeva, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Weronika Lizakowska, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hannah Irwin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Petja Klojčnik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicole Kendall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weronika Lizakowska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289 Online events: New: Alphabet run I & J | Geofocus: Indian subcontinent | Women in Politics Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest Tip of the month: When translating articles from another language Wikipedia, don't forget to include attribution in your first edit summary. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Agnes Born, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deleila Piasko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Celine Simunyu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lauryn John-Baptiste, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angelica Raggi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jenna Defalco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ljubo Puljić, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft doesn't look bad, but I just think we've still got too little information about the player, considering that Ndala hasn't even made his proper professional debut, yet... Also, I think you should replace sources like "Manchestercity.news" with something more reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joel Ndala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jane Buckley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Meakin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Meakin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not reliable sourcing for major BLP facts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gordon Botterill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles Broom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Graham (snooker player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Graham (snooker player) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Hildreth gazzard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Audrey Jacobs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.