Thanks for uploading File:SoulIISoulLivefromBrixtonAcademy.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PurpleRoseRecords.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Soul2Soul.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ex Girlfriend (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Another Star, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. If you have verifying references, please add them. Egghead06 (talk) 06:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Egghead06: I didn't know All Music Guide and Official Charts were unreliable sources. Did you decide that yourself? Horizonlove (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't "decide" anything regarding Wikipedia policy but if you are confused regarding references you might like to read WP:RSMUSIC.--Egghead06 (talk) 06:48, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Egghead06:You mindlessly reverted without reviewing those new sources I added (which were sources that you asked for) as well as the sources that were already there before I edited. So next time, I advise you read Wikipedia policy more thoroughly and check new edits before reverting. Horizonlove (talk) 14:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kathy Sledge, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cassette and We Are Family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article First Ladies of Disco Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, unsourced concert tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR that has been tagged as having a single source for over a year.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 22:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soludo Marcel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soludo Marcel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 22:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Horizonlove. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Soludo Marcel, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Horizonlove. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Horizonlove|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be so kind as to explain how this professional shoot is your “own work” yet you haven’t disclosed a COI? Celestina007 (talk) 23:00, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: I am not being compensated for any work. I did not take the picture but I did request permission from the photographer and model. Please remove the deletion tag. Also respectfully, please try to sum your comments up in one edit because I kept trying to reply but I kept getting "edit conflict" messages. Horizonlove (talk) 23:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can change the description the photo tags if needed. I just thought it would have been simpler if I said I took the picture. Horizonlove (talk) 23:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you have been here long enough to know that wouldn’t be possible. You know how an AFD works so why do you ask me to do that which you know isn’t possible? Celestina007 (talk) 23:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: Please stop behaving so combative. Wikipedia users are supposed to assist others. Horizonlove (talk) 23:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I haven’t been combative. You are free to show me what combative statements I have made thus far. Celestina007 (talk) 23:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007:"you have been here long enough to know that wouldn’t be possible." was an inappropriate comment as well as to accuse me of sockpuppetry because of one edit. You don't have proof of that because this is only account I have ever created. Stop being combative and behave better. Horizonlove (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please WP:INDENT your responses for other editors to follow the conversation with ease. “you have been here long enough to know that wouldn’t be possible” is not combative but is factual. Your comment as to how you got the photo dose not seen probable. I would implore you to not edit in areas you have a conflict of interest in. If after this fair warning your edits are still worrisome, I’m afraid an indefinite block is what you are seeking for and one which I can make come true. Furthermore please do not WP:REFACTOR my comments in the chronological order it was supposed to be. Celestina007 (talk) 23:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use threats on my page. Again, please stop behaving inappropriately. And you still never justified accusing me of being a sockpuppet. As a far as grammar goes, please kindly check your spelling... "Your comment as to how you got the photo dose not seen probable." Which mind you, that is your opinion, not a fact. I have already explained the situation and I will no longer respond your comments. I can easily contact the photographer and/or model have them send an email backing my claims. If there are any further problems, please ask another user to communicate. I have no intentions in playing tick for tack with you. Horizonlove (talk) 23:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. But I can assure you that an indefinite block is being arranged for you if you continue down this path, Its no threat but an eventuality I’d make sure happens if you don’t refrain from COI editing.Celestina007 (talk) 23:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Celestina007 (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: If you are going to accuse me of sockpuppetry, please provide proof as well as name(s) of other accounts that I am apparently editing under. If you can not provide any (I know you can't because I don't have any), I will be taking you to ANI. However, I am willing to avoid this if you offer an apology because of your bad behavior. Horizonlove (talk) 23:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I’m not apologizing for nabbing you in covert UPE, You are welcome to try and report me and see how that turns out for you. Please do so. Celestina007 (talk) 23:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to report me to ANI for nabbing you in UPE because if you don’t I’m taking you to the WP:COIBOARD, which is it going to be? Celestina007 (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]