Archives
2007-2010: Archive 2010-2012: Archive 2012-2013: Archive 2013-2015: Archive 2015-2016: Archive 2016-2018: Archive 2018-2019: Archive 2019-2021: Archive 2021-2022: Archive 2022-2023: Archive

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

intelrefrev 201.162.232.5 (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Hughesdarren. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Hughesdarren. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eucalyptus gomphocephala you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 23:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks vet much for taking this on @Grungaloo:. Looking forward to your review. Hughesdarren (talk) 03:39, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Eucalyptus gomphocephala you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eucalyptus gomphocephala and Talk:Eucalyptus gomphocephala/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 01:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Eucalyptus gomphocephala you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eucalyptus gomphocephala for comments about the article, and Talk:Eucalyptus gomphocephala/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 04:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Merry Christmas, Hughesdarren
	or whatever else you may celebrate at this time of year. Thank you for all your work on Wikipedia throughout the year and may 2024 prove to be a happy and successful year for you and your family Josey Wales Parley 22:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		Thank you for cleaning up my mess with a misspelled page name. Name Omitted (talk) 06:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries @Name Omitted:, the sort of mistake I've made several times myself, happy editing. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 07:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Hughesdarren! I wanted to let you know I have undone your reviews for Alana Murphy and Ella O'Grady draftified the articles. They only contained one primary source each, which does not establish notability under NSPORT, and you did not add any maintenance tags. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is ludicrous, had you bothered to check there are multiple sources online for each of the player. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alana Murphy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hughesdarren (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ella O'Grady, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hughesdarren (talk) 04:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award
		For over 1,000 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,013		Bougainvillea (talk)	Add sources
1,197		Salvia (talk)	Add sources
39		Flannel moth (talk)	Add sources
14		Telamona dubiosa (talk)	Add sources
253		Bagworm moth (talk)	Add sources
13		Huaceae (talk)	Add sources
41		Menispermaceae (talk)	Cleanup
385		Proboscis (talk)	Cleanup
38		Three-sided football (talk)	Cleanup
2,273		Cactus (talk)	Expand
4		2013–14 Melbourne Victory FC (W-League) season (talk)	Expand
4		Ernie Otten (talk)	Expand
13		Macrolepidoptera (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
70		Backyard cricket (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
121		Oxalis pes-caprae (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
41		Zempoala (Hidalgo) (talk)	Merge
162		Pelagie Islands (talk)	Merge
488		Australian Grand Prix (talk)	Merge
24		Blasphemy law in Egypt (talk)	Wikify
6		Larry Bellew (talk)	Wikify
34		TP 52 (talk)	Wikify
2		Onze Bravos do Malembo (talk)	Orphan
3		Pinda Simão (talk)	Orphan
3		Brown's vasomotor index (talk)	Orphan
24		Cyrtolobus (talk)	Stub
5		Heterobathmia (talk)	Stub
37		Cyrtolobus tuberosus (talk)	Stub
4		Aenigmatineidae (talk)	Stub
4		Cimeliidae (talk)	Stub
46		Cyrtolobus acutus (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
16		Westbourne Grammar School (talk)	Add sources
21		Sacré Cœur School (talk)	Add sources
3		Tyndale Christian School, Adelaide (talk)	Add sources
5		St Margaret's Berwick Grammar School (talk)	Add sources
2		Covenant Christian School, Sydney (talk)	Add sources
111		Collegiate church (talk)	Add sources
6		St Columba's College, Essendon (talk)	Cleanup
1,468		Brampton (talk)	Cleanup
21		Santa Maria College, Perth (talk)	Cleanup
11		Trade unions in Ecuador (talk)	Expand
38		2023 in Australian television (talk)	Expand
2		Plagia, Kilkis (talk)	Expand
11		Dorothy Montagu, Countess of Sandwich (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
221		Ecuadorian–Peruvian territorial dispute (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		St. William Parish (Lawncrest) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17		East Lindfield, New South Wales (talk)	Merge
289		29 December 2023 Russian strikes on Ukraine (talk)	Merge
16		Scrabble 2007 Edition (talk)	Merge
310		Architecture of cathedrals and great churches (talk)	Wikify
73		Santillana del Mar (talk)	Wikify
10		Andoni Island (talk)	Wikify
36		Saint-Saturnin Church of Cusset (talk)	Orphan
2		Tulbeckstraße (talk)	Orphan
1		Calcutta in the Morning (talk)	Orphan
3		Syarinidae (talk)	Stub
2		Compsaditha (talk)	Stub
5		Oxley Christian College (talk)	Stub
6		St. Benedict's Church, Munich (talk)	Stub
13		March Revolution (Ecuador) (talk)	Stub
14		Rockhampton Grammar School (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]