Welcome to Wikipedia, IM-yb! Thank you for your contributions. I am Epeefleche and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type ((helpme)) at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Epeefleche (talk) 20:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you change ((S.L. Benfica sections))? SLBedit (talk) 03:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The club is consistently referred to as "Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk" throughout the article. You can't just change one instance, it needs to be the same throughout. – PeeJay 20:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's irrelevant. Wikipedia as a whole has made a decision to refer to the club as Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk. If you want to change that, you need to do it on a larger scale than just one article. – PeeJay 20:46, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Only in the match summary, and only after the first mention. In all the prominent mentions, the club is called "Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk". – PeeJay 20:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Βασικα το σωστο ετσι οπως τα εγραψα ειναι, καθως δεν υπαρχουν fc, bc και vc το ονομα του συλλογου επισημως ειναι π.α.ο (δλδ p.a.club στα αγγλικα) για ολα τα τμηματα, αλλο αν χρησιμοιουνται ενιοτε τα fc,bc για ευκολια για το αγγλοφωνο κοινο ορισμενες φορεςGreco22 (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

anyway they use them for communication reasons for the english public. The oficial names are as you wrote καε,παε,ταα παναθηναικος αθλητικος ομιλος. Like °Aek Athens°. Europe uses some times this term, but there is not in the official club's name

επισης στον ερασιτεχνη του παοκ εβαλες α.σ. παοκ κατι που ηταν εξοφθαλμο λαθοςGreco22 (talk) 13:58, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please bring up any issues you have with the format most commonly used now on my talk page instead of changing each previous table so you can use the excuse "like the previous editions"50.153.149.65 (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at 2011 Copa América. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 22:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Who says that? Is there a wikipedia rule that obliges us to use a white space in every club's template? I don't think so. Moreover, there can be no confusion whatosever between a banner with stripes and the club's official emblem. It's perfectly legit, commensurate with the club's colours and aesthetically suitable.Gtrbolivar (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I believe you didn't get it. You are right, fake sports flags shouldn't be used in clubs' articles. But the file I use, the red and white stripes file, ISN'T A FAKE SPORTS FLAG. It's simply a free image of red and white stripes, perfectly suitable for usage in any template. The file is my own work, it's a mere image of red and white stripes. I repeat: it isn't a fake sports flag, it's a free image that doesn't fall within any restriction whatsoever. Gtrbolivar (talk) 16:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's not a fake sports flag nor a logo. It's a free image of red and white stripes that can be used anywhere, including templates. There isn't a single wikipedia rule or restriction that forbids editors to use a free image in templates. It's 100% legit and within wikipedia rules. The files that have some kind of restriction, such as the fake sports flags, have a specific label in the summary and licence paragraph that explicitly warns every editor of their usage restrictions. Gtrbolivar (talk) 17:09, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Man seriously, I appreciate the job you've done in wikipedia and especially when it comes to templates. You've spent a lot of time to improve wiki and you have my respect for your contributions. But I really can't possibly understand what is the matter here. I explained you that this image is totally free of all restrictions and every editor is free to use it wherever he likes, including templates. You were right about the fake sports flag status and I respected it. But I cannot understand all this fuss about it now. Gtrbolivar (talk) 17:21, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll make the case to the admins because it's perfectly clear that we can't understand each other. You said (quote): "Fake flags or other files are subjective. Anyone can make a file for Olympiacos and other clubs but that file can't used everywhere in wikipedia(...). Only in the sports articles who referenced Olympiacos, at 20px. That is a note to wikipedians." I didn't quite understand what you're suggesting here, but in any case I feel that you're constantly repeating the same arguments over and over again. I'll ask the admins about this issue and they will give us their ruling. Gtrbolivar (talk) 18:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikitable: As you can see here Real Madrid C.F.#Kit manufacturers and shirt sponsors we can use a colour befitting the club's colours in the wikitable. I didn't really understand why you changed it mentioning the word "wikitable" in your edit's summary but I'll use red in Olympiacos article. Gtrbolivar (talk) 18:44, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Of course it's not enough. I am free to use the red colour, as the blue colour is being used Real Madrid C.F.#Kit manufacturers and shirt sponsors or other colours elsewhere. It's perfectly legit. I am not going to ask for your permission obviously. If you have objections, ask the admins.

As far as the templates are concerned, the admin said that the red and white stripes file was free and that we can use it in any template we see fit. I didn't press the issue because I don't have unlimited time to discuss such matters indefinitely. I saw that you deleted the file from the template and you removed the "Club" section. I really cannot understand what's the big deal and why you're pressing such matters of no real importance with such fanaticism, especially when it's perfectly obvious that you're 100% wrong. Anyway I don't have the time, nor the mood to continue that kind of "dialogue" with you regarding every possible little detail about templates, colours etc. The next time you undo my edits for no good reason, I'll be asking directly the admins to solve the issue. They'll decide who's wrong and who's right, without us having to spend hour after hour to discuss these "issues". Gtrbolivar (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are much colors on NFL and NBA teams tables. --AAgentt (talk) 00:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you explain this edit? I think it's valuable, it'S the same club, isn't it? I see they are named AC PAOK in the PDF, but the website suggests it's PAOK FC. -Koppapa (talk) 12:47, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Είδα ότι έχεις φτιάξει διάφορα κιτ και τα έχεις προσθέσει στις σεζον 2004-2005/2005-2006 π.χ. Από ότι καταλαβαίνω ξέρεις να τα δημιουργείς. Είναι εύκολο; Μπορείς να μου πεις πως γίνονται; Γιατί θα ήθελα να δημιουργούν σε όλα τα άρθρα στα εκάστοτε PAOK season , και ακόμη και για το κεντρικό άρθρο του PAOK FC όπου προσθεσα μια φώτο με 117 κιτ από το 1926 μέχρι το 2016. Paoki4 (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Make one of yours if you dont like this Greco22 (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No this is from a photo with Andrianopoulos (Olympiakos vs Panathinaikos) in 1929 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andrianopoulos-Messaris.JPG

Seems Panathianikos used a lot this motive in the past. You can make some examples of this motive, as you made for the recent kits Greco22 (talk) 00:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Take a look also, if you like, in 1968 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pao1968.jpeg and 1971 versions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Antonis_Antoniadis.jpg Greco22 (talk) 00:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok. I saw the site of pas giannina and the crest of the team seemed to me more close to the emblem you uploaded anyway Apart from that, take a look if you like to this kit of Panathinaikos (Ι think is from 2005-06 season). Its a different quality, more deep green (close to "petrol") and spangly. Could you make a try creating sthing similar?

http://www.gazzetta.gr/football/article/705305/haralampidis-itan-ola-yperoha-tote-me-ton-mihali http://prasinanea.gr/football/article3491894.ece

Greco22 (talk) 19:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Greece national football team - God help us. Thank you. Blackmane (talk) 15:47, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Understood. My mistake entirely, I thought whoever put it had copied/pasted and not checked. I apologise. '''tAD''' (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You will be blocked from editing if you keep doing rubbish on our page. Why did you remove the official logo of the Nigeria national team You better put it back or you get blocked ... Michaelgodstimeake (talk) 22:36, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nigeria national football team. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 22:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see that you just changed the player tables of every single NFT article, taking the custom colors out so that the template's default light blue is back. Why is light blue so much better than the national team's "theme color" though? It's only what the template creator thought looked good; it's not a Wikipedia standard or anything, that would be light grey.

Several people have already reverted your change, others will likely only do that after a few days since they won't be noticed as quickly. In any case, it's too bad that you wasted so much time making changes that aren't desired. If you are convinced player tables should not have themed colors, then first discuss this on for example WP:FOOTY's talk page, and then link to that discussion when you make the changes. That way you can be sure it's a desired change, and people will be less likely to revert it. Right now, it comes across as a very individual choice, trying to go against each article's regular editors. Sygmoral (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just so you know: I answered to your reply on my own talk page. —Sygmoral (talk) 19:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I made it approximately. It is in the years 93-95, next to dark yellow that Aek used in Champions League as sais. You can make a more close one if you wantGreco22 (talk) 18:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thts why I told you I made it approxiamtely. So I think that the black which I created is more close to the 97-98 away [1] Greco22 (talk) 20:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So, actualy, I wanted to create the two kits here from the left (the third of CL exists) kits Greco22 (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I ll try to change it so to be closer to the originalGreco22 (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2004–05 AEK Athens F.C. season

added a link pointing to Nike

2015–16 AEK Athens F.C. season

added a link pointing to Nike

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whats your opinion abt making a little more red the first 1908 kit of Panathinaikos? Watching the crest of 1908, it is more possible the first shirt to has been a more dark red See also an old football ball of the era https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Allen-1938.jpg

I had used this color type 9F1D35, a Burgundy (color) wine color. What do you think? Greco22 (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What do u mean? you have a programme for the color codes?Greco22 (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seems I have an edit war with user:Sotoyolo in Aris fc article, cause he removes references of mine whats your opinion? If you want contribute also yourself to the article Greco22 (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, but why you didnt create personal page for you? --Muhib mansour (talk) 05:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Mr IM-yb, there are page, I suggest to merge this page and I wrote the reason in talk page here, but 2 days past, nobody from users talk about Merging, what can I do? --Muhib mansour (talk) 21:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lega Basket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rai Sport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Everton in the Community is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everton in the Community until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi IM-yb, feel like participating in the new discussion on Player table headings? The thread you linked to can barely be called a decision as it was taken in a single day with only two voices. Perhaps we can come to a stronger solution this time. –Sygmoral (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you explain on Talk:European Multisport Club Association how this organizations meets GNG/WP:NORG? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 17:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, IM-yb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Pannaxiakos AON sections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ferencvárosi TC (logo 2013).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, IM-yb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Selección Nacional de México (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Japan Football Association logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Decorative use of a non-free former logo which fails WP:NFCC#8. While non-free logos of organizations, etc. are generally allowed to be uploaded and used for primary identification in articles about the organization they represent, the use of former logos requires that the logo itself be the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article to provide the context required by WP:NFCC#8. Simply moving the old logo to another part of the article and assuming the justification for non-free use is going to be the same is not really a valid type of non-free use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, IM-yb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:United Nations Peacekeeping logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article 2017–18 Kavala F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSEASONS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 01:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article 2016–17 Kavala F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSEASONS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article 2015–16 Kavala F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSEASONS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Japan Football Association symbol.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! can I know, how to create a custom cricket kit pattern for wiki articles? Cric editor (talk) 04:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]