This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: Eastern Europe or the Balkans They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Archive 1

Your edit to Thermobaric weapon has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day Ilenart626. I'm writing here, because this is not directly on-topic.

I had a quick look at the two ABC references that you used in the Ukraine war crimes article. This one makes the rather dubious claim that However, in Syria, Bashar al-Assad and senior defence leaders have been convicted of war crimes but remain in power. If you're a twitterer and if Tracey Shelton (the author) is a twitterer (or if you're both in the free world of the Fediverse instead of in a walled garden), then you might want to start up a conversation to convince her to be a lot more careful next time. Shelton is devaluing the significance of a legal arrest warrant or legal conviction (her word) against a head of state or head of government.

If al-Assad had been convicted, then I would expect that we would have heard a lot more about it. En.Wikipedia doesn't have any WP:RS supporting Shelton's claim:

• Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic is presumably trying to convict al-Assad, and the article would be worth updating even if there are no convictions yet
• Bashar al-Assad#War crimes lists lots of investigations and legal cases heading towards al-Assad, but nothing about a conviction; again, updates would be useful

The closest analogy to Shelton's dubious claim is that of Omar al-Bashir#International Criminal Court, who the compromise semi-junta, semi-civilian government of Sudan repeatedly promised to send to The Hague, but now with the junta running Sudan again, this is unlikely to happen until (I'm being optimistic) the junta give up power to the sustained long-term civil disobedience movement. Al-Bashir is subject to an ICC arrest warrant, but has not yet been convicted. I don't think that conviction in absentia is normally allowed at the ICC. Boud (talk) 13:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent editing history at War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Volunteer Marek 08:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, as I had promised to you when we were discussing the Human Shield section (which by the way needs a bit of care because it keeps on being disrupted), I've written this. Could you please have a look and check my English? Thank you Gitz (talk) (contribs) 08:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All good, minor changes only. Keep up the good work, you have more patience than me! Ilenart626 (talk) 09:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:War_crimes_in_the_2022_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#Migrants. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Shadybabs (talk) 13:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Reactive Scientific Research Institute at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein ^talk 13:25, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 12:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard § NPOV issues in some sections at Space Race. 204.15.72.92 (talk) 20:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 21 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reactive Scientific Research Institute, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Reactive Scientific Research Institute developed the Katyusha rocket launcher (examples pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reactive Scientific Research Institute. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Reactive Scientific Research Institute), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,385 views (448.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 13:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We haven't heard your view: shall we close? [1] Gitz (talk) (contribs) 07:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have started a Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#German influence on the Soviet space program for German influence on the Soviet space program Sorry for mismatching your user name in the first run. "I" and "l" are not easily discriminated. SchmiAlf (talk) 08:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Laterthanyouthink I assume you are refering to this edit which has nothing to do with me. Looks like I’m not the only one who disagrees with your edits Ilenart626 (talk) 15:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My apologies. They did similar to what you have done twice, and used words similar to what you said on the talk page. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thank you for keeping your cool and presenting your arguments and concerns in a persuasive way. I learned a lot, and the experience was a positive one. Neopeius (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from R-7 Semyorka into Soviet rocketry. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Refer this edit which I posted 4 minutes later, which includes “Addiing section on the R-7 rocket, mainly from the R-7 Semyorka article”. Ilenart626 (talk) 23:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry I missed that. — Diannaa (talk) 03:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why are you so insistent on reverting my edit without seeing its merit Nguyen280405 (talk) 10:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Besides, you violated the 3RR rule. Nguyen280405 (talk) 10:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

you need to reread the 3RR rule Ilenart626 (talk) 11:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

my edit is good faith edit, you did violate the 3Rr rule Nguyen280405 (talk) 12:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And don't even think changing a few letters will make you innocemt Nguyen280405 (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

the three revert rules is “An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page”. I have reverted you three times, hence I would need to do another revert to breach the 3RR. @Nguyen280405 after my 1st revert you should of started the discussion on the Talk page Ilenart626 (talk) 16:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are numerous by the US first that she did not mention, and you still want to include that. Are you trying to tell me that you want to include misinformation on Wikipedia? Nguyen280405 (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Refer my response on the Talk page Ilenart626 (talk) 11:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]