Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Border policy of Donald Trump, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 02:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The maintenance templates you added in Border policy of Donald Trump were removed because there was no issue to begin with and so the maintenance was resolved. Every single fact has a citation for reference. If you think there should be more citations for reference, highlight the individual facts that need a citation for reference. Impartial unbiased editing is needed moving forward. Thank you. Impartial Unbiased Triumph (talk) 02:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Border policy of Donald Trump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border policy of Donald Trump until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 03:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Drmies (talk) 03:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• What do you wish to do with User:Impartial unbiased 2017? You can only have one account at a time. Drmies (talk) 03:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• What does the account have to do with Border policy of Donald Trump? Aren't they two separate things? You can delete User:Impartial unbiased 2017. Impartial Unbiased Triumph (talk) 03:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know--who said it had anything to do with that? I can't delete the account but I will block it. Drmies (talk) 03:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • You posted it as a bullet point under Nomination of Border policy of Donald Trump for deletion.
    • Oh, pure accident. Drmies (talk) 04:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Impartial Unbiased Triumph (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Impartial unbiased 2017". The reason given for Impartial unbiased 2017's block is: "test--alternate account; see [[User talk:Impartial Unbia

• Blocking administrator: Drmies (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Autoblock already cleared, accepting to close template. Yunshui ^雲_水 10:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• See if you can edit now. Drmies (talk) 04:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Ok Impartial Unbiased Triumph (talk) 05:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Impartial Unbiased Triumph! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)