Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Border policy of Donald Trump, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 02:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The maintenance templates you added in Border policy of Donald Trump were removed because there was no issue to begin with and so the maintenance was resolved. Every single fact has a citation for reference. If you think there should be more citations for reference, highlight the individual facts that need a citation for reference. Impartial unbiased editing is needed moving forward. Thank you. Impartial Unbiased Triumph (talk) 02:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Border policy of Donald Trump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border policy of Donald Trump until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 03:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Drmies (talk) 03:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Impartial unbiased 2017". The reason given for Impartial unbiased 2017's block is: "test--alternate account; see [[User talk:Impartial Unbia
![]() |
Hi Impartial Unbiased Triumph! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |