Hello, Indylover2010! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 20:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Indylover2010! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They're rather good articles, except that they are completely lacking in references. Do you have a source you are using to write them, and if so, can you cite it please? Thanks, C628 (talk) 02:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SS Oslo (1906).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Musa Raza. Indylover2010, thanks for creating RMS Amazon (1906)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page doesn't belong to any category.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Musa Talk  17:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SS Chancellor (1895), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hoop (1600).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Hoop (East Indiaman), Indylover2010!

Wikipedia editor Olowe2011 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work. Could do with some more references.

To reply, leave a comment on Olowe2011's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for helping teach our readers more about naval history. For a newish editor you have really been doing great work! :)  ' Olowe2011 Talk 02:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I've noticed you've been creating a few ship articles using the Archaeosousmarine website as a source. You'll need to watch out for flags and countries, as in many cases they are not the same as they are today. I've been working on a guide at User:Mjroots/Flags which may be of some use (Europe and South America are fairly complete, others not started). Also, try to find other sources about the ships. Once you know the builder / owner / tonnage etc it greatly aids searching. You may be interested in joining the ships' Wikiproject - we have a page giving useful ship resources at WP:SHIPS/R. Any questions, feel free to ask. Mjroots (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SS Sizergh Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunderland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating SS Ajax (1889), Indylover2010!

Wikipedia editor Ymblanter just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for the article. Please in the future add categories at the bottom of the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Ymblanter's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating SS Germaine, Indylover2010!

Wikipedia editor Xanthomelanoussprog just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reference section was needed.

To reply, leave a comment on Xanthomelanoussprog's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SS Linda (1899), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blyth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Battle of Corinth Canal, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=ah/aam/ah20070824c.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:49, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating SS Minnewaska (1909), Indylover2010!

Wikipedia editor WikiEditCrunch just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating the article! I have marked it as reviewe.

To reply, leave a comment on WikiEditCrunch's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for your recent articles, including Fuso Maru, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like ((WikiProject Keyword)) to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fuso Maru

added links pointing to Malaya and Libau

Battle of Corinth Canal

added a link pointing to Macedonia

SS Burdigala (1897)

added a link pointing to Blue ribband

SS Dana (1883)

added a link pointing to Sunderland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Authion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 2nd Brigade, 1st Brigade and 4th Brigade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of the Corinth Canal, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from Content is directly copied from the 4 sources given as references (see history)., and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Battle of the Corinth Canal and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Battle of the Corinth Canal, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Battle of the Corinth Canal. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Battle of the Corinth Canal with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Battle of the Corinth Canal saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Crow^Caw 21:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles de Brouckère (1757-1850)

added a link pointing to Henegouwen

List of Mayors of Torhout

added a link pointing to Charles Boone

Roger Windels

added a link pointing to CVP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not remove the Copyright Investigations tag from this article. I have restored it, as changing a word here and there does not address the issue. If you wish to re-write the article (a complete re-write, not just changing a few words, you have to change the presentation), you may do so Here but do not remove the tag again. Continuing to do so can be considered "repeatedly restoring copyrighted material", which can lead to a block. Crow^Caw 23:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portuguese presidential election, 1923, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In absentia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Battle of the Corinth Canal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.feldgrau.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27776. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sabena Flight 503, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Indylover2010! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:20, Wednesday, February 17, 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Konstantin Grachev, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 1956 Olympics and 1960 Olympics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martha Carrier (Salem witch trials), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welsh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryanair Flight 3445 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryanair Flight 3445 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Indylover, good to see you writing articles! The problem is your choices of subject have been a bit lacking in notability and become targets for deletion. To avoid having your articles deleted please apply notability guidelines at WP:GNG and for aircraft accidents use WP:Aircrash as an unofficial guideline.--Petebutt (talk) 04:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ryanair Flight 3445, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Take-off. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SS Cathay (1924), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cockatoo Island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating SS Cathay (1924), Indylover2010!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I very much enjoyed reading this high quality article about a ship that certainly had a screw loose, if you pardon the pun. I would write am and pm instead of AM an PM, but you might have a reason for the capitalisation. Thank you for your efforts.

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SS Ardmore (1909), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish Channel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. I saw you created a separate article for the Sidónio Pais assassination of 1918 a few years ago. I've recently extended his biographical page, and included most of the text in it. Do you think the assassination article should continue to exist on its own and if so, how? --Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 13:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Hoop (1600).jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Soviet submarine A-3, Indylover2010!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed, well done!

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I presume you copied the info to start this list from the List of shipwrecks in 1869. If this is the case, would you please post the ((copied)) template on the talk page and add the relevant details. This is required for copyright reasons. Mjroots (talk) 15:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Indylover2010. This article is missing its bibliography section. You've used short form refs (((sfn))/((harvnb))) on the article, but haven't defined what any of them mean. Could you add the required cites defining what works "Pula 2013"/"Besier & Stokłosa 2014"/etc are referring to? Using SFRs without a cite for them to link with causes a no target error. These are usually hidden by default but can be turned on, the details van be found here Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on Albanian-Yugoslav Border War (1921). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SS Gifu Maru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS Gifu Maru until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:19, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article SS Daram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of any importance. Ordinary cargo ship that ran aground.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:24, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010,

Even though you are an experienced editor, you seem new to the subject of article deletion on Wikipedia so I thought I'd pass along a few tips. First, anyone can remove a Proposed Deletion (PROD) tag, for any reason at all, even the article creator. PRODs are for uncontroversial deletions so since you had objections to the deletion of an article you wrote that was being PROD'd, I removed the PROD tag from the page. Frequently, editors who PROD articles that are de-PROD'd, will then take them to Articles for Deletion (AFD) but not always. It's considered good practice when you remove a PROD tag to use the edit summary to address the concerns of the editor who tagged it or, in general, work on improving the article to respond to their criticism and what might be missing from the article.

Speedy deletion (CSD) tags, on the other hand, can be removed by other editors but not by the page creator. The CSD criteria for deletion are very limited and are supposed to be for obvious problems like copyright violations and advertising. I delete a fair number of pages that have been tagged for speedy deletion and they are primarily newly created articles by inexperienced editors. Many of them are promotional in nature, either self-promotion or promoting a company or brand.

Regarding AFD tags, those can not be removed by any editor, including the page creator, until the AFD discussion is closed. The closer will remove the tag from an article that is not deleted. In a recent discussion, you responded to the AFD deletion rationale but along with that necessary component, you should also "Vote" which you can do but writing '''Keep''' for Keep or '''Delete''' for Delete. There are other common options that can be offered like Merge, Redirect or Draftify. Article creators are welcome to participate in AFDs for articles they create and to cast a "vote" as well. Although AFDs are not a matter of counting votes, reviewing them can be a quick way for editors looking at a discussion to see whether or not the deletion nomination has any support.

I hope this information helps you as you see your articles tagged for one of Wikipedia's forms of deletion. I urge you not to take such taggings personally (even though that can be a challenge), editors tagging articles (or tagging redirects, templates or categories) are well-intentioned and trying to remove content they believe doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards, typically of notability. But since I've been working in the AFD area this year, I've also seen a fair number of articles survive an AFD discussion and actually become better articles as other editors work to address any deficiencies in them. I've even seen articles be completely rewritten from weak articles into acceptable ones during the course of an AFD. So, unless an article is just truly garbage (which yours are not), the week of an AFD discussion is a rather fluid process that can be unpredictable depending on who chooses to participate in the discussion and how well they evaluate content and sources. As a content creator, it can be helpful to listen dispassionately to what editors are saying and trying to take any criticism in a constructive way that can help you become a better writer, at least by Wikipedia standards. Good luck! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Goodday, Liz,

Thank you very much for your explanation on the subject of article deletion. I must admit that I'm not used to such discussions and processes yet, so it was indeed a little complicated to fully understand the steps and instructions that tend to come along with it. I mainly wanted to save the articles because I believed that deletion was a bit extreme, so I wished to know how to fix or improve the article so it would become acceptable for Wikipedia's standards. My main goal is to add articles to red links for subjects that I believe would warrant an article. So although it saddens me if they are marked for deletion with the remarks that it doesn't comply to notability standards, I'll of course try to save the article. But if in the end it would get deleted, I wouldn't take it personally, I would be sad yes, but I wouldn't see it as a personal attack. I only wish for Wikipedia to flourish, with as many good written articles as possible. I just hope that mine are able to take their place within those good ones. Still, thank you a thousand times for taking the time to write such a good and thorough explanation for me, so I can better understand the deletion process. Have a great day! Indylover2010 (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Stavfjord, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on Lee Emmett Thomas. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much! You are most kind. Indylover2010 (talk) 09:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stavfjord, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, @Indylover2010. I have recently noticed the creation of several Connecticut-related election articles. I would like to let you know that these articles do not need a short description, as per WP:SDNONE. Thank you BurgeoningContracting 03:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for notifying me on the matter. I will take it into account. Indylover2010 (talk) 03:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. You might also find it beneficial to add Template:Connecticut-election-stub to articles created with lower amounts of content. BurgeoningContracting 03:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a reminder that this applies to elections from other states. BurgeoningContracting 15:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please don't use ourcampaigns.com as a source, it is a wiki and not a reliable source. Fram (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	MV Oceania (1932) is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much for the kind gesture! Indylover2010 (talk) 03:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. See my message above and this RfC about ourcampaigns.com. Please stop using this source. Fram (talk) 12:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good day Fram

I just based my sources on those many other election articles use. They have all used Ourcampaigns without issue, and everytime I've checked the results on the site with the results in other avalaible media (when there is one) it checks out. The Ourcampaign pages have also remained unchanged in many years, so I doubt any unreliable information is present on the site. I've read the discussion and the concensus seems to be divided with some seeing no issue with it while others think it's unreliable without any real resons for it. So if many election articles have used this among their sources for years, then why is it now suddenly an issue when wikipedia itself hasn't outright blacklisted it as a source yet. I'd suggest to just blacklist Ourcampaigns as a source if it truly is as flawed as you claim it to be, otherwise I can't see why it can't be used for referincing.

Kind regards, Indylover2010 (talk) 00:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One issue with it is that when there are no known votes (because there is only one candidate, or because the results have not been noted), the site lists it (and you copy it) as there being "one vote cast", which isn't true (see e.g. 1802 Virginia gubernatorial election, which person had the right to cast that one vote to decide who would be governor?). Anyway, you don't have to believe me, there was a 2021 RfC about this, and the site has been declared "generally unreliable" there[1], so please don't add it to any articles. Fram (talk) 08:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Les Bleus de la marine, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on 1781 Virginia gubernatorial election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on 1816 United States presidential election in Delaware. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on 1820 United States presidential election in Delaware. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on RMS Hesperian. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

I'm thrilled to share the exciting news that your article has met all of Wikipedia's guidelines! After a careful review, I'm happy to say that it's good to go. Great job! Wishing you and your family an absolutely fantastic day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Indylover2010!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010,

Thank you for creating Arthur Ryerson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I'd encourage you to make the notability of Ryerson clearer. Right now it seems like his notability is entirely based around the Titantic. #WP:BIO1E

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Smasongarrison)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mason (talk) 21:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Smasongarrison, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arthur Ryerson, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Ryerson.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Smasongarrison)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mason (talk) 21:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stavfjord, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

123Writer ^talk 21:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur Ryerson, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Ryerson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on Stará Kremnička derailment. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Indylover2010, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 07:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on Stavfjord. User:Carwil, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The article on Stavfjord learly passes GNG and is location of settlements. No problems found.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Carwil)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Carwil (talk) 04:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on Les Bleus de la marine. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Merged

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Indylover2010. Thank you for your work on Les cousins d'en face. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Converted to redirect

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Here's a plate full of cookies to share!
	Hi Indylover2010, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying ((subst:Sharethecookies)) to their talk pages. Enjoy! GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 07:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Thank you very much for creating this article. One question though – the results table is sourced to the Bromley & Kossman and Nohlen & Stöver books. While the vote figures are in Nohlen & Stöver, the Bromley & Kossman book doesn't actually list the 1886 election results (it only has results for 1883 and 1887), or at least doesn't do so on the page listed (page 198) – you can download the entire book through the WikiLibrary if you wish to use it yourself! Just wondering where the seat figures were actually taken from. Cheers, Number 57 01:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sigríður Hrund Pétursdóttir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigríður Hrund Pétursdóttir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alvaldi (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]