Hi. Thanks for your note. The post you saw on my talk page was regarding the deletion of a category that the other editor had created at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 25. My concern was that the names of the categories were incorrect according to our manual of style, but I was also concerned about how such categories would be used and whether they would be inappropriately applied. I am not very fond of labels myself, but I do think, in this case, it was more in regard to accurate categorization that it was stigmatization. In any case, the link for the discussion is above. Welcome to Wikipedia! Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, 😊 Irshgrl500 (talk · contribs) 04:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry, I missed the second message you left for me. The blue icon with the I is just an icon that denotes information. Everyone has the icon at the bottom of the contributions page and the links next to it gives a quick rundown of pages that relate to your editing. You can probably find a lot of answers if you would look through the pages linked at WP:HELP and at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. I hope that helps! Wildhartlivie (talk) 13:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add ((User WikiProject Films)) to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for April has been published. May's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for contacting me, and again, welcome to the project. Our project currently has over 55,000 film and film-related articles under our scope. As of right now, around 600 are B-class or above. We're always striving to improve articles to higher quality, and that usually takes adding some content, some sources, and following the guidelines at WP:MOSFILM. First, I'd recommend working on articles that you know about. Is there a particular film(s) that you enjoy or are interested in? If so, consider working on that film and see how you can improve it. I would recommend looking to some of our project's best work to see how you can improve a particular article. Or, if you are interested in just cleaning up articles, consider taking a look at this category: Category:Film articles needing attention. Within the category are various categories on improving articles by adding infoboxes, cleaning up plot summaries, adding sources, etc. If you haven't already, take a look at the main project page and explore the different departments to get a good idea of the project, its task forces, and its members. Our project needs assistance in all areas, and it's up to you on where you want to help out. My talk page is always available if you have questions on a particular article or guideline. Or you can always leave a message at the main WP:FILM talk page (or other WP:FILM members' talk pages), where multiple editors should be available to help you out. We're a pretty nice bunch, and are always happy to help those that want to improve film articles. Let me know what you're interested in working on and maybe I can provide you some better guidance. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Samy y Sandra Sandoval has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bangelfire\.com\b (links: http://www.angelfire.com/vamp/arlyn/biografias.htm, http://www.angelfire.com/vamp/arlyn/biografias.htm, http://www.angelfire.com/vamp/arlyn/biografias.htm).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Though I am still learning about contributing, I have contributed enough to know the basics. The Samy y Sandra Sandoval article was not properly referenced or linked. Further, it was lacking key and vital information, and, though it read smoothly, it appeared as though the article was written by a Foreigner speaker of the English language. It appeared as though someone took the Spanish language version of the article and used a very high powered translator for the English version. Next, I clicked on every one of your links, and I did not find that Angelfire.com was a "blacklisted" spam site. If I am wrong, please excuse me. Next, other than the angelfire.com link, I saw nothing in my article which violates Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. I take painstaking efforts to reference, link and verify my contributions, and I still get it wrong, occasionally. I am not sure if you or the Bot system automatically reverted my work. I was in the end process of making the edits to this article that literally took over six hours. Perhaps you could wait until I have made my changes before reverting my work. Tell me what I have done that is in error, and you or I can edit the work. I see that you are a Bot, I will assume you are a real person, and not a system generated command. Thank you--irshgrl500 (talk) 01:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

XLinkBot is indeed a bot, and that was a computer-generated message. New users aren't allowed to add links to angelfire, among other various sites that are not usually reliable enough to link from Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stifle/wizard Thank you very much. I was trying to add reliable information to the article on Samy y Sandra Sandoval. I searched the Internet in English and Spanish, and surprisingly, could find little information from reliable sources. I apologize for not recognizing that Angelfire is not to be used by new users. I guess I am sort of new. I have been making contributions to Wikipedia since 2007 but have recently increased my efforts and time devoted to contributions. Thanks again.--irshgrl500 (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

((adoptoffer))--irshgrl500 (talk) 23:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Per your email, I would be happy to adopt you. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 00:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with some local Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal of those sessions was to gather feedback to help design an embedded application that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for asking but I prefer not to participate. --irshgrl500 (talk) 00:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 00:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

Again, Thank you for asking but I prefer not to participate. --irshgrl500 (talk) 03:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear fellow Wikipedian, on behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not!  :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 23:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! To fix the awards, just cut the <nowiki> from the code; anyway, I fixed it for you on my userpage. best, --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:54, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --A Nobody^{My talk} 04:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 16:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A Nobody^{My talk} is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding ((subst:User:Flaming/MC2008)) to their talk page with a friendly message.

To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 16:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Irshgrl500, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((help me)) before the question. Again, welcome! Jamietw (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Kat! I think I formatted the references in Aeroméxico Flight 498 the way you intended. To have multiple citations to a single footnote, you need to you the named references format.

Your other questions:

1. Redirects are titles that point to a differently titled page, or section within a page. They are used when there are multiple terms that people use for the same topic, or when the term is covered briefly in an article about a broader topic but shouldn't have a separate article. See Wikipedia:Redirect for more information on how they work and how they are used. If you ever search for something on Wikipedia but don't put in quite the same title as a the article you were looking for, that's usually a sign that a redirect would be useful, pointing from the term you searched for (which someone else will probably search for too) to the article you wanted.
2. You can use your own user page, or a subpage of your userpage, to keep whatever links and information you would like. These are accessible, and technically editable, by other editors. But by convention, people will leave your user page and subpages alone. A subpage of your userpage is something like User:Irshgrl500/My page of links and stuff.

Let me know if any of that is confusing.--ragesoss (talk) 02:47, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Irshgrl500! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 03:04, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Irshgrl500. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The file File:Playing in cage.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The file File:Pet Umbrella in cage.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Irshgrl500! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Joanelle Romero several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Joanelle Romero, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Joanelle Romero. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Read the guidelines that have been posted. The BLP subject has a conflict of interest and should not be editing their own article. Additionally, the article subject's self-claims are not a reliable source for a Wikipedia article. Read the links you've been provided about sourcing Indigenous identity on Wikipedia - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:29, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CorbieVreccan & Netherzone Thank you for the explanations of why my edits were reverted. I do now, understand. However, I know nothing of editing or the rules on Wikipedia. It has been 6 years since I've made any contributions to Wikipedia, erroneous or otherwise. CorbieVreccan, you mentioned that once an edit has been reverted or again, edited that there should be some sort of discussion as to why there were reversions or edits. Netherzone, simply referenced an article, without any explanation. You, CorbieVreccan were super helpful.Irshgrl500 (talk · contribs) 23:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Irshgrl500! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If I make contributions now, may I be added back into the list? Irshgrl500 (talk · contribs) 06:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello colleague,

I am interested in the Middle Ages too.

I created Category:Medieval civilizations which is part of Category:Civilizations by time. The former is nominated for deletion and at the moment the vote is 2:0 in favor of deletion. I am used to deletions, but this time I am stunned. I do not believe there is no place for such a category. I believe that most people with interest in history would agree that civilizations existed in the Middle Ages. I ask people to contribute their opinion to the discussion. Regards,--Maxaxa (talk) 02:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]