This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
I wanted to talk about why the ECU Health Logo was deleted for "non-fair use" reasons. The logo was used at the top of the Wikipedia page to identify the company, which is, under my understanding, able for use under fair use. Since this was using the logo to identify the company in an editorial work, it falls under fair use as defined by US Trademark Law.
Any guidance as to why this was deleted would be appreciated. Sheehanpg93 (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
|article=
parameter in the non-free use rationale's template. Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is much more restrictive that fair use as explained here and there are 10 criteria that each non-free use needs to meet for it to be considered policy compliant. Since the bot wasn't able to determine that a separate specific rationale had been provided for the file's two uses, it removed the file from each article. Personally, I think the non-free use of the logo could be justified in ECU Health, but I don't think the same can be said for ECU Health Medical Center. This is because Wikipedia's non-free content use policy encourages us to keep non-free use to a minimum as much as possible. Since one non-free use is already considered quite an exception to Wikipedia's general licensing policy per se, additional uses are thus considered to be even more exceptional and harder to justify. Generally with respect to corporate logos like this, non-free use is limited to the primary article about the parent entity (i.e. the main article) and using the same logo in secondary articles about child entities isn't considered acceptable per item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. So, it would be OK to use a logo specific to the medical center in the article about it, but typically not OK to use the same primary logo (even if the medical center uses it) in the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Your edits are disruptive and could be considered vandalism, so please refrain from editing where you are not welcome. You can bring up issues on the sandbox talk page, if you have them. If you need help, please feel free to use my talk page and I will answer any question or help you to be a better editor. AggiesNeverLie (talk) 22:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
__NOGALLERY__
to it; images are linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are a topic of discussion.) Chip3004 (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Could you point me to a discussion where the decision has been made to change all the names from "O-Methylat(ion/ed)" to "O-methylat(ion/ed)"? As I don't really care about the names in en.wiki, your edits resulted in changes to the labels in Wikidata, which I had to mass-revert. Wostr (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
I found this in the review queue, didn't think it was ready for main space, and tried to move it to Draft:Gullurikya. What should I be doing? :D valereee (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Paramount Pictures (2022).svg
This has gone far enough! I see the Universal, Columbia, 20th Century and Warner Bros. logos on their respective lists of 2020–2029 films, so why doesn't Paramount Pictures?
XSMan2016 (talk) 15:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Re. [1]: are we really not allowed to use screenshots of Wikipedia in discussions of what Wikipedia looks like? – Joe (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
|description=
parameter, just describe what the screenshot is. For the |date=
parameter, just add the dates the screenshots were taken. For the |author=
parameter, you can use ((own)). For the |source=
parameter, things get a bit tricky since you need to attribute the source of the screenshot as well as each image shown in the screenshots. For the source of the screenshot, just provide a link to the page the screenshot comes from. For the images, there doesn't appear to be an Wikipedia equivalent to the Commons' template c:Template:Own based, but you can basically manually attribute the images in the same manner (e.g. [[file 1 name]] by file 1 author; [[file 2 name]] by file 2 author; [[file 3 name]] by file 3 author
, etc. for each image). Once you've done all of that, you can also add ((Copy to Wikimedia Commons)) since the files should now be OK to move to Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Digimon Survive artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Hope you are keeping well. I thank you for your time and effort in reviewing this article. However I see that you have moved this to draft space. The article is useful for students who pursue medicine in that field. Do I need to rename that article to move that back to main space. Kindly guide. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 02:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89.Thanks for your prompt response. Have a nice day. Gardenkur (talk) 02:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. JJMC89 bot seems to recently coming across more and more files being transcluded into articles and other pages by the template ((Extract)). Perhaps this isn't a recent phenomenon, but it does seem more commons that before. Anyway, when the bot comes across one of these files, there's really nothing to remove from the violating pages since there's nothing but template syntax on that page; so, there's nothing for the bot to do. Adding the syntax "noinclude" to the page with the rationale seems to work in most cases, but I'm wondering if there's a better way to stop these transclusions from happening. For an aexample of what I'm referring to, see File:Arianespace logo.svg: it was being transcluded into Expendable launch system and History of spaceflight. FWIW, this used to happen mainly with portals, but now it seems to be more common in articles: nine files on the most recent update of User:JJMC89 bot/report/NFCC violations (61 files; Last updated: 12:23 am, Today (UTC+9)) were NFCC#10c violating transclusions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
|freefiles=yes
to remove non-free files. — JJMC89 07:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking that IP.
Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted Top Gun (film series) per the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Gun (film series), for which I was the nominator. A similar article has been created at Top Gun (franchise). Can you check to see how similar.the two are? Thanks! BilCat (talk) 06:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. I was discusing this file's licensing at User talk:Masem#File:Littleprince.JPG because the file seems to be licensed as ((PD-old-70)) but was flagged as a NFCC#9 violation by both the betacommand bot and JJMC89 bot. Since there's no non-free license or non-free use rationale on the file's page (maybe there should be), I was wondering why the bots are treating this as non-free. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)