Hey JK. I noticed that you have a picture from Livengood, AK on Wiki. I was wondering if you could get a picture of the CO in Livengood. I would love to see even just the outside of this building.

The Livengood CO runs a Redcom Labs MDX384 switch. This type of switch allows in-band signalling. Livengood happens to be the last CO in North America that still accepts in-band signalling. For this reason, I feel that a picture of the Livengood CO would be appropriate for the Livengood, Blue box, Phreaking and/or 2600 article(s).

This CO will probably be upgraded to a DMS type switch in the near future due to the population burst expected from the recent discovery of gold under the town. It would be really cool if you could get some pictures of the MDX while it is still active but as I said before, even a pic from outside would be welcomed.

I know this is out of your "scope of interest" but I'm sure that many people would appreceiate a picture of the last North American telco "toy".

Thanks very much, Meshif420 (talk) 08:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on having an article you created (1981 Peach Bowl (January))and are the principal author of acheive "good article" status. I was at that game and being able to read about it in detail was a heart-warming experience. I remember that it got very cold after the sun started to set. My wife and I kept trying to stay in the sunshine because I was a little under-dressed. We had migrated to the upper northeast corner of the stadium by the time the game ended — the place where the very last rays of sunshine had been. I don't know whether I was happier Miami won or happier to get in the car and turn on the heater. Cheers!--Hokeman (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing JKBrooks85 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 01:31, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a reviewer of Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2007 USC Trojans football team, I thought you might consider commenting at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1997 Michigan Wolverines football team/archive1‎.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance we'll be seeing articles from you again? Looks like you've been busy based on minimal edits the past year. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 05:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that, glad to see you're back. I actually run the topics process now so you shouldn't have any further problems with it, lol. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Place these at the top of the article or section
• Use {inuse} (while actively editing new articles) so those well meaning but annoying people who monitor new page creation will not destoy subsequent edits, and {underconstruction} (for brief periods between major edits during the construction phase)
• Use {merge} for short articles --> merge into a larger one
• Use {npov} for bias; also used are {POV-section} and {POV-intro}
• Use {Inappropriate tone} and/or {Copyedit} for amateurish, poorly-worded articles
• Use {Expert-subject|subject name (e.g. military history)|date} when article needs expert attention
• Use {reqphoto} on the talk page to request photos be placed in articles
• Use {expandsect} when a section requires expansion
• Use {prune} when an article or section needs condensing, summarizing or reconstructing
• Use {lead too long} when the introductory section is too long
• Use {refimprove} for lack of verifiability
• Use {cleanup-refs} when footnotes are of inconsistent style
• Use {cleanup-link rot} when bare urls are used rather than proper in-line citations
• Use {cleanup-rewrite} when article does not comport with Wikipedia's quality standards
• Use {cleanup-reorganize} when the article shows promise, i.e. good information just poorly organized
• Use {nofootnotes} when articles contain external links or list of references but no in-text citations
• Use {timefact} when a chronology source is needed
• Use {notenglish} when encountering an article written in a foreign language on english Wikipedia
• Use {citations broken} to tag an entire article or section in the same manner {dead link} is used as an individual tag

Place these in-line

• Use {fact} for citation needed and {failed verification} for not in citation given
• Use {clarify} for text that is difficult to understand
• Use {dubious} when something just sounds too much like a crock
• Use {who} when you come across a phrase like "Some observers have said..." or "They say..."
• Use {says who} in similar instances as above where no source is mentioned
• Use {weasel words} for evasive, ambiguous, misleading content
• Use {lopsided} when an opinion needs balancing
• Use {notincitation} when a citation doesn't cover the stated information.

• Use {convert} for translating figures between metric and Imperial

• or  Completed or  Done
•  Not done
•  Doing...
• Y
• N
•  Done
• ✗ Not done
• Thank you
• *

For the record, I am the other main author of the article, so I hope you don't mind my input as well. Thanks for the review, your comments look extremely engaging. SCS100 (talk) 23:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for jumping in your review, but I do think the article should mention the All-star game appearances by the players. I don't know what you think about this issue.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, I added suggestions because of my knowledge of Michigan football, but I did not review it myself because of how much Michigan content I create, which makes me impartial.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was also the primary GAC editor of the 2009 article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Tony. The more input we get the better. SCS100 (talk) 07:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that I have fixed everything you asked. Let me know if there is anything else that needs to be fixed. Thanks again for the review. SCS100 (talk) 18:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Fixed everything that Tony mentioned. SCS100 (talk) 23:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for the review. I added the reference asked about but I'm not sure where the pronoun is that was confusing if you point it out I'll clarify the sentence. Thanks again. --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 06:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the review; I responded to many of your concerns in the FAC, and I would appreciate feedback on my replies. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 10:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome back! I wanted to tell you that your Virginia Tech bowl game articles and topic were the major reason I started editing Wikipedia in the first place. I have been working for the past year on creating a Connecticut Huskies bowl game topic similar to your Virginia Tech bowl game one; naturally this topic is far smaller in scale. I have a bowl game article, 2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl, currently nominated at FAC. This article has gone through two FACs previously but has failed to be promoted, mainly due to prose issues especially associated with the Team selection section. If you could take a look at the article and provide your feedback, I would greatly appreciate it. The FAC can be found here. –Grondemar 21:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your detailed comments. I believe I have addressed all of them; if you could come back and comment I would appreciate it. –Grondemar 02:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've gotten through your second round of comments; if you could re-review, I'd appreciate it. –Grondemar 05:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JK, I'm here to tell you that I'm grateful for your review and support. Empire of Brazil is now a featured article. Thank you very much! Cheers, --Lecen (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know I addressed your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rosendale trestle/archive1. You asked a lot of questions that I also wondered about when researching the trestle, and I really wish there was more published material. I'm hoping that an engineering report comes out soon, or that when the Century House Historical Society opens in the spring, I can convince them to publish online whatever information they have on the bridge.
--Gyrobo (talk) 21:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the GA review for 2009 ACC Championship Game. Nikki♥311 19:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JKBrooks85. You have new messages at Nolelover's talk page.
Message added 17:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.[reply]

Nolelover ^{It's almost football season!} 17:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Just thought I'd let you know I have placed my GA review of the 2011 Orange Bowl which you nominated on hold for the time being. Overall it is a very good article however I think it could use one or two minor additions, one being an image from the game and the other being a reference in the lead somewhere. As you can see both are fairly minor (the image may be hard to get though so I understand if this is not possible). MobileSnail 05:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JKBrooks85. You have new messages at Mobile Snail's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

And, uh... if you'd like to give me some advice at the Boone Kirkman peer review, that would be much appreciated :). MobileSnail 20:26, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! It is quite hard to find sources online, but I never thought about doing some offline digging. I actually have a mutual friend who personally knows this guy, so maybe I will do some inside digging :) if I can. MobileSnail 01:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your review, thanks! Would you like to check this one out as well?

Hello!
Thank you for adding your comments to the Broad Ripple Park Carousel. I was glad to see that you have memories of the carousel! I'm currently The Children's Museum of Indianapolis's Wikipedian-in-Residence (latest news here) and this is one of the projects that I'm most proud of! ... I'm really lucky to have User:Ealdgyth step up to the plate for me on-Wiki as I've coordinated the back and forth between her and the curators. I thought you'd be glad to see that through the GLAM initiative we recently developed a Wikipedia Widget that is now in use on the museum's carousel webpage. We're now working on a QR code to be added to the line/exhibit so that visitors can read the Wikipedia article (hopefully FA status soon!) while waiting to ride. Thanks again for helping out and checking in! HstryQT (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you so much! I'm just absolutely thrilled to have inspired you to contribute to the Children's Museum! It's really great to come upon Wikipedians who have a history with the museum and to see them excited about the Wikipedia collaboration. Thank you so much! We will be writing a case study specifically about the carousel article, the process of collaborating to get it to FA, and the results. Would you be OK with us including this as one of our (more surprising :) results? Thank you again for sharing your memories! I'll be sure to keep you in the loop with other announcements. HstryQT (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JKBrooks85. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

Hey there. I have followed up on most of the issues brought up at the Boone Kirkman peer review and I was hoping you'd be willing reevaluate some of said problems. Thanks a ton! MobileSnail 21:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice start! You may find Convoyweb and Warsailors useful websites for expanding the article with. Do you have access to The Times digital archives (subscription required), as they may also prove useful. Mjroots (talk) 08:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article SS Ranpura, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the ocean liner SS Ranpura ran aground near Gibraltar on 15 April 1936 while carrying $50 million (1936 dollars) of rare Chinese art? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

On 27 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United States Trust Company theft, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1934 United States Trust Company theft was the work of an international gang that stole more than $2,000,000 in multiple robberies? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello! While I know you're very far away, I still wanted to keep you in the loop on our latest goings ons at the Children's Museum and pass along the information I've prepared for our 2nd Backstage Pass and Edit-a-Thon, which will occur on Saturday, August 20. The Wikipedian in Residence project is coming up on one year and is going strong. While the first year focused on garnering institutional enthusiasm among staff, organizing multiple content donations, and guiding teens in research and article creation, the next year will focus on establishing an E-Volunteer program and more deliberately connecting with local Wikipedians and WikiProjects around the world. You can read a summary of our projects on the museum's blog, or visit the project page.

Since you most likely will not be able to attend, but are likely interested in remaining involved and up to date on the museum's Wikipedia project, you can sign up on our E-Volunteer page. There will also be an opportunity to participate in the Edit-a-Thon online, if you cannot attend on-site. Also, if you'd like to make a request for images or research content from our curators, you can add to the Requests page. Let me know if you have any questions and I hope to be in touch! Thanks again. LoriLee (talk) 11:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Keynoter Front Page.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm touching base with you because of your prior interest in The Children's Museum of Indianapolis Wikipedia project. The museum is considering adapting a formal E-Volunteer program and they welcome your opinion as a Wikipedian. Your responses to this E-Volunteer survey will be extremely valuable. The survey will come to a close on October 1st. If you're interested, here are other ways you can help the Children's Museum's Wikipedia project. Thanks so much! LoriLee (talk) 20:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello JKBrooks85! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2005 ACC Championship Game tickets.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's time again to share the latest news on the Children's Museum of Indianapolis Wikipedia project! In the last few months we have been busy with our third image donation, which was made up of 150 images that were professionally photographed specifically for this upload. We are asking for volunteers to categorize these images and distribute them into Wikipedia articles. Your help is appreciated! Check them out here.

We have also donated our first video and a second GLAM-Wiki Infographic to Commons. In September we were thrilled to welcome Jimmy Wales to the museum. Following our successful Edit-a-Thon and Translate-a-Thon in August, translations have continued with the help of the established QRpedia community, (particularly Russian translations thanks to Lvova!) We have begun to analyze our implementation of QRpedia codes and completed an extensive case study. In November we presented at the Museum Computer Network conference about how museums can effectively collaborate with Wikipedia. You can see more details on the Prezi.

In more general news, in addition to serving as the Children's Museum's Wikipedian-in-Residence, it was recently announced that I will be taking on the role of US Cultural Partnerships Coordinator for the Wikimedia Foundation. In this role I will be working to streamline the process of connecting interested US GLAMs with the Wikipedia community. If you have any questions or suggestions, feel free to let me know. Be sure to sign up for This Month in GLAM to keep up with the latest GLAM-Wiki news from around the world (subscribe).

We have a listing of High Need and Moderate Need requests on the Ways to Help section on the project page. I encourage you to lend a hand if you're able. While the Children's Museum partnership continues to truck along, we still are in desperate need of volunteers to help disperse our images and update and maintain content. Thank you for your time and help. Happy holidays! LoriLee (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of 2006 Gator Bowl know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on January 2, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 2, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The 2006 Gator Bowl was a college football bowl game between the Louisville Cardinals and the Virginia Tech Hokies in Jacksonville, Florida on January 2, 2006. Virginia Tech was selected as a participant in the 2006 Gator Bowl following a 10–2 regular season; a loss to Florida State in the inaugural ACC Championship Game gave Tech a position in the Gator Bowl instead of the more prestigious Orange Bowl game. Facing the 12th-ranked Hokies were the 15th-ranked Cardinals, who finished 9–2 during the regular season of their first year in the Big East Conference. Louisville led for much of the game, beginning with an 11-yard touchdown pass in the first quarter by backup quarterback Hunter Cantwell. In the second half, however, Virginia Tech's offense began to have success. Tech earned the only points of the third quarter—a 28-yard field goal from kicker Brandon Pace—to narrow Louisville's lead to 17–13. In the fourth quarter, the game fully turned in the Hokies' favor. Though Louisville scored a touchdown early in the quarter, Virginia Tech scored 22 unanswered points in the final 13 minutes of the game to take a 35–24 lead and earn the win. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Stanford University. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

ralphamale (talk) 21:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno if you're still checking in here. Since Sharon Cissna filed to run against Don Young, various editors decided to actually do something with her article. I was just curious if you're planning on doing any research about her Kodiak years for your job, or if there is anything known about those years which may be relevant enough to share on here. I do know she was living there as the wife of Edward F. Naughton, Kodiak's then-member of the Alaska House of Representatives. Therefore, I would think there to be something relevant. Thanks.RadioKAOS (talk) 02:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of 2009 Orange Bowl know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 21, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 21, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The 2009 Orange Bowl game was the 75th edition of the annual college football bowl game known as the Orange Bowl. It pitted the 2008 Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) champion Virginia Tech Hokies against the Big East Conference champion Cincinnati Bearcats on January 1, 2009 at Dolphin Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida. Cincinnati scored first, converting the game's opening possession into a touchdown and a 7–0 lead in the first quarter. Virginia Tech responded in the second quarter, tying the game at seven before taking a 10–7 lead with a field goal as time expired in the first half. In the third quarter, the two teams battled defensively, with only the Hokies able to score any points as Tech extended its lead to 13–7. During the final quarter, Virginia Tech scored its second touchdown of the game, giving the Hokies a 20–7 lead that lasted until time expired. In recognition of his performance during the game, Virginia Tech running back Darren Evans was named the game's most valuable player. Three months after the game, players from each team entered the National Football League (NFL) via the 2009 NFL Draft. Cincinnati had six players selected in the draft, while Virginia Tech had one. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yukon-Quest-map.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:23, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:2008 Tanana River flood at Nenana.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you.

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed between 12-14 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the initial messages I sent out went to only WikiProject members and users that had over 15 reviews). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. Now, one of the most important criteria is that you have at least 15 independent reviews. If you are reading this, you are likely 3 (or less) reviews short, so if you review another couple nominations, you can become a recruiter! If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". NOTE: If you are interested in becoming a recruiter but do not meet the 15 review requirement, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters and put your status as "Not Available" until you have reviewed enough nominations. Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sugar bowl
Thank you for quality articles on championship games, such as 2005 Sugar Bowl, and on history, such as Fairbanks, for featured lists such as List of Yukon Quest competitors, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 605th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today's 2008 ACC Championship Game, - PumpkinSky is delighted, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Six years ago, you were recipient no. 605 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for 2005 ACC Championship Game! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Wanted to get in touch on Wiki side. This exciting in an utterly nerdy way. User:Caffarellino just created an account, and here's User talk:Joe Roe. -Ahalenia (talk) 21:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Ahalenia[reply]

Do you just type in a reply like this? I feel like my mother with her new iPhone Caffarellino (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

College bowl season is rolling around soon, if you have time and inclination to produce some wonderful bowl game articles again . Go Phightins! 12:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Chena River Lakes Flood Control Project dam clearing.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:27, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2011 Orange Bowl.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brooks,

It looks like you've done a great job improving the quality of sports-related articles on Wikipedia. I had intended to nominate List of Yukon Quest competitors for a featured list slot, but I noticed that the information is out of date; none of the competitors since 2012 appear on the list. Might you be willing and able to update the list? I would like to see the article featured on the main page, but it doesn't meet the featured list criteria if the last three years aren't covered.

Neelix (talk) 16:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Neelix:, I've updated the page with the 2012 through 2014 results and updated some source links as well. JKBrooks85 (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! The list looks great. Neelix (talk) 15:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had been meaning to say something for quite some time, but you haven't exactly been around. During that time, it has come in useful as a poster child for my complaints about how evidently low the FL threshold is. Some specific points:

• "Its length is equivalent to the distance between England and Africa" – To me, "Africa" covers a lot of ground. Perhaps this could be more useful were it to be narrowed down?
• "The racers have come from various professions: taxicab drivers, a swimming instructor, a coal miner, a tax assessor, a lawyer, fur trappers, journalists, and a car salesman, among others" – If "car salesman" was in reference to Ralph Seekins, he would more accurately be described as a car dealer. I know you didn't stay in Fairbanks for very long, but he's owned the dealership since 1977. I also wonder if the lawyer described is the one who took up dog mushing after being disbarred, though someone is likely to throw up a BLP flag were I to divulge further details.
• "Mayor's Award" – Mayor of what?
• The latest award winners are mentioned, as well as Lance Mackey's win, but no mention of topics of perhaps more lasting significance such as the record finishing time, or how numerous mushers (including Mackey) developed the strategy of running the Quest and the Iditarod back-to-back.
• The list of mushers contains lots of notable people but is short on links. Some names have articles yet aren't linked; most notables lack articles, such as the aforementioned Ralph Seekins and a host of others.
• OTOH, the locations appear to be fully linked, but I see lots of dubious redlinks. Examples: the only "Manley" I'm aware of in Alaska is Manley Hot Springs, same with "Mentasta" and Mentasta Lake; Mendenhall, Yukon, if I remember, is a subdivision on the outskirts of Whitehorse and not a community per se; likewise, I'm pretty sure that Lincoln Creek, Alaska is nothing more than a subdivision near the former Murphy Dome Air Force Station. Goldstream Valley and Sunshine are actual places, but not ideal links. The former is typically regarded as part of Fairbanks; there is a CDP called Goldstream which does not have an article. Sunshine is a railroad siding located within the Susitna North CDP, though it's typically regarded as part of Talkeetna; same with Sheep Mountain, though I can't remember what the community equivalent is on here. Finally, there's little appreciable difference between Old Minto and the present-day Minto.
• Speaking of hometowns, would it help to spell out that these are as of the time period in which they participated? For instance, Ketil Reitan moved back to Norway a long time ago (he's married to a woman from Kaktovik).
• How about a sortable table where appropriate?

Now, I know that I just threw a lot of stuff in your face, but I do want you to know that you did a great job here and to keep up the good work. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 21:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Yukon Quest competitors may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/sites/default/files/files/2014%20YQ%20Media%20Guide-%20WEB.pdf "2014 Yukon Quest Media Guide"] (PDF), Yukonquest.com. Accessed Sept. 3, 2014.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Battle of Waterloo (1913 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vignette. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Louis bullfight riot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Louis County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee. ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St. Louis bullfight riot, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that thousands of St. Louis, Missouri, residents rioted after a bullfight was canceled by governor Alexander Monroe Dockery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St. Louis bullfight riot. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated an article you helped bring to FA for WP:TFAR consideration as Today's Featured Article, see discussion at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/2008 ACC Championship Game. — Cirt (talk) 21:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We are preparing to take a closer look at Featured articles promoted in 2004–2010 that may need a review. We started with a script-compiled list of older FAs that have not had a recent formal review. The next step is to prune the list by removing articles that are still actively maintained, up-to-date, and believed to meet current standards. We know that many of you personally maintain articles that you nominated, so we'd appreciate your help in winnowing the list where appropriate.

Please take a look at the sandbox list, check over the FAs listed by your name, and indicate on the sandbox talk page your assessment of their current status. Likewise, if you have taken on the maintenance of any listed FAs that were originally nominated by a departed editor, please indicate their status. BLPs should be given especially careful consideration.

Thanks for your help! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond at Wikipedia talk:Unreviewed featured articles/sandbox#Pinging next round; thanks! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:10ACCCGlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FDNMmast.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JKBrooks85. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Diamond Walnut Bowl logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 20:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JKBrooks85. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2011CompassBowl.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 20:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. JKBrooks85, thanks for creating SS Victoria (1902)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Sourcing is borderline and I'd like to see at least one refernece to something available online for verification.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 22:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JKBrooks85, do you still have your correspondence with vtphreak4evr regarding File:Jim Weaver.JPG that you could forward to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as described at WP:COPYREQ? Unfortunately, it's newer than the cutoff for c:COM:Grandfathered old files. (I know that Eric passed away a few years ago, so unfortunately it's not possible to contact him any more.) --B (talk) 19:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JKBrooks85. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JK. I am a meeting planner in Anchorage, Alaska and I help plan the Alaska Statewide Special Education Conference every year. We have a mushing theme for our conference next month and we came across your "Mushing in Detail" poster that we would like to print and hang. I'd like to get your permission to do this, would that be possible? If you have any questions or concerns you I can be reached at lorell@idoeventsak.com Thank you for your time.

Lorelld (talk) 23:44, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Lorell[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SunBowloldlogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup! The first round began on 1 January and your submissions page can be found here. If you are wondering how to get started, a good article review might be a good place to begin, or a DYK for a newly created article. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. The first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of George Forrester Williams at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 12:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for 2008 Orange Bowl, introduced )in 2008); "2008 Orange Bowl is one of the finest articles to yet come out of the knowledge factories at Wikiproject College Football. Crafted with the finest in citations, photographs, and content, the raw material was mined from the richest veins of Internet ore and forged in the fires of [insert impressive-sounding, yet humorous name here]."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the 2008 Orange Bowl article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 3, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 3, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outside (Alaska) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside (Alaska) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sojourner in the earth (talk) 19:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]