Thanks for uploading File:PHL Senate mace.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PHL House of the Representatives mace.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar. My first ever. Maybe in the near future I can help again in majority of the editing in Survivor Philippines articles, but not right now. Thanks again. --Ja 1207 (talk) 01:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your message: Use "Cursed Pearl." It is termed "Black Pearl" in the show; however it was colored black only in Palau. The Cursed Pearl in the first season was actually silver, so it is inappropriate to call it a "black" pearl. Therefore, the Pearl is termed according to its function rather than its color just for consistency across seasons. Ja 1207 will also agree on "Cursed Pearl" as well. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:55, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I cannot answer your question. Again, just ask Ja 1207 (I can't tend to the page due to work). Also, look at the Survivor US articles. Furthermore, instead of annoying me by putting questions on my talk page, please just put your suggestion on the talk page rather than on mine. I'm not on a mood to answer Survivor-related at this moment. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 10:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Janbryan, I really don't know about that though. You can change it, until someone objects. As for me, I am neutral.--Ja 1207 (talk) 04:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Expedition Robinson at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :D--Renzoy16 | Contact Me 05:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man. how you doin? sorry for missing that discussion. i wish i was there to help you t get through it cause right now Grammys topics are a mess. i've been away for a month or more, now I'm back. is it possible to run this discussion again? cause we have to move them back to their original style. thank you. Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 13:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again... sorry if i replied after a long time. sure i would do that but i ned to clear my time and schedule to know that i can be there and support every word of it. thanks again Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 15:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

23rd Awit Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 05:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Your question:) Hi! I just want to ask where did you get the number-one albums for the years 1978, 1979 and 1980 that Nielsen Soundscan had compiled. Nielsen Soundscan was created in 1991. How was it possible for it to already compile these charts without creating itself yet? Janbryan (talk) 04:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: I did not create the part about Nielson Soundscan; it was already there. I added the parallel RPM charts because they were used as the standard from at least 1968 onward and ran for some time simultaneously with Nielson's lists.

You will see that starting at 1981 (right up to 1990 and beyond), there are further such lists. I would have completed the addition of the RPM parallel lists, but it is time-comsuming in the extreme. Someday I'll get to them. User talk:Scarbluff

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Surely there was no need to remove all the details? Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Greenmaven (talk) 04:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this article to your userspace so that you can work on it. It's located at User:Janbryan/22nd Awit Awards. ... discospinster _talk 05:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi, [1] this link shows shakira's "laundry service" sold 20 million , therefore to include on "best selling album" list, I have had problems putting it on the list, do you have a minute to look at this thank you--65.8.187.140 (talk) 23:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the 28th Awit Awards here, in your userspace. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((Ping|I dream of horses)) to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 05:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Janbryan

In our recent talk page discussion where I took umbridge for appeared to be an attempt to edit for pay without disclosure, you told me that I should do what I was gonna do [sic]. I am leaving you this note to advise you that I have considered what that should mean. I have reviewed your last thousand edits or so and found no evidence of a concerning pattern of behaviour wrt paid editing. However, I do believe, on the balance of probabilities, that your attempts to create Daniel Margotta was a direct action as a paid editor - and the concerning pattern of behaviour was also noted by another editor commentating in his estimeed role as a talk page stalker.

What is frustrating is that all the TOU requires you to do is to declare the payment on your talk page and for you to edit according to the COI rules. That you chose to obfuscate and deny the obvious simply made a marginal situation concerning and is actually the only part of the whole thing that gives me pause for considering action.

That said, I will not be taking any formal adminstrative action at this time. I am leaving this message (which I expect will immediately pass into the memory hole of your talk page history) to formally record my concerns and confirm that I have formally warned you about the potential TOU violation and drawn your attention to the COI rules. I will also periodically check your contributions for evidence of further attempts at undeclared paid editing. If I see anything concerning I will then consider what further action is required. Remember: all you have to do to comply with the rules and TOU is to declare the payment/agreement to act. If you do that, I will not have cause for concern. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PHL Senate mace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the protection and you can now create the article. Kimchi.sg (talk) 12:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Janbryan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Janbryan,
I note that according the award's Wikipedia article history section there is a note that there were no awards given in 2009 in what would have been the "28th Luna Awards".
Instead of deleting 32nd Luna Awards and 33rd Luna Awards, maybe they should be redirected to Luna Award#Ceremonies for their years with a note that the Film Academy of the Philippines declined to make an award in those years?
What do you think about this? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the spedy tags you placed on these articles, because the reason you gave is not covered by any of the WP:CSD#criteria for speedy deletion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will just make them redirects instead. Janbryan (talk) 20:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2 Cool 2 Be 4gotten, Janbryan!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I have deleted the article's synopsis as a WP:COPYVIO, with text directly lifted from http://www.rappler.com/entertainment/movies/150962-cinema-one-originals-festival-2016-lineup

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kung Magarap Ka't Magising poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I advice you not to change Philippine to Filipino in film articles released in the Philippines. Just because some articles use "Filipino" as a way to start the lede doesn't mean we shall follow suit. Take 3 Idiots for instance: as you can see in the lede, it doesn't use the descriptive as a "Hindi film" (the language spoken in India) but an "Indian film" (the citizens of India). In our case, the word Philippine may refer to the nationality of Filipino citizens or their language. So it's best to start the lede by the film's country of origin's nationality. Besides, MOS:PHIL also says that Philippine is generally used with inanimate nouns. Bluesphere 04:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The sources you provided are not reliable. A reliable source should show the exact box office figures and not the rough estimates. Another thing that bothers me is that most press releases does not indicate whether the gross was earned outside or inside the Philippines. Let me remind you that the article is about the highest-grossing films IN THE PHILIPPINES. Hollyckuhno (talk) 02:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When adding references to articles, please make sure the dates you've used in the reference are consistent with the dates used on that article—please observe whether date or month comes first, and format the dates appropriately (so, either 12 June 2017 or June 12, 2017 will be used). Also, there is no need for the language parameter if the site is in English. It is redundant. Thank you. Ss112 22:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janbryan, I can't explain why other people have chosen to do what they do on chart pages; I didn't monitor Closer (The Chainsmokers song) into 2017 to see who was still adding what. I personally disagree with adding new song peaks to an old article beyond a certain point; the chart is new and just because it exists does not mean its peaks should be added to every possible article. That's all I have to say. Talk:Juju on That Beat (TZ Anthem) is a more appropriate forum for this discussion, not either user talk page. Ss112 23:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of top 10 singles in 2017 (Philippines) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top 10 singles in 2017 (Philippines) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:53, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Batch 81 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Oro Plata Mata poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Janbryan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Fan Choice does need to be separated from the "special awards", because it's not the same thing by any stretch of the imagination. The special awards do not have "nominees" — the Academy simply picks a single winner as a "lifetime achievement" award and announces that winner as a fait accompli months before it's even announced the nominees in any other CSA category — whereas "Fan Choice" has nominees that social media users get to "vote" on. Which means it does have to be handled differently, because in a multiple-nominee category our article is supposed to be listing all the nominees and not just the winner alone. If it's being done that way in other CSA articles it's not supposed to be — if 1-5 are doing it wrong, then that's not a reason to make 6 do it wrong too: it's a reason to fix it in 1-5. Bearcat (talk) 15:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:40th Gawad Urian poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Janbryan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PHL House of the Representatives mace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cai Cortez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 17:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Karnal poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of top 10 singles in 2017 (Philippines) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top 10 singles in 2017 (Philippines) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Template:Billboard Philippines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BillboardPhilippines.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]