Feel free to start discussions here. JeevanJones (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JeevanJones. I have restarted the above FLC because the consensus was unclear. Can you revisit it to ensure that all of your comments have been addressed, and if possible, declare whether you support, oppose, or are neutral towards the list's promotion to FL status? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your improvement to the name, but please see Talk:United States federal government credit rating downgrade, 2011 as I'm concerned about what we may be inadvertently implying. 99.50.188.77 (talk) 16:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing a response on that page now. Thanks for your notice. —JeevanJones (talk) 16:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repeating a link to the same thing isn't necessary. Only one link per article per WP:REPEATLINK. Also, it could be seen as an unnecessary link per WP:OVERLINK, but that's debatable. - Bkid ^Talk/_Contribs 05:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's already linked in the "Development" section of the article, so it doesn't need to be linked anywhere else. - Bkid ^Talk/_Contribs 18:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, honestly I had to ctrl+f and search for "$" just to find every instance that it appears in the article. However, we'll leave it linked where you have it per WP:REPEATLINK's exception, "where the later occurrence is a long way from the first.". But maybe the "$6.99" in Minecraft Pocket Edition section should be linked instead? I think it should be fine either way. - Bkid ^Talk/_Contribs 18:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeevan,

I only added the membership figures to the "infobox" -- they were already in the article itself. See the third paragraph of the second section. That's where I got them from -- and the source cited there (by someone else) is the 2005 Electoral Commission report (See footnote 20).

I looked on the Labour party website but couldn't find more up-to-date figures -- I hoped someone else with more time would update them -- there's probably something from 2010 on the Electoral Commission website. I think this is an essential figure to have in the Infobox.

Hope that helps -- let me know if you need any more information.

FrenchieAlexandre (talk) 16:42, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah -- all I found were those articles just after May 2010 -- you'd think they'd give the total figure at the same time. It's frustrating the figures aren't easily available! FrenchieAlexandre (talk) 19:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Tory (British political party), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]